Rusty Lee, 34, and his wife, Tierra Jolly, 34, have a two-month-old daughter, Rocket Josephine Lee, who was born with Down syndrome and a heart defect. (Sarah L. Voisin/The Washington Post)

Millions of Americans of all ages and needs would be affected if Republicans in Congress succeed in overhauling major parts of the Affordable Care Act. And the latest maneuvering is only intensifying concerns.

But with Senate GOP leaders trying to retool parts of their bill — which was pulled back this week after support for a fast vote eroded — it isn’t easy sussing out exactly how an individual might benefit or lose. Would an uninsured home-care worker in Ohio get a tax credit that would make private health coverage affordable? Would the big changes envisioned for Medicaid funding cut out a New Mexico house painter with emphysema? What about the medical services a young West Virginia boy might require for the rest of his life?

Those with health care on the line are thinking a lot about the future, many with real anxiety. Here are some of their stories.

Tierra Jolly touches her daughter’s foot as husband Rusty Lee cradles 2-month-old Rocket. Given the child’s significant congenital health issues, the couple hope to get Medicaid coverage for her. (Sarah L. Voisin/The Washington Post)

The Affordable Care Act mandates are “a waste of time,” says Dave Ratner, a business owner who nonetheless supports providing health care to most employees. (Courtesy of Dave Ratner)

Elizabeth Alcorn has health issues and concerns that she and her husband won’t be able to get insurance coverage in the future. (Norm Shafer/For The Washington Post)

Elizabeth Alcorn and her husband, Gerald Corridon (Norm Shafer/For The Washington Post)

Christine Ferguson focuses these days on her 5-month-old daughter, Reanna, and the treatment that is helping her stay off drugs. (Courtesy of Christine Ferguson)

Cheryl Kinsey gets a kiss from her son, Jensen, in between his play on the family’s trampoline. Kinsey stresses over the family’s future health-insurance options — and costs. (Tammy Shriver/Times West Virginian)

Jensen Kinsey still has significant health conditions stemming from his premature birth. (Family photo)

Eric Jette, right, standing with a friend last winter, has health coverage for the first time in years because of the Affordable Care Act. (Courtesy of Eric Jette)

Dante Ficeti became uninsured when he surpassed the age limit for his parents’ health plan. He hopes Senate Republicans eliminate the Affordable Care Act penalty for going without coverage. (Dustin Franz)

The first tweet contained the typical name-calling fare from President Trump, the kind of attacks that no longer surprise most people — labeling MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” as “poorly rated” and calling its hosts “low I.Q. Crazy Mika” and “Psycho Joe.”

But the second tweet, landing about six minutes later, caused an immediate and sustained uproar, as it contained a deeply personal and vulgar attack on Mika Brzezinski.

“She was bleeding badly from a face-lift,” the president tweeted Thursday morning, claiming that months earlier, Brzezinski and co-host Joe Scarborough tried to spend time with him at his private club in Florida. “I said no!”

Those words amounted to perhaps the most caustic insult that Trump has publicly hurled at another American since taking office, going beyond his usual name-calling and flame-throwing. More than three dozen Republicans and Democrats in Congress issued tweets of their own expressing disgust, calling the remark “unpresidential,” “vile, sexist and unbecoming of an American leader,” “divisive,” “unhinged and shameful” and “amazingly graceless.” Even some of the president’s close allies warned that he needed to act like a president and stop getting into distracting fights.

And by going after a powerful female journalist’s appearance and mental health, Trump not only distracted the country from his legislative agenda for a full news cycle, but also added yet another data point to the argument that he treats women differently from men.

“It is really not normal that the president of the United States and the commander in chief would be tweeting about somebody’s face,” said Liz Mair, a longtime Republican strategist and critic of the president. “It does not conform with the norms that we expect and we treat as pretty set in stone in this country, but it’s also just strange.”

[Trump’s Mika tweet underscores a dark reality: For him, it’s always about gender]

Trump’s staff quickly came to his defense, saying that Brzezinski and Scarborough have said far worse things about the president and his staff.

“Look, I don’t think you can expect someone to be personally attacked day after day, minute by minute, and sit back,” deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters at the White House. “Look, the American people elected a fighter. . . . They knew what they were getting when they voted for Donald Trump.”

Trump once had a chummy relationship with “Morning Joe,” regularly calling in for lengthy interviews, referring to Brzezinski and Scarborough as “supporters” and offering to officiate at their wedding. But the hosts have become increasingly critical. For months, Brzezinski has raised questions about the president’s psychological health, calling him “possibly unfit mentally” and saying that he is “such a narcissist, it’s possible that he is mentally ill in a way.”

On Thursday morning, Brzezinski said that if someone took over NBC and acted as Trump has — “tweeting wildly about people’s appearances, bullying people, talking about people in the competition, lying every day, undermining his managers” — that “there would be concern that perhaps the person who runs the company is out of his mind.”

Sanders pointed to such rhetoric in her defense of Trump. “The things that this show has called him — and not just him, but numerous members of his staff, including myself and many others,” Sanders said. “It’s kind of like we’re living in the Twilight Zone. They do this day after day after day, and then the president responds and defends himself, and everybody is appalled and blown away.”

[‘Mr. President, please grow up:’ Lawmakers slam Trump’s shocking Mika Brzezinski tweets]

Later in the day, Sanders’s father, former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, said in a Fox News Channel interview that the president “makes my daughter’s job very difficult with tweets like that.”

Less than half an hour after Trump fired off the tweet, Brzezinski responded by tweeting a photo of a Cheerios cereal box including the caption: “Made for Little Hands.” The message seemed to be aimed at mocking the size of the president’s hands — a sensitive topic for Trump that has dogged him for decades and even came up during a GOP presidential debate.

Mark Kornblau, the NBCUniversal News Group’s senior vice president for communications, tweeted: “Never imagined a day when I would think to myself, ‘it is beneath my dignity to respond to the President of the United States.’ ” The company later released a statement saying: “It’s a sad day for America when the president spends his time bullying, lying and spewing petty personal attacks instead of doing his job.”

The tweet marked a new low in presidential history, said Douglas Brinkley, a presidential historian at Rice University.

“We make a big deal that Harry Truman told off a newspaper critic for writing a bad review of his daughter’s music concert,” he said. “How G-rated is that compared to what Donald Trump has done?”

Dozens of lawmakers from both parties, activists, political pundits and others rushed to condemn the president’s comments. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) tweeted: “This has to stop — we all have a job — 3 branches of gov’t and media. We don’t have to get along, but we must show respect and civility.”

The tweets also came up in news conferences and interviews on Capitol Hill, where most lawmakers would have much rather discussed immigration and health-care legislation.

“Obviously, I don’t see that as an appropriate comment,” House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) said during a news conference. “What we’re trying to do around here is improve the civility and tone of the debate, and this obviously does not do that.”

Nicolle Wallace, an MSNBC host who was George W. Bush’s communications chief, used her Thursday afternoon show to urge women working in the White House to “go on the record and condemn your boss’s comments.” She challenged the women who are defending Trump and asked how mothers can raise their sons to be “good men if the most powerful man in the world gets away with this.”

“As someone who once proudly called myself a Republican, the party will be permanently associated with misogyny if leaders don’t step up and demand a retraction,” Wallace said.

Laura Ingraham, the conservative commentator who has considered working in Trump’s administration, tweeted: “MESSAGE DISCIPLINE!” She added that the White House should have spent Thursday focused on two immigration-related bills that passed in the House and “not cable TV hosts.”

Bill O’Reilly, a former Fox News personality and a longtime friend of Trump, said on Ingraham’s radio show that the president is undermining his own message. “It’s kind of discouraging for Americans who want important things to get done to be sidetracked by something like this,” he said.

[How Trump’s relationship with ‘Morning Joe’ went downhill]

The president claimed in his tweets that Brzezinski and Scarborough tried to spend time with him at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Fla., over three days around New Year’s Eve. The two were spotted by journalists at Trump’s New Year’s Eve party at the private club, and Scarborough said at the time that they were there to set up an interview with the president-elect. A routine-looking photo of Brzezinski from that night circulated on Twitter on Thursday showing her smiling broadly.

The president’s tweet was reminiscent of other comments that he made about women on the campaign trail — including his rival, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, whom he accused of not looking presidential and lacking the “stamina” needed for the job. He made fun of GOP rival Carly Fiorina’s face; tweeted a side-by-side comparison of his wife and the wife of then-rival Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.); and lashed out at Megyn Kelly of Fox News, saying that she had “blood coming out of her whatever” as she questioned him about comments he had made about women during a debate. Since becoming president, Trump has also continued to call Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) “Pocahontas” in mocking a controversy over her ancestry.

Although Trump has boasted about the level of support he has received from female voters, he is much more popular among men. Many of the protests during his presidency have been led by women, including hundreds of thousands who rallied in cities around the world the day after his inauguration for the Women’s March.

For Republicans who opposed Trump during the campaign, the episode has felt like a sickening moment of “I told you so,” Mair said.

“Personally, that’s a pretty demoralizing feeling,” Mair said. “A lot of people hoped that things would be different once he got into the office, but the guy’s been on this earth for seven decades. You can’t really change his behavior after all that.”

As of Thursday evening, Trump’s wife and daughters had not publicly reacted.

Stephanie Grisham, a spokeswoman for the first lady, referred reporters to comments that Melania Trump made on the campaign trail about her husband needing to defend himself. At an April 2016 rally in Milwaukee, she said: “When you attack him, he will punch back 10 times harder. No matter who you are, a man or a woman, he treats everyone equal.”

Scottie Nell Hughes was among the few female defenders to appear on national television in October after The Washington Post unearthed an “Access Hollywood” video that featured Donald Trump bragging about groping women without their permission. Hughes said Thursday that it is “definitely a struggle” for his supporters to defend him in such cases.

“I personally would never attack a woman and her looks, and I don’t like that at all,” said Hughes, who is now the spokeswoman for a pro-Trump political action committee, the Committee to Defend the President. “But America wanted a fighter, and that’s why we elected him, he’s fighting back — not exactly how I would choose to do it, but he’s defending himself.”

Paul Farhi contributed to this report.

For a video, go to wapo.st/trumpattack

With Breanne Deppisch and Joanie Greve

THE BIG IDEA: To win the House majority in the midterms, Democrats will need to make big gains with suburban voters, defend incumbents in rural districts where President Trump remains popular, topple a handful of Republicans in the Sun Belt and probably win a handful of seats that still aren’t on anyone’s radar.

The opposition party needs to win 24 seats to take control of the House in 2018. Understandably, operatives and handicappers have focused on the 23 districts that Republicans hold, which voted for Hillary Clinton last year. But some of the incumbents are very popular, with brands that are distinct from Trump’s, and they are unlikely to lose no matter how bad the headwinds become.

In other words, it’s inconceivable that Democrats run the table in those 23 districts. Even if they did, they’d still be one short. And Democrats must defend 12 seats in districts that Trump carried in 2016.

Third Way did a deep dive to try to understand what the 2018 playing field will look like. The center-left think tank focused on 65 “Majority Makers,” the battlegrounds where a majority would most likely be won. Using 48 Census data points, two experts from the moderate group looked at variables such as how many people moved into a district over the past year, what percentage of residents have access to broadband Internet and how many houses are vacant.

They divided the swing districts into four categories: Thriving Suburban Communities, Left Behind Areas, Diverse/Fast-Growing Regions, and Non-Conformist Districts. Their report, shared first with The Daily 202, includes a rich data set (in a downloadable Excel file) so you can play around with the metrics for yourself.

The 65 swing districts identified in the report are sorted into four categories. (Courtesy of Third Way)

The numbers underscore how different even the 23 GOP-held Clinton districts are demographically. Many are suburban and overwhelmingly white. Others are rural and heavily Latino. Within the broad categories, there are stark differences on income, educational attainment and employment rates. More than half of adults in New Jersey’s 7th District, for example, graduated from college. Only 17 percent in California’s 10th District did.

“The most important takeaway is that there is no one kind of voter or district that can deliver the House for Democrats in 2018,” said Lanae Erickson Hatalsky, the vice president for social policy and politics at Third Way. “There’s been a lot of focus on suburban districts. There’s no doubt that those are important, but there are not enough of them to win the House.”

Hatalsky, who co-authored the report with Ryan Pougiales, emphasized that Democrats still would not win the House even if they could get every single 2016 Clinton voter who backed a Republican House candidate to turn out again in 2018 and cross over.

“You can’t get to a House majority without winning over Trump voters,” she said. “There are some people who definitely want to believe that they can because they still don’t know how to deal with Trump voters and are intimidated by the idea of appealing to them.”

Third Way’s new study is an interesting contribution to the debate that’s now raging among elite Democrats about what the party’s theory of the case should be going into 2018. It may seem early to some, but this is prime candidate recruitment season. Decisions that will be made in the coming weeks about who the Democratic establishment coalesces behind could make the difference 16 months from now between whether Nancy Pelosi retires, stays on as House minority leader or becomes speaker again.

National Democrats have lurched to the left in recent years. Clinton felt she needed to become more liberal during the 2016 primaries to fend off an unexpectedly robust challenge from Bernie Sanders, a septuagenarian socialist from Vermont, and reactivate the unenthusiastic coalition that powered Barack Obama’s two victories. Even Bill Clinton found himself on the defensive over his third-way roots.

Hardcore progressives have been the loudest voices in the debate over the party’s future since November. The tea-party-like “resistance” movement that has erupted in response to Trump has put growing pressure on elected Democrats to call for a new era of big government by embracing proposals like single-payer health care, a $15 national minimum wage and tuition-free college.

There is palpable concern among moderate Democrats that the party will squander precious pick-up opportunities in the midterms, and even allow Trump to get reelected in 2020, by nominating unelectable liberals. One episode that gives credence to their fears: When House Democrats went to their February retreat in Baltimore, several progressive groups protested that a Third Way executive was even invited to speak about how the party could find its way out of the wilderness.

Third Way believes Democrats must embrace ideological diversity to take back legislative seats that were lost during the Obama era at the federal and state level. “There are a lot of different kinds of candidates and policies we’re going to have to welcome into the coalition to win,” Hatalsky said. “There’s no single kind of candidate that would resonate in all these places. The idea of purification – that we just need one kind of person who is going to bring us the majority – is not borne out by how different these places look. … The upshot from our perspective is that we need an all-of-the-above strategy. We need to take a wider look at the kinds of candidates you need and the sort of agenda to address.”

When I spoke by phone yesterday afternoon with Hatalsky, she was between interviews with voters in the Little Havana neighborhood of Miami. It’s part of a national tour that she has embarked on to better understand the dynamics in GOP-held Clinton districts and Democratic-held Trump districts. Little Havana is in the heart of a Florida district that has been represented by retiring Republican Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen since 1989. Clinton won there by more than 20 points.

“Both in thriving suburban communities and fast growing diverse regions, these folks are mostly not in poverty,” Hatalsky said. “They’re in the growing middle class. They see their fortunes rising. They have different perspectives about how the economy impacts their life. They’re not looking for more safety nets. They’re looking for more opportunities.”

WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING:

— A cardinal in charge of the Vatican’s finances has been charged with multiple sexual offenses by Australian police, in one of the most significant indictments against a top-ranking leader of the Catholic Church. From Julie Zauzmer: “Cardinal George Pell faces multiple charges of ‘historical sexual assault offenses’” the Australian criminal justice system’s term for offenses committed in the past, Victoria Police Deputy Commissioner Shane Patton announced at a news conference on Thursday morning in Australia. Victoria police notified Pell’s legal representative that he has been charged and must appear in court on July 18. … In the Vatican, Pell’s job as secretariat of the economy is so crucial that it has been described as the second-most-powerful role in Rome, after only the pope. But for years, he has faced accusations of improper behavior connected with clergy sexual abuse in Australia.”

— “The Trump administration has set new criteria for visa applicants from six mainly Muslim nations and all refugees that require a ‘close’ family or business tie to the United States,” AP’s Matthew Lee reports. “Visas that have already been approved will not be revoked, but instructions issued by the State Department Wednesday said that new applicants from Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Iran and Yemen must prove a relationship with a parent, spouse, child, adult son or daughter, son-in-law, daughter-in-law or sibling already in the United States to be eligible. The same requirement, with some exceptions, holds for would-be refugees from all nations that are still awaiting approval for admission to the U.S. … As far as business or professional links are concerned, the State Department said a legitimate relationship must be ‘formal, documented and formed in the ordinary course rather than for the purpose of evading’ the ban.”

GET SMART FAST:​​

1. DHS officials announced enhanced security measures for all U.S.-bound international flights, declining to embrace a proposal to ban laptops and other electronic devices, at least temporarily, on the condition that airlines and airports comply with new rules. Authorities did to offer specifics about the changes, citing security concerns, but said they could include “enhanced screening” of electronic devices and increased security protocols in certain areas of the airport. (Lori Aratani)
2. A special agent for the FBI’s elite hostage rescue team was indicted and accused of trying to cover up the firing of gunshots during a standoff last year with a member of the armed group occupying an Oregon wildlife refuge. While the indictment does not accuse the agent of shooting the occupier, it serves as a public black eye for the FBI group, which has been described by the bureau as “unparalleled” in its law enforcement capabilities. (Leah Sottile and Mark Berman)
3. The Mormon Church said it will begin offering paid maternity and parental leave to its full-time employees and will relax its dress code to allow women to wear pants. The shift is a surprising and significant move from the institution, known for its highly traditional views on family and gender. (Sarah Pulliam Bailey)
4. UPS notified more than 70,000 of its nonunion employees this week that it plans to freeze their pensions, joining a growing group of other large employers that have begun moving away from the defined benefit plans. (Jonnelle Marte)
5. An Ohio city council member frustrated by the ballooning opioid epidemic in his town has proposed a cost-saving but deeply controversial plan — simply denying services to repeat overdosers. Under his proposal, addicts would be treated with a “three-strikes” policy — each accompanied by a community service mandate or other punishment — and on the third strike, those who phoned 911 for an ambulance would be told “no.” (Cleve R. Wootson Jr.)
6. Outgoing Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) will join Fox News as a contributor. The longtime Oversight Committee chairman will begin his work at the network on July 1, one day after he is slated to resign from Congress. (Politico)
7. In an interesting and politically symbolic break from tradition, far-left members of the French parliament have decided to stop wearing ties. The sartorial scandal comes as members of the small coalition seek to brand themselves as members of the working-class — though critics have slammed the movement as insulting. (Adam Taylor) 
8. Mohammed bin Nayef, who was recently deposed as crown prince of Saudi Arabia, has been confined to his palace. He is also barred from leaving the kingdom. (The New York Times)
9. A 19-year-old “vlogger” was arrested after she accidentally shot and killed her boyfriend during a failed YouTube stunt. The woman, who is pregnant, told police that her boyfriend had wanted to film her shooting a book as he was holding it — erroneously believing that the book would stop the bullet. (BuzzFeed News)
10. Scientists are baffled by the giant clusters of “sea pickles” that have recently started washing ashore in the Pacific Northwest, sometimes by the thousands and in sizes up to two feet long. The gelatinous, bumpy-looking creatures have infuriated fishermen, who say they’ve clogged nets and thwarted profits — but scientists studying the phenomenon say warmer ocean temperatures could be to blame. (Lindsey Bever)
11. A wrestler who goes by the name “Progressive Liberal” has become the most hated character in Kentucky’s Appalachian Mountain Wrestling program. He has taunted crowds by insulting the president and suggesting that Bernie Sanders would make a good secretary of state. (Travis M. Andrews)
12. An ethics commissioner is under fire in Connecticut after he mistook a local woman for the sex worker he had ordered online. The woman and her boyfriend, who was nearby, both apparently feared that the commissioner would assault her in a dispute over money, so they each used pepper spray against him. (Connecticut Post)
13. Travelers in China were less than thrilled to find out the five-hour delay on their airplane was caused not by inclement weather or a routine scheduling issue — but rather, an 80-year-old woman who was tossing coins at the plane for good luck. A handful got stuck in the engine, inspectors said, and though the woman’s tossed change only amounted to 25 U.S. cents, the total cost of delay and engine inspection it caused could total more than $140,000. (Amy B Wang)

HEALTH-CARE LATEST:

— After the Senate’s original bill failed to even reach the debating stage, Mitch McConnell now hopes to send the CBO a new version by Friday. Sean Sullivan, Juliet Eilperin and Kelsey Snell report: “The effort reflects the tight timeline McConnell faces in his attempt to hold a vote in July — and the pressure he is under to change the bill to garner enough support to pass it. … Some [Republican] members questioned McConnell’s handling of the issue — an unusual public rebuke of a leader who managed to preserve his party’s control of the upper chamber despite a stiff challenge from Democrats in last year’s elections … McConnell spent most of the afternoon in closed-door talks with GOP moderates who appear open to negotiation … McConnell is trying to move quickly to produce a new CBO score by the time lawmakers return to Washington in mid-July. That would give the Senate about two weeks to fulfill the majority leader’s goal of voting before the August recess.”

— Sean, Juliet, Kelsey and Bob Costa also have a great ticktock on how the Senate bill failed to reach the floor — at least for this week: “Nearly everyone [at the huddle with Trump] Tuesday had a different take on the meeting, reflecting the Republican divide amid the struggle to fulfill a signature party promise. White House officials and Trump loyalists saw a president diving in to patch up strife and save legislation that had been curbed in the Senate. Some seasoned senators, however, saw a president unable to grasp policy details or the obstacles ahead.” A comment from the president during the meeting also alarmed some senators: “‘This will be great if we get it done. And if we don’t get it done, it’s just going to be something that we’re not going to like,’ Trump told the room … To a number of [senators present], Trump’s remark had the same ring as his comment a week earlier about the House’s health bill being ‘mean.’ His enthusiasm, to them, was debatable.”

— The Senate majority leader’s failure to rally his caucus enough to pass the original version of the bill has called into question his image as a legislative wizard. Paul Kane writes: « If they can’t [repeal Obamacare], it will be a humbling defeat for a Senate leader who thrives on his ability to play the behind-the-scenes game. It illustrates how, 10 years after taking over as Republican leader, McConnell still struggles to corral his caucus and how this has left something missing in his legacy: a sweeping rewrite of big policy along the lines of revamping the health-care system. … Certainly, McConnell’s recent history is filled with important accomplishments. But time and again they involved crunching numbers and splitting the differences with Democrats on the other side of the table … Health care is bigger than just a few billion dollars here or there, and McConnell is struggling to find that sweet spot.”

— As McConnell attempts to craft a new version of the bill, some moderate Republicans are suggesting he reconsider a certain tax cut for wealthy Americans. Bloomberg’s Sahil Kapur and Steven T. Dennis report: “Susan Collins of Maine and Mike Rounds of South Dakota both criticized the draft bill released by McConnell for repealing a surtax on net investment income imposed under Obamacare … A third Republican, Bob Corker of Tennessee, expressed discomfort with the idea of cutting taxes on the rich while transferring burdens on the poor. Scaling back the tax cuts could provide a path to winning over key moderate senators who have recoiled at the soaring premiums and deductibles for millions of low-income people as scored by the CBO … Meanwhile, conservatives have pushed to wipe out all of the taxes.”

— The tight timeline has led at least one Republican senator, David Perdue of Georgia, to publicly call for the August recess to be canceled in an op-ed for The Daily Signal.

— Although the president has not been very hands-on in crafting the bill, he promised a “big surprise” yesterday. “‘Health care is working along very well … We’re going to have a big surprise, » Trump told reporters at the White House. « We have a great health-care package. » Trump offered no details, only reiterating, « We’re going to have a great, great surprise. » (Abby Phillip)

— New polling shows that the bill is deeply unpopular. Jessica Taylor reports on an NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll: “Just 17 percent of those surveyed say they approve of the Senate’s health care plan, the Better Care Reconciliation Act. Fifty-five percent say they disapprove, while about a quarter said they hadn’t heard enough about the proposal to have an opinion on it … While Democratic opposition to the bill, as expected, is high, GOP support for the Senate GOP’s plan is very soft. Twenty-one percent of Republicans oppose the bill and just 35 percent support it. Sixty-eight percent of independents also oppose the proposed legislation.”

— The bill’s unpopularity has put Republican gubernatorial candidates in a tough spot. John Wagner and Fenit Nirappil report: “In Virginia, Republican gubernatorial nominee Ed Gillespie is getting peppered with questions on the campaign trail about President Trump’s efforts on health care, and he has declined to take a clear position. In Maryland, Gov. Larry Hogan (R), who is up for reelection next year, says health-care plans being advanced by the Republican Congress ‘do not work’ for his state, but he is still getting badgered by Democrats to speak out more forcefully against Trump. And in Illinois, Gov. Bruce Rauner (R) is taking flak for saying he still needs time to study the GOP bills. »

Vladimir Putin stands with an unidentified intelligence officer during a meeting yesterday in the headquarters of the Foreign Intelligence Service in Moscow. Putin attended a meeting marking the 95th anniversary of the Russian Foreign Intelligence’s so-called “illegal” section, which oversees agents working undercover abroad. (Pool photo by Mikhail Klimentyev via AP)

THERE’S A BEAR IN THE WOODS:

— White House advisers have struggled to convince the president that Russia remains a threat to the United States, CNN’s Sara Murray and Dana Bash report: “One intelligence official said the intelligence community continues to brief Trump on Russia’s meddling in the election as new information comes to light. The source said the President appears no less engaged on issues surrounding Russian election meddling than on any other matters covered in the presidential daily brief … Some in Trump’s own party believe he hasn’t done enough to repudiate Russia’s actions and are pushing him to back a sanctions package Congress is considering … The President doesn’t differentiate between investigations into Russian election meddling and investigations into potential collusion between Trump campaign associates and Russia … The President’s muted interest in election interference stands in stark contrast to the collusion investigation, which has consumed his attention.”

— The new Russia and Iran sanctions still haven’t passed through Congress. Senate Democrats refused to approve technical changes to the bill, prompting Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker to call them “Russia’s best friend.” Karoun Demirjian reports: “Senate Democrats do not trust that House Republican leaders will put the measure on the floor in its current form … Many of them suspect House leaders are using the procedural complaint as a delaying tactic or an excuse to alter the bill in deference to President Trump, whose administration opposes the measure … The measure is controversial for the White House because of a provision giving Congress the right to review any attempts the president makes to change the Russia sanctions before he can go ahead … It’s in that section of the bill that the House’s technical complaint arose — and although members of both parties say they have found an acceptable fix, some Democrats are still suspicious.”

— The Senate Armed Services Committee called for new measures to counter adversarial Russian actions abroad, including the establishment of new offensive ground-based missile program, a prohibition on the Defense Department using a Russian company’s computer software, and a requirement that the Pentagon report to lawmakers about Russian hybrid warfare. Dan Lamothe reports: “The committee’s version of the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act, approved Wednesday night, also included $500 million to provide Ukraine with security assistance — including lethal weapons — against Russian-backed separatists. And it extends existing prohibitions on the Pentagon cooperating directly with the Russia military. … Additionally, the committee approved $4.6 billion for the Pentagon’s European Deterrence Initiative, which seeks to bolster security along Europe’s eastern flank. Some $100 million of that will support a joint program in which the Pentagon is helping Baltic nations to ‘improve their resilience against and build their capacity to deter Russian aggression.’”

— “A provision in a Senate spending bill that is likely to become law would bar the Defense Department from doing business with Kaspersky Lab, the Russian cyber-security company whose employees were interviewed at their homes this week by FBI agents,” NBC’s Ken Dilanian and Tom Winter report: “In recent months, U.S. intelligence officials have expressed concerns that the company is a security risk, without specifying the basis of those concerns. Last month, Sen. Marco Rubio … asked the chiefs of the NSA, [CIA], FBI and three other intelligence agencies during a hearing whether they would be comfortable using Kaspersky products. Each said no. FBI agents on Tuesday paid visits to at least a dozen employees of Kaspersky … Its billionaire owner, Eugene Kaspersky, has close ties to some Russian intelligence figures … Kaspersky Lab [also] paid former national security adviser Michael Flynn $11,250 in 2015 for cyber-security consulting.”

— The Senate Intelligence Committee reached an agreement to receive memos written by James Comey detailing his interactions with Trump. Politico’s Austin Wright reports: “It had been an open question whether Congress would get access to the memos, which several committees in both the House and Senate have demanded to see. Comey, who testified before Burr’s panel earlier this month, kept detailed memos about his meetings with Trump, including one in which he says Trump expressed a desire for the FBI to drop its investigation into [Flynn].” “I’ve got a commitment,” Burr said when asked whether his panel would get access to the documents. Asked who gave him that commitment, the senator responded: “I’m not going to tell you.” He said he is “fairly certain of the timeline” for getting the memos and suggested it would be soon. “It does us no good later,” he quipped.

— The AP’s Eric Tucker and Chad Day profile Abbe Lowell, the high-profile Washington lawyer hired to represent Jared Kushner in the ongoing Russia probe: “Kushner has turned to one of the best-known trial lawyers in the nation’s capital and perhaps the country. His pick of Lowell suggests he’s bracing for lengthy government probes and wants in his corner someone with decades worth of experience confronting thorny and contentious congressional and Justice Department investigations. It also gives him a lawyer more seasoned in navigating Washington scandals than the members of Trump’s own legal team … Known for zealous public advocacy of his clients[,] … Lowell is also regarded among peers for aggressive cross-examination and strategic thinking. [And] he has said he adapts to the circumstances of every case he takes in how he handles the press and the public. ‘Sometimes you tune it out. Sometimes you channel it,’ he told Washington Lawyer.”

Rep. Dave Brat and Speaker Paul Ryan arrive for a House GOP conference meeting on Capitol Hill Tuesday. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images) 

THE CONGRESSIONAL AGENDA:

— Despite some Republican defections, the House narrowly passed a medical malpractice bill yesterday by a vote of 218 to 210. Kimberly Kindy reports: “The biggest point of contention was over a provision that places a cap of $250,000 on noneconomic damages awards to victims, which includes for pain and suffering. Nineteen Republicans voted against the bill, many of them citing this as a key reason, saying it would trample on states’ rights because it would take away their ability to establish their own laws on the matter … The caps would apply broadly to all manner of medical malpractice, including errors in surgery, side effects from unsafe drugs, abuse and neglect in nursing homes, and sexual assault by doctors. The issue will probably decrease the odds of the Senate taking up the measure, opponents and proponents of the measure said. The Senate has routinely declined to vote on previous tort measures passed by the House.”

— A decades-long congressional conflict could be nearing its resolution. Lawmakers are reaching a consensus on a bill to make the reports of the taxpayer-funded Congressional Research Service public. Mike DeBonis reports: “A draft report set to be adopted by the House Appropriations Committee on Thursday includes language ordering the CRS ‘to make available to the public, all non-confidential reports’ … This is the farthest CRS transparency efforts have advanced after a long push to make the agency’s reports more directly accessible to the public … Under current CRS policy, agency products are released only under limited circumstances, such as when a report is given to a federal agency after the agency provided data for analysis.”

Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.) waves as he arrives at a campaign event. (Steven Senne/AP)

THE MOST “THIS TOWN” STORY YOU’LL READ TODAY:

— The Boston Globe A1, “Seth Moulton seemed to be in Nancy Pelosi’s fan club. And then he wasn’t,” by Annie Linskey: “Over last Labor Day weekend, when Democrats were under the mistaken belief they would win the White House and Senate, Representative Seth Moulton sat down to pen a note that departed from his renegade brand. Three pages of gushing words to Nancy Pelosi, the House minority leader, thanking her. For everything. … After a devastating November election for Democrats … Moulton became a loud voice opposing Pelosi’s leadership, joining 62 other House insurgents who voted to replace her in November. Last week (after Georgia), Moulton again joined a band of House members demanding that Pelosi, 77, step aside. Loyalties in Washington are fluid, but even by the Capitol’s standards, Moulton’s change in posture is striking.” (Read the letter here.) 

THE PRESIDENT’S DOMESTIC AGENDA:

— “Trump on Wednesday highlighted what he called the dangers posed by illegal immigrants ahead of important House votes on two bills aimed at cracking down on those who commit crimes and cities that refuse to help deport them,” Mike DeBonis and David Nakamura report. “Appearing with families that were victimized by immigrants, Trump called on lawmakers to ‘honor grieving American families’ by sending the ‘lifesaving measures’ to his desk quickly. The House action marks the first major legislative test of tougher immigration laws under Trump … But several House conservatives — already frustrated that Trump has not acted more quickly to undo Obama’s executive immigration actions — lamented that it took so long into Trump’s presidency to get any immigration bills onto the House floor.”

— A report from The Post that 1,000 immigrant military recruits would have their enlistment contracts canceled, leaving them vulnerable to deportation, has three Democratic lawmakers leaning on Trump and the Pentagon. Alex Horton, who broke the story, reports: “Rep. Betty McCollum (D-Minn.) will propose an amendment to constrain the Pentagon from eliminating those contracts in an appropriations committee markup Thursday … ‘For the Defense Department to even consider terminating these contracts is a betrayal of people who want to serve the United States,’ McCollum [said] … Rep. Grace Meng (D-N.Y.) demanded personal assurances from Trump to step into the fray and block any potential forced removals … ‘I’m sad to see that with President Trump as commander in chief, even our military can’t be trusted to keep its promises,’ Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), an Army veteran wounded in combat, [said].”

— The acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Thomas Homan, was asked yesterday whether he agreed with the president’s campaign insinuation that undocumented immigrants are more likely to commit crimes. He suggested that they weren’t. Philip Bump reports: « Homan was describing a number of crimes that had been committed by immigrants in the United States and advocated for building a wall on the border with Mexico. ‘Aren’t you concerned, though, about exacerbating fears about undocumented immigrants?’ CNN’s Jim Acosta asked. ‘You’re making it sound as if undocumented immigrants commit more crimes than people who are just native-born Americans. What is your sense of the numbers on this? Are undocumented people more likely or less likely to commit crimes?’ Acosta asked. ‘Did I say aliens commit more crimes than U.S. citizens? I didn’t say that,’ Homan replied. »

— Southern Company announced that it would discontinue work on Mississippi power plant intended to showcase the possibilities of carbon capture and “clean coal.” Steven Mufson reports: “The Kemper plant, which has cost $7.5 billion so far, has been supplying customers with electricity by running on natural gas for three years, but its once-promising carbon capture and coal gasification technology has been $4 billion over budget and three years behind schedule. The plant was once held up as an example of promising technologies that could help fight climate change … Instead, Kemper has imposed financial burdens on tax payers and local households.”

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, flanked by Joint Chiefs Chairman Joseph Dunford,and Defense Undersecretary David Norquist, speaks to lawmakers. (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)

THE NEW WORLD ORDER:

— Defense Secretary Jim Mattis claimed Wednesday that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad backed down from plans for another possible chemical attack, speaking two days after the White House warned the regime would pay a “heavy price” for unleashing such an assault on its people. “They didn’t do it,” Mattis said. Thomas Gibbons-Neff reports: “Speaking to reporters aboard a flight to Brussels, the retired four star general gave few details to support the assertion that the Syrian military stepped back from [its] plans … Mattis’s remarks come a day after the Pentagon said it had seen ‘active preparations for chemical weapons use’ at Shayrat Airfield, the same place struck by more than 50 cruise missiles earlier this year. Mattis did not say if the Pentagon had seen activity elsewhere, but indicated that Assad’s chemical weapons program remains firmly intact despite his earlier pledges to dismantle it.” His remarks come just one week after a U.S. aircraft shot down a Syrian government jet that had bombed U.S.-backed fighters in the ISIS stronghold of Raqqa. Despite the recent spate of incidents, however, Mattis maintained Washington is completely focused on fighting Islamic State militants and reiterated that the U.S. refuses “to get drawn into the Syrian civil war.”

— And despite Trump’s frequent criticism of Obama’s plan to defeat ISIS, the one his administration is pushing currently looks « very much » like his predecessor’s approach. Karen DeYoung reports: “The Pentagon is putting the final touches on a promised new counter-Islamic State strategy for Syria and Iraq, and it looks very much like the one the Obama administration pursued … The core of the strategy is to deny territory to the militants and ultimately defeat them, and to stay out of Syria’s civil war … [but] the two fights in that country have come into increasingly close proximity in recent months, and there have been clashes. Military officials from [Jim Mattis] on down have emphasized in recent days that they are not looking for a fight with the regime or the Iranians. That has put them at odds with White House officials who have expressed concern about Iranian expansion.” 

— Trump has accepted an invitation from French President Emmanuel Macron to visit his country on July 14th for Bastille Day, where he will also attend an event commemorating the 100th anniversary of the U.S. entry into World War I. (Jenna Johnson)

— The announcement that the president would travel to Paris angered some in the United Kingdom, where Trump has yet to make his promised state visit. Adam Taylor reports: “Despite months of discussion, no trip has yet materialized. Some reports in the British press even suggested that the trip was canceled for now, though the White House later denied this … Some Brits expressed their frustration that Trump appeared likely to visit their neighbors across the channel first as their visit stalled … Generally, such sentiment appears strongest among right-wing and pro-Brexit Brits, but even some outsiders suggested the France trip could be a loss for Britain.”

— Tensions abound elsewhere in Europe, as well: Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross was abruptly cut off while remotely giving remarks to an economic conference in Germany this week. Philip Bump reports: “Ross was allotted 10 minutes to speak. After he spoke for more than 20, the conference organizers cut his feed mid-sentence. The audience ‘laughed and clapped’ in response … Merkel then rose and, during her remarks, disagreed with one of Ross’s points.”

— H.R. McMaster defended Trump’s strained relations with America’s European allies as “tough love” — insisting during a conference in Washington that the administration is actually making the NATO alliance “stronger.” Greg Jaffe reports: “His remarks drew a wry reply from his host and interviewer. ‘I can tell you they are not feeling very loved,’ [the host quipped]. … [McMaster pointed] to the more than $1 billion that the United States has spent in recent months to bolster NATO forces on the fringes of Europe … ‘I would just say, ‘Look at our actions,’’’ McMaster said.”

Rex Tillerson speaks to Trump during a meeting with leaders of the GCC. (Mandel Ngan/Getty)

FOGGY BOTTOM WATCH:

— Who is really running Trump’s foreign policy? Mark Perry’s new piece in the American Conservative suggests that it’s not Rex Tillerson: « After the blockade of Qatar was announced, Tillerson and Mattis were scrambling to undo the damage caused by Saudi action … Tillerson called on Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain and Egypt to ease their anti-Qatar blockade. The problem for Tillerson was that his statement was contradicted by [Trump] who, during a Rose Garden appearance on the same day, castigated Qatar, saying the emirate ‘has historically been a funder of terrorism at a very high level’ … A close associate of the secretary of state says that Tillerson was not only ‘blindsided by the Trump statement,’ but ‘absolutely enraged.’ Tillerson’s aides … were convinced that the true author of Trump’s statement was Yousef Al Otaiba [a friend of Kushner and the UAE Ambassador]. ‘Rex is just exhausted,’ [the associate said]. ‘He can’t get any of his appointments approved and is running around the world cleaning up after a president whose primary foreign policy adviser is a 36-year-old amateur.’”

— The bubbling frustration appears to have spilled over last Friday, when Tillerson apparently shouted down a White House staffer. Politico’s Josh Dawsey, Eliana Johnson and Alex Isenstadt report: “The normally laconic Texan unloaded on Johnny DeStefano, the head of the presidential personnel office, for torpedoing proposed nominees to senior State Department posts and for questioning his judgment. Tillerson also complained that the White House was leaking damaging information about him to the news media, according to a person familiar with the meeting. Above all, he made clear that he did not want DeStefano’s office to ‘have any role in staffing’ and ‘expressed frustration that anybody would know better’ than he about who should work in his department — particularly after the president had promised him autonomy to make his own decisions and hires.”

— Trump is slated to nominate a former Bush-era Justice Department official known for helping architect the Patriot Act as his top State Department lawyer. BuzzFeed News’ Zoe Tillman and John Hudson report: “If confirmed, Jennifer Newstead … would be in charge of a raft of thorny legal issues involving the most sensitive foreign policy and security challenges facing the U.S. The State Department legal adviser plays a key role in justifying the use of military force abroad, applying the laws of war to cyber intrusions, determining what represents a foreign military coup, and interpreting a maze of international treaties and obligations. Newstead … was credited with helping to draft the Patriot Act and pitch it to members of Congress after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The Patriot Act granted broad new surveillance and detention powers to law enforcement agencies, and was amended In 2015 after years of criticism from civil liberties groups that it violated Americans’ privacy.”

Sarah Huckabee Sanders speaks during a press briefing at the White House yesterday. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)

THE FOURTH ESTATE:

— Sarah Huckabee Sanders again led yesterday’s White House press briefing in Sean Spicer’s absence, and TV cameras and live audio broadcasts were banned for the seventh of the past nine briefings. (The Fix has an annotated version of the off-camera briefing.)

— On Tuesday, Sanders encouraged members of the press and Americans in general to watch a video shot by James O’Keefe purporting to show a CNN producer criticizing the network’s Russia coverage as a ratings ploy. But O’Keefe, who has been criticized for his journalistic methods in the past, left out a few key details in the video. Paul Farhi writes: “For example, it never mentions that [John] Bonifield is a producer of health and medical stories, raising questions about how relevant his views are, and how informed he is, about CNN’s political coverage … Instead, the video identifies him a ‘supervising producer,’ suggesting a senior decision-making role. O’Keefe, who appears on the video as a kind of master of ceremonies, furthers this impression by saying the footage describes ‘the real motivation behind our dominant media organizations.’ But CNN said Bonifield speaks only for himself.”

— Fox News has devoted a lot of airtime to discussing O’Keefe’s video, even at the expense of discussing this week’s major health-care news. David Weigel reports: “The network’s prime-time shows, ratings kings of cable news, ignored the health-care story. Fox’s 8 p.m. and 10 p.m. shows began with stories about [the O’Keefe video] … ‘The Five,’ Fox’s 9 p.m. show, began with the ‘bombshell’ news that President Barack Obama had said — in October 2016 — that it would be ‘impossible’ to rig the election. Nine minutes were spent on the Senate bill before a segue way into the CNN story. The lack of ‘Obamacare repeal’ coverage, unthinkable just six months ago, reflected a general decline of conservative interest in what had united Republicans for seven years.”

— Trump appears to be shifting more media responsibilities away from Spicer and toward his personal lawyer Jay Sekulow. Callum Borchers writes: “In the hours after the Supreme Court allowed partial implementation of Trump’s travel ban on Monday … Spicer did not have much to say about the decision … Before Spicer briefed reporters … Sekulow appeared on live television to do exactly what the White House spokesman would not — deliver the president’s understanding of the power vested in him by the Supreme Court. … It matters a great deal whether information comes from the White House press secretary, who owes a duty to voters, or from an attorney working for Trump, who does not. In recent weeks, Sekulow has become increasingly visible, while Spicer has receded into the background.”

— Speaking of Sekulow, he could be facing investigations from two state attorneys general over revelations that he funneled millions of dollars from his charity to himself and his family. The Guardian’s Jon Swaine reports: “Josh Stein, the attorney general of North Carolina, and Eric Schneiderman, the attorney general of New York, said on Wednesday they would be examining the operations of Jay Sekulow’s group Christian Advocates Serving Evangelism (Case). Stein said in a statement: ‘The reports I’ve read are troubling. My office is looking into this matter.’ Amy Spitalnick, a spokeswoman for Schneiderman, said in an email: ‘We’re reviewing their filings.’”

— “Trump and his allies believe he’s gained a tactical advantage in his war with the media,” Politico’s Hadas Gold writes. “Many White House staffers were ‘elated’ … when they learned that three [CNN] journalists had resigned over a botched story [regarding possible Trump campaign ties to Russia] … Trump was quick to publicize the retraction and resignations on his Twitter feed, adding, ‘What about all the other phony stories they do. FAKE NEWS’ … The attacks marked an escalation of Trump’s strategy of citing media bias to rally conservatives and undecided voters around the idea that the investigations of Russian influence in the 2016 election are media-driven and politically motivated … Internally, some staffers at CNN saw the retraction episode as embarrassing, and expressed chagrin at having given Trump such powerful ammunition.” But the staffers also argued that the controversy paled in comparison to Fox News’ handling of the Seth Rich story.

— CNN foreign correspondent Clarissa Ward shared her belief yesterday that Trump’s war on the media is emboldening foreign adversaries. While asking one of her guests when the president’s rhetoric begins to get “dangerous,” she said, “I’m not just talking about dangerous in terms of tearing at the social fabric, I’m talking about dangerous as in a journalist gets hurt, because I can tell you working overseas in war zones, people are emboldened by the actions of this administration, emboldened by the all-out declaration of war on the media.”

— Chuck Todd equated Trump’s war on the media to “nothing less than a war on the truth”: “[Journalists] get fired for not telling the truth. And, of course, that’s the point, isn’t it? Of course the White House attacks. Delegitimize the media to create running room for your version of events – it’s as old as the media itself … The media is not the enemy of the people. We’re just here to find, as Carl Bernstein put it so well, ‘the best obtainable version of the truth.’ And sometimes, the truth hurts. It can hurt us, and, yes even you, Mr. President.”

— Two former White House press secretaries have come out against the briefings being broadcast live. The Hill’s John Bowden reports: “Press secretaries to Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton said on Wednesday that the White House should embargo all video from press briefings for later use, preventing the video from being broadcast live. Ari Fleischer and Mike McCurry issued identical statements on Twitter Wednesday morning that they support ‘no live TV coverage of WH briefing. Embargo it let it be used, but not as live TV.’ The statements continued, saying the proposal would be ‘better for the public, the WH the press.’ »

A mother and her newborn baby sit at a house for the displaced in Banki, Nigeria. (Jane Hahn for the Washington Post)

WAPO HIGHLIGHTS:

— “They fled Boko Haram and famine — and then they were forced back,” by Kevin Sieff: “The soldiers arrived in the middle of the night, tearing through the village of Nigerian refugees, barging into stick huts where families slept in knots on the floor. For years, those refugees had been on the run from Boko Haram insurgents, finally escaping across a dried riverbed that served as the border with Cameroon. … And then, in March, the Cameroonian soldiers arrived, [rounding up] refugees haphazardly and pushed them into military trucks, often separating parents from their children[.] The refugees soon realized where they were headed: back to one of the most dangerous corners of Nigeria. The U.N. would eventually put a label on what happened that night and many others to follow — ‘forced return.’ Over the past few months, at least 5,000 [refugees] were rounded up in Cameroonian villages and refugee camps and expelled to a region under frequent attack … [Now], as the number of refugees around the world soars … they are facing growing hostility from host countries and shrinking protection from the international legal framework put in place decades ago to defend such vulnerable people.”

— “Amid Venezuela’s chaos, protesters ask: Was helicopter ‘attack’ rebellion or ruse?” by Joshua Partlow and Rachelle Krygier: “A rogue helicopter that buzzed Venezuela’s Supreme Court building and possibly dropped grenades became a strange centerpiece Wednesday in the country’s meltdown — with some suspecting it was a ruse by President Nicolás Maduro to further clamp down on the opposition. The chopper flight Tuesday — trailing a banner saying ‘Freedom’ — was initially hailed by opposition groups as a sign that security forces were breaking ranks in the first step in a possible coup. But later, questions crept in. The helicopter pilot turned out to be an actor, Oscar Pérez, who also served in special operations forces. Maduro opponents then began to interpret the incident as a possible government-staged charade to muster support for even tougher measures against protesters as Venezuela’s political crisis grows more violent and desperate …”

— “‘He was born this way’: Martin Shkreli’s attorney offers defense as securities-fraud trial opens,” Renae Merle: “‘Is he strange? Yes. Will you find him weird? Yes,’ said Shkreli attorney Benjamin Brafman. ‘But [his investors] used his genius and made millions. . . . Despite his flaws and dysfunctional personality, Martin Shkreli is brilliant beyond words.’ Shkreli, best known for raising the price of Daraprim — a 62-year-old drug primarily used to treat newborns and HIV patients — from $13.50 to $750 a pill, went on trial Wednesday for allegedly defrauding investors. After struggling for more than two days to seat a jury, Shkreli’s attorney spoke directly to the Brooklyn native’s reputation as the worst of Wall Street. ‘As Lady Gaga would say: He was born this way,’ Brafman said.”

SOCIAL MEDIA SPEED READ:

The president took aim at The Post, met the 2016 World Series Champions and accused Democrats of lying on health care :

One news organization responded with a chart of its own:

A New York Times reporter came to The Post’s defense:

Trump, whose properties display fake Time magazine covers with his picture, calls the Washington Post « fake news » after it reports on them.

— Peter Baker (@peterbakernyt) June 28, 2017

A good note:

A Bush White House official weighed in on Trump’s media criticism:

No US president before has called the press the enemy of the people. Dictators have said that, but no US president.

— Richard W. Painter (@RWPUSA) June 28, 2017

On Republican defenses of the Senate health-care bill, from a Times reporter:

I honestly don’t understand the point of proposing to cut Medicaid, and then, instead of defending the choice, arguing the cuts don’t exist.

— Margot Sanger-Katz (@sangerkatz) June 28, 2017

Democratic lawmakers participated in a protest of the Senate health-care bill at the Capitol:

Protesters visited Sen. Rob Portman’s office:

A congressional colleague wished House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) well:

The vice president and a Republican representative visited Ohio yesterday:

The Chicago Cubs’ owner toured Capitol Hill and took a picture with his doppelganger:

The president had a mix-up while meeting the Chicago Cubs:

« Where’s Dan Gilbert? » Trump says at a meeting with the Chicago Cubs, who are not owned by Cleveland Cavaliers owner Dan Gilbert.

— Alex Wayne (@aawayne) June 28, 2017

The Trump Organization opened a new golf course, with a medieval king cutting the ribbon:

Protesters interrupted diners at the Trump International Hotel:

Portraits of the president and first lady were spotted on Capitol Hill:

Reporters originally thought they were intended for the vice president’s office, but:

The paintings were later found in the office of Rep. Mike Kelly, who confirmed that the artist was his constituent:

And Sen. Orrin Hatch got into a bit of a Twitter spat with PETA:

Present your best argument for eating bacon.

— PETA (@peta) June 28, 2017

GOOD READS FROM ELSEWHERE:

— AP, “Texas Medicaid cuts leave special needs kids without therapy,” by Meredith Hoffman: “Stacey English has modest desires for her 7-year-old daughter Addison: Be able to eat without gagging and move both her arms. But since Addison’s [therapist] went out of business … [she] has regressed in her fight to do even that much. ‘I don’t know where to go from here,’ said English, who has been unable to find a replacement… ‘How do you continue to help her make progress when you don’t have someone to teach her?’ Some Texas children with special needs like Addison have lost critical services since the state implemented $350 million in Medicaid cuts … In Texas, reimbursement offered to [certain] providers fell up to 50 percent … Clinics closed and therapists quit. The Texas cuts are separate from Republican proposals now before Congress, which academics say could cut federal Medicaid spending … But the fallout could eventually be similar if some form of what’s been approved in the U.S. House, and is under consideration in the Senate, becomes law.” “Of all the things to cut,” English said “they’re taking away care from those who truly need help the most.”

— New York Times Magazine, “Greetings, E.T. (Please Don’t Murder Us.),” by Steven Johnson: “A new initiative to beam messages into space may be our best shot yet at learning whether we’re alone in the universe. There’s just one problem: What if we’re not?”

— Politico Magazine, “Has a Civil Rights Stalwart Lost Its Way?” by Ben Schreckinger: “These are the twin legacies of Montgomery’s most famous nonprofit: Since 1971, the SPLC has fought racial discrimination in the South and established itself as the nation’s most prominent hate-group watchdog, most notably winning legal fights that put some of the last nails in the coffin of the Ku Klux Klan. It has also built itself into a civil rights behemoth … inviting charges that it oversells the threats posed by Klansmen and neo-Nazis to keep donations flowing in from wealthy liberals. And as [it], navigates the era of Trump, there are new questions arising around a charge that has dogged the group for years … Is tough immigration control really a form of hate, or just part of the political conversation? Does rejecting a religion make you an extremist? At a time when the line between ‘hate group’ and mainstream politics is getting thinner and the need for productive civil discourse is growing more serious, fanning liberal fears, while a great opportunity for the SPLC, might be a problem for the nation.”

— The New York Times, “A New Kind of Tech Job Emphasizes Skills, Not a College Degree,” by Steve Lohr: “A few years ago, Sean Bridges lived with his mother, Linda, in Wiley Ford, W.Va. Their only income was her monthly Social Security disability check. He applied for work at Walmart and Burger King, but they were not hiring. Now Mr. Bridges, 25, is a computer security analyst, making $45,000 a year. In a struggling Appalachian economy, that is enough to provide him with his own apartment, a car, spending money — and career ambitions. Mr. Bridges represents a new but promising category in the American labor market: people working in so-called new-collar or middle-skill jobs. As the U.S. struggles with how to match good jobs to the two-thirds of adults who do not have a four-year college degree, his experience shows how a worker’s skills can be emphasized over traditional hiring filters like college degrees … And elevating skills over pedigree creates new pathways to employment and tailored training and a gateway to the middle class.”

HOT ON THE LEFT:

“A Navy veteran who identifies as neither male nor female can’t get a passport. That could change,” from Peter Holley: “Dana Zzyym wants to travel abroad. But the Navy veteran and intersex citizen — who identifies as neither male nor female — is unable to hop on an international flight because Zzyym doesn’t have an updated passport and can’t seem to get one. As Zzyym identifies as neither — preferring to use the pronoun ‘they’ — Zzyym wrote ‘X,’ along with an explanation simply reading, ‘I am not male or female.’ On Tuesday, a federal-district court in Denver granted a motion to reopen Zzyym’s case …. With the case reopened, the State Department will be asked to submit new information and documentation that reveals reasoning behind its decision to deny Zzyym’s latest application. The judge will review the constitutionality of the State Department policy of refusing to grant passports to intersex people, which could result in that policy being forcibly changed.”

HOT ON THE RIGHT:

“Why one man keeps ramming his car into Ten Commandments statues on government property,” from Cleve R. Wootson Jr.: “In the video, the Arkansas Capitol dome can be seen lit against the night sky as the Dodge Dart accelerates … ‘Oh my goodness,’ a man says as he flicks on the car’s lights. ‘Freedom!’ The vehicle speeds up the hill, and the last thing that comes into view before a crash is a large, newly installed monument. Authorities say the man in the video is Michael Tate Reed, an alleged serial destroyer of Ten Commandments monuments. [A] 2015 law required Arkansas to allow the Ten Commandments display near the capitol. But [some groups] … have criticized the placement of a biblical statue on the grounds of the seat of the state’s government. [And] after plans for the Ten Commandments monument were announced, the satanic temple pushed for a competing statue of Baphomet, a goat-headed, angel-winged creature accompanied by two children smiling at it …”

DAYBOOK:

President Trump will give afternoon remarks at the Energy Department on “unleashing American energy.” In the evening, he and the first lady will welcome South Korean President Moon Jae-in to the White House for a reception and dinner.

Vice President Pence will introduce the president for his speech at the Energy Department. 

NEWS YOU CAN USE IF YOU LIVE IN D.C.:

— The temperatures will climb a bit in D.C. today, but we shouldn’t see showers. The Capital Weather Gang reports: “Sunshine dominates the day with highs mainly upper 80s but hotter spots likely to make lower 90s. Humidity only slowly climbs keeping the heat index muted. Brisk south winds help mitigate the increased heat as well.”

— The Nationals beat the Cubs 8-4. (Jorge Castillo)

— The two men killed on Amtrak tracks Tuesday night were CSX workers who had gotten off their freight train to inspect a problem. Dana Hedgpeth and Luz Lazo report: “Amtrak train No. 175, which had 121 passengers on board, hit the two men — a conductor and a conductor trainee — as the pair tried to identify what triggered an alarm that something was wrong with the wheels, causing the train to stop, NTSB officials said.”

— The Prince William Board of County Supervisors approved construction of a mosque in Nokesville after a contentious debate. Dalton Bennett and Julie Zauzmer report: “On one side, impassioned Prince William County residents dressed in green shirts argued that constructing a new house of worship would disrupt their quiet community … On the other side, their Muslim neighbors said that all they wanted was a place to pray in their own community—and that opposition to their plans to construct a mosque might arise out of not just technical arguments about land use but also bias against Islam.”

— Former congressman and Democratic gubernatorial candidate Tom Perriello has launched a PAC aimed at ending Republicans’ long hold on Virginia’s House of Delegates. (Gregory S. Schneider)

— Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan reversed his predecessor Martin O’Malley’s zero-waste landfill rules, describing them as burdensome for local governments. (Josh Hicks)

— Prince George’s County police are in search of three men who tried (and failed) to steal an ATM by tethering it to the end of a van. (Lynh Bui)

VIDEOS OF THE DAY:

Samantha Bee interviewed Sen. Elizabeth Warren:

An animatronic Abraham Lincoln explained on « The Late Show with Stephen Colbert » why he was seceding from Disney’s Hall of Presidents:

Trump hosted the Chicago Cubs at the White House yesterday:

And he claimed that Chuck Schumer was not a « serious person »:

Protesters encircled the Capitol to demand better health care from lawmakers:

The new golf course at the Trump Turnberry resort in Scotland opened:

An Oklahoma family assembled an amateur sting operation to catch a man accused of pursuing a 15-year-old girl for sex: