Archives par mot-clé : video

How to Ride the Livestreaming Wave to Marketing Success

Live video marketing has become a must-do trend in the digital marketing community. Thanks to Snapchat, Facebook Live and other competing social media that connect users to brands in real-time, there’s been a surge in content creation that boosts social presence and builds brand loyalty while live streaming.

It’s a no-brainer because from what I’ve seen these companies seem to give more exposure to live streams. They want live video to be seen as effective. I believe they want to use it to ensure deeper involvement from brands who may pay more for their streams to be seen down the line. It’s all part of being profitable and making shareholders happy right?

One of the most valuable byproducts of livestreaming is that it bridges the gap between clients and brands and allows for a much more intimate interaction. In essence, it’s a video marketing strategy that brings us back to a time when we could physically and emotionally interact with other people who represented the brand we were crazy about.

In this day and age, however, thanks to our incredible technological landscape, it can be easy to feel out of touch with others, and more so with the brands we love. As the retail business declines and online shopping grows, marketers are embracing and adapting to new digital marketing strategies — like livestreaming — to keep their products and services competitive, while also ensuring they remain ever-present in the lives of consumers.

When to reach your audience.

At this point, we all know the benefits of this tool. The question is, when is the ideal time to use live video? On the flip side, when should we avoid using it? The reality is that it’s a new marketing strategy that’s rapidly developing so the rules will continue to change. With that said, there are a number of things that are already fairly well established.

For instance, knowing when your target market has free time to watch is vital to putting on a successful livestream. After all, you want to make sure that your audience is available to have the opportunity to generate as many viewers as possible.

Sundays and Mondays are said to be your best bet most often for offering a live video stream. Those days have been statistically proven to have a greater number of people browsing the web and shopping online.

However, it all depends on how your audience uses the web, often as part of their demographic. If they’re mainly working adults, you should try to do your livestreams after the workday ends during a weekday. If they’re college students, you might get away with offering something on what might be a lazy Saturday afternoon full of leisure time.

In all cases, avoid early mornings. Why? Most people aren’t available to interact at those times. Whatever the audience, it’s vital that you do your own research and know your target market well so that you can produce videos at the best times for them.

As livestreaming continues to evolve, certain content appears to be more popular than others. Here are some of the various types of live videos that seem to be working exceedingly well in connecting with audiences.

Related: 12 Live Streaming Video Tips to Build Your Brand and Business

QAs with your audience.

Probably one of the most fruitful types of livestreams you can do is one where you answer any questions people might have. It’s a valuable way to interact with your audience and get as much input from them as possible on what they think about the brand, new product or service you offer.

Product introductions and special announcements.

The introduction of a new product can be a boring affair for people unable to attend the sometimes glamorous events accompanying them. Now everyone can participate in a live event during which a brand releases information about a new product.

This trend has caught on like wildfire with car companies. For example, Nissan streamed its launching of the 2016 Maxima at New York’s auto show. Meanwhile, General Motors became the first car manufacturer to livestream a product introduction on Facebook when they revealed the new Chevy Volt EV at the Consumer Electronics Show.

Related: 5 Steps to Make Livestreaming Part of Your Content Strategy

Interviews and influencer outreach.

Interviewing industry elites and popular influencers can also have a positive effect on your conversion rate if you’re promoting your company. People trust other influencers and experts when making decisions about a product they might want to buy. By associating yourselves with such high profile people you are also enhancing your own reputation.

Live events.

A live event should be authentic and people should be excited to participate. That’s why it’s important to let your audience know ahead of time when the event will take place so that viewers can schedule it on their calendars. Live events include such things as presentations, performances, talks, conferences, media briefings, tours, concerts and demos. 

As part of #Droneweek, GE used drones equipped with Periscope to provide guided tours through remote facilities. It was very well-received. Spotify and U2 have livestreamed concerts, and Dunkin Donuts did so too for a summer music event shown on several platforms.

Related: How Your Business Can Use Livestreaming to Attract More Customers

Behind-the-scenes glimpses and backstage passes.

There’s no better way to get your brand evangelists excited than with behind-the-scenes glimpses into what your company is doing. This is an effective way to bridge the gap with your clients and make them feel like they’re almost a part of the organization.

High profile livestreaming events like this include the ones offered by the creators of the Madden video games series. Also, Ariana Grande, Selena Gomez and other popular singing artists use the medium to give an inside look and backstage access to their shows across the country.

Regardless of how you intend to make use of livestreaming, the important thing is to ensure you know when your audience is available to participate in your live stream sessions. Know your target audience. If you understand their needs, creating the best livestream marketing strategy for your brand shouldn’t be too much of a stretch.

John Boitnott

John Boitnott is a longtime digital media consultant and journalist living in San Francisco. He’s written for Venturebeat, USA Today and FastCompany.

ZeeVee Showcasing Third Generation ZyPer4K(TM) Video Distribution Solution with ExtremeUSB(R) and …

BURNABY, BC–(Marketwired – April 25, 2017) – Icron Technologies Corporation, a leader in USB and video extension technology, announced today that ZeeVee, Inc., a global manufacturer of video and signal distribution technology, will be featuring its newest ZyPer4K™ video distribution solution incorporating Icron’s patented ExtremeUSB® and SwitchableUSB™ technologies at the 2017 NAB Show in Las Vegas, April 24-27.

The Zyper4K simplifies video distribution by offering virtual plug and play configuration using the ZeeVee Management platform and nearly any off-the-shelf 10G Ethernet switch. The third generation ZyPer4K offers full HDMI 2.0 and HDCP 2.2 capability including support for uncompressed, zero latency 4K video. Optional inputs for DisplayPort, HD-SDI and Analogue are supported as well as the ability to create flexible multi-view and video wall configurations.

By adopting Icron’s SwitchableUSB protocols, ZeeVee customers are able to dynamically switch video and USB 2.0 signals at the same time while enjoying the benefits of the ExtremeUSB suite of features such as transparent USB extension, true plug and play (no software drivers required) and compatibility with all major operating systems: Windows®, macOS™ and Linux®.

« ZyPer4K is ideal for broadcasters looking to distribute uncompressed 4K images with zero latency in an economical way over a 10G network, » said Chris Scurto, Vice President of Sales and Marketing at ZeeVee. « Incorporating ExtremeUSB and SwitchableUSB technologies from Icron provides our customers with the ultimate user experience as both UHD video and full bandwidth USB 2.0 signals can be extended and switched at the same time as desired. »

« Offering media integrators a quality solution for distributing 4K video plus USB 2.0 signals without any latency over off-the-shelf standards based 10G network switches is both economical and resourceful, » said Glenn Antonelli, Vice President of Marketing at Icron. « Dynamic USB 2.0 switching in conjunction with video provides ZeeVee customers a full range of USB 2.0 devices to use in addition to traditional HID keyboard and mouse, providing optimal flexibility for increasing productivity. »

A live demonstration of the ZyPer4K solution will be on display at ZeeVee’s NAB show booth SU14207 at the Las Vegas Convention Center.

About Icron Technologies
Icron Technologies is the leading developer and manufacturer of high-performance USB and video extension solutions for commercial and industrial markets worldwide. Icron’s patented extension technology extends USB and video devices over many media types including CAT 5e/6/7, Fiber, Wireless, DisplayPort® and over a corporate LAN while featuring the ExtremeUSB® and ExtremeUSB-C™ suite of features such as transparent USB extension, true plug and play (no software drivers required) and compatibility with Windows®, macOS™ and Linux® operating systems. Icron’s extension products are deployed in a wide range of applications including proAV, industrial automation, machine vision, medical imaging, aerospace, interactive whiteboards, digital signage, remote desktop extension, security, enterprise computing and isolated USB, or anywhere a computer needs to be remotely located from a display or peripheral device. icron.com

About ZeeVee
ZeeVee is a global manufacturer of video and signal distribution technology for the ProAV and IT marketplace. As the only manufacturer today that can deliver multimedia content over coax, fiber, and CATx, ZeeVee has transformed the digital video industry with its award-winning, HD to Ultra-HD/4K solutions. The company offers a variety of innovative, cost effective and easy to install distribution platforms. ZeeVee is installed in thousands of facilities worldwide where there is a need to transport HD/UHD content from multiple sources to multiple displays over long distances. For more information, please visit: zeevee.com

About the 2017 NAB Show
NAB show, held April 22-27, 2017 in Las Vegas, is the world’s largest convention encompassing the M.E.T. effect: the convergence of media, entertainment and technology. With 103,000 attendees from 166 countries and 1,700+ exhibitors, the NAB Show is the ultimate marketplace for solutions that transcend traditional broadcasting and embrace content delivery to new screens in new ways. From creation to consumption, across multiple platforms and countless nationalities, NAB Show is where global visionaries convene to bring content to life in new and exciting ways. For more details, visit nabshow.com.

Questions raised over lack of marketing for Wonder Woman

Questions raised over lack of marketing for Wonder Woman

Wonder Woman is due in New Zealand cinemas on June 1

Geek fan site SyfyWire is concerned about the lack of marketing Wonder Woman.

Site contributor Girl Geek Diva has pointed out the paltry amount of marketing the film has received compared to other DC franchise films like Suicide Squad and Man of Steel.

Wonder Woman is less than six weeks away from its June 1 release but has only three trailers on the Warner Bros YouTube channel. Recent stable-mate Suicide Squad has 30. There are more videos on the channel for Justice League – out in November – than there are for Wonder Woman.

Gal Gadot's Wonder Woman finally gets her own film - but where's the promotion?

Gal Gadot’s Wonder Woman finally gets her own film – but where’s the promotion?

The writer also points out the lack of product tie-ins and television commercials.

READ MORE:
UN appoints Wonder Woman as ambassador
Wonder Woman actress Gal Gadot listened to Beyonce to slay her audition
UN ends Wonder Woman’s ‘battle for equality’ after protests

She says she’s worried about the lack of marketing because it suggests the studio thinks the $120 million film is bad.

The first official trailer for the Warner Bros film, starring Gal Gadot and Chris Pine.

« The lack of marketing worries me. It worries a lot of people who are invested in the success of female superheroes in film and television.

« Because it looks like Warner Bros. isn’t even trying, and we all need this movie to be a success because we need more female-led movies, period. Especially ones where the woman is the hero. »

So, what do you think? Does Wonder Woman deserve the full hype machine? 

The DC Comics film tells the story of how the Amazon warrior princess becomes the legendary superhero.

Wonder Woman is in Kiwi cinemas on June 1, 2017. 

An Amazonian princess leaves her island home to explore the world and, in doing so, becomes one of the world’s greatest heroes. This is the first trailer in HD for the much anticipated ‘Wonder Woman’ starring Gal Gadot, Chris


 – Stuff

Next Film story:

Film review: Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 – loads of laughs but script lacks focus

Entertainment Homepage

Online Video Marketing – Promotion Needed For Your Site – JOSIC

Online video marketing is on the rise. Several reports and data show that video works. Research found that videos were 50 times more likely to receive an organic first page rank than traditional text pages. Online video marketing is attractive to many businesses nowdays for numerous factors. Making videos and publishing them online is reasonably inexpensive. Plus online videos stay online forever. If you spend the money to record one time, your video can still be obtaining views a year from now. Furthermore, social networking sites and video come together and many sites encourage video posting and sharing. The viral video possibilities are endless when you use the correct strategies to produce and publish your videos online.

If you’re new to video, or happen to be considering flipping on your camera for the first time, here are a few strategies to optimize your videos. Once you record your video, follow these suggestions to make sure it gets to your main audience and receives the views it describes.

1) Help make your title count. An excellent title may immediately grab a viewer’s interest. And when you use the appropriate keywords in your title, you will probably show up on search engines when people are looking for your topic.

2) Give exceptional content. Take a moment to consider your ideal viewer. Videos are successful since not only do they provide great value to your viewer, but you are also allowed to show off your knowledge as well as expertise, thus positioning yourself being an expert. This is a key as you keep growing your brand. Also, no matter how good your content is, it will not make a difference if your video is too lengthy. You will lose your viewer’s attention. Have them brief.

3) Include your URL in your video. When you edit your video, take advantage of the various editing attributes. One simple aspect is to add a textual content box in your video. This is where you can show your site address and it’s a terrific way to obtain exposure.

4) Make the most of video’s branding options. For branding intentions, have your company logo design displayed prominently somewhere on the screen. You may display your logo through your video or just at key times.

5) At all times supply an HTML hyperlink. When you post on YouTube, you have the choice to publish a brief description of your video. Begin with the hyperlink you wish to drive your viewers to so you do not neglect this key opportunity.

6) Go beyond YouTube. A lot of people post their videos on YouTube. In addition, be sure to always embed your video on your own site. This will improve the amount of time people devoted to your website and help grow a captive audience.

Online video marketing supplies companies with video production, optimization and promotion. Video marketing allows businesses to speak their message in one deliverable on several levels: imagery, spoken word, and text, while attaining a huge audience along with minimum cost plus the shortest period. Other benefits of video search marketing include: Easy consumption. Attract the senses. Activate the emotions. Demonstrates expertise and enable prove reliability and branding. Allow for quick re-purposing of content.

Depending on keyword phrase, online video marketing are typically successful at getting the video ranked on page one of Google. They could aid to optimize and spread it for the best achievable outcomes. Google loves fresh and interesting content material. Video marketing is an ideal means of having your information out to individuals on the internet. Online video marketing does not have to be intricate.

Source by William Vito U Moody

Take Your Business To New Heights With Video Marketing – JOSIC

A few years back, video marketing was considered a high priced activity for any business. It required cameras, cameramen, professional editors and time on TV channels; all these required heavy prices to be paid. However, with the popularity of internet more number of people can have access to it, along with the reduced price of cameras and other equipments have made video marketing an affordable and valuable method for business people to reach out millions of people across the globe. If you are still confused, this article shall provide you a few helpful reasons to start video marketing. Check them out as follows:

Good reasons to opt video marketing

• Adds a personal touch: Video marketing permits you to interact directly with the customers. The business owner speaking directly with customers is more effective than just displaying products and services. When the proprietor himself explains about the products/services and company, this picture will stay in the minds of audience for a longer time than expected. Furthermore, customers will also find it comfortable to work and can easily trust on the company. Not only owners, even past customers and clients can give their feedback through video testimonies, this will improve the business credibility.

• It is inexpensive: As stated earlier, gone are the days when video marketing pulled lots of dollars from the customers. Nowadays, video cameras come at reasonable prices, and the video editing software too comes at less than $100. In addition, there are numerous video hosting websites like Vimeo and YouTube that will help you for absolutely free of costs. If you can put in some money, then you can create a professional video too. Film your video, edit it and post it for your customers on your website.

• Improved Visibility: No doubt, online videos add more visibility to your online business. You can effectively use videos to enhance the presence of your business site in search engine results. Moreover, as soon as any video gets uploaded in sites like YouTube, content starts getting popular in just a few months, providing it has the ability to pull the online audience. And once your video starts turning out to be popular, search engines like Bing and Google start fetching the videos in their search result. All you need to do is use the right keywords that represent your business.

• Customer Support: Videos can also be used to interact or communicate with your customers. Through videos, you can promote a product or the services offered by your company, and let everyone know about it. You can use videos to explain about your product, like how it works, how it can help customers, and many more. So, basically you can upload videos containing FAQs or frequently asked question, which will surely make your targeted customers feel more confident about your company and its products/services. Make sure the content is absolutely presentable and simple enough for the online viewers to comprehend the message you wish to provide through the video.

Source by Barbara Rollins

5 YouTube hacks to maximise your video marketing efforts …

I remember a conversation with a fellow resident many years ago, arguing over the future of print media like we often did. I am a woman of words – always have been. Back in 2010, I didn’t see how anybody would choose video over text. Cut to today, I eat my words all the time as I consume practically all of my information and entertainment from videos, as do you I am sure. From 11-second tips and tricks to a full hour of live interviews, from slo-mo driving videos to hyper lapse dusks, video has truly taken over the way the way interact, consume information, and market products and services.

Image : shutterstock

Image : shutterstock

Today, YouTube alone has the second greatest reach after Facebook. As a search engine, it ranks just below its parent company, Google. Video is a marketer’s Holy Grail these days, and why not? Several native searches are biased to videos and our multiscreen culture is making sure engagement comes from content that says what it has to, entertains while it does, and gets out of our faces quickly. That is exactly where videos are winning.

If you are new to video or YouTube marketing, here is a quick list of cool hacks that not many know about:

Create links that lets viewers start a video at a certain time

Click ‘share’ just below the video title. Under the first tab, you will see a box that says ‘Start at’ the box next to ‘Start at:’. Check and enter when you need the video to start in HH:MM:SS format. You can also pause the video at exact moment you want it to start and it will auto fill this field.

Upload transcripts to enhance your chances to show up in search

Transcription is one of the criteria that Google and YouTube use to rank videos. If you already have one at hand, use it. You only need to click on CC (stands for ‘closed captions’ or subtitles) and you will be presented with three options to: (1) Upload a transcript file (2) Paste a full transcript and YouTube will generate subtitle timings (3) Type as you watch the video

In fact, typing as you watch the video is also not as painful as it sounds – YouTube gives you the option to pause the video when you type.

Custom URLs

YouTube, much like LinkedIn, lets you customise your handle URL. Brands must use it to ensure their handles are easy to remember. To do this, you just need to go to YouTube account settings and click ‘advanced’ in the ‘Name’ section. If eligible for a custom URL, you will see the option there. Click on it and save the URL you want. This process is irreversible, so make sure you think through the URL you want before you claim it on YouTube.

Add clickable links to videos

YouTube lets you add clickable links, or as they like to call them, ‘annotations’, to your videos. Brands can use these annotations to direct viewers to their website or campaign site, subscribe to the channel, etc.

Only verified accounts can add clickable links to their videos and your account would also need external linking turned on. Next, go to Video Manager and find the video you want to add the link to. In the ‘Edit’ drop down menu, select ‘End Screen and Annotations’, go to ‘Annotations’ and select from the five types of annotations that YouTube allows – Speech Bubble, Note, Title, Spotlight, and Label. You can then customise the fonts and general sizing and placement for your annotation. This is where you have a checkbox labeled ‘Link’ – click on it. Once done, click ‘Apply changes’ and you are done!

Find audio for your content – on YouTube

YouTube has a large library of royalty-free, high-quality, 320kbps audio tracks and sound effects at your disposal. All you have to do is go to YouTube’s Audio Library in the Creator Studio. You can search for sounds (eg. raindrops) or search by category (examples range from human voices to vehicle sounds). You can also look for music. You will probably not find Ed Sheeran here, but you will find reasonably good music for your videos, ranging from Alternative Punk to Reggae and Rock, and everything in between.

Clearly, video marketing is not hard or expensive anymore, even if you are a bootstrapped startup comprising of two founders. You just know where to look. And finally, just to end the story of the argument between the fellow resident and me – turns out that seven years later, he won that round!

Here are a few more reads on video marketing, to help you get started:

  1. How to simplify video making process for startups
  2. Lessons in viral marketing from the Content Marketer of the Year
  3. Videos are taking over the internet, here’s how to boost your video marketing
  4. Why you need to get into video marketing right now
  5. 9 affordable video marketing strategies for startups in 2016

Despite his rhetoric, here’s a clear sign that Trump is eager to show 100-day wins


Donald Trump gives the thumbs-up as he arrives at the Trump National Golf Club Bedminster clubhouse in Bedminster, N.J., on Nov. 19, 2016. (Carolyn Kaster/Associated Press)

The surest sign that President Trump isn’t doing well in a particular area is when he goes out of his way to undercut its importance.

When he was struggling in polls during the campaign, the pollsters behind the numbers were regularly disparaged as biased or wrong or both. And when he’s asked how he measures up to past presidents on the (admittedly arbitrary) 100-days-in-office standard, Trump tells the Associated Press that it’s “an artificial barrier” that is “not very meaningful.”

This is not an indication that he is confident in how he stacks up.

Nonetheless, Trump insisted in that same interview that he has “done more than any other president in the first 100 days.” And to help make that case, the White House website now features a page detailing “President Trump’s first 100 days.” In three big buckets — “Building American Prosperity,” “Keeping Americans Safe and Strengthening Security Abroad” and “Making Government Accountable to the People” — the site details some of Trump’s wins.

Here are the six points under “Building American Prosperity.”

  • Over 500,000 new jobs — with a surge in female employment last month
  • Approved the Dakota Access Pipeline and the Keystone XL pipeline
  • Promoting America’s energy independence
  • President Trump has rolled back job-killing coal regulations
  • Buy American, Hire American executive order
  • Putting the American worker first, President Trump has taken immediate action on trade

Caveats should be applied to several of those bullet points: The job-killing coal regulations, for example, may have created as many jobs in compliance as were lost, and the Keystone XL pipeline is projected to create only a small number of long-term jobs. But to the broader point here, let’s focus on that first one.

More than 500,000 new jobs — with a surge in female employment last month. There are two claims being made. The first is that there were 500,000 new jobs in Trump’s administration. The second is that female employment “surged.” These are claims central to Trump’s claims of 100-day success; they’re the first claims on the page. So, how do they stack up?

Here’s the number of new jobs — that is, the change in the number of people employed — month over month since the beginning of Barack Obama’s first presidential term.

Relative to the months prior, 216,000 jobs were added in January, 219,000 in February and 98,000 last month. Those latter two figures are likely to be revised in the next jobs report, out at the beginning of May. But taking them at their face value, that’s 533,000 jobs added, to Trump’s point.

But notice that, over the track of time, that number is not all that big. In fact, 53 times over the course of Obama’s two terms, there were three-month stretches that yielded more jobs than the first three months of Trump’s presidency. That’s including the November 2016 to January 2017 stretch since, after all, Obama was president for 20.5 of the 31 days that month. If you prorate the number of jobs in January relative to how long Trump was in office — about a third of the month — 390,000 jobs have been added during his tenure.

That point about the surge in women going to work is represented in the charts below.

In February and March, there were indeed big jumps in how many women were employed. Only twice over the course of Obama’s two terms did more women find employment in a single month.

That said, the coin has a flip side. Although about 475,000 more women were employed in March than in February, dropping the unemployment rate from 4.6 percent to 4.3 percent, the number of men who were employed fell by 5,000. That fact didn’t make it into Trump’s 100-day bragging.

Put another way: Trump’s team is cherry-picking a bit here. Continued employment growth is good; a surge in women gaining employment is good as well. But the former is not particularly exceptional and the latter also draws attention to the (minor) negative turn for men.

When you’re scrambling to produce a list of victories, though, you take what you can get.

German crowd boos Ivanka Trump for calling her father a ‘champion’ for families

A German crowd booed Ivanka Trump on Tuesday after she called her father a “a tremendous champion of supporting families.”

Trump was taking her first crack at diplomacy abroad in her new role as assistant to the president, vowing at an economic conference in Berlin to create “positive change” for women in the United States.

“He encouraged me and enabled me to thrive,” she said on a panel with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. “I grew up in a house where there was no barrier to what I could accomplish beyond my own perseverance and my own tenacity.”

Miriam Meckel, editor of the German magazine Wirtschaftswoche, noted the audience’s response of groaning and hissing and asked Ivanka Trump whether her father is actually an “empowerer” of women.

« I’ve certainly heard the criticism from the media and that’s been perpetuated,” Ivanka Trump said on the panel, “but I know from personal experience, and I think the thousands of women who have worked with and for my father for decades when he was in the private sector are a testament to his belief and solid conviction in the potential of women.”

President Trump was caught on tape in 2005 talking about grabbing women’s genitals without their permission and, in a 2004 interview, called pregnancy an “inconvenience” to employers.

Ivanka Trump, who moved into her own West Wing office last month, advocated for gender equality during the campaign and is now working to reform the nation’s child-care system. Her Germany appearance comes a week before the release of her advice book, “Women Who Work.” 

Her father has called her the mastermind behind his paid maternity leave proposal, unveiled last September, but the White House has made no moves on the family leave front since Trump took office.

The U.S. position on paid maternity leave stands in sharp contrast with Germany, where mothers are entitled to take six weeks of paid time-off before the birth of a child and eight weeks after an infant arrives. The United States is the only industrialized nation that does not offer any paid leave to new parents.

Ivanka Trump had hoped to use her appearance in Berlin to talk about boosting women entrepreneurs. But some female entrepreneurs in the United States, however, say the White House is making their jobs even harder.


BERLIN, GERMANY – APRIL 25: Ivanka Trump sits on a panel with Angela Merkel.  (Photo by Sean Gallup/Getty Images)

Businesses owned by women tend to face a disadvantage when it comes to expanding into foreign markets — and experts say Trump’s talk on trade and immigration has made it harder for them to pursue international opportunities.

The president has threatened, for example, to slap steep tariffs on goods from China and Mexico. He has asked for a review of the high-skilled worker visa, which tech companies rely on for talent. His travel ban on people from predominantly Muslim nations risked straining relations with Middle Eastern countries and America’s democratic allies.

All of this can impede an entrepreneur’s step into internationalization, or the act of growing beyond the American border, said Nathalie Molina Niño, a serial entrepreneur and founder of Brava, a holding company that bankrolls start-ups that benefit women.

“Women are at a particular disadvantage,” Molina Niño said, “because unlike large, well-funded companies, women-owned businesses are less equipped to throw money at issues like this.”

Advancing into foreign markets is expensive, she said. Entrepreneurs need cash for shipping, research, travel and hiring more employees. Consulting experts to keep up with today’s unpredictable business climate adds to the cost. And female entrepreneurs, Molina Niño noted, generally have less spending power.

Venture capitalists poured $58.2 billion into companies with male founders last year, while women received a comparatively measly $1.46 billion, according to data from the venture capital database PitchBook. (Less than 10 percent of VC-funded start-ups are run by women, according to the Harvard Business Review, and firms owned by women make up 38 percent of the business population.)

Still, female entrepreneurs in the United States are better off than those in most other countries, studies find.

This year, Mastercard’s Index of Women Entrepreneurs put the United States in third place for female entrepreneurs, behind New Zealand and Canada.

The authors, however, highlighted a persistent challenge: “In the United States where the underlying entrepreneurial conditions and women’s advancement outcomes are among the best in the world,” they wrote, “women’s entrepreneurial advancement is held back by the lack of internationalization opportunities.”

Fiona Murray, the associate dean of innovation at MIT’s Sloan School of Management, said the uncertainty clouding international relations, driven by Trump’s “America first” rhetoric, could exacerbate the problem. She pointed to Trump’s executive order last week calling for a review of the H1-B visas for highly skilled workers.

“That makes it difficult for any entrepreneur to think about an appropriate internationalization strategy,” Murray said. “Can you hire the people you need to hire? They need highly specialized talent, and that talent comes from all over the world.”

The Daily 202: Trump is caving on border wall funding after showing his base that he tried

With Breanne Deppisch

— Thank you, readers! The Daily 202 has won The Webby Award for Best Email Newsletter.

THE BIG IDEA: Donald Trump blinked first – again.

After the bluster comes the inevitable bow to reality. Last night the president backed off his demand that any deal to fund the federal government include money to start construction on his border wall. At an event with conservative journalists, Trump said he’s okay waiting until September to have this fight.

While the mainstream media will cover this as another failure, the president’s core supporters will not see it that way. They see someone fighting to keep his promises and will give him an “A” for effort.

Elites routinely blast Trump for focusing too much on his base, rather than extending an olive branch to moderates who didn’t support him last November or reaching across the aisle to Democrats.

These critiques have validity, but the president’s focus on paying his respects to the populists who powered his unexpected victory – whether rhetorically or with executive orders – is paying dividends 96 days into his term that should not be ignored. It has helped solidify his firewall of support and prevented any cracks from forming in his coalition.

Trump’s approval rating is at record lows, but he maintains credibility with his base. Our new Washington Post/ABC News poll shows that his overall approval rating is 42 percent, but his rating among those who voted for him is 94 percent. Only two percent of his voters now regret doing so.

Especially after all his recent flip-flops on everything from NATO to China, the president is working to convince his supporters that he’s keeping his promises and getting things done. In our poll, 56 percent say Trump hasn’t accomplished much. Of those, 47 percent blame him while about a quarter blame congressional Republicans. Only 7 percent blame Democrats.

Trump’s posture in the border wall fight reflects a desire to shift those numbers. Immigration is one of the few populist rallying cries he has not backed away from. “My base definitely wants the border wall,” Trump told the Associated Press last Friday. “You’ve been to many of the rallies? The thing they want more than anything is the wall. … That wall’s getting built, okay? One hundred percent.”

Even after he realizes the border wall is infeasible, he is unlikely to ever acknowledge it publicly because it was such a central rationale of his candidacy. “I will build a great wall,” Trump promised in his June 2015 announcement speech. “And nobody builds walls better than me, believe me. … And I will make Mexico pay for that wall. Mark my words.” (The Huffington Post created a timeline tracking his promises on the wall over the past two years.)

— The president’s aides have convinced him that he can present a little bit of money for border security, especially technology and more agents, as a victory. And he will avert a government shutdown that would have raised questions about his competence and basic leadership ability, especially with the GOP in total control of Washington. Trump has already begun taking credit for a drop in illegal border crossings and a reduction in crime along the border. He says his tough enforcement policies are deterring many from trying to enter the country.

— These dynamics mean that the White House is walking a delicate tightrope this week. While Trump is talking tough for the benefit of his base, his team has been trying to soothe the jittery nerves of Republican establishmentarians and greybeards around town. Administration officials yesterday backed off some of the ominous language they used on the Sunday shows. During his briefing, Sean Spicer said the money for the wall was always more of a priority than a demand. He also said he was “very confident” that an agreement would be reached by Friday. Compare that to what Trump was posting on Twitter around the same time:

Democratic leaders are fine appropriating money for border security, even though they know it lets Trump save face, but they are insisting on language that guarantees it will not be spent on a wall, so that they don’t get hammered by their own left flank.

— Republicans tried to make a trade. The White House wanted $1.5 billion now for construction, and $2.6 billion more in the fall. Administration officials offered money for insurance subsidies under the Affordable Care Act if Democrats would go along with cash for the wall. But Democrats stayed united, and GOP negotiators backed off.

— The biggest reason Trump is caving: There is no appetite among Republican leaders in Congress for this fight right now. Trying to help their president save face, they too are working to define Trump’s campaign promise down, arguing that any form of border security would fulfill it. From a story on the funding fight by Philip Rucker, Robert Costa and David Weigel:

  • “I think you’re going to get a down payment on border security generally,” said Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), a key appropriator and member of Senate leadership. He explained that “there could be a wall in some places and technology in other places,” implying that there would not be funding for the wall sketched out in campaign rhetoric.
  • “There will never be a 2,200-mile wall built, period,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a supporter of immigration reform who faced Trump in the 2016 primaries. “I think it’s become symbolic of better border security. It’s a code word for better border security. If you make it about actually building a 2,200-mile wall, that’s a bridge too far — but I’m mixing my metaphors.”

— A good window into why GOP leaders are skittish: Polls consistently show that most Americans do not want a border wall. Kristine Phillips and Scott Clement review the important numbers from four surveys conducted in 2017:

  • WaPo-ABC News: Sixty percent of adults oppose building a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, while 37 percent support it. Nationally, 47 percent are “strongly” against the wall. Three-quarters of Trump voters support it, while 91 percent of Hillary Clinton voters don’t.
  • Pew Research Center: The nonpartisan organization found in February that only 29 percent think a wall would lead to a “major reduction” in illegal immigration. An additional 25 percent think it would lead to a “minor reduction,” while 43 percent don’t think it would have much effect. Another key finding: 70 percent think the United States would ultimately foot the bill. Only 16 percent said they think Mexico will pay for the wall.
  • Gallup: This poll from January found that a majority of Americans would rather see other campaign promises fulfilled. Sixty-nine percent think Trump should renew the country’s infrastructure. More than half want him to reduce income taxes, establish tariffs on imports and deport illegal immigrants with criminal records. Forty-six percent want Obamacare repealed and replaced. Only 26 percent say a wall should be a priority.
  • Quinnipiac University: Five polls conducted over the past months show that an increasing number of voters oppose building a wall, and that support for a wall has been waning. In November, 55 percent were opposed, while 42 percent were in support. By March and April, 64 percent said they were opposed, while 33 percent said they were in favor.

— Karen Tumulty wrote a fantastic profile of Rep. Will Hurd, one of the most outspoken Republican critics of Trump’s border wall, for The Post’s front page: “The vast, volatile 23rd Congressional District of Texas is bigger in area than 29 states. It stretches from San Antonio to El Paso and includes about one-third of the entire U.S.-Mexico border. (Trump’s proposed wall would cover 820 miles in the district, much of it on private property.) The district’s overwhelmingly Latino electorate last year went for Hillary Clinton in the presidential race. … Hurd narrowly won a second term in what turned out to be the most expensive House race in Texas history. Democrats have put Hurd’s seat in their top five targets in 2018. He will also be running to beat the fickle tendencies of a district that has ousted four different incumbents since 2006…

“A scorching, dusty morning last week found the 39-year-old congressman in the desert outside El Paso, at the dedication ceremony of a project he has championed for two years. A border crossing was being renamed in honor of World War I’s most decorated Texan, a Mexican immigrant named Marcelino Serna. The 5-foot-6 Serna volunteered for the Army to avoid deportation, and at one point he single-handedly captured 24 enemy soldiers and killed 26 in France. That his Mexican citizenship made him ineligible for the nation’s highest military accolade, the Medal of Honor, has long been a sore point with El Paso-area veterans. It was lost on no one there that Hurd was standing just a few hundred yards from where Trump’s wall would go. Currently, there is a fence, which local residents say has been effective in stemming illegal traffic.”

Hurd says the wall would be an inefficient, impractical and wasteful “one-size-fits-all” means of controlling illegal immigration and reducing crime.

In interviews with several dozen of Hurd’s constituents, not one expressed the opinion that building a wall is the best way to control problems on the border: “In Hurd’s district and elsewhere throughout the state, support for enhancing border security runs strong. But there are also fears that a physical wall would violate the property rights that Texans hold dear, and be a kick in the gut to a regional economy heavily dependent on cross-border trade.” (Take the time to read Karen’s full piece here.)

Hurd and the people he represents are not unique: “Not a single member of Congress who represents the territory on the southwest border said they support Trump’s request for $1.4 billion to begin construction of his promised wall,” according to a survey conducted by the Wall Street Journal’s Laura Meckler and Kristina Peterson. “Most lawmakers representing the region—both Democrats and Republicans—said they are opposed and many said they have unanswered questions. A few were noncommittal, but not a single member offered support.”

FOUR MORE POST STORIES ABOUT THIS FIGHT:

1. The Trump administration has quietly begun scaling back the proposed footprint for the wall, focusing only on the most highly trafficked corridors. A Department of Homeland Security planning document identifies as “high priority” the border sectors of the Rio Grande Valley in the southern tip of Texas — encompassing Rio Grande City, McAllen and Weslaco — as well as El Paso, Tucson and San Diego. “The areas were selected because of their proximity to urban centers and roads, allowing those who cross to vanish quickly,” Tracy Jan and David Nakamura report. “The preliminary plan anticipates adding more than 100 new miles of wall over the next two years, on top of the 700 miles of fencing that already exists, at an initial cost of more than $3.6 billion. The National Border Patrol Council, a union representing Border Patrol agents, hailed the targeted approach as a more practical and effective solution to illegal immigration than a 2,000-mile wall stretching from the Pacific Ocean to the Gulf of Mexico.”

2. Trump’s claim that the wall would halt the flow of drugs is dubious. From Fact Checkers Michelle Ye Hee Lee and Glenn Kessler: The president told the AP last week that the wall will stop “all” the illegal drug smuggling from Mexico to the U.S. “Experts say that drugs are actually shipped through the border on the underside of vehicles that have permits to cross the border in a special lane. ‘As long as the U.S. remains the world’s largest consumer of coke, and as long as Mexico continues to provide it, no wall will ever be able to stop the trade,’ wrote Roberto Saviano in Newsweek.”

3. The funding fight is galvanizing disheartened Democrats. From Amber Phillips: “Democrats have their own divisions to deal with. But opposing Trump’s wall is a near-perfect rallying cry almost everyone in their party can get behind. It’s just too good an opportunity to whack Trump and Republicans in Congress.”

4. Trump’s continued bellicosity may not get the wall built, but it could destabilize Mexico. From Adam Taylor: “Some critics worry that Trump, more used to negotiating cutthroat business deals, may push for a measure that humiliates Mexico or has a major negative effect on its economy (cutting off remittances to Mexico, for example, could be disastrous). Some suspect a hard line from Trump could even propel Andrés Manuel López Obrador, a populist compared by opponents to the late Hugo Chávez, to the Mexican presidency next year.

THREE FRESH DISPATCHES FROM THE BORDER:

1. “Trump’s border wall faces another challenge with Indian reservation,” by CBS News: “The Tohono O’odham Nation is roughly the size of Connecticut. It straddles 62 miles along the U.S.-Mexico border in Arizona. Tribal members live on both sides and are caught in the middle of the border debate. They allowed the federal government to build a vehicle barrier in 2006, but they strongly oppose a wall through their land. The current border fence cuts right through a ranch owned by a tribal family. Their well is now on the Mexican side and a wall would make it impossible to get to.”

2. “Mexico Worries That A New Border Wall Will Worsen Flooding,” by NPR’s Morning Edition: “Mexican engineers believe construction of the border barrier may violate a 47-year-old treaty governing the shared waters of the Rio Grande. If Mexico protests, the fate of the wall could end up in an international court. Antonio Rascón, chief Mexican engineer on the International Boundary and Water Commission, said in an interview that some border wall proposals he’s seen would violate the treaty, and that Mexico would not stand for that.”

3. “Texas border hurt by (EPA) cuts,” by the San Antonio Express-News: “Sewage gushing into the Rio Grande offers a pungent reminder of problems that could worsen under the Trump administration’s plan to reduce the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency budget by nearly a third and eliminate dozens of anti-pollution programs. Joint U.S.-Mexico spending under the 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement – including $650 million in EPA funding for water projects – has helped stop release of millions of gallons daily of Nuevo Laredo wastewater into the river. Despite those investments, an estimated 6 million gallons of untreated sewage flows daily into the river from Nuevo Laredo. … An EPA memo circulating among regional administrators and top staff asserts flatly that U.S.-Mexico border activities will be ‘eliminated’ starting next fall.”

The New York Times fronts a story this morning about all the immigration hard-liners who have gotten key jobs inside the relevant agencies: “After sending more than 13,000 Twitter messages in less than three years, Jon Feere, an outspoken opponent of illegal immigration, suddenly went silent after Inauguration Day. As a legal policy analyst at the Center for Immigration Studies, a Washington-based group that favors significant reductions in immigration, Mr. Feere had staked out tough positions on the subject, including pushing for an end to automatic citizenship for children born in the United States. Mr. Feere’s newfound reticence reflected not a change of heart but a new employer. He now works for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the agency tasked with finding and deporting people living in the United States illegally. His last Twitter post, on Jan. 20, read simply: ‘It’s time to make immigration policy great again.’”

In many cases, these people don’t just oppose illegal immigration. They’re also against any increases in legal immigration: “Julie Kirchner, who served for a decade as executive director of [FAIR] is now working as an adviser to the commissioner of Customs and Border Protection. Kellyanne Conway … worked regularly as a pollster for FAIR. … Stephen Miller worked tirelessly to defeat immigration reform as a staff member for Senator Jeff Sessions, now the attorney general. Gene P. Hamilton, who worked on illegal immigration as Mr. Sessions’s counsel on the Judiciary Committee, is now a senior counselor at the Department of Homeland Security … Julia Hahn, who wrote about immigration for Breitbart — with headlines like ‘Republican-Led Congress Oversees Large-Scale Importation of Somali Migrants’ — has followed her former boss, Stephen K. Bannon, to the White House as a deputy policy strategist.”

Historical context: “Daniel Tichenor, an immigration politics scholar at the University of Oregon, called it ‘highly unusual’ in the post-World War II era to have proponents of sharply reduced immigration in such high-ranking positions. ‘You would have to go to the 1920s and 1930s to find a comparable period in which you could point to people within the executive agencies and the White House who favored significant restrictions,’ Mr. Tichenor said.”

WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING:

— Must-see TV: Former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates will testify on May 8 before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee about Russia’s interference in last year’s elections. Lindsey Graham will chair the hearing. Yates, who got fired by Trump for refusing to defend his refugee ban, has also been invited to testify before the House Intelligence Committee on May 2. (CNN)

— Arkansas executed two inmates in back-to-back lethal injections Monday night, carrying out the first double execution in the U.S. since 2000. The deaths come just one week after Arkansas issued its first lethal injection in more than a decade – an unprecedented and harried pace that authorities say is propelled by an expiring drug. Mark Berman reports: The second execution Monday night was briefly delayed by a federal judge so she could consider claims that the first lethal injection may have been botched, but she lifted that stay shortly before 9:30 p.m. local time. The second inmate was pronounced dead about an hour later … These lethal injections marked the first back-to-back executions in the United States since Texas carried out two death sentences in one night nearly two decades ago. Arkansas was also the first state to make such an attempt since a widely publicized [screw up] in Oklahoma in 2014. The two prisoners, Jack H. Jones Jr. and Marcel W. Williams, were both convicted of brutal murders two decades ago, and failed to delay their lethal injections in an appeal to the Supreme Court. »

— Bill O’Reilly shows no contrition. On the night he was scheduled to return to Fox News from vacation, the deposed King of Cable News spoke out on a podcast that went live last night about the sexual harassment allegations that led to his ouster and hinted at a coming campaign to clear his name.

“I am sad that I’m not on television anymore. I was very surprised how it all turned out,” O’Reilly said. “I can’t say a lot, because there’s much stuff going on right now. But I can tell you that I’m very confident the truth will come out, and when it does, I don’t know if you’re going to be surprised — but I think you’re going to be shaken, as I am. There’s a lot of stuff involved here. Now, I can’t say any more because I just don’t want to influence the flow of the information. I don’t want the media to take what I say and misconstrue it.”

The Fix’s Callum Borchers writes that the podcast sounded like the start of “a revenge tour” and forecasts that O’Reilly will portray himself as the victim of a left-wing conspiracy: “It is important to note that there is no clear reason O’Reilly ‘can’t say any more.’ The harassment allegations, chronicled in a New York Times report earlier this month, already have been settled. O’Reilly’s reported $25 million severance from Fox News presumably precludes him from suing the network, so there is no pending litigation that we know of.”

GET SMART FAST:​​

  1. A recent decision to tear down four Confederacy-linked statues in New Orleans has provoked such intense backlash that the mayor has ordered they be dismantled in the middle of the night. Workers also wear masks and are protected by police snipers. (Avi Selk)
  2. Virginia gubernatorial candidate Corey Stewart’s “Confederate-centric” campaign tactics have cost him the endorsement of a longtime political ally, Prince William County Sheriff Glendell Hill, and prompted four of the five Republicans who serve with him on a county board to back his GOP rival. The loss of support comes after Stewart’s participation in a Confederate-themed ball earlier this month, as well as a supporter who flew his plane, streaming both a Confederate flag and a Stewart banner, over an outdoor gathering. (Laura Vozzella)
  3. Chobani is suing InfoWars founder Alex Jones, after the well-known conspiracy theorist published false information linking the yogurt company to a sexual assault case involving refugee children in Twin Falls. Jones’s false accusations come after news that Chobani owner and Turkish immigrant Hamdi Ulukaya employs hundreds of immigrants and refugees at his company – prompting a barrage of outrage and threats from far-right corners of the internet. (Idaho Statesman)
  4. Republican student groups at UC-Berkeley are suing the university for cancelling a speech by Ann Coulter over security concerns, charging that the school’s actions “smother the speech” of the conservative « minority. » The back-and-forth comes after university police put the campus on lockdown and canceled a talk by another controversial figure, Milo Yiannopoulos, amid violent protests. (Susan Svrluga and William Wan)
  5. The Supreme Court is weighing whether defendants being tried for the death penalty are entitled to have a mental-health expert testify on their behalf. At issue is whether poor defendants should have a chance to obtain the kind of expert assistance that wealthy defendants and state prosecutors can afford, rather than relying on testimony from a neutral expert. (Robert Barnes)
  6. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a dissent that the court is developing a “disturbing trend” of siding with police officers accused of excessive force, breaking with seven of her colleagues as she argued that the court should have accepted the case of a man who was shot in the back by a Houston police officer in 2010. Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined her. (Robert Barnes)
  7. Members of the Writers Guild of America voted overwhelmingly to authorize their union to call a strike as contract negotiations barrel towards a May 1 deadline. If an agreement can’t be worked out, some of the most-loved shows on television may stop production. (Elahe Izadi)
  8. A recent string of extreme weather events has been substantially shaped by human-influennced global warming, according to a new study. The conclusion comes as scientists have become increasingly adept at analyzing what impact climate change has on bizarre weather patterns. (Chelsea Harvey)
  9. Four marijuana activists were arrested after lighting joints in front of the Capitol, part of a demonstration urging lawmakers to remove marijuana from the nation’s list of most dangerous drugs. A number of other protestors, also illegally in possession of marijuana on federal land, were not arrested. (Perry Stein)
  10. In Pennsylvania, real-estate executive and GOP bundler Jeff Bartos joined a growing field of candidates hoping to unseat incumbent Sen. Bob Casey (D) in 2018. Bartos sought to brand himself as a conservative businessman and Casey as an out-of-touch Washington insider, the Philadelphia Inquirer reports. Dave Weigel noticed that Bartos’s introductory video presented stock images from Hangzhou, China, as coming from D.C.
  11. A Tennessee teacher accused of abducting a 15-year-old student will be transferred to his home state to face charges after he was arrested in California. His capture ended a five-week manhunt in which the teacher allegedly traveled through nine states and had plans to take the teen girl to Mexico. (Lindsey Bever, Cleve R. Wootson Jr. and Peter Holley)
  12. In Japan, tattoos are associated with the mafia. Even tourists who are seen sporting body art larger than the size of a band-aid can be denied access to pools, restaurants, and convenience stores. But as Tokyo prepares to host the 2020 Summer Olympics – and the huge number of ink-sporting athletes who will compete – some are seeking to put an end to the bias. (Anna Fifield profiles one.)

TAX REFORM:

— Trump will propose cutting the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 15 percent, moving to fulfill one campaign pledge even as he shatters another. Damian Paletta and Robert Costa preview tomorrow’s big announcement: “By doing so — but not committing to measures that would offset the revenue loss — Trump is making clear he is putting a priority on cutting taxes over the national debt. It also potentially creates a tension point with House Republicans, who have spent years advancing a vision for tax restructuring of their own. When Trump proposed the 15 percent rate during the campaign, the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center projected that this would reduce federal revenue by $2.4 trillion over 10 years. But White House officials have said that the tax cuts will create such a jump in economic growth that it will create new revenue, an assumption that has divided experts. If the amount of taxes paid by businesses falls, it could put more pressure on other taxpayers to make up the difference. But Trump has said he wants to put in place a ‘massive’ cut for the middle class, which means all tax revenue could fall. »

  • House Republicans have pursued lowering the corporate tax rate to 20 percent.
  • Trump’s push for unveiling his tax plan began last week during several meetings in the Oval Office where he expressed his frustration with the slow pace of legislation on several fronts.
  • The president urged his top economic advisers to ready a rollout this week and to keep the details of the plan controlled as much as possible by Trump advisers and Cabinet members rather than GOP lawmakers.

— “The disrupter president and the do-little Congress,” by Dan Balz: “Will President Trump and congressional Republicans ever understand one another? Over time, they might accomplish things of mutual interest. Big things, perhaps. But the mismatch between the disrupter president and what has been a business-as-usual, do-little Congress seems especially evident as the 100-day mark of the administration nears. Even with a president of their own party and majorities in the House and Senate, congressional Republicans have been stuck. Trump tries to prod Congress to act, not always forgiving of why things move slowly. Congressional leaders try to educate the president on the limits and culture of the legislative process.”

On Trump’s tax announcement: “What’s coming appears likely to be little more than principles, rather than proposed legislation. Those principles might not go any further than the tax plans he proposed during the campaign. It will be more motion without real action. That’s the difference between the presidency and Capitol Hill. Trump likes to say things and sign things. And so, day after day, surrounded by aides or people from the outside, he makes announcements, or he puts his signature — in big strokes — on official documents, whether executive orders or presidential memorandums. These orders are not without impact, symbolically and eventually practically. He signs them and moves on. … The legislative process doesn’t comport with his approach to governing.

LAUNCHING A TRADE WAR:

— The White House announced plans to impose a roughly 20 percent tariff on softwood lumber imported from Canada. Ana Swanson and Damian Paletta report: “Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said in an interview that his department had reached a preliminary decision to impose the tax, the administration’s first major trade action against our northern neighbor. Ross portrayed the action as a tough measure to punish Canada after [Trump] declared last week that ‘we can’t let Canada or anybody else take advantage and do what they did to our workers and to our farmers.’ ‘What we are doing is dealing with another bad act on the part of the Canadians,’ Ross said. The Obama administration began the review of trade in softwood lumber last year out of concern that Canada was subsidizing its wood industry in a way that hurt U.S. rivals.”

How it works: “The decision to impose what are known as “countervailing duties” in retaliation for Canada’s wood subsidies … is subject to a final review by the International Trade Commission, an independent federal agency that advises the government on trade policy. Yet the decision allows U.S. Customs and Border Protection to begin collecting the funds from Canadian importers immediately. Five Canadian companies were a part of the investigation, and the United States will seek to collect money from four of them retroactively for actions taken in the past 90 days … Ross said this could amount to $1 billion in new tariffs, as well as $250 million in retroactive collections. All other Canadian softwood lumber companies will face the same tariff of 19.88 percent going forward.”

DECONSTRUCTING THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE:

— Trump is going to sign an executive order on Wednesday instructing the Interior Department to review national monument designations made by his three predecessors – a move that could potentially upend more than two decades of protections put in place in Utah and across the country. Juliet Eilperin reports: “Presidents of both parties have invoked their executive authority under the 1906 Antiquities Act to provide safeguards for federal lands and waters. But some of these moves — including [Obama’s] designation of the 1.35 million-acre Bears Ears National Monument … and Bill Clinton’s 1996 declaration of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, both in Utah, have sparked fierce criticism from Republicans. Members of Utah’s congressional delegation started lobbying Trump shortly after his November win to take unilateral action to undo the designation for Bear Ears, which they said should have been protected instead through legislation.” The White House has not yet indicated whether it will remove protections for the monument.

— Trump coul be shutting down the EPA’s Open Data Web Service – a citizen-linked data tool that provides critical information on health and environmental issues. The Independent reports: “The [EPA’s service] … which stores information on climate change, life cycle assessment, health impact analysis and environmental justice – is to have its funding removed and will no longer be in operation, according to people working on the plan. A pop-up on the site appears to confirm the shutdown, with anyone visiting the Open Data page told that the site will not be operational from Friday. Since this story was first published, that message has been updated to read: ‘The data on this Web site will continue to be available on April 28, 2017.’ The EPA also tweeted to say that the website wasn’t going anywhere … though it seemed to be experiencing occasional outages. If the site does go offline, it will mean that citizens will no longer be able to access information on their environment and climate, keeping them from researching potentially fatal changes to their area.”

— USA Today, “Republicans in Congress push for religious liberty executive order,” by Eliza Collins: “Dozens of Republican lawmakers are asking [Trump] to scale back Obama-era protections for gays and lesbians in order to make good on a campaign promise to protect religious liberty. In early February, Trump was reportedly considering an executive order that would reverse [Obama’s] orders prohibiting discrimination against gays and lesbians in the federal workforce or by federal contractors. But the order was never signed. A group of 51 members of the House wrote to Trump this month [to request he sign the order].” Meanwhile, a senior White House official said Monday that some sort of policy to protect religious liberty is still in the works, but that Trump is “trying to find middle ground.” The official acknowledged it would be a “delicate balance,” adding that discussions were “ongoing” about how best to proceed.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:

— The State Department removed its promotion of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort Monday following a storm of criticism. The AP’s Julie Bykowicz reports: “In an April 4 blog post that was republished by several U.S. embassies abroad, Mar-a-Lago was described as ‘Trump’s Florida estate,’ where he has hosted foreign leaders. ‘By visiting this ‘winter White House,’ Trump is belatedly fulfilling the dream of Mar-a-Lago’s original owner and designer,’ the post said. Left unsaid: Mar-a-Lago is part of Trump’s business empire. After his election, the resort doubled its membership fee to $200,000. The State Department said late Monday that its intention was ‘to inform the public about where the president has been hosting world leaders’ and that it regrets ‘any misperception.’ The White House did not respond to questions about whether it had any involvement in the original posting or the decision to take it down. »

The Mar-a-Lago post was nearly three weeks old but gained traction Monday when several people noticed the U.S. embassy to the United Kingdom was featuring it: « Sen. Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, asked on Twitter why taxpayers are ‘promoting the president’s private country club’ and referred to the incident as ‘kleptocratic.’ Former Obama-era White House ethics attorney Norm Eisen said the promotion is ‘exploitation,’ comparing it to Kellyanne Conway’s promotion of Ivanka Trump’s clothing business during a West Wing interview earlier this year. ‘This idea of using government for private gain is metastasizing,’ Eisen said. ‘It must be stopped.’ And Richard Painter, who served in the ethics role for Bush, tweeted that the State Department post was, ‘Use of public office for private gain pure and simple.' »

— Ivanka Trump’s eponymous clothing line was relabeled and sold to Stein Mart under a different name, “Adrienne Vittadini Studio.” Business of Fashion reports: The decision to relabel the garments was made by a manufacturing and distribution company, without knowledge of the Ivanka Trump brand, came after several prominent retailers dropped her clothing line.

PERSONNEL IS POLICY:

— The Senate confirmed former Georgia governor Sonny Perdue as Agriculture secretary on Monday, voting 87-11 in his favor. Jose A. DelReal and Caitlin Dewey report: « Perdue, who received thumbs up from hundreds of food and agricultural groups nationwide, faced few obstacles in his confirmation. Still, he may have to contend with deep cuts to the USDA budget proposed by Trump – which could pit him between the White House’s priorities and those of rural and agricultural interest groups across the country. »

— Jeff Sessions vowed not to diminish the Justice Department’s focus on corporate fraud, telling a gathering of white-collar lawyers that his aggressive crackdown on violent crime would not diminish the department’s longstanding mission to prosecute white-collar offenders. Matt Zapotosky reports: “Sessions took aim at recent speculation that his Justice Department might be easier on white-collar crime, saying while there could be ‘some uncertainty’ when administrations changed, he would ‘still enforce the laws that protect American consumers and ensure that honest businesses are not placed at a disadvantage to dishonest businesses.’ He acknowledged that he had been focused in his first weeks on the job on violent crime and immigration but said that did not mean he would give other criminals a pass. ‘These are important priorities for our department,’ Sessions said. ‘But focusing on these challenges does not mean we’re going to reduce our efforts in other areas.’ This was the first time he addressed topics of public corruption and corporate fraud in a significant way since being confirmed as attorney general. »

— Retired Marine general Randolph Alles, who currently serves as the U.S. Customs and Border deput directory, is expected to be tapped to lead the Secret Service. Politico reports: “Alles has served as the acting deputy commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection since Trump’s inauguration. He previously served stints as the CBP’s acting executive assistant commissioner of enterprise services and leading the department’s Air and Marine Operations. Prior to serving in the federal government, Alles served for 35 years in the Marine Corps … [His] expected appointment comes after a search that purposefully looked outside of the Secret Service ranks — and process that hasn’t exactly been popular among former agents. The 6,500-person bureau has its own unique characteristics and culture, which are often best understood by someone who has served on a protective detail.” « Imagine taking a guy from USDA and moving him over to be the commandant of the Marine Corps,” said former deputy assistant director Bill Pickle. “They’re totally different jobs. »

— Former “Fox and Friends” anchor and ABC News correspondent Heather Nauert has been tapped as the State Department spokeswoman. “Heather’s media experience and long interest in international affairs will be invaluable as she conveys the administration’s foreign policy priorities to the American people and the world,” the State Department said in a statement. (Reuters)

— Trump welcomed about 50 people from conservative media organizations to a reception in the Roosevelt Room last night. It was supposed to be on background, a ground rule that was stressed to attendees at the start, but then Trump walked in and declared it on the record. There were people from Breitbart, the Washington Free Beacon, Daily Caller, Christian Broadcast Network, The Eternal Word Television Network, as well conservative radio hosts like Laura Ingraham, Larry O’Connor and John Fredericks, per Politico’s Hadas Gold. “Nearly the entire communications staff were in attendance in addition to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, chief of staff Reince Priebus, chief strategist Stephen Bannon, senior adviser Jared Kushner, National Security Council spokesperson Michael Anton and Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland.”

— Bloomberg, « Trump Adviser Gorka Walks Off Stage at a Discussion of Fake News, » by Nafeesa Syeed: « [Sebastian Gorka], under fire for his alleged association with a Hungarian nationalist group and his views on Islam, walked off the stage during a conference in Washington after facing questions from students and protesters he said distracted from other participants. Gorka, a deputy assistant to [Trump], was on a panel at Georgetown University on Monday titled ‘News, Alternative Facts and Propaganda: The Role of Cyber in Influence Operations.’ During the question-and-answer period … Gorka said, ‘You are the victims of fake news’ and he called his experience a ‘superb case study of fake news.’ After intense questioning, Gorka said he was leaving the stage ‘to allow my colleagues to actually get questions about the issues on the table.' »

— Huffington Post, “The Guide To Becoming Jared Kushner,” by Ben Walsh: “When Charles Kushner was heading to federal prison in 2005 … his son Jared got some advice from Howard Rubenstein ― the dean of New York damage control ― on how to rehabilitate the Kushner name, Charles would later tell a family friend. Step one: Buy a New York newspaper. Don’t be too particular, Rubenstein told Jared … Any newspaper will do. Step two: Buy a big Manhattan building. Any building will do. Step three: Marry the daughter of a rich New York family. Anyone will do. Whether or not Kushner was indeed working through a checklist, his actions during those years have served him well. They also laid the groundwork for the meticulous public relations strategy that has made possible Kushner’s current paradoxical role in the press, as a blameless yet uniquely powerful member of the Trump administration. ‘I don’t talk to the press,’ he told Forbes in December. But someone is clearly shaping his image in the media as a beacon of moderation, the man working to pull Trump toward consensus-minded policies and socially liberal politics.”

MOSCOW IS MEDDLING:

— The general in charge of U.S. forces in Afghanistan appeared to confirm that Russia is sending weapons to the Taliban – an intervention that will likely deepen complications in the country’s 15-year-war, as well as U.S.-Kremlin relations. Thomas Gibbons-Neff reports: “We continue to get reports of this assistance,’ [Gen. John Nicholson said Monday, speaking to reporters alongside Jim Mattis.] A senior U.S. military official … said the Russians have increased their supply of equipment and small arms to the Taliban over the past 18 months. The official said the Russians have been sending weapons, including medium and heavy machine guns, to the Taliban under the guise that the material would be used to fight the Islamic State in eastern Afghanistan. Instead, the official said, the weapons were showing up in some of Afghanistan’s southern provinces, including Helmand and Kandahar — both areas with little Islamic State presence.” “Any weapons being funneled here from a foreign country would be a violation of international law unless they were coming to the government of Afghanistan,” Mattis said, adding that they would “have to be dealt with as such.” Mattis and Nicholson’s remarks come just days after the Taliban pulled off the single deadliest attack against Afghan security forces since the beginning of the war.

— Emmanuel Macron, the frontrunner for president of France in the upcoming runoff with Marine Le Pen, appears to have been targeted by the same Russian operatives who targeted Hillary Clinton’s campaign ahead of the U.S. election, a cybersecurity firm warns in a new report. The news heightens concerns that Russia may have turned its playbook on France – seeking to bolster Le Pen’s candidacy the final round of voting May 7. The New York Times’ Nicole Perlroth reports: “Security researchers at the cybersecurity firm, Trend Micro, said that on March 15 they spotted a hacking group they believe to be a Russian intelligence unit turn its weapons on Mr. Macron’s campaign — sending emails to campaign officials and others with links to fake websites designed to bait them into turning over passwords. Those websites were registered to a block of web addresses that Trend Micro’s researchers say belong to the Russian intelligence unit they refer to as Pawn Storm, but is alternatively known as Fancy Bear, APT 28 or the Sofacy Group.” American and European intelligence agencies determined that the group was responsible for last year’s DNC hack.

— The Turkish man who gave Michael Flynn a $600,000 lobbying deal just before Trump tapped him to serve as national security adviser has business ties to Russia, including a 2009 aviation financing deal negotiated with Vladimir Putin. Politico’s Isaac Arnsdorf reports: “The man, Ekim Alptekin, has in recent years helped to coordinate Turkish lobbying in Washington with Dmitri ‘David’ Zaikin, a Soviet-born former executive in Russian energy and mining companies who also has had dealings with Putin’s government … This unusual arrangement, in which Alptekin and Zaikin have helped steer Turkish lobbying through various groups since at least 2015, raises questions about both the agenda of the two men and the source of the funds used to pay the lobbyists. The revelation of Russian business ties to the man who hired Flynn — which has not been previously reported — threatens to complicate the White House’s struggle to escape the shadow of the FBI investigation into whether members of the Trump campaign coordinated with Russian agents.”

THE NEW WORLD ORDER:

— The administration announced it will host a private briefing on North Korea for the entire Senate Wednesday at the White House – an unusual event that has prompted some lawmakers to question whether the administration plans to use the event as a photo op ahead of its 100-day mark. David Nakamura and Ed O’Keefe report: “[Sean Spicer] told reporters that the lawmakers would be briefed Wednesday by several senior administration officials, including [Rex Tillerson] and [Jim Mattis]. Yet the White House setting perplexed lawmakers who have grown accustomed to such briefings taking place in a secure location on Capitol Hill, where there is more room to handle such a large group. Past administrations … have traditionally sent high-level aides to Capitol Hill to hold discussions with larger groups in secure underground locations. »

“Congressional staffers suggested that the briefing’s proximity to Trump would make it easy for him to ‘drop by’ and perhaps take over the briefing. The image of senators meeting with Trump at the White House on a top national security concern could be touted by the White House as a key moment in the run-up to Trump’s 100th day in office — a milestone … that his administration is working aggressively to promote. … ‘These briefings are always, always, always done in the SCIF up here,’ said one Senate aide. ‘Does it mean classified information is going to be shared in an unsecured setting? Or that we’re not hearing about classified material?’ Another senior aide said it was Trump’s idea to hold the meeting at the White House. »

— Meanwhile, Trump just postponed the dinner he had scheduled at the White House for all nine Supreme Court judges. Aides cited scheduling conflicts. (Politico

SIGNS OF ESCALATION:

— Trump spoke by phone to his counterparts in China and Japan on Monday, discussing concerns that North Korea could use a key anniversary Tuesday to stage a provocative missile or nuclear test. Simon Denyer and Anna Fifield report: “In his phone call with Trump, [Chinese President Xi Jinping] called for restraint from both Washington and Pyongyang … but he also stressed that China ‘resolutely opposes activities that violate U.N. Security Council resolutions’ and is willing to work with the United States and other countries to keep the peace. Japan’s [Prime Minister Shinzo Abe] had a 30-minute call with Trump to discuss North Korea, whose actions he called an ‘extremely serious threat’ to international society and to his country. »

In Beijing, the possibility of another missile test is leading to mounting frustration with Pyongyang and an increasingly obvious deterioration in relations with its neighbor: « On Monday, the Global Times newspaper said that if North Korea stages a sixth nuclear test, Beijing would ‘undoubtedly support’ the U.N. in adopting tougher sanctions against the regime, including an embargo on oil exports. … Meanwhile, naval destroyers from Japan started drills with the carrier strike group led by the USS Carl Vinson in the Philippine Sea on Sunday, and the South Korean navy is expected to do the same. »

The Japanese government is preparing its citizens to be ready in case of a missile strike: The prime minister’s office began issuing new “actions to protect yourself” guidelines this week — including for the first time instructions on how to respond if a North Korean ballistic missile is heading toward Japan. But Pyongyang has long had the technology to strike all of Japan. So the guide’s advice isn’t exactly helpful. (Anna Fifield)

— “Behind the Trump administration’s sudden urgency in dealing with the North Korean nuclear crisis lies a stark calculus: a growing body of expert studies and classified intelligence reports that conclude the country is capable of producing a nuclear bomb every six or seven weeks,” the New York Times’ David E. Sanger and William J. Broad report. “That acceleration in pace — impossible to verify until experts get beyond the limited access to North Korean facilities that ended years ago — explains why [Trump] and his aides fear they are running out of time. For years, American presidents decided that each incremental improvement in the North’s program — another nuclear test, a new variant of a missile — was worrisome, but not worth a confrontation that could spill into open conflict. Now those step-by-step advances have resulted in North Korean warheads that in a few years could reach Seattle. ‘They’ve learned a lot,’ said Siegfried S. Hecker, a Stanford professor who directed the Los Alamos weapons laboratory in New Mexico … from 1986 to 1997, and whom the North Koreans have let into their facilities seven times.

“But the North Koreans are discovering — as the U.S., the Soviet Union and China did before them — that it is far more complicated to design an intercontinental missile. To reach their goal, North Korean weapons designers are looking to miniaturize their warheads, making them far lighter and more powerful. How long will it take for the North Koreans to solve those problems? The best guesswork is around 2020 — while Mr. Trump is still in his first term.”

THE MIDDLE EAST:

— A devastating Taliban attack on an Afghan army base last week has shaken up the government in Kabul, forcing resignation of the country’s defense minister and army chief as Defense Secretary Jim Mattis arrived in to survey the deteriorating situation. Thomas Gibbons-Neff, Pamela Constable and Sayed Salahuddin report: “The Taliban, which is contesting control of one-third of Afghanistan, has continued to steadily gain territory and inflict record casualties on civilians and troops since most NATO troops withdrew from the country in 2014. The assault Friday — following a winter of repeated Taliban attacks on strategic cities and towns — adds to concerns that Afghanistan will not be able to defend itself without a major commitment of U.S. support.” With the conflict at a stalemate and no sign that peace talks will resume, it is unclear whether the White House will decide to send in more men or money. « But the continued weakness of the Afghan military adds urgency to a request from Gen. John Nicholson, in charge of U.S. forces here, for additional troops. He has told Congress that about 3,000 more troops are needed. » National security adviser H.R. McMaster is leading a review of U.S. strategy in the country, including troop levels.

 — The White House announced that it is imposing sanctions on more than 270 employees of a Syrian government agency that produces chemical weapons and ballistic missiles, blacklisting them from travel and financial transactions in the wake of last month’s sarin attack on civilians. Karen DeYoung reports that the sanctions on members of Assad’s Scientific Studies and Research Center more than doubles the number of Syrian individuals and entities whose property has been blocked by the United States and who are barred from financial transactions with American people or companies.

IS THE E.U. MAKING A COMEBACK?

— “In this era of fiery populism and muscular anti-globalist forces, politicians across Europe are suddenly discovering an electoral surprise. It might actually pay to embrace the European Union,” Griff Witte and Michael Birnbaum report. “The top finisher in the first round of the French presidential election on Sunday is Macron, a [centrist] who is strongly favored to beat his anti-Europe rival, Le Pen, in a May 7 runoff. After years in which the E.U. was the favorite foil for ascendant politicians on the continent, the 28-nation club may be making a comeback despite Brexit and Trump’s euroskepticism…

“The Netherlands’ staunchly pro-European Green Left party quadrupled its support in elections last month. Former European Parliament president Martin Schulz is surging in polls ahead of September elections in Germany. And Macron has promised, if elected, to help lead ‘an ambitious Europe,’ restoring France to a preeminent place in the E.U. after years in which the French role has been diminished by its domestic struggles with unemployment, terrorism and political dysfunction. … For all their concerns about the E.U., voters may be becoming more wary of disruptive European politicians as they watch Trump churn up political turmoil in the United States and Britain solidify its E.U. divorce plans.”

— Still, French voters rejected both traditional parties for the first time in modern political history – making the next round of voting not just a question of governance, but also a question of national identity. Birnbaum and James McAuley report: « With just two weeks left before the next round of votes, Macron is seeking to bolster his appeal among centrist voters, while Le Pen has doubled down on her anti-immigrant rhetoric. And in a ploy to win over leftist voters who share some of her views – including an aversion to the E.U. – Le Pen on Monday temporarily stepped down from her position as the head of the National Front party. Macron is not without obstacles as he enters the runoff – especially if Le Pen can capitalize on the enthusiasm of leftist populists. (Combined, populist voters who said they wanted to ‘overhaul the system’ accounted for 49.8 percent of Sunday’s votes.) Now the question will be whether Macron can seize the moment and convert grudging support into enthusiastic backing. »

— Fun fact: The 39-year-old Macron could become the youngest contemporary French president. He would also be accompanied into the Élysée Palace by his wife, Brigitte, who is 24 years older than he is. From Rick Noack in Paris: “Born as Brigitte Marie-Claude Trogneux, the now 64-year-old is the daughter of a family of chocolatiers who are known for their macaroons. The two first met when Macron was 15 years old at the high school in Amiens where she taught a French and a theater class. ‘Whatever you do, I’ll marry you!’ Macron told her there. Despite reports that the 15-year-old even kissed his then-teacher on the cheek during a theater play, few voters seem to care.”

— British Prime Minister Theresa May has hired Obama’s former deputy chief of staff Jim Messina for her election campaign, reuniting the winning team behind David Cameron’s unexpected victory in 2015. Messina and his colleagues arrived in London this week to begin work on May’s bid – seeking to help her secure a larger Conservative Party majority, as well as a fresh mandate for her vision of “Brexit,” Bloomberg’s Tim Ross reports.

OUT OF HIBERNATION:

— Barack Obama didn’t mention Trump once as he spoke to a group of young voters at the University of Chicago yesterday afternoon in his first public appearance since leaving the White House. He urged attendees to find common ground and overcome divisiveness that has permeated national politics, Amber Phillips and Juliet Eilperin report: “‘The single most important thing I can do is to help in any way prepare the next generation of leadership to take up the baton and to take their own crack at changing the world,’ said Obama, who sat onstage … with a half-dozen Chicago-area activists in their teens and 20s, as dozens more student leaders watched on.”

He admitted that he failed to realize his “aspirational” goal of uniting Americans in red and blue states, but he argued that the country is not as divided as it sometimes seems: “In keeping with his previous vow not to criticize his successor, Obama made little mention of Republicans’ rush to dismantle his legacy back in Washington as quickly as possible. Instead, he focused on political polarization, which he ascribed to gerrymandered electoral districts, money in politics, a politicized media and voter apathy, especially among young people. ‘The one thing I’m absolutely convinced of is: Yes, we confront a whole range of challenges, from economic inequality and lack of opportunity, to the criminal justice system to climate change to issues related to violence,’ he said. ‘All those problems are serious, they’re daunting. But they’re not insolvable. What is preventing us from tackling them and making more progress really has to do with our politics and our civic life.”

The session marked the start of a series of public appearances Obama will make in the U.S. and abroad – including planned speeches in Boston, Berlin, and Italy.

SOCIAL MEDIA SPEED READ:

Many online took umbrage when they found out about the State Department promoting Mar-a-Lago:

Meanwhile, Rep. Rod Blum (R-Iowa) used the hashtag #First100 to promote Trump:

Jimmy Carter’s Library is trolling Trump:

Scott Walker praised the president for siding with Wisconsin dairy farmers in a trade dispute with Canada:

Obama nostalgia was ripe among Democrats as he spoke in Chicago:

Sean Hannity’s friends showed support after a woman accused him of inviting her to his hotel room:

Pretty cool:

This too:

The president spoke with her yesterday:

The Capitol police have a new toy:

So does Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.):

GOOD READS FROM ELSEWHERE:

— New York Magazine, “First, She Survived a ‘Cult.’ Now She’s Running for Office,” by Caitlin Moscatello: “The chicken legs wouldn’t cook right. Chelsea Savage, then 17, could feel tears welling up as she stood over the stove. She would be chastised for this, for not getting the skins crispy enough, for not pleasing the woman who ruled over her … If she lived in a world beyond the confines of a ‘church’ where members were forced to wear Victorian-style clothes and pulled out of school, she’d be like the girls in the magazines she was forbidden to read …  But instead she was crying in a kitchen in rural Virginia, her hair pinned up like a turn-of-the-century housemaid. ‘I wasn’t even allowed to use the dishwasher, because then I wasn’t ‘building character,’’ [she said]. That was 1987. It’s hard to imagine that these are the beginnings of a woman who would go on to earn two advanced degrees … much less run for office. And yet this week, Chelsea Savage, now 46, is doing just that — she’s hoping voters in Virginia’s 73rd district will support her bid for the Democratic nomination for state delegate. A Democratic victory would be a major feat, but for Savage — an openly gay single mother who grew up not just poor, but about as far from political pedigree as one can get — it would also be a personal triumph. A signal of how far she’s come.”

HOT ON THE LEFT:

“New Kids’ Book Helps Parents Approach ‘The Talk’ About Police Brutality,” from HuffPost: “In the black community, ‘the talk’ with your children isn’t just that of the birds and the bees ― it’s the one where you explain to them how their skin tone may one day make them a police target. It’s a conversation so difficult that mother, former social worker … Sanya Gragg wanted to help fellow parents navigate it with her recently released book Momma, Did You Hear The News? Gragg, 46, said … her decision to go forth with it came after the police killing of Terence Crutcher last September. ‘I knew there would be many families having ‘the talk’ with their children,’ [said] Gragg … ‘It confirmed that this was my assignment.’ Gragg, who now has two grown sons and a 3-year-old daughter, said that the hardest part of having the talk with her sons was knowing it could only guarantee that they might practice greater caution when confronted by police.” “The most difficult part for me is knowing my sons and yours can do everything right and still end up in a tragic situation,” she said.

 

HOT ON THE RIGHT:

“Bill Nye’s Bizarre Video On Transgenderism Bombs On YouTube,” from the Daily Caller: “A clip of Bill Nye’s latest television show promotes transgenderism and other gender identities as hard science, and it’s performing horribly on YouTube, as of Monday. [The video] … published on YouTube Sunday, features actress Rachel Bloom singing a song about transgenders … and how sexuality is a fluid concept. The clip comes from an episode of Bill Nye’s show ‘Bill Nye Saves The World.’ ‘Sexuality’s a spectrum, everyone is on it. Even you might like it if you sit up on it,’ Bloom sings on stage. ‘Drag king, drag queen just do what feels right.’ Bloom also delves into a bizarre chant where she laments a world in which you have only two choices between gender identity: male or female.  ‘Bill Nye Saves The World’ purports to look at various problems through a more scientific perspective, according to the International Movie Database.”

 

DAYBOOK:

At the White House: Trump will travel to the Capitol to give remarks and participate in the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum’s National Days of Remembrance. Later, he will travel back to the White House to meet with Steven Mnuchin and have a meeting on tax reform. Following that, the president will participate in a farmers’ roundtable and signing of the Executive Order Promoting Agriculture and Rural Prosperity in America. Afterward, POTUS will meet with H. R. McMaster and then have dinner with Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.

The White House just launched a new web site to tout Trump’s accomplishments in the first 100 days.

After a little over nine-hours flight, Air Force Two landed at Joint Base Andrews at 6:38 a.m. from Hawaii. “During the flight, the Vice President came back briefly to speak off the record, but the flight was otherwise uneventful,” the AFP’s Andrew Beatty writes in a pool report. “After nine days, an estimated 53 hours in the air, four countries (and) three domestic stops … the Vice President’s trip has come to an end. The Vice President will now head back to the Observatory, then to the White House and later to the Senate policy lunch.” 

The House comes back from recess today. The Senate also has votes.

 

NEWS YOU CAN USE IF YOU LIVE IN D.C.:

— Another day of gray and drizzles – but hopefully our last for the week. The Capital Weather Gang forecasts: “Periods of rain, which could be moderate at times. Temperatures don’t move much as highs creep into the upper 50s to low 60s under heavy dense overcast skies. Rainfall totals today could range from a quarter to half inch, but locally heavier amounts can happen, especially east and north of the city.”

— Even with the recent spate of rainy, chilly weather we’ve seen, Washington is currently having its warmest April on record: Average temperatures for this month are nearly seven degrees higher than normal – putting us on track to have a month that more closely resembles a typical April in Memphis. (Jason Samenow)

— The Wizards lost to the Hawks 111-101 after falling apart in the fourth quarter. The series is now tied going into Game Five. 

— The Nationals lost to the Rockies 8-4.

— Elizabeth Warren endorsed Tom Perriello in Virginia’s Democratic primary for governor, throwing her weight behind the challenger to Democrat Lt. Gov. Ralph Northam (who is favored by the Richmond establishment and Terry McAuliffe). Bernie Sanders backed Perriello earlier this month.

— Maryland Del. Richard K. Impallaria was ordered to serve two days in jail for drunk driving, after a judge suspended the rest of his 60-day sentence. Impallaria’s temporary detainment comes after he was convicted of a DWI in Ocean City last summer, during an annual Maryland Association of Counties conference. (Ovetta Wiggins)

VIDEOS OF THE DAY:

Trump said his U.N. ambassador « can easily be replaced: »

Watch Trump talk to astronauts at the International Space Station:

Seth Meyers talks about France’s « female Trump: »

Stephen Colbert talks about the 100-day mark:

Allison Janney feels sorry for Sean Spicer:

Arkansas carries out country’s first back-to-back executions in almost two decades

Arkansas on Monday night executed two inmates in back-to-back lethal injections, carrying out the country’s first double execution since 2000.

The executions came after Arkansas, pushing back on legal challenges, executed an inmate last week, the state’s first lethal injection in more than a decade. As part of a hurried execution pace that has drawn national attention, Arkansas officials returned to the execution chamber four days later to carry out a pair of death sentences.

The second execution Monday night was briefly delayed by a federal judge so she could consider claims that the first lethal injection may have been botched, but she lifted that stay shortly before 9:30 p.m. local time. The second inmate was pronounced dead about an hour later, according to the Associated Press, which had a reporter witness it.

These lethal injections marked the first back-to-back executions in the United States since Texas carried out two death sentences in one night nearly two decades ago. Arkansas was also the first state to make such an attempt since a widely publicized botch in Oklahoma in 2014.

Arkansas hoped this month to resume executions by carrying out eight death sentences in 11 days, an unprecedented schedule that has been thwarted by court orders blocking half of those lethal injections. State officials then shifted their focus to carrying out the remaining executions on the schedule.

Jack H. Jones Jr. and Marcel W. Williams, both of whom have been on Arkansas death row since being convicted of brutal murders two decades ago, unsuccessfully sought to delay their lethal injections at a state prison southeast of Little Rock.

Both appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which rejected their requests Monday afternoon and evening. Jones was executed first. Williams was scheduled to follow not long after, but his lethal injection was postponed while his lawyers argued in federal court that Jone’s execution was botched. Both men had said their medical issues presented complications to the executions, which involve injections of three drugs.

The Supreme Court first denied Jones’s request for a stay about an hour before the executions were set to begin at 7 p.m. Monday in Arkansas. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., who is assigned cases from the federal circuit covering Arkansas, referred the request to the full court, which denied it without explanation; Justice Sonia Sotomayor was the only member of the court to register a dissent.

Jones was pronounced dead at 7:20 p.m., 14 minutes after his lethal injection got underway, according to the Associated Press, which had a reporter serve as a media witness. He delivered a last statement expressing remorse.

Arkansas inmates Jack Jones, left, and Marcel Williams. (Arkansas Department of Correction via AP)

Williams’s appeal was still pending when Jones’s execution ended, but not long after, the justices denied the stay request. Again, no explanation was given and Sotomayor was the only justice to note a dissent.

While the Supreme Court’s decision to reject Williams’s requests seemingly meant that the second execution could proceed as planned, that was quickly cast into doubt after a federal judge issued a temporary stay later Monday night.

U.S. District Judge Kristine Baker issued the order indefinitely delaying Williams’s execution after his attorneys filed a motion seeking a stay, arguing that Jones’s “execution appeared to be torturous and inhumane.” Baker later issued an order denying the motion and lifting the stay after a hearing was held.

In the motion, Williams’s attorneys, noting that he shared medical issues with Jones, said corrections staff struggled to insert a central line into Jones’s neck. The attorneys said that corrections officials did not wait five minutes, as required by the execution policy, after the injection began to check and make sure Jones was unconscious after the sedative was administered. They also alleged that Jones was still “moving his lips and gulping for air” after five minutes had elapsed.

One media witness says Jones’s “lips did move, but only very briefly at the very start of the process.” According to the Associated Press, its reporter who witnessed Jones’s execution said that the inmate moved his lips briefly after the sedative was first administered and noted that officials put a tongue depressor in his mouth intermittently during the first few minutes. The AP reporter also said Jones’s chest stopped moving two minutes after they checked his consciousness.

Under the Arkansas lethal-injection protocol, state officials must check to make sure inmates are unconscious at least five minutes after the sedative is injected. If they remain conscious, officials are then directed to inject a second dose of the sedative.

Williams’s attorneys say in their filing that he did not agree to have a central line inserted, and warned that their client’s execution could be “even more torturous” than Jones’s.

State officials filed a short response pushing back on these assertions about the IV and the execution, calling them “inaccurate” and “utterly baseless.”

“The claim that Jones was moving his lips and gulping for air is unsupported by press accounts or the accounts of other witnesses,” the Arkansas response stated. “The drugs were administered to Jones at 7:06 p.m. and he was pronounced dead at 7:20 p.m. There was no constitutional violation in Jones’ execution.”

After Baker lifted her stay, Williams’s execution proceeded, and he was pronounced dead at 10:33 p.m. after a 17-minute lethal injection, the Associated Press reported.

After both executions were finished, Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R) — who scheduled the lethal injections and did not issue a statement following the execution last week — said that “the rule of law was upheld” and “justice has prevailed.”

In a statement after Jones’s execution, Hutchinson said that the “victim’s family has waited patiently for justice” for two decades. After Williams’s execution, Hutchinson thanked the victim’s family for their patience and said “in this case our laws ended in justice.”

 

The lethal injections in Arkansas were planned as part of a schedule that would have been without parallel in modern capital punishment. Hutchinson set eight executions to occur in pairs — back-to-back on four nights spread out over last week and this week — and while most executions occur with little public notice, the timetable in Arkansas drew unusual attention and some criticism.

Attorneys for the inmates filed a volley of appeals seeking to delay the executions, while two dozen former corrections officials wrote a letter to Hutchinson asking him to reconsider the schedule. They warned that the schedule was “needlessly exacerbating the strain and stress placed on” the people carrying it out and saying the timetable could “increase the chance of an error occurring.”

Arkansas officials defended this schedule as necessary because their stock of midazolam, a common sedative that has provoked controversy after some executions and is one of three products used in the state’s executions, expires at the end of April. Due to an ongoing shortage of lethal injection drugs, Arkansas authorities say they are not sure if more can be obtained. Leslie Rutledge (R), the state’s attorney general, pledged to fight attempts to delay the remaining executions, saying that “families have waited far too long to see justice.”

As the execution dates approached, both sides engaged in a multifaceted legal battle, with death-row inmates and Arkansas officials appealing to state and federal courts. Drug companies also weighed in, unsuccessfully asking judges to prevent the state from using their products, which at least one company suggested was obtained through dishonest means.

Death-row inmates in Arkansas also appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court as a group, but those requests have been rebuffed, most recently Monday, when the high court denied a request to rehear a case from Arkansas inmates that the justices had already denied. No explanations were given, though Justice Sotomayor said she would have granted the petitions in that case.

The lethal injections planned Monday come just four days after Arkansas resumed executions, carrying out the death sentence for Ledell Lee after the Supreme Court declined stay requests.

Last week, the Arkansas Supreme Court blocked the first two executions on the schedule, and another execution planned for the same night as Lee’s was stayed. Another execution is planned for Thursday night, while a second originally set that night was stayed this month by a federal judge.

While two executions per night had been the original plan in Arkansas, Jones and Williams appear to be the only two who will actually be put to death under the back-to-back scheduling.

Jones, 52, was sentenced to death in 1996 for raping and killing Mary Phillips. According to court records, Jones stalked and killed Phillips, a bookkeeper, and before killing her, he beat her 11-year-old daughter so severely that police thought she was dead when they got to the scene.

The Arkansas Department of Correction’s Cummins Unit prison, where executions occur. (Kelly P. Kissel/AP)

Jones’s attorneys have argued in court that he has medical conditions that could result in the Arkansas execution method causing him severe pain, according to court records. In a filing, his attorneys said Jones has diabetes, hypertension and several other conditions that cause him to be on medication that could bring intense or painful suffering because of a possible tolerance to the sedative used in the lethal injection.

State officials argue that Jones’s challenge involves “guesswork” about the sedative and “is no different than the many lethal-injection challenges” he has filed before. Baker, the federal judge, denied that motion Friday, saying Jones’s case did not show “a significant possibility” that the lethal injection process could cause that pain and suffering.

After Jones was executed, Rutledge, the attorney general, released a statement saying she hoped this helped Phillips’s family.

“This evening, Lacey Phillips Manor and Darla Phillips Jones have seen justice for the brutal rape and murder of their mother, Mary Phillips,” Rutledge said in a statement. After detailing the case, Rutledge added: “The Phillips family has waited far too long to see justice carried out, and I pray they find peace tonight.”

Williams, 46, was sentenced to death in 1997 for abducting, robbing, raping and killing Stacy Errickson, who was 22 and was living at the Little Rock Air Force Base while her husband was serving overseas. Arkansas officials, in court filings opposing a stay in his case, said he forced her at gunpoint to take cash from ATMs before raping, beating and strangling her.

Attorneys for Williams have argued in court filings that he had poor counsel during his trial in both his guilt and penalty phases, which they said meant he was sentenced to death despite the jury not hearing any mitigating evidence arguing against the death penalty.

In another filing, they pointed to health issues, saying he weighs 400 pounds and suffers from several medical maladies that meant the planned lethal injection “was more likely to maim than kill him.” His attorneys argued for stays on both counts, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit rejected both requests on Friday.

Rutledge said she felt the execution provided justice for Errickson’s family and friends.

“I hope that tonight’s lawful execution brings much-needed peace to all of Stacy’s loved ones, particularly her now-adult children Brittany and Bryan,” she said in a statement.

The Arkansas Supreme Court rejected stay requests from both men. The 8th Circuit, which had denied an appeal filed by the eight inmates facing execution that challenged the Arkansas method of execution, also denied another challenge Friday that was filed by some of the inmates — including Williams, but not Jones — and focused on the state’s clemency procedures.

The double execution was the country’s first since August 2000. Texas was in the midst of carrying out 40 death sentences that year, the most for any state in a single year since the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty in 1976, according to the Washington-based Death Penalty Information Center. (Executions nationwide have fallen since that time, and last year, 20 death sentences were carried out nationwide.)

Before the double execution in 2000, the first inmate’s last words were an admonition against racism targeting black people, according to records kept by Texas corrections officials. He then said, “Let’s do it.” The second inmate apologized to his victim and his family before saying, “I am ready. I love you all.”

Arkansas is not the first state to plan a double execution since then. Perhaps the most highly publicized botched lethal injection in recent memory occurred the last time a state tried carrying out two executions in one night.

In 2014, Oklahoma authorities attempted to execute Clayton Lockett, a convicted murderer, in the first of two lethal injections planned that night. They bungled the process: Lockett writhed and grimaced on the gurney, prompting the execution to be called off, and he died 43 minutes after it began. (The second execution scheduled for that night was delayed; when it was carried out months later, Oklahoma officials used the wrong lethal injection drug. The state has yet to resume executions.)

Officials in Oklahoma later blamed that bungled execution on a misplaced IV. In a state review, officials involved in the process said the back-to-back scheduling added to the stress they felt.

This story, first published at 4:58 p.m. Monday, has been updated repeatedly with news from Arkansas. 

Further reading:

Executions and death sentences declined last year in the U.S.

After divided Supreme Court allows Alabama execution, inmate heaves and coughs during lethal injection

 The state Supreme Court justice who stepped down to protest the death penalty