Archives par mot-clé : video

Like Father, Like Son! Jackson Roloff Looks Just Like His Famous Dad in New Photo

Since entering the world on May 12, Jackson Roloff has stolen the hearts of Little People, Big World fans. The littlest member of the Roloff family has grown so much over the last few weeks alone, and proud mama Tori‘s most recent photo shows Baby J morphing into a mini Zach! Take a look at the video below to see the resemblance to his famous father:

MORE: Matt and Amy Roloff Start Drama Just Days Before Daughter Molly’s Wedding (REPORT)

Earlier this week, a new photo of Jackson sparked rumors that he was a « rainbow baby » — a term used for a child born after a miscarriage. Despite there being a rainbow on his forehead, fans were convinced that the new parents’ son is a true miracle. « Did she have a miscarriage prior to Jackson? If not, this is a sh-tty way to use the term ‘Rainbow Baby.' » Another added, « This I did not know… »

As Tori and Zach previously revealed, Jackson has achondroplasia, which is the same form of dwarfism his father has. In a recent episode of their vlog, Z and T Party of Three, Zach said, « Baby Jackson came in as [a little person] — just like me. Yeah, we’re super excited for it, though. We’ll hope to just give him a healthy, happy life and support him in every way. He can experience as much of the world as Tori and me[sic] have been able to and hopefully much more! »

Caption this picture… because I can not. #zandtpartyofthree bonus points if you know what we are standing in front of.

A post shared by Zach Roloff (@zroloff07) on Aug 3, 2017 at 9:16pm PDT

MORE: Tori Roloff Sparks Pregnancy Rumors With Her Anniversary Tribute to Hubby Zach Roloff!

He’s only just about to celebrate his three-month birthday, but the new parents already seem to be doing a great job! Although it hasn’t been without a few bumps in the road — Tori admitted she’s been having difficulty breastfeeding — the little guy is making progress. Just recently, Jackson experienced a growth spurt and Tori took to Instagram stories to post a photo with the text, « I think we’re going through a growth spurt » and used a crying emoji. Like his mama, we’re sad too. Slow down, Baby J!

More from In Touch

Who is Camerino Gonzalez Sanchez? Meet the Roloff’s Former Employee Who Was Recently Deported

Tori Roloff Gushes Over Baby Jackson, Teaches Everyone an Important Anatomy Lesson

Audrey and Jeremy Roloff’s Nursery Is Literally So Beautiful, We Wish It Was Our Room

Welcome to the Brand-Safe Economy

There is a brouhaha up and down New York’s Madison Avenue over fake news, non-human traffic, ad blocking and non-viewable digital ads. This is a good thing.

“We have a media supply chain that is murky at best and fraudulent at worst. We need to clean it up and invest the time and money we save into better advertising to drive growth.” Those are the words of Marc Pritchard, the chief marketing officer of the largest advertiser in the world, Procter Gamble. The gauntlet has been thrown down.

Why is bad digital advertising bad for brands? Because brands matter and big companies are failing. Brands can’t afford misalignment or worse. The average life expectancy of a brand was once 75 years. It’s now only 15 and that is thought to be driven in part by media.  

In 2017 there will be winners and there will be losers. What we see is that the winners are demanding their messaging runs in brand-safe and transparent environments so their brand doesn’t get tarnished in the current media melee. Despite this upheaval around brand safety, fake news and audience accountability on digital platforms, the one unwavering thing is this: consumer appetite for video and premium content is immense. And the race is on to capitalize on it. 

The landscape is all ablur: YouTube and Hulu have entered the TV business with their live streaming services. The OTT behemoths, Amazon and Netflix are doubling down on original programming and content acquisition to lure younger consumers and cord cutters. Social networks, once the place to share with friends, are now leading hubs for news and entertainment, garnering millions of video views daily.  How are buyers deciding where to invest their video advertising budgets?

Based on a recent study conducted with over 300 advertisers and their agencies about the trends shaping today’s marketplace, marketers have three top priorities on their minds: brand safety, digital video growth and the importance of social video. 

Marketers don’t believe that programmatic delivery can or will solve the brand safety problem.

While there is high agreement about the need for brand safe environments, seven in 10 marketers surveyed find it a challenge to ensure brand-safe environments when buying programmatically on the open exchange. More than half don’t anticipate increased transparency in programmatic buying.

 

Q.  In the next six months, how do you expect the transparency of the sites you run programmatic ads on to change?

Base: Involved in Digital/Mobile Advertising

 

Video advertising continues to experience strong growth

Since the release of a similar study conducted in June 2016, there has been a significant shift in where advertisers want to put dollars when it comes to video. Social platforms (Facebook, Snapchat) are now decidedly most important when planning digital video campaigns, voted as such by 68 percent of participants vs. 56 percent last June, a 12 point lift.  That puts social platforms (and presumably Facebook is dominant) as the number one distribution partner, eight points ahead of video platforms (YouTube, Vevo, etc.), which were rated as most important by 60 percent of those surveyed. In previous research, video platforms were ahead of social by a small margin, and only marketer, not agency respondents put social in the top spot. 

 

Video buyers are looking at social channels more than video platforms to place pre-roll and branded content campaigns

Further inquiry shows that among seven possible distribution platform types, social gets the highest marks for delivering on engagement (59 percent), ROI (39 percent) and customer service (38 percent); whereas video platforms deliver best on measurement/reporting.  Perhaps YouTube’s announcement that they will allow more third party verification and measurement is being recognized here.

 

Show them the numbers. As advertiser consciousness get raised about issues from brand safety to viewability in the world of automated advertising, platforms must find better ways to prove their worth and accountability. Not only in how well they solve these issues, but in where they reach audiences.

Have a video strategy. Video is the largest advertising growth area in digital display right now according to eMarketer. Advertisers recognize the huge and growing consumer audiences for video and the engagement chops of sight, sound and motion in advertising. Video will be front and center for the foreseeable future. 

Facebook will lead. Who can beat 1 billion daily users? Despite some grumblings that Facebook is driving the fake news problem, they get high marks from buyers for engagement and ROI and have emerged as the definitive partner for video campaigns — at least for right now.

Shorter is better. Short form is the most likely pre-roll digital format to get support and drive engagement. Other formats have their place and we see sizeable investment still promised for premium, long form, live stream and user-generated formats.

 

Brands today have a new set of expectations around all their messaging including digital video. Publishers need world-class audience targeting. They need to provide brand-safe content and standardized measurement. Most importantly, the media needs to show return on marketers’ investment. Data is more important than ever and in the current market shift, demographics and audiences have quickly become “old school.” Marketers are demanding first party data and one-to-one targeting.   #ShiftHappens #DataIsGold

Welcome to the brand safe economy. Is your brand safe?

Stop Ignoring Video Marketing: Tips on How to Leverage

It’s not just cat videos the public is going crazy over; it’s all videos, including real estate videos. Marki Lemons-Ryhal, REALTOR®, teacher, social media expert and Facebook Live video host, swears by live video. “By the end of 2017, 74 percent of all content viewed online will be in the form of a video,” she says.

Lemons-Ryhal doesn’t just comment on the video phenomena; she’s mastered it. She opened her first real estate company in 2003, and a year later had sold over 60 units and jumped to the top 10 percent of REALTORS® in Chicago, in large part due to her mastery of social media.

In 2009, she was invited to speak at National Association of REALTORS® Conference Expo and was named Illinois Real Estate Educator of the year in 2010. She currently travels and teaches social media and technology classes for NAR, Chase and Goldman Sachs. She has multiple designations and degrees, including CRB, ABR, ABRM, CRMS, and an MBA from Saint Xavier University.

<!–/*
* The backup image section of this tag has been generated for use on a
* non-SSL page. If this tag is to be placed on an SSL page, change the
* 'http://openx.rismedia.com/www/delivery/…'
* to
* 'https://openx.rismedia.com/www/delivery/…'
*
* This noscript section of this tag only shows image banners. There
* is no width or height in these banners, so if you want these tags to
* allocate space for the ad before it shows, you will need to add this
* information to the tag.
*
* If you do not want to deal with the intricities of the noscript
* section, delete the tag (from … to ). On
* average, the noscript tag is called from less than 1% of internet
* users.
*/–>

Her first video, “Crabs in a Bucket,” received 19,442 views. By taking out a $20 Facebook Ad to boost the video, she got 1,241 more views, resulting in 23,683 views. Using those Facebook views, she leveraged the interest in her video into radio and television interviews. “Social media works,” she says. “I don’t teach theory. I practice what I preach. We have come to realize one can receive a 2,100 percent return on their marketing if they implement video.”

Video Can Be Your Best Marketing Tool—If You Know These Facts

The objections to video are the same from all REALTORS®, and Lemons-Ryhal addresses them right upfront:

  • Stop procrastinating. Stop “getting ready to get ready” to do video. Just do it.
  • Don’t worry about how you look. Everyone already knows how you look. You’re the only one who’s not used to seeing you.
  • Cost is not a barrier. All the video equipment you need is included in your cell phone’s camera.
  • If you’re not doing video, you’re ignoring a huge audience. Facebook has over two billion users, so you don’t need another app. Live-streaming video is already built into the Facebook app.
  • Video rules SEO. If you want to be found through local Search Engine Optimization (SEO), a video is the best way to do that. Facebook has altered its algorithm to promote video over content.

3 Things REALTORS® Don’t Understand About Social Media and Real Estate

  1. Video is a social media tool first and a real estate tool second. Use video to reach and connect with buyers before selling to them. People buy from REALTORS® they know, like, and trust, and there’s no better way to show buyers who you are than through video.
  1. “Every buyer has a problem,” Lemons-Ryhal says. Carrie Little, one of the agents Lemons-Ryhal works with, produced a three-minute video that talked about what specific buyers were interested in and got 2,900 viewers who watched her Facebook live broadcast. Out of those 2,900 viewers, she closed on eight of out nine deals for a total production of $1,578,900 and a personal earning of $42,100. What Little did was simple: she focused on the pain of a specific demographic, college graduates. She told her audience, “If you are a recent college graduate with a job and one month’s worth of paycheck stubs, you may be eligible to buy a home. Don’t invest in a landlord; invest in yourself.” That’s how she got their attention. The rest was follow-through.
  1. “Video’s not enough,” says Lemons-Ryhal. Video is just the beginning. “You want to get viewers off of Facebook and to a landing page, or keep them on Facebook and use something to capture their name and email information. By placing a $20 Facebook Ad, [Carrie] Little was able to generate a 2,105 percent return on her investment.” Not only can she use that same video, Lemons-Ryhal says, but “video is the only form of content that real estate professionals can download and repurpose into 200 different forms of content and marketing opportunities.”

Why Little’s Video Worked

Little didn’t just happen to appeal to college students; she studied the niche, understood their pain points and then found a lender who specialized in loans to recent college grads. Lemons-Ryhal suggests that you do the same thing in your market. “Find a lender with a unique program in your market place,” she says. “Ask them to create a PDF with either an infographic or checklist. That will be your call to action for buyers to download.”

If you’re using Facebook for business purposes, “you need to have established Facebook Live goals,” she says. “You want to decide whether to go live daily, weekly, monthly, or only for special events.” People spend more time watching Facebook Live videos than they do recorded videos. “Take advantage of that,” she says.

If you’d like to learn more about using Facebook and social media for your business, including a step-by-step tutorial on how to use Facebook Live and dozens of additional tips for getting the most out of your Facebook Live sessions, listen to Marki Lemons-Ryhal’s webinar, “Earn a 2105% Return on Your Marketing Strategy.”

For more information, please visit connect.homes.com.

For the latest real estate news and trends, bookmark RISMedia.com.

Whosay Debuts a Mobile App for Video Marketing Matchups



Find the perfect video influencer while on-the-go. That’s the promise of Whosay Match, an iOS and Android app released today from the influencer marketing specialists at Whosay.

The Whosay Match app interface

With the Whosay Match app, marketers can search through thousands of possible video influencers at every level, such as Icons (tier one celebs), Trailblazers (close to household recognition), Influencers (those with big social platform buzz), and Micro-Influencers (big fish in smaller ponds). It sounds like there’s a talent pool for every size budget or any campaign objective.

To get started, marketers need to download the app and then visit the Match Report page on Whosay.com to request access. Like the company’s Whosay Talent app, this isn’t open to everyone.

Once logged in, use the app to create a custom list of brand-friendly influencers, then create a custom social feed showing their social network posts from multiple platforms. This custom feed includes the level of fan engagement.

To give marketers a helping hand, the Whosay team creates hand-selected lists of niche influencers, such a “Health-Conscious Celebrity Moms” and “Teen Beauty Influencers.” The app also provides a direct messaging option so marketers can hit the Whosay team with a question at any time.

“We’re constantly checking affinity for brands and often surprised by the results,” says Harvey Schwartz, founding partner and executive vice president of influence marketing at Whosay. “Like Miley Cyrus showing up for a mayonnaise brand, feels random but our affinity cross-check brings us new ideas all the time.”

While the app is new for general use, Whosay has been testing it internally for two years already. It’s been used to grab talent for over 100 brands and over 300 campaigns. These video campaigns for Buick and Xfinity were created with the help of the Match algorithm, the same technology that powers the app.

A Whosay Match report


Comparing 11 top telehealth platforms: Company execs tout quality, safety, EHR integrations

Telemedicine is on the rise, just ask the companies behind the technology.

“We’ve had more telehealth visits during the last year than in the nine previous years combined,” said Katie Ruigh, senior vice president of product at telemedicine technology vendor American Well. “In terms of clients, we have about 70 health systems using our platform, and we had half that at the end of 2015.”

Currently, 31 percent of healthcare organizations use video-based telemedicine services and 34 percent offer remote patient monitoring, according to a KPMG survey conducted by HIMSS Analytics. Expansion plans for these services will drive future use with another 44 percent of healthcare organizations eyeing video-based telemedicine services and 48 percent planning for remote patient monitoring, the survey of 147 C-suite, IT and clinical leaders found.

“The business case for implementing a virtual care program is improving as healthcare evolves toward value-based care incentives from limited fee-for-service reimbursements,” said Richard Bakalar, MD, KPMG managing director and member of the firm’s Global Healthcare Center of Excellence. “It’s more efficient for high cost and limited clinical staff as well as other onsite resources, while making it more convenient and timely for patients to receive their care.”

In this guide, we gave executives from 11 telehealth company’s a chance to talk about what their products offer and how they are attempting to help healthcare providers gain a stronger expertise with their telehealth solutions.

American Well

American Well offers telehealth visits by video and phone, though the vast majority are video. The vendor supports patient-to-provider, provider-to-provider and multi-party video visits as well as service lines and practices that enable healthcare organizations to customize the telehealth experience for their providers and patients. Organizations can brand a service, a specialty or a facility, and have a different look and feel or workflow for each of the service lines.

“With the virtual visit itself, there is another bucket of capabilities around medical history collection and teeing up a visit,” said Ruigh. “We collect self-reported data from the patient like medical history and biometric information and vital signs. So, for instance, with our Apple Health integration they can use their devices in-home and we’re able to pull that data in and make it available for the consult. And we also can pull data from external sources like from an EHR system or from pharmacies.”

“…If they want to pass a subset of clinical information like a problem list from an EHR, they can pass it to the American Well platform. And after that, if any documentation occurs on our platform, we can pass that data back to the EHR.” 

American Well wants to set up every virtual visit with the appropriate clinical context from a variety of different sources so physicians can treat patients as if they were in the same room together.

“How would a provider virtually treat a patient,” Ruigh said. “They treat a patient as if they were in person, including diagnosing them clinically, assigning any procedures, prescribing, writing clinical notes; as the providers see the patients they can do the same things they would do in a brick-and-mortar setting. And if they document using the American Well platform, that documentation can get back into the system of record. And we offer secure messaging – here a patient and a provider can communicate in a secure fashion like emails but because it is on our platform it’s secure and HIPAA-compliant.”

American Well claims its telemedicine exchange is a unique product. It’s a collection of providers ready and able to deliver consults from different provider organizations.

“The exchange is a way for our clients who own and operate telehealth solutions to share clinical services with one another, or to access clinical services from another American Well partner,” Ruigh said. “We have a lot of clinicians who are using telehealth with their own patients and want to use it as a way to capture new patients. Cleveland Clinic has made their services available through an American Well system, and people can see Anthem’s white label version of the American Well technology.”

Samsung also recently partnered with American Well, integrating virtual visits into the Samsung health experience app.

American Well says its products can be integrated with EHRs, too.

“We have a suite of APIs,” Ruigh said. “We have a scheduling integration so they can register on their side and pass that visit to us. And from a clinical perspective, we have an inbound/outbound clinical integration option. So if they want to pass a subset of clinical information like a problem list from an EHR, they can pass it to the American Well platform. And after that, if any documentation occurs on our platform, we can pass that data back to the EHR. And that data is passed as discrete data, not just a PDF or a screen shot, it takes the data and puts them into the right places in that EHR system.”

Avizia

Avizia’s technology enables patient access to clinicians, provider collaboration from the onset of a condition, care coordination, and point-of-care devices. The solution includes carts and tablets as well as proprietary software that enables remote consultations with patients using devices of their choosing. 

“I would not say we have one predominant service line or specialty area,” said Chief Marketing Officer Tycene Fritcher. “I would say right now we are more comprehensive, which is a blessing and a curse. Because I cannot say I am the leader in tele-stroke today, but we have taken that stance in the market where we want to be that comprehensive provider, so we are OK not leading in one area, we want to be the predominant health system telehealth solution provider.”

Fritcher said it’s the company’s care coordination that sets it apart.

“It’s no secret that originally Avizia started as a point-of-care device company, started with carts and so forth, but we liked the path of our carts being platform-agnostic,” Fritcher said. “When we added in our solution set, we wanted to enable greater care coordination. So integrating with an EHR. And care coordination enabling instant alerts as opposed to the old phones, paging physicians, or emailing or texting them.”

When a caregiver clicks on a secure instant alert link saying a consult is waiting, they instantly are immersed in case details and can connect to that telehealth video visit.

“Some of the chief pain points health systems are looking to address are reduced costs with increased access and improved outcomes, and face-to-face allows them to do that in a significant way,” Fritcher said. “Face-to-face enables a higher level of revenue than the methods of telehealth that are just voice.”

Avizia’s telemedicine technology can be used on any desktop, laptop or mobile device with a web browser and a camera. As for its telemedicine carts, the video infrastructure here could be one a healthcare organization already has in place, or Avizia’s video cloud technology, which is designed to help organizations avoid infrastructure costs.

The company said its technology meets all HIPAA compliance requirements and uses end-to-end encryption. Further, the company continuously monitors for suspect traffic patterns and fraud attempts.

“We are a cloud-based application, and we use Amazon Web Services,” said Cory Costley, chief product officer. “We go through rigorous testing by third parties and others to do intrusion detection, we have robust service providers, we sign business associate agreements, those are all set up to make sure things are as secure as possible. We have active and passive intrusion detection inside of the network and regular audits to ensure things are safe and secure.”

Avizia integrates with EHRs, from standards-based data exchange like HL7 to custom API integration.

Carena

Carena, which started as a primary care company that delivered care by house calls ,has its white label telemedicine technology in more than 120 U.S. hospitals, the company says.

“When we moved into telemedicine, our approach was how do we deliver as much of that value and patient experience as a house call but virtually,” said Ralph Derrickson, president and CEO. “The way we deliver our services today is we build virtual clinics for health systems. A virtual clinic is a way for a patient to come to a health system without knowing what they need, they just need help. We operate that virtual clinic, we provide the software to present that to the patient, the software tools so providers can communicate with those patients, and the back-end software and systems to integrate the activity in the virtual clinic into the rest of their health system.”

Carena also provides the medical staffing so the care in the virtual clinic is an on-demand service offering.

“Health systems do everything via schedules, they are not set up to do on-demand,” Derrickson said. “We provide 24/7 on-demand service and staffing, which is quite different than a lot of telemedicine providers. We have a network of providers that are employed by our medical groups, their adherence to clinical guidelines are substantially different from the rest of the market. We provide operating support, we stand it up and operate it for them. They can outsource it to us, we also provide the digital marketing services to drive utilization.”

A virtual clinic asks patients for the least amount of information possible to reduce the click-to-care time, the company said. It can support multiple video formats, including Skype, Apple Facetime and built-in video. Patients indicate how they wish to pay and consent to treatment after entering minimal health information, all of which takes about five minutes, the company said.

Patients could be people a virtual clinic knows nothing about, a member in a membership plan or part of a managed at-risk population.

“On average a patient will wait less than 10 minutes; maybe 15 minutes,” Derrickson said. “They will be notified when the provider arrives in the virtual exam room in whichever video format they choose. Our visits last 20 minutes, we do a full history, we make sure we can treat them, if not we refer them to an urgent care center or encourage them to wait for their regular doctor if appropriate. When that visit is done, they receive a visit summary, any treatment information that the physician is giving, follow-up information if the patient needs additional treatment, then give them information on the follow-up care, and if there was a prescription that prescription is sent to the pharmacy of choice.”

Clinical information is shared with the health system, and if the patient indicates a primary care provider, the information goes directly to them, as well. Carena does integrations directly into EHRs; some health systems will have more sophisticated integrations while others will use a CCDA or PDF, the company said. The billing staff is billed. And if a patient was part of an at-risk population, Carena will notify care coordinators, as well.

The company said its telemedicine visits are secured by multi-factor authentication and end-to-end encryption of data at rest and in flight. Video services that patients may choose to use such as Facetime and Skype have their own sets of security in place.

“Offering virtual care, about 70 percent of the patients are new to a health system and that health system wants to start building a relationship with the patients so when they need medical care down the line they will come back,” Derrickson said. 

Doctor On Demand

Doctor On Demand views itself as a nationwide medical practice connecting consumers with board-certified physicians in an on-demand fashion. Consumers can gain access to a provider within minutes on a mobile device or a desktop or laptop with a camera. The company only offers video visits because the physician conducts a visit in the same way as he or she would in a brick-and-mortar setting, with a history, examination and treatment plan.

“We have done the closest approximation to that in-person visit, and the success rate we have with video is a major component of that,” said Ian Tong, MD, chief medical officer. “We were the first to develop the video technology that has the success rate of a cell phone call; we have a 98 percent success rate with video calls, and that is a very big technical achievement.”

Doctor On Demand offers access to a wide variety of types of physicians, including internists, family practitioners, pediatrics and emergency medicine providers; it also has a mental health practice.

“A lot of our competitors are communicating with patients through technology but saying we will call you back when we can find a provider for you,” Tong said. “We have a workforce of employed physicians who are on dedicated shifts, trained through our training programs, and who know the requirements and expectations of a video visit, and are trained for that visit, and are ready and on a dedicated shift so when that patient calls they have an average wait time of less than five minutes.”

Tong added that the company has high provider engagement in the training program and high provider satisfaction, adding that happy doctors practice better medicine.

“So it really allows us to provide a certain amount of customization of what we can offer,” he said. “So if a health system wants to offer a specific type of program, they want the mind/body approach to smoking cessation, our practice can offer that because we have the different providers set up and we can design an integrated medical practice for their patients.”

Providers and patients can connect with a mobile device or a desktop or laptop with a camera. Participants can access the system through a web browser or through Apple or Android mobile apps. The company also issues laptops to its providers so it can have a firm hold on security and authentication. The company has been certified for security by HITRUST.

Doctor On Demand has the capability to integrate with EHRs, but it is not something it stresses.

“We can do it; it’s a lot easier for us to do unidirectional, but we have done integration with one of the most complex EHRs out there, Epic,” Tong said. “It’s a capability we have demonstrated, but right now what we have found is if I talk to a health system or smaller practice, they do not want to invest in that area, each one of those is custom and it’s a big lift to do it and it’s expensive.”

MDLive

MDLive’s telemedicine system offers a patient experience, a provider experience and a call center. A patient can come in through the mobile app, through a website or through the call center. The call center is for a phone-only visit. If a call center patient ultimately needs a video consult, call center staff guides them through downloading the mobile app or sends them to a URL to log in through a browser.

On the provider side, physicians log in to a dashboard where consultations are sourced one of two ways. Some consultations happen on-demand, where a patient comes in and will just drop themselves into the virtual waiting room. An algorithm in the background determines which patients to grab for physicians based on the state a patient is in, the licenses the physician has, and more information.

“The connection has HIPAA-compliant security and privacy controls in place, and we use end-to-end DTLS encryption.”

Physicians also have the ability to make themselves instantly available online so when a consumer comes through the front door they will see a list of providers and see that provider is available.

Further, physicians can create schedules for when they are available for consults, and patients can schedule their video consultations.

The provider on their dashboard sees medical history, surgical history, family history and anything the patient has entered into their consumer experience. The physician can also see data that might have been pulled in from a health plan claim file or an outside EHR integrated into the system.

“For Humana, whenever a Humana patient comes in to see one of our providers, our system has the integration built in to immediately recognize that the consumer belongs to a Humana plan and our system automatically goes out to the Humana system and brings the patient’s most recent health summary into the MDLive provider portal so the provider has the most recent data on that patient prior to seeing the patient,” said Brian Lichtlin, chief technology officer. “The physician can prepare himself with the history of that patient. Once they review that, they click another button and it connects them into the consultation.”

MDLive gets patients from three verticals: employers, health plans and health systems. Employers send eligibility files that say their employees are eligible along with some information on that patient. A health plan will push the subscriber ID for the plan so MDLive can determine who that person is and what their benefits are, along with some basic information. In both cases, patients fill out a digital clipboard with background information they want providers to see.

MDLive also gets telemedicine patients through an agreement with Walgreens, where Walgreens customers can see a doctor through MDLive video technology.

“When it comes to security, a consultation is treated with the same attention and confidence as a face-to-face visit,” Lichtlin said. “The connection has HIPAA-compliant security and privacy controls in place, and we use end-to-end DTLS encryption.”

And MDLive does integrate with EHRs.

“Some of the EHRs are very technically advanced. Folks like athenahealth, we connect to them through end-point APIs, they are on the cutting edge. Epic is starting to allow API integration, as well. We have a team of people who have been working in this business for the last 20 years, so we do all sorts of integrations. Some of your older EHR vendors are not deploying mobile end-points to integrate with so we do a lot of HL7 integration with the legacy EHRs.”

Philips

Philips delivers enterprise telehealth systems across multiple modalities in the hospital and in the home. The most critical patients are those in the ICU, where Philips has a specialized system that can be extended into med-surg floors and skilled nursing facilities. In the ambulatory setting, the company has systems to monitor patients in their homes and a suite of products to manage wellness and early stages of chronic illnesses.

Last summer Philips acquired Wellcentive, which helps providers entering value-based contracts maximize their outcomes and payments under those contracts. Those capabilities will be applied to Philips’ telehealth programs so Philips can recommend which patients would most benefit from telehealth and calculate the value that telehealth interventions will provide.

“We have a stroke module within our care management platform that allows folks into the telehealth center that act to manage the care the stroke patients get once they are in the emergency department,” said John Ryan, senior director, global marketing, at Philips telehealth. “We’ve used carts in skilled nursing facility settings to manage at-risk patients there. But our bread and butter to date has been the tele-ICU solutions. Clients start there and extend it from there into other solutions within the inpatient enterprise.”

In the inpatient setting, Philips has a database of 3.5 million patient records that it uses to develop algorithms that act on the signals coming in from patients so Philips can prioritize the patients for the care teams.

“On the ambulatory platform, one very unique differentiation is the fact that we can serve up assessments to patients in 33 different languages, and when those assessments come back to the clinician they can all come back in English,” Ryan said. “So if you are looking at population health management solutions in L.A. you can serve patients in Spanish or Farsi or Chinese. That form of communication is really important so you can apply your standards of care no matter where people originate from in the world.”

For the tele-ICU setting, hospitals need a video infrastructure for high-fidelity video connections. Additionally, there need to be interfaces to the EHR, as well as the various monitoring devices in the patient rooms.

“A lot of times you go in and it’s a very heterogeneous environment,” Ryan said. “Philips can work in these environments because we’re not coming at it from the EHR side, we know it’s a complex world and we’re used to coming in for one view of these patients.”

On the ambulatory side, providers use a desktop computer and patients use Philips devices, including a tablet, in the home for security and reliability, the company said.

“We are a class 2 medical device on the inpatient and ambulatory sides, we hold ourselves to a very high standard of reliability when it comes to the safety of information,” Ryan said. 

Philips integrates with EHRs, which it considers critical to telehealth.

“On the ambulatory side we will take patient records down from the EHR, patient demographic information, medical record number, phone number, anything else pertinent to set up on the system, and then publish information like vital signs and assessments and notes back up into the medical records,” Ryan said. “The EHR tends to be history of what has happened with the patient. Telehealth tends to look at what is going to happen with the patient if you do not intervene. Any time the information is pertinent and collected it is published back up.”

Polycom

Polycom touts its high-quality audio and video and its content communication capabilities on various platforms, from a basic codec that one hooks up to a TV to a rolling cart that moves from room to room to things like tele-psychiatry on a desktop. In addition to these codec systems, Polycom also has software-enabled systems, such as mobile software for iPads and Android devices, as well as software for Macs and PCs, all with the ability to provide up to HD video. Polycom also offers APIs that other vendors can use to integrate Polycom software into their systems.

One of the top telemedicine areas for Polycom systems is stroke assessment, where there is a risk because of the limited time to dispense drugs to inhibit a stroke from doing further damage.

“In the case of tele-psychiatry, it is extremely important that a patient feels more than just comfortable, it has to be virtually equal to an in-person experience with a natural conversation both from an audio and video perspective.”

“A patient might be in the middle of Kentucky but need access to a center of excellence, for example, in Louisville, to talk with a doctor who can make that assessment, and it’s critical for the doctor to be able to see and hear the patient clearly and make it easy for the technicians on the end to control the camera and zoom in and see if the face is drooping and make that clinical diagnosis remotely,” said Bob Knauf, senior product marketing manager.

Polycom is seeing a lot of growth in the field of tele-education in healthcare. Hospitals using Polycom video for everything from clinical rounds to nursing training for students studying from their homes.

“Some hospitals, like Johns Hopkins, are using our mobile software, sending iPads home with patients after major surgeries and keeping them on track via video versus having them have come in for exam after exam after exam,” Knauf said. “They are just doing checkups and delivering better patient care.”

Knauf said that audio is the biggest differentiator for Polycom telemedicine technology.

“We have stereo audio, but we also have a mode called music mode, it’s a mode we’ve used in music education for a long time that gives a much more natural representation of a musical instrument,” he said. “We recently found hospitals using music mode to listen to heartbeats remotely because they have found that when you switch this music mode on you get amazing clarity. We made it to hear a guitar or piano more naturally. It’s the same with a heartbeat. It’s not being compressed like many video systems will do, which is unnatural.”

But Polycom also boasts about its video quality, where software and algorithms enable users to have high-quality video conversations from as low as 128kbps, Knauf said.

“In the case of tele-psychiatry, it is extremely important that a patient feels more than just comfortable, it has to be virtually equal to an in-person experience with a natural conversation both from an audio and video perspective,” he added.

Required hardware depends on the situation. For inpatient stroke care, for example, a video codec and a pan-tilt-zoom camera are required. But for other uses, only an Internet-connected device with a camera is required.

“For tele-psychiatry, the best method for the psychiatrist is to have our Real Presence Convene, a desktop video system with our high-powered codec in there, for the highest quality audio and video,” Knauf said. “That patient could be on an iPad or an iPhone or their PC.”

Polycom secures all of its data in flight and at rest with AES encryption, from its iPhone app to its computer software to its video codecs.

Polycom’s telemedicine systems do not directly interface with EHRs.

“It can’t just pull information from a database into our system,” Knauf said. “You can connect your computer to it or share from an iPad or other device to our video codec; you are just sharing content. You can pull up X-rays, MRIs, EKGs, but you are not pulling from the EHR database.”

Sherpaa Health

Sherpaa Health markets its telemedicine offering more as a service than a technology product.

“We don’t white label our technology,” said Jay Parkinson, MD, founder and CEO. “If we partner with a health system, they are purchasing Sherpaa as a service. We use our doctors. And the consumer behavior we want to change is before you go to a doctor in person, go online first, because 70 percent of things can be resolved online before you wind up in the emergency room or urgent care center.”

Sherpaa Health services come in many forms.

“We have a website and iOS and Android apps for patients, and the technology platform we built for our doctors facilitates their own practice, and their own practice is exclusively virtual, they never see you in person,” Parkinson said. “When members of Sherpaa create a case, if it’s a simple case, it takes 10 minutes, if it’s a complex case, it may take six months. We own that case from beginning to end. It’s not a sort of 10-minute video transaction. In many ways we’re a new type of delivery model rather than a technology.”

For example, a recent patient who signed up on Sherpaa Health in September 2016 ended up diagnosed with testicular cancer. Sherpaa arranged for all of his care and three days later he was home from surgery, the company said.

“We have a proprietary network of caregivers we can refer your care to if virtual diagnosis and treatment is not the right avenue you can take,” Parkinson said. “We either diagnose and treat you or diagnose and care coordinate you. The concept of having a CRM is a big deal. Most telehealth is if we can’t help you here, you are on your own again. But this is more of a hand-holding scenario throughout the situation.”

Ninety-eight percent of interactions between Sherpaa’s physicians and patients occur over asynchronous secure messaging; the remaining communications occur on the phone. In five years of operation, the company has used video communication twice, it said. Patients need only any device that can handle secure messaging via web browser or mobile app.

Sherpaa Health stresses that its technology and processes are HIPAA compliant and secure.

“No personal health information is part of the email notification you receive,” Parkinson said. “It just says you have a new message from Sherpaa. All the messages, labs and everything are contained within the secure app.”

However, Sherpaa Health’s telemedicine offering does not integrate with electronic health records.

“I do not believe that is the right move for us because we treat this more as a service,” Parkinson said. “The way we integrate is with digital faxes. Whenever we refer someone, the specialist gets a referral via fax, the specialist consult report we get back from the specialist is a digital fax, which is included in the case. Our problems are not billing and data problems, it’s communications issues to make sure our doctors and patients are working with the same information, and digital faxes connect everybody.”

SnapMD

SnapMD positions its virtual care management system as complete virtual point of care. It has a patient interface, a provider interface and an administrative back-end that enables health system staff to operate the platform and their telehealth program.

“It has communication tools like high definition video, multi-participant video, screen sharing for presenting medical images to patients remotely, diagnostic devices, a full file-sharing feature within the system, e-prescribing, a Dropbox-like feature, a full scheduling system that has the ability to manage all of your patients and their records, you can manage staff within the system, and run full analytics reports,” said George Tierney, chief operating officer and executive vice president of product development and marketing.

SnapMD said its system is akin to setting up a virtual clinic, with all the tools necessary to run a clinic.

“Anything you need to run and operate a medical practice, any telehealth program in a virtual environment,” Tierney said. “We have within the administrative interface a rules engine, it’s close to programming. You can create custom rules within the system. A rule might be please make sure the system double-checks that the patient verifies they are still within the state of their home address, or you can set rules that certain patients can only see certain providers based upon the state in which the provider is in.”

There also is a roles-based engine, where administrators can create roles and responsibilities that are quite broad or very narrow, then assign those roles to each staff member.

“We looked at everyone in the space, and we realized telemedicine is not a new carve-out service, that’s a mistake,” Tierney said. “By doing that, that is a massive limitation. Those in the market that are both developing the technology and delivering the service have a ceiling at which they can actually provide value. We decided we would build a system we would put in the hands of the existing healthcare providers and in order to do that we need to do that in a certain way.”

When SnapMD designed its system, it designed it on what is known as a self-consuming API construct, which supports data interoperability.

“We built the brains, the center of the system, and then built our front-end around it using those APIs, that we would then make available to our clients to do with as they want,” he said. “They want to do data integration with their systems, if they have plans to build complementary systems on top of our platform, they can do that.”

By using the API construct, it creates a self-regulating quality assurance because those APIs are not a side project, they are the center of attention and have to work at peak performance at all times, Tierney said.

“And because we are self-consuming our APIs, that means we can make our entire system available through APIs and SDKs,” he said.

The video and data connections are fully encrypted end to end. And the system does integrate with EHRs.

“This goes back to our APIs, the other system needs to be able to accommodate that integration,” Tierney said. “We are integrated with athenahealth, Allscripts, some custom with Epic and some of the others, and we also offer our clients an option to go with integration with Redox, which was founded three years old ago by members of Epic’s integration team. Redox is like a health information exchange, middleware, and they’ve integrated with the top 10-15 EHRs out there.”

Teladoc

Teladoc was founded 15 years ago, selling its telemedicine offering to large self-insured employers and then to health plans and over the last couple of years to hospitals and health systems.

“We did 952,000 visits in 2016, and will do more than 1.4 million in 2017, and a lot of scalability is required for that, and a lot of flexibility at the patient level so patients can use it in multiple modalities,” said Dan Trencher, senior vice president of product strategy. “We have Android and iOS mobile apps, a website, and a 24/7 call center that can support patients going through our registration process and into having a visit.”

« It’s intended to exchange, pulling from a health record or other type of clinical data repository as well as sharing data back out. »

The company performs quality assurance with a team of nurses that reviews patient charts to ensure patients are getting a quality experience, Trencher said.

“It’s not just a video connection between a doctor and a patient, it’s a service with high quality care baked in,” Trencher said. “And patient engagement is key. There is a high incentive to drive the behavior change so that consumer thinks of accessing telehealth when they have the need, or in other cases like in post-discharge cases when they want to check in. That further engagement, we have a bit of science around that, and we’re pretty good at it.”

Teladoc can be used where Teladoc physicians are teed up, where a health system’s doctors are the go-to clinicians, or where there is a combination of the two.

“We can wrap our physician network around theirs and set up business rules so that during the day during the week the consult request that comes in will first route to the doctors affiliated with the health system, but if they are not available then our network can wrap around that and provide care,” Trencher said. “Also, because the platform is built on a very open architecture and uses APIs as its core way of interacting, it’s built for connectivity and real-time data exchange, so we have real-time connectivity with 20-plus of our health payer partners as well as connectivity to exchange clinical data with care management platforms at a health plan through multiple different potential formats or channels.”

And the company takes security very seriously, Trencher said.

“We’ve been put through the wringer by having large clients who are financial institutions or health plans with tens of millions of members, we’ve had to answer long lists of questions in our RFPs. We have been tested in that way.”

And the Teladoc system integrates with EHRs.

“It’s built structurally to do that,” Trencher said. “It’s intended to exchange, pulling from a health record or other type of clinical data repository as well as sharing data back out. We have developed the different approaches for that as well as the technology underneath. In the end we have the process and standards in place to share data by the alphabet soup of clinical data sharing standards.”

Zipnosis

Zipnosis said health systems would implement its telemedicine offering for two reasons. The first is for downstream revenue from patients and access, and gaining a powerful way to drive the relationship with a patient, the company said. The second is the clinical efficiency in delivering very simple care, the company added.

“We have an independent study of one of our clients that showed about 25 percent of the new patients who used the system went on to develop an ongoing relationship with the health system that developed $3,000 of incremental revenue,” said Jon Pearce, CEO. “It’s about accessing and keeping those customers when they are making healthcare choices.”

Zipnosis provides four ways to interact with its telehealth platform. The first is through an asynchronous adaptive interview, something of a digital conveyer belt to get to the right care. The second is direct to video, the third is direct to phone, and the fourth is a triage tool, so a patient ultimately can schedule an in-clinic visit, if necessary. There is also a boarding pass mode that enables quick access to clinical tests.

“From our user research we know that younger, healthier patients do not want to do a video or phone visit, so offering them the asynchronous tools is the way to get them,” Pearce said. “We have the ability to take our tool set and match it to demonstrated patient preferences in the market and then tie that to an ROI.”

Patients and providers only need an Internet-connected device with a camera. They can access the system through a website or a mobile app.

“In the security realm, the system is cloud-based and we work with a third party that has a HITRUST certification,” said Art Brown, director of marketing. “And PHI is only accessed after log-in, all the information is encrypted under SSL both in transit and in the database as well. It’s above industry standards.”

Zipnosis integrates its telemedicine system with various EHRs, including Epic, Cerner and athenahealth.

“Today we support HL7 and CCDA into those three EHRS,” Pearce said. “We also have single-sign-on so the platform can be embedded in an Epic or Athenahealth portal so the patient does not have to re-authenticate. And the whole application has an API wrapper for a customer that wants to truly embed the platform into their existing technology stack.”

Twitter: @SiwickiHealthIT
Email the writer: bill.siwicki@himssmedia.com


Like Healthcare IT News on Facebook and LinkedIn

Industry Moves: Former Iconix Marketing Vets Launch Branding Agency

Nicole Winnaman Maria Dolgetta Dari Marder

Aug. 2, 2017: Former Iconix Brand Group marketing and communications veterans Dari Marder and Maria Dolgetta partnered with entertainment-and celebrity-branding expert Nicole Winnaman to launch a new branding and marketing agency, Creative Playground, LLC.

The company will specialize in celebrity branding, marketing and communications across the fashion, entertainment, beauty and wellness industries. In addition, the firm has announced Creative Playground Productions, a strategic partnership with production company 3 Ball Entertainment for projects involving long and short-form video content.

Before forming Creative Playground, Marder was the longtime global chief marketing officer for Iconix Brand Group where, for more than two decades, she led branding for the portfolio of more than 30 brands including Candie’s, Badgley Mischka and London Fog.

She also created and launched Madonna’s fashion brand, Material Girl. Dolgetta oversaw global public relations and corporate communications during her tenure at Iconix Brand Group and helped build brands such as Danskin, Op and Candie’s.

Winnaman has negotiated high-profile partnerships for several celebrities including Justin Timberlake for Myspace, Fergie for Wet n Wild and Ellen DeGeneres for American Express. Creative Playground has offices in New York City as well as Santa Monica, Calif.

Want more?

Industry Moves: July 2017

Industry Moves: June 2017

Industry Moves: May 2017

Industry Moves: April 2017

Mark Ritson: Marketing debate is so polarised it’s hard to be sure of anything

Ritson head scratch smallThe worst of all sins in marketing, in my book at least, is the use of that hoary old quote often incorrectly attributed to either John Wanamaker or Lord Leverhulme. You know the one with the apocryphal line that “half the money I spend on advertising is wasted, the trouble is I don’t know which half”. If it crops up in a presentation, marketing article or debate – with the exception of this masterpiece you’re reading at the moment – it signals an almost inevitable journey to cliché and obviousness in equal measure.

But there is another problem with that quote these days: it’s not just a cliché, it’s also wholly inconsistent with the current way in which we discuss anything in marketing. Gone is the uncertainty and open, plaintive thinking of an earlier age in marketing when we queried with honest introspection what does and does not seem to be working. That’s been replaced by a form of tribal combat in which different sides hammer each other with exactly the opposite point of view constructed from equal parts of wobbly data and fake news.

READ MORE: Marketing must be better defined to be taken seriously

Rather than Lord Leverhulme bemoaning his uncertain advertising spend, today’s equivalent axiom would have him boasting “I’m spending all my money on digital and it’s working 180%”, followed by his arch nemesis Lord Beaverbrook retorting “shut your face Leverhulme, your money is being wasted because you don’t understand content marketing like what I do”.

Everywhere you look in marketing there isn’t just debate about what is and isn’t the right approach, there is vehement and unyielding certainty that my way is correct and yours is total balls.

Polarisation complicates marketing

Take the debate about brand safety for example. Depending on who you listen to it is either a massive threat to brand equity that has infected a significant proportion of global advertising, or it’s a tiny issue that was drummed up by the traditional media to inflict maximum damage on Google and other digital platforms and has been largely forgotten. Clearly it can’t be both, so which Is it?

If we ran a poll here on Marketing Week’s home page and asked readers to rate the degree to which brand safety is a serious threat to your brand on a scale of 1 (no threat) to 10 (huge threat) I am betting that we’d derive an average of around 5 but that the answers would be polarised at either end of the spectrum.

And it’s that polarisaiton that afflicts and affects seemingly every dimension of marketing. It makes for fabulous arguments on social media, juicy debates at conferences and several emotional comments at the foot of Marketing Week columns. But it also complicates the act of doing marketing tremendously.

Marketing debate is tribal combat in which different sides hammer each other with views constructed from equal parts of wobbly data and fake news.

It has never been a more exhilarating or exhausting time to work in this discipline. Never before has so much happened in marketing with so little consensus around what is and isn’t working. We do our business on what appears to be a continually moving and undulating platform of knowledge that constantly contradicts and reverses itself as we cling on for grim life.

Look at the act of targeting. I can spend a morning with a client that is convinced of the merits of micro-targeting using digitally enabled options such as lookalike modelling and A/B testing, and then the afternoon with a second company that follows the sophisticated mass-marketing approach and now believes (incorrectly) that it can go after everyone with a pulse. Depending on how you look at it you either target no one and let the computer do it for you, or everyone.

Take the optimum length of digital video advertising on Facebook. I can cite extremely persuasive men and women who tell me not to worry about sub-two-second exposures because that is more than sufficient to influence consumer decision making, and who then remind me that digital video is more complex than simply putting overly long TV ads online. Just as I am nodding and starting to get my head around two-second exposure models someone else pops up and says: “Bollocks! We are getting incredible results from three minute films.”

READ MORE: Mark Ritson – Why can’t marketers see that digital metrics are bullshit?

Or how about viewability? It seems logical to assume that 100% viewability is the gold standard for digital media. If consumers can’t see the bloody ad then clearly it’s not going to be impactful. So surely 100% viewability is the way forward?

Well not necessarily. It turns out that chasing 100% viewability often leads to much more expensive programmatic prices, opens you up to far greater risk of ad fraud (you always get 100% viewability from a bot) and generally ensures that the overall impact of advertising is lessened. Depending on who you ask, 100% viewability is either the only acceptable way to ensure effectiveness or a guaranteed way to reduce it.

You see what I mean? As soon as we develop even the semblance of marketing best practice, someone turns up, turns it upside down and claims the opposite. You need marketing training; you don’t need marketing training. Artificial Intelligence is dangerous; artificial intelligence is essential. Marketing needs to get back to basics; marketing is changing dramatically. Content marketing is a crucial new development in marketing; content marketing is just a bunch of fancy names for stuff that has existed for 50 years.

I could go on – trust me – and on.

Loss of nuanced debate

Surely you have seen it yourself. You read an article on a marketing concept and then, in the comments section, another marketer not only disagrees, they go out of their way to completely refute the whole nature of the original argument and supplant it with the exact opposite perspective.

My favourite current example is programmatic. There are only two clear and overriding observations we can make about programmatic in mid-2017. First, it’s growing like the clappers. Second, it’s unavoidable given the plethora of new channels that now exist and exceed human capabilities. More contentious is the current state of programmatic and whether the murky media supply chain and the multiple commissions it takes renders it inefficient.

I certainly think that’s the case and have been very – ahem – vocal on the subject. That has resulted in an entirely typical marketing response.

Mumbrella Ritson debate

Two very senior, very smart media professionals have responded to my wailings in the same Australian marketing site independent of each other. One of them agrees wholeheartedly with me. The other disagrees completely and, very politely, suggests my argument is nonsensical.

I read both articles, and was persuaded mightily by both articles, even though they perfectly contradict each other. My point is not to dwell on the respective arguments of my two commentators but to suggest that this is the nature of marketing these days. Everything is up, unless you think it’s down.

Mumbrella Ritson debate

Maybe the answer to all the quandaries is: it depends. That was usually the right answer in marketing in the olden days. We would look at the brand, the target segment and the objectives, and these factors would direct us to the make the right choice from the potential options in front of us.

But that’s not how contemporary marketing works. There is no room for ‘it depends’ anymore. It’s either totally wrong if you belong to tribe A or, if you belong to tribe B, entirely and completely correct.

We seem to have lost nuance, relativity and context. In our search for definitive answers to marketing’s big questions we’ve created chaos. It’s an exciting, fast-moving and emotional chaos. But it’s chaos nonetheless. And I wonder if things will ever calm down again.

But why bother asking you? Given you are also a marketer operating in 2017 I already know what your response will be. This column is nonsense and my point of view ridiculous. There is no issue with polarisation within marketing; we are all completely and utterly aligned.

Unless, that is, you disagree.

From ‘stories’ to livestreaming: The newest video formats for brands

As brands become more aware of the need for video content, social media sites and content creators are proving their worth through livestreaming, tailoring video options to screen size and launching several variations of short, disappearing ‘live’ videos.

The way content is created, branded and shared is constantly evolving. Here Marketing Week explores some of the newest options in video.

The rise of live video

Livestreaming is currently being tried, tested and launched via various platforms. Twitter announced its plans for a 24/7 live video stream in April, Facebook and YouTube continue to try and grow their live offering and other players in the market are proving their worth.

Brands can advertise against live video streams to reach a desired audience but increasingly it’s a way for brands to create their own live content.

Aside from creating this content with Google, Facebook and Twitter, other platforms are emerging that offer the tools to take control and brand a video experience rather than having to use the existing platforms and all that comes with them.

READ MORE: Amazon’s Twitch on why brands should see it as the ‘Gogglebox of live streaming’

One example is Telefónica’s livestreaming tool Xtreamr, which is designed to help brands, content producers and TV broadcasters create interactive live experiences for audiences via a web tool and mobile app.

Ahead of launching the service Ana Cattell, head of commercial innovation at Telefónica, and her team did some research into livestreaming to assess the current landscape.

They discovered brands felt they were being “sent to third-party sites or ecosystems where they would have to fit in with the norms that were being dictated,” she claims. “They didn’t have the ability to fully brand the experience and they were rescinding ownership of the video created.”

Telefónica’s livestreaming app Xtreamr is designed to help brands, content producers and TV broadcasters create interactive live experiences

The Xtreamr app is designed to alleviate some of the barriers to content creation, equipping brands with the tools and allowing them to fully own and brand the experience themselves without third parties.

Despite the excitement around live video, Marketing Week columnist Mark Ritson believes “livestreaming is just the latest in a line of nausea-inducing trends that have no impact or reach but are still lapped up by credulous marketers”.

READ MORE: Live streaming has no impact or reach, but marketers will do it anyway

Making video fit for purpose

It’s no longer a viable option for brands to simply repurpose TV ads for use on other channels, instead content should be created especially for each screen.

“Tailoring video marketing to the environment has never been more important. A 30-second spot which works well as a pre-roll may not work as well in an autoplay format in a news or social feed,” says Nigel Clarkson, managing director of Yahoo UK.

Clarkson says understanding users’ context is also key. He adds: “Matching context is one of the key benefits of native video, as the format is designed to seamlessly blend into the stream of content that the user is viewing at the time, without disrupting their experience.”

Context also means thinking about how that video is being viewed, this is often without sound, “which on face value presents a challenge for marketers” according to Clarkson, but he believes “it also presents a chance to work with content designed to be viewed muted”.

He says: “Marketers are adapting to this and creating their videos for autoplay, keeping in mind viewers without audio who might be sitting in the doctor’s office or on the train by using captions and on-screen graphics to deliver their stories.”

Tailoring video marketing to the environment has never been more important.

Nigel Clarkson, Yahoo UK

Justin Taylor, UK managing director at native video company Teads, sees a shift towards content created for screen size to be more relevant to the device, particularly mobile.

Teads’ research, conducted with Ipsos, shows that mobile-optimised square video formats drive 66% more completed views than horizontal creative when viewed on mobile devices.

It also shows that outstream vertical and square formats are the least intrusive of all mobile ads, driving a 39% enhancement in user experience. Vertical formats achieve 83% higher ad recall than the horizontal format, with square ads achieving 60% better ad recall.

But Taylor says there is still “catch-up” needed by creative agencies and investment in making video fit for various screens. He says: “There’s still a traditional approach to AV production but these types of stats will shift the change.”

Innovation in video creation will also aid this move. Taylor says clients and creative agencies are going to need to have “systems that add and build efficiency” to get the reach and frequency via video.

To bring content to life brands are also adding haptic technology to mobile video, which causes it to vibrate in time with the visual and audio experience. Ahead of the release of the Jason Bourne movie, for example, Teads and developer Immersion, created a trailer for the mobile that vibrated when explosions were seen on screen.

Creating these videos can require a lot of investment from brands, not just budget but time and effort. Tech startup Vidsy – one of Marketing Week’s 100 Disruptive Brands 2017 – creates mobile video ads for brands through a collaborative video production model, where multiple ‘creators’ simultaneously produce videos around a brand brief through a tech platform.

This enables a marketer to produce 30-50 original videos, ready-made for platforms like Facebook and Snapchat.

“There are a lot of brands struggling with the traditional way of producing video because the infrastructure used was designed for TV and it’s slow, complex and often too expensive for mobile and social,” says Pedro Carvalho, head of marketing at Vidsy.

Building brand stories

Airbnb used Instagram Stories to build awareness of its Airbnb Experiences offer.

Snapchat, Instagram and Facebook all offer a ‘stories’ function on their sites. Stories originated with Snapchat in 2013 and allows users of the social media platform to play a series of ‘snaps’ or videos in one sequence to share with friends and followers that disappears after a certain amount of time.

Instagram and Facebook followed suit in 2016 and 2017 with their own not dissimilar versions of the feature. And Facebook this week made its ‘Stories’ feature public, allowing influencers and celebrities to share their photos and videos beyond their immediate network of friends to extend reach.

A report in TechCrunch found that view counts on Snapchat Stories dropped by 15-40% after the launch of Instagram Stories, and posting volume declined as well so there is much competition in this area.

READ MORE: Snapchat must prove to marketers it has mass appeal

These functions are now open to brands to create their own stories and Instagram seems to be stealing a lot of the limelight.

Airbnb has used Instagram Stories to build awareness of Airbnb Experiences, a product which launched in December 2016 where local experts give travellers their curated recommendation of a town or excursion.

Fashion retailer Asos has also trialled ads on Instagram Stories to raise brand awareness among teens and millennial customers in the US and in the UK. The campaign targeted men and women aged over 18, with the aim of diving into certain fashion and pop culture interests through targeting.

READ MORE: Instagram introduces ads and live videos to its ‘Stories’ feature

Instagram says 200 million people are using Instagram Stories every day with 70% of stories watched with the sound on. Brands’ stories have proved popular with a third of the most viewed stories coming from businesses.

Delivering personalised video at scale

National Lottery owner Camelot set up a personalised video campaign during the Rio Olympics to show the support funding provides Olympic and Paralympic athletes.

The Games provided an opportunity to thank National Lottery players for the difference they make, says Camelot campaign manager Priya Patel. Working with Team GB and ParalympicsGB athletes, and using EchoMany technology across Twitter, Camelot was able to deliver a personalised campaign at scale.

“​As a business we’re focused on driving more engaging and personalised relationships with our players,” says Patel. “When a [lottery] player tweeted #IAmTeamGB or #IAmParalympicsGB they instantly received a personalised video response from one of over 70 athletes saying thank you.”

The campaign led to engagement on Camelot’s Twitter account increasing by 460%, as well as 51% of the personalised replies being retweeted, which contributed to the National Lottery being one of the most talked about brands on Twitter during Rio 2016.

Following the success of the campaign, Camelot continues to use video personalisation. The most recent campaign is #ThanksToYou, focusing on players’ contributions to The National Trust, The Royal British Legion, The Natural History Museum and British Film Institute.