Archives par mot-clé : video

Engaging travel audiences through 360-degree video

Imagine being able to invite potential customers into your world from the comfort of their sofa, giving them the chance to experience your destination as they sit down in search of their next adventure.

NB: This is a viewpoint from Jon Mowat, managing director of Hurricane Video Strategy.

We’ve come a long way from the days of sending out promotional ‘guided tour’ VHS tapes to woo would-be guests, and the dawn of 360 video marketing is poised to revolutionise travel advertising.

Our minds are hardwired to react to movement, and there’s something innately appealing about video content that lets you take control and manipulate the viewpoint, surveying the action from every angle as if you’re really there.

Users don’t even require VR headsets (although they’re relatively cheap and readily available) as both YouTube and Facebook 360 videos employ a click and drag motion that lets you manipulate the action – looking up, down, left, right and behind to create that ‘real life’ effect.

You’re probably aware of how quickly video content is taking over the internet, but here’s three reasons why 360-degree video should be central to your marketing strategy:

  • A Google study recently ran two variations of the same ad – a traditional video versus a 360-degree video – and the 360 version triumphed with 41% more ‘earned actions’ (subscribes, shares, and views).
  • 82% of consumer internet traffic will be video by the end of the decade – Cisco’s Visual Networking Index.
  • Facebook’s vice president for EMEA region, Nicola Mendelsohn, predicts that the platform will likely “be all video” within the next four years.

360-degree video does have the ability to be heard above the noise, but there needs to be a real emphasis on producing quality output that promises to engage audiences. Let’s take some travel marketing examples that do just that.

Panoramic inspiration

Creating immersive experiences that titillate the travel bug is the aim of the game, and 360 video is paying dividends for early adopters, such as Expedia’s partnership with Tourism Australia for their ‘How Far’ campaign. (Note: Safari doesn’t currently support 360 playback on YouTube content, so you may need to switch to another browser to watch the film.)

From the cliffs of Tasmania, to the kangaroos of Karratha Station, the depths of Ningaloo Reef, to the indigenous tribes of the outback, we’re presented with a vibrant world of activity waiting to be explored.

Diving the coral reef and sleeping under the stars of the desert are two prominent dreams on bucket lists all over the world, so being able to get a deeply engaging taste of the action could certainly trigger ticket sales. Indeed, comments from the public are incredibly complimentary:

360-degree video

The general response from the 3.5 million viewers has been overwhelmingly positive, and Expedia bookings to Australia have surely soared, contributing to the company’s revenue growing 22.3% year-on-year.

Another popular hotspot on the holiday hitlist is the Grand Canyon, and this effort from Visit The USA allows viewers to peer over the edge to whet the appetite and test their head for heights.

You really get that ‘butterflies in your tummy’ feeling when you look down – an effect that simply can’t be replicated with standard videos. This particular response might not be for everyone, but there’s no doubting 360’s ability to move you in ways like never before.

Again, the three million viewers have great things to say, extending the video’s reach with each comment, organically growing the audience of potential customers.

Next up on our tour of tours is Royal Caribbean International’s film showcasing its grand Voyager of the Seas cruise ship. Make sure you ‘look up’ when instructed to gauge just how big this boat is!

Flicking through a brochure is fine, and watching a traditional video can give you an accurate idea of what life on board might be like, but nothing beats spinning 360 to get a real feel for the place.

It’s surprising how many features are incorporated into this floating city, and being able to move around the family suite gives a sense of assurance over how much space guests can expect.

Yet again, 360 video seems to have had the desired effect:

Travel operators need to focus on the destination to engage social media audiences, and nothing will bring your particular port of call into sharper focus than going big on 360-degree video.

‘Engagement’ is the buzzword that marketing managers the world over are trying to tap into, and the stats suggest that 360 is the way forward.

Whether you run a hotel, theme park, airline, cruise ship, bus tour or some form of holiday activity, there are many reasons to pack 360-degree video in your travel marketing kit.

NB: This is a viewpoint from Jon Mowat, managing director of Hurricane Video Strategy.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInEmail to someone

Meet the Latest Facebook Marketing Partner for Video Content Category — Mosaicoon

via Mosaicoon

via Mosaicoon

Mosaicoon is the first company for content marketing based in Italy, to be named as a Facebook Marketing Partner.

Mosaicoon, the award-winning Italian tech company that provides video content solutions, has been named as a Facebook Marketing Platform. The new partnership will enable social media marketers to leverage the fast and cost-effective video monetization platform from Mosaicoon. Facebook marketers will able to access Mosaicoon’s solutions in the Content Marketing specialty, specifically focusing on video.

Mosaicoon’s Founder and CEO Ugo Parodi Giusino says –

We are proud to be selected as Facebook Marketing Partner and enthusiastic to continue our work with the greatest brands on Facebook.”

As a Facebook Marketing partner, Mosaicoon joins a global community of technology companies that are known for excellence in seven marketing categories –

  • Advertising Solutions
  • Community Management
  • Content Marketing
  • Audience Data Providers
  • SME Solutions
  • Audience Onboarding
  • Mobile App Campaign Performance Measurement

Mosaicoon is the first Italian company that Facebook chose as a partner for content marketing. The Sicily-based video marketing platform enables marketers to build Video-First brands, offering top quality video content that is original, engaging and ROI-specific. In short, Mosaicoon campaigns help “supercharge your video strategy”.

Mosaicoon provides tailor-made customized video content that can either be developed or rebranded for immediate consumption, with guaranteed performances.  Video content providers that offer inventories for browsing, purchasing and building can also leverage this platform to drive more engagements. Mosaicoon offers video content strategy over an ingenious platform, which it brands as – the “Human Creativity Engine”.

Giusino adds, “With Facebook being a video-first company, we are excited to contribute to an increase of video consumption toward good quality content and to boost brands’ video communication by reducing any complexity and solely engaging their users with relevant content. Video is the new language of digital, users are looking at videos everywhere, and brands need to take it into account if they want to properly reach their audience. Our goal is to give companies all the video content they need to become publishers, and Facebook Marketing Program is a great opportunity of synergy toward this direction.”

In addition to the revolutionary video strategy and solutions, Mosaicoon also provides matchmaking AI-powered keyword tagging feature for videos, enabling brands to pick relevant video inventories that match their business demands. The proprietary algorithm named “Sonar” helps clients plan the best video strategy by identifying the items they need to cover by video communications.

For brand marketers looking to monetize their video content, Mosaicoon provides a pricing model called “CPVplus”. This model allows brands to only pay content per effective views rather than purchasing videos at a fixed price.

This is the second big update on Mosaicoon in less than a year. In May 2016, the Sicily-based martech firm raised $9.67 million in Series B funding. The company has so far raised close to $15 million in three rounds of funding since its inception in 2010.




Recommended for you

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Social Media Video Marketing Must Knows

social media video advertising

As was mentioned in Rebecca Moore s What’s on the Agenda for Marketing in 2017 post, video marketing is becoming increasingly important and profitable, particularly social media video marketing. Of course, to assume that video marketing is one and the same via all social platforms would be a mistake. Just like you wouldn’t post content the same way across all platforms, the video content that you create needs to be unique for each platform that you intend to use. Consider the differences and benefits discussed below for four of the major platforms when planning your social media video marketing strategy.

Video Marketing via YouTube

Since YouTube is entirely video content, it makes video marketing on YouTube a no-brainer. Of course with most people trying to take advantage of video marketing on YouTube, standing out and achieving better results requires a few best practices. Creating unique or unconventional content will be your first priority. With hundreds of hours of video available for audience consumption on YouTube, yours has to stand out from the rest. Ultimately people are on YouTube to be entertained and will steer clear of anything that seems boring, unoriginal, or purely promotional. You want to ultimately tell a story, not overtly sell a product. Aside from content, there are some basic marketing strategies – sort of SEO tips if you will – that you can implement to improve your video ranking on YouTube. This article explains many of them in good detail if you’re keen on trying your hand at them. This includes things like contextual keywords used to be found through a standard search and optimising your video advertisement. You should also experiment with video length and audience targets to see how your advertisements perform one against the other, then keep what works and build on it.

Video Marketing via Facebook

Despite YouTube’s video heavy content, when it comes to social networks and audience reach potential, nothing beats Facebook. With just under 2 billion users, the audience market and potential for exposure is just too big to ignore. And because Facebook videos begin playing automatically, you have added opportunity to hook your audience if you design your video correctly. Audio is only activated after a user clicks on the video, so don’t rely on sound to get your point across. Instead, use intriguing or compelling visuals to tell your story. Depending on the aim of your video, you need to create that video differently. Video on Facebook performs best, then, when it is focused – stick to one purpose and drive the message home. Since the option is there, you should be using audience targeting to your advantage. If your video won’t be appealing to everyone, then turn on custom audiences to ensure that you are reaching the correct target group. This will help you make more of an impact within your video reach. It is also best to keep videos concise and easy to consume.

Video Marketing via Twitter

Although often overshadowed by the likes of Facebook and YouTube, Twitter video marketing is not to be overlooked. In 2015 Twitter released some video statistics that showed a high engagement or 82% of users watching video on Twitter. The general consensus was that “Twitter users love video!” Twitter offers options to upload pre-made videos via file or YouTube link, or the added benefit of creating Twitter videos directly in the mobile app. This opens up the ability to harness spontaneity and create “in the moment.” The types of video content that tend to do well on twitter are informational how-to videos, product demonstrations, behind-the-scenes looks into brands, customer response videos from brands, interviews and events, and strangely enough even promotional videos – when done tastefully – are consumed well on Twitter.

Video Marketing via Instagram

Instagram is seeing video rise in popularity and importance, taking the “sharing content via images” backbone that Instagram has built to a new level. The major benefit of utilising Instagram for video marketing is its very specialised audience. Instagram, with over 600 million users, is an extensive network of eager people who are there specifically to consume visual content. Videos on Instagram can be up to 60 seconds long and you are able to add filters – one of the Instagram claims to fame. Despite the fact that Instagram does offer video ads, your content should nevertheless not be purely promotional. The Instagram audience is there to be awed and amazed, not to consume advertisements. In order to make your 60 seconds count, it is better to create intriguing content that shows your brand personality and utilises humour, as well as engages the community directly through user generated content.

Small business to business video marketing can be as straightforward as shooting a melon

Owning and operating a number of medium-small retail websites that sell items that are difficult to ask for in person posed a marketing challenge to its owner Tom Nardone of Troy, Michigan who runs PriveCo. Although he saw the potential of selling an item such as the inexpensive bulletproof vest online according to a recent Associated Press (AP) article, Nardone realized that he needed to reach a wider audience than he was getting at gun shows. He began creating videos where he demonstrates the strength of the vest, shooting everything from watermelons to boxes of candy to illustrate what his bulletproof vest can and will do. The videos can be graphic, with items exploding at slow speed and Nardone sometimes splattered with barbecue sauce or peanut butter.

PriveCo’s videos have collected a following, according to the AP article, with the melon video earning nearly one million views. In the video, Nardone lines up seven melons and shoots them at point blank range. The video illustrates that one would have to carry around four water melons to match the protection Nardone gets from one inexpensive bullet proof vest. Nardone is often recognized at gun shows and has received compliments from people who like to watch him shoot items from gravel to boxed wine, AP notes.

« The vest does its job, but it’s nothing to look at, » Nardone says. « So we said, uh oh, we’ve got to come up with something good. »

It’s natural for some small businesses like real estate brokers to use videos in marketing campaigns for houses and other properties; for others, it can take some brainstorming and perhaps even an offbeat sense of humor to come up with something compelling, the article notes. But more businesses are getting on board — Facebook counted more than 3m small business videos posted in September, up 50% from 2m six months earlier, according to the company’s most recent published figures.

Arlington Machinery, which sells, repairs and appraises used plastic-making machines, began posting videos on YouTube nine years ago with several objectives. One was to raise the company’s rank in internet search results, and another was to display machines for prospective buyers. Or, if equipment was sent to the company for repair, videos could show the owners that the machines were ready to be sent back, the article notes.

But more recently, Arlington realized videos were also a way to market itself to different kinds of customers. The Elk Grove, Illinois-based company decided to have a little fun and commissioned the whimsical animated video that explains the company’s services.

« Used machinery is not all that exciting to most people, » says David Pietig, a general manager at the company. « What we’re trying to do is make people interested in what we do. »

Thinking about what customers want to see is the best way to get inspired, marketing experts say according to the AP article.

« Good ideas can come from everywhere. If there is an old-school mentality at a company, they should get a pool of 21-year-olds that are more digitally and socially media savvy, » suggests Brian Metcalf, CEO of GreenRoom, a digital marketing company based in Miami.

Making videos for these small businesses can cost almost nothing or run into the tens of thousands of dollars. Arlington Machinery says its animation cost only about $100, but Nardone paid more than $15,000 to produce a series of videos last summer. At Mountain View Vineyard, a Pennsylvania winery that began making videos in the past year, a smartphone and a still camera have kept the costs minimal.

When marketing director Laurie Monteforte started working at Mountain View a year ago, she made it a priority to create a campaign that included videos. But the standard way of selling wine — showing smiling people gathered around a food-laden table and lifting their glasses in a toast — won’t work in a video, she says.

« Today’s audience doesn’t want commercials, where we try to sell you something, » Monteforte said in the AP story.

Mountain View’s videos teach viewers how to make something with wine, such as red wine hot chocolate, or show some aspect of the winery’s operations. Last summer, owner Linda Rice demonstrated how she hand-picks Japanese beetles off of plants and drops them into soapy water, killing them without chemical pesticides.

Mountain View says its revenue is up about 30% in the past year, and credits about three-quarters of that gain to video and social media, the AP story notes.

« There are so many options where people can go for wine and spirits, » Rice says. « Video and social media set us apart because people get to know us. »

White House aides struggle to defend Trump wiretap claims

The White House on Monday attempted to defend President Trump’s unfounded claim that former president Barack Obama wiretapped Trump Tower near the end of the presidential campaign, sending out several administration officials — both on and off camera — to reiterate the assertion without providing supporting evidence. 

In tweets over the weekend, Trump claimed he had “just learned” that Obama wiretapped his midtown Manhattan skyscraper, where he lives and which housed his presidential campaign — accusing the former president of a potentially illegal act and writing that Obama was a “bad (or sick) guy.” 

Trump has since provided no proof to back up his assertion, which has been rebuffed by Obama, FBI Director James B. Comey and former director of national intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. On Monday, senior administration officials contorted themselves trying to defend the president’s claims, which seemed to emanate largely in response to a rant on conservative talk radio and in an article on Breitbart News, the conservative website that Stephen K. Bannon, Trump’s chief strategist, formerly led.

Speaking to reporters from the White House briefing room without cameras present, White House press secretary Sean Spicer referred reporters to his weekend statement calling on the House and Senate intelligence committees to investigate the wiretapping charges as part of their broader probe of alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. He refused to add clarity or context to Trump’s Twitter missives, saying neither the president nor the White House would comment further until the congressional investigations are completed.

“I’m just going to let the tweet speak for itself,” Spicer said. “I think the president speaks very candidly.” 

Spicer, citing news reports, said there was sufficient evidence to warrant further investigation at the congressional level. 

“I think that there’s no question that something happened. The question is, is it surveillance, is it a wiretap or whatever?” Spicer said. “But there’s been enough reporting that strongly suggests that something occurred.”

Asked whether he could unequivocally say that Trump’s tweet was based on more than a talk radio report and the Breitbart article, Spicer declined, again referring to his calls for the intelligence panels to take the lead.

Asked about the specific sourcing behind the president’s tweets, Spicer said there were several options: “It could be FISA, it could be surveillance,” he said, referring to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, under which a secret court can issue warrants for electronic surveillance on potential spies or terrorists. If there was a FISA wiretap of Trump during the campaign, it would mean that the court had found there was probable cause to believe he was acting as an “agent of a foreign power,” as the law requires.

In perhaps the clearest sign of the uncomfortable situation the president’s tweets created for his aides, the normally media-
hungry White House went largely dark Monday. Although several top officials did defend Trump in TV interviews, Spicer did not allow cameras into the briefing room for his news conference Monday, and Trump signed an executive order for his revamped travel ban in private.

Speaking on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday, Clapper did provide the White House with a bit of cover, saying there was “no evidence” of collusion between Trump and Russia during the campaign. But he also undercut the president’s assertion that Obama had wiretapped him, saying, “There was no such wiretap activity mounted against the president-elect at the time as a candidate or against his campaign.” 

President Trump and former president Barack Obama at the Capitol on Inauguration Day. On Monday, the White House attempted to defend Trump’s claim that Obama wiretapped Trump Tower. (Pool photo by Jack Gruber/USA TODAY NETWORK)

Spicer urged reporters to note Clapper’s comments about an apparent lack of collusion, but gave less weight to his remarks rebutting Trump’s claims of wiretapping. Asked about the difference, Spicer said, “He said that he wasn’t aware of anything. I take him at his word that he wasn’t aware, but that doesn’t mean that it didn’t exist.”

This reverse-engineering of evidence has happened before, as when the president declared erroneously that his inauguration crowd was the largest in history and when he claimed without evidence that at least 3 million undocumented immigrants illegally voted for Hillary Clinton in the general election.

The public face of this latest effort has mostly been deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who was dispatched to a Sunday news show — even though Spicer and chief of staff Reince Priebus usually take that task — and to two Monday morning talk shows.

Huckabee Sanders admitted that she had not discussed the matter with the president, and she lacked answers to questions. When asked Monday by ABC News’s George Stephanopoulos whether the president accepted that Comey had refuted his tweets, she responded: “You know, I don’t think he does.”

Like Spicer, Huckabee Sanders claimed Trump’s accusations are supported by news media reports, even though a list of such articles provided by the White House contained no such evidence. She also attempted to recast the president’s words with a softer tone.

“Look, the president firmly believes that the Obama administration may have tapped into the phones at Trump Tower,” Huckabee Sanders said on NBC’s “Today” show on Monday. “This is something that we should look into. We’d like to know for sure.”

Huckabee Sanders repeatedly urged that the news media and others give the president the same benefit of the doubt that they seemed to be giving to those accusing the Trump campaign of coordinating with the Russian government.

“Look,” she said on the “Today” show, “I haven’t had the chance to have the conversation directly with the president, and he’s at a much higher classification than I am, so he may have access to documents that I don’t know about, but I do know that we take this very seriously.”

White House counselor Kellyanne Conway followed a similar script Monday on Fox News’s “Fox Friends,” saying there have been numerous media reports that there was “politically motivated activity all during the campaign and suggesting that there may be more there.”

“He’s the president of the United States,” Conway said. “He has information and intelligence that the rest of us do not. And that’s the way it should be for presidents.”

At times, it seemed that even West Wing officials had not coordinated their responses with one another. Asked about Conway’s comment Monday, Spicer said he hadn’t talked with her about what she meant.

“I can’t specifically respond to you in terms of what she was referring to, whether she was referring to the exact nature of this charge or whether generally speaking he is given information,” Spicer said.

Ultimately, the White House all but stated that the best person to explain or defend the president’s claims was the president himself. Asked by a reporter how it was appropriate for Trump to make an explosive statement and then send out his aides to “clean it up,” Spicer again referred back to Trump’s social media feed.

“The president’s tweets,” he said, “speak for themselves.”

Obamacare Lite? New GOP Health Care Bill Has Host of Critics

A new Republican health care plan keeps much of the basic framework set up by Obamacare, but with a conservative twist, analysts say.

But it’s full of holes, with no detail on how to pay for its provisions and no estimates at all of how much it will cost taxpayers.

While conservatives praised the emphasis on personal responsibility, liberals said it would take newly won health insurance away from millions and cost people protection from some of the worst abuses of the insurance industry.



And it’s not even clear if all Republicans in Congress will vote for it. At best, analysts agreed, it’s a work in progress.

« I think their basic overriding philosophy is to let the states decide a lot of things, which is sensible, » said economist Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum and a former director of the Congressional Budget Office.

Related: Entry Ban Could Cause Doctor Droughts in Pro-Trump States

Moments after the House Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means committees unveiled their plans on Monday, Michigan Republican Rep. Justin Amash called it « Obamacare 2.0 » on Twitter.

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, another Republican, called it « Obamacare Lite. »

« What they kind of have is a repeal plus, » said healthcare expert Joe Antos of the American Enterprise Institute, who’s done stints in the Congressional Budget Office and the Health and Human Services Department.

« This is a kind of a hodge podge and I don’t see it’s much different from what we saw a few weeks ago, » Antos told NBC News.

The plan stops the unpopular mandate that required almost everyone to have some sort of health insurance. It replaces that by allowing health insurance companies to charge 30 percent higher premiums if customers had gone 63 days or more without health insurance.

Both provisions were meant to prevent people from waiting to buy health insurance until they were sick.

« That could encourage some healthy people to sign up initially, » said Larry Levitt, a health policy expert at the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation.

Related: Is Obamacare Collapsing?

The 2010 Affordable Care Act required health insurance companies to cover anyone who wanted to buy insurance, and is laid out a minimum list of conditions that had to be covered or services provided, from pregnancy care to cancer screenings.

It stopped a once-common practice of capping coverage once a customer started costing too much, and aimed to limit bare-bones plans that covered almost nothing.

Many of these appear to be preserved in the new plans, at least for a time, along with another popular provision that allowed young adults to stay on their parents’ plans until they turned 26.

The new American Health Care Act would allow health insurance companies to charge older people five times as much as they charge younger clients — the current limit is three times as much.

Taxes that paid for the old Obamacare subsidies, which helps an estimated 85 percent of people who bought private health insurance on the exchanges, are gone. Instead of subsidies, the plan provides tax credits for people making less than $75,000 a year.

There are few details on how the Republicans plan to pay for the tax credits, however.

« I don’t understand where the money comes from. I understand what they have taken away, said Republican health economist Gail Wilensky, who now is a senior fellow at Project HOPE. « It’s just a mystery. »

Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA, a strong supporter of Obamacare, said it will return many Americans to pre-Obamacare days.

« This bill would strip coverage from millions of people and drive up consumer costs. It shreds the Medicaid social safety net that serves more than 72 million people, including many children, senior citizens and people with disabilities, » said Pollack. « And it once again leaves millions of people in America with chronic illness and disease at the mercy of insurance companies. »

Image: Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi


Image: Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi

House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California called it a « Make America Sick Again » bill.

« Republicans even enable insurers to once again charge more or deny coverage to millions of Americans with pre-existing conditions, abandoning those families who lapse in coverage for any reason at all, » she said

House Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member Frank Pallone, Jr., a New Jersey Democrat, and Ways and Means Committee Ranking Member Richard Neal of Massachusetts said they could would not support the plan.

« The Republican repeal bill would rip health care away from millions of Americans, ration care for working families and seniors, and put insurance companies back in charge of health care decisions — contrary to everything President Trump has said he would do with his health care plan, » they said in a joint statement.

The plan sets out a path to revising Medicaid, the joint state-federal health plan for low income people. It allows the 31 states plus Washington D.C. that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act to keep getting federal funding to do that but inexplicably leaves out the 19 most Republican states that refused to take part.

Instead, those states will get cash. It’s not enough, said Wilensky. « I don’t think $10 billion is enough, » she said.

Baltimore City Health Commissioner Dr. Leana Wen says the changes to Medicaid will eventually leave many people out in the cold. « Medicaid provides the ultimate safety net for individuals who need it the most. I am extremely concerned about that, » she said.

The ACA was designed to get health insurance to more Americans, and it did. At least 20 million more people have health insurance than before the law was enacted, about half of them on new exchanges set up to help people buy private health insurance, often with federal subsidies, and about half through an expansion of Medicaid.

In 2010, the year the law was signed, 48.6 million Americans or 16 percent of the population had no health insurance. The ACA brought that to below 9 percent.

Republicans are wary of making changes that will take health insurance away from millions of Americans, but are under pressure to make the reforms look more like a return to private industry, with less government oversight.

Antos said the plan may compromise too much.

« Some Republicans will say, ‘No, you’ve gone too far (and) give things away’ and other Republicans will say, especially in the Senate, ‘you haven’t gone far enough to say what you are going to replace it with’, » he said.

« So it seems like there’s a sweet spot here, but it’s not a sweet spot that a politician would want to be in. »

Once more, North Korea launches banned ballistic missiles into Japanese waters

March 6, 2017
Monday’s successful launch by North Korea of four banned ballistic missiles, three of which landed in Japanese waters, has its neighbors and their allies concerned.

The missiles “clearly represent a new threat from North Korea,” said Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe during a parliamentary committee session that morning.

It appears the test launch was a response to annual United States-South Korean military drills that the two countries consider routine, but that the North views as a rehearsal for an invasion. In the past, North Korea has conducted missile launches to coincide with the joint military exercises, something it promised to do this year as well.

But Monday’s test launch comes as countries threatened by the hermit kingdom are reconsidering their stances towards it. The Trump administration is currently crafting its policy on North Korea, after The New York Times reported over the weekend that the US, starting with the Obama administration, hasn’t effectively developed cyber-weapons and electronic strikes to counter Pyongyang’s missile program. And Monday’s test launch has led some in Japan and South Korea to call for more robust defense spending, including on the US-made THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) system that China vehemently opposes.

“This can be used by the government as a pretty credible reason why we have to spend more on defense at the expense of other budget items,” including social welfare programs, Narushige Michishita, director of the Security and International Studies Program at the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies in Tokyo, told The New York Times.

The four missiles, fired simultaneously from a launch site near the border with China, landed in the sea off the northwest coast of Japan. Three of the missiles fell within the so-called exclusive economic zone, which extends 200 miles offshore, and where fishing and cargo ships are active. The fourth missile landed outside but close to the zone, according to Mr. Abe, Japan’s prime minister.

Officials and analysts doubt the missiles were intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), which can reach the United States. The missiles flew on average about 620 miles and reached a height of 160 miles. South Korea’s military said the missiles were unlikely to have been ICBMs. Joshua Pollack, editor of the US-based Non-Proliferation Review added that the launch “sounds like a field exercise involving deployed missiles, probably ones we’ve seen before.”

Days before the launch, North Korea threatened “strong retaliatory measures” in response to the US-South Korean military drills. Seoul and Washington consider the military drills defensive and routine. Technically, the Korean Peninsula remains in a state of war, since the Korean War ended in 1953 with an armistice, not a peace treaty.

But an unidentified spokeswoman for the North’s General Staff of the Korean People’s Army said Pyongyang’s reaction to the drills would be the toughest ever. In response to the drills last year, North Korea fired a long-range rocket that put an object into orbit.

But Monday’s launch also comes the month after North Korea test-fired a new type of missile into the sea, and has said it would continue to launch new strategic weapons. That launch was the first since President Trump took office. And it comes on the heels of the suspected assassination of the half-brother of North Korea’s leader, which appears to be prompting a reassessment of China’s relationship with the regime, as The Christian Science Monitor’s Peter Ford reports.

 … the assassination risks unleashing far-reaching strategic consequences: a new US-China campaign against the Supreme Leader’s illegal nuclear weapons program.

“The chances have never been bigger to coordinate” the two countries’ efforts to choke off Pyongyang’s nuclear work, says Zhu Feng, an influential Chinese policy adviser and professor at Nanjing University.

There are signs that Beijing is losing patience with North Korea, and inflicting real economic pain on its wayward ally for the first time. Now, as China at last wields an economic stick, the question is whether the new US administration is ready to offer diplomatic carrots to persuade Mr. Kim to freeze or abandon his nuclear ambitions.

North Korea’s threats have its neighbors worried. Japan plans to reinforce its ballistic missile defenses and is considering either buying THAAD or building a ground-based version of the Aegis system that is deployed on ships in the Sea of Japan. South Korean security officials also called for the early deployment of THAAD, according to The New York Times. China has protested the deployment of the anti-missile system on the Korean peninsula because the system’s radar would be able to track Chinese missile launches.  

On Monday, Moscow also expressed concern over the North Korean launch.

« Definitely, we are seriously worried – these are the sort of actions that lead to a rise in tension in the region and of course in this situation, traditionally, Moscow calls for restraint from all sides, » Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told a conference call with reporters.

But at a daily news briefing, China’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang encouraged prudence from both sides.  

<!–

Thanks for signing up.

–>

« All sides should exercise restraint and not do anything to irritate each other to worsen regional tensions, » Mr. Geng said, referring to both the missile launch and U.S.-South Korean military exercises. 

This report includes material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

The Daily 202: Wiretapping allegations accomplished what Trump wanted – but may backfire bigly

With Breanne Deppisch

THE BIG IDEA: It is easy to pooh-pooh Donald Trump’s predawn Saturday tweetstorm accusing Barack Obama of the worst political crimes since Watergate while offering no evidence  as an undisciplined rant from someone who has long embraced conspiracy theories.

That neither gives the president enough credit nor reflects the gravity of his unfounded accusations.

It is past time to dispense with the fiction that Trump doesn’t know what he’s doing. He knows exactly what he’s doing. He is trying to distract us. And, at least this weekend, he succeeded.

— The country’s chief law enforcement officer made a false statement to Congress, while under oath, about his contacts with one of this nation’s biggest adversaries. (Legal experts, including Republicans, note that others have been prosecuted for less.) When he got busted, Attorney General Jeff Sessions initially claimed through a spokeswoman that he couldn’t recall specifics of what had been said during his undisclosed sit-down with the Russian ambassador, except that it wasn’t political in nature. Then, with his job on the line, he miraculously remembered supposedly exculpatory details.

This is a big dang deal, no matter how hard Sessions tries to spin it. It’s such a big deal that, after weeks of  refusing to do so and with the president publicly urging him not to, the AG agreed to recuse himself from any investigations related to the 2016 campaign.

Last Thursday, Sessions said at his press conference that he would write the Judiciary Committee “today or tomorrow” to clarify his misleading testimony. It’s now been four days, and he has yet to formally clean things up. A spokesman said he’ll submit amended testimony later today. We’ll see. Either way, a delay this long only happens when one is trying to get one’s ducks in a row.

But the press didn’t spend this weekend talking about Sessions. He had confirmed to attend the Gridiron Dinner in Washington on Saturday night, but he skipped it and flew to Florida to be with Trump. The Sunday shows did not dwell on debates over the AG’s duplicity. Instead, everyone talked about whether Obama wiretapped Trump Tower last October.

And Trump was happy as a clam about that. A White House official told The Post that the president was in a brighter mood on Sunday morning than he was on Saturday because he was pleased that his allegations against Obama were the dominant story on cable and led the newspapers.

The president knows the media cannot ignore him when he says something so inflammatory, and he believes there will be no real consequences for him if it turns out that everything he said was nonsense. After all, there haven’t been up until now.

Moreover, Trump’s core supporters also got a new talking point. Whenever they’re confronted with the links between Trump associates and Russia, millions of people are now going to reply that the real story is Obama’s wiretapping — even if that claim is shown definitively to have no basis in reality.

HOW HE DECIDED TO TWEET:

— The president was seething mad as he watched round-the-clock cable news coverage about Sessions. He was angry that the positive marks he received for his Tuesday speech to Congress, which made him jubilant, had been replaced by the Wednesday night news about Sessions. The Post’s Phil Rucker, Bob Costa and Ashley Parker have a tick tock on the fury that followed, based on interviews with 17 top White House officials, members of Congress and friends of the president:

  • “Inside the West Wing [on Wednesday night], Trump’s top aides were furious with the defenses of Sessions offered by the Justice Department’s public affairs division and felt blindsided that Sessions’s aides had not consulted the White House earlier in the process….
  • “The next morning, Trump exploded, according to White House officials. He headed to Newport News, Va., on Thursday for a splashy commander-in-chief moment. The president would trumpet his plan to grow military spending aboard the Navy’s sophisticated new aircraft carrier. But as Trump, sporting a bomber jacket and Navy cap, rallied sailors and shipbuilders, his message was overshadowed by Sessions….
  • “Then, a few hours after Trump had publicly defended his attorney general and said he should not recuse himself from the Russia probe, Sessions called a news conference to announce just that — amounting to a public rebuke of the president….
  • “Back at the White House on Friday morning, Trump summoned his senior aides into the Oval Office, where he simmered with rage, according to several White House officials. He upbraided them over Sessions’s decision to recuse himself, believing that Sessions had succumbed to pressure from the media and other critics instead of fighting with the full defenses of the White House…
  • “In a huff, Trump departed for Mar-a-Lago, taking with him only his daughter and [son-in-law], who is a White House senior adviser. His top two aides, Chief of Staff Reince Priebus and [Stephen] Bannon, stayed behind in Washington.
  • “Stories from Breitbart News, the incendiary conservative website, have been circulated at the White House’s highest levels in recent days, including one story where talk-radio host Mark Levin accused the Obama administration of mounting a ‘silent coup,’ according to several officials.”

THIS IS TRUMP’S MODUS OPERANDI:

— Whenever he is under fire for something in a sustained way, he makes a shocking claim or provocative declaration about something else to change the subject. He is a master practitioner at the politics of distraction. These five examples might jog your memory:

  • After struggling during the first GOP primary debate to explain his disparaging comments about women, he attacked Megyn Kelly. “There was … blood coming out of her wherever,” he said, ensuring that the media focused on the new Trump-Kelly “feud.”
  • When the 2005 Access Hollywood video came out, he brought Bill Clinton’s former accusers to St. Louis as his guests to the second debate.
  • In November, the morning after agreeing to settle a fraud lawsuit against Trump University for $25 million, he demanded that the cast of “Hamilton” apologize to Mike Pence.
  • Days after firing Michael Flynn, he held a rambling 77-minute press conference because he knew that it would get the Flynn story out of the news.
  • Perturbed when critics pointed out that he lost the popular vote, he claimed that 3 million to 5 million people voted illegally.

ALWAYS ATTACK, NEVER APOLOGIZE

— Trump’s approach to crisis management continues to be guided by the Roy Cohn playbook. “This is McCarthyism!” Trump said, as he attacked Obama for supposedly wiretapping him, on Saturday. There was great irony to this. Cohn, after all, was Joe McCarthy’s chief counsel on the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations during the early 1950s. Two decades later, he became one of Trump’s biggest mentors during a formative phase of his life.

— Cohn’s creed was to always be on the attack, to counterpunch whenever punched and to never apologize. Never, ever, ever apologize. He believed that you never yield an inch, even if you’re in the wrong, because your opponents will take a mile.

— “The man who showed Trump how to exploit power and instill fear is how The Post’s Robert O’Harrow Jr. and Shawn Boburg described him in a story last June: “Trump was a brash scion of a real estate empire, a young developer anxious to leave his mark on New York. Cohn was a legendary New York fixer, a ruthless lawyer in the hunt for new clients. They came together by chance one night at Le Club, a hangout for Manhattan’s rich and famous. Trump introduced himself to Cohn, who was sitting at a nearby table, and sought advice: How should he and his father respond to Justice Department allegations that their company had systematically discriminated against black people seeking housing?My view is tell them to go to hell,’ Cohn said, ‘and fight the thing in court.’ It was October 1973 and the start of one of the most influential relationships of Trump’s career.”

Cohn represented the Trumps throughout their protracted legal fight with DOJ. In 1973, looking to change the storyline, Cohn had a news conference to announce that Donald and Fred were countersuing the federal government for $100 million. He claimed the government was trying to force “subservience to the Welfare Department.” Ultimately, the Trumps settled without admitting guilt, which allowed them to declare victory.

— Trump was even quoted in The Post’s 1986 obituary of Cohn, who died of complications from AIDS. « If you need someone to get vicious toward an opponent, you get Roy,” he said.

— This same approach is on display when Trump tries to repurpose the very attacks being leveled against him against his accusers. On Friday, he literally called for investigations into Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi for meetings they had with the Russian ambassador. It’s a slightly more adult version of, “I know what you are, but what am I?”

— In Politico Magazine last April, Michael Kruse documented the many ways that Cohn was more than just Trump’s lawyer: “Over a 13-year-period, Cohn brought his say-anything, win-at-all-costs style to all of Trump’s most notable … deals. Interviews with people who knew both men at the time say the relationship ran deeper than that — that Cohn’s philosophy shaped the real estate mogul’s worldview and the belligerent public persona visible in Trump’s campaign. … He brokered the gargantuan tax abatements and the mob-tied concrete work that made the Grand Hyatt hotel and Trump Tower projects. He wrote the cold-hearted prenuptial agreement before the first of his three marriages and filed the headline-generating antitrust suit against the National Football League. … ‘He considered Cohn a mentor,’ Mike Gentile, the lead prosecutor who got Cohn disbarred for fraud and deceit not long before he died, said in a recent interview.”

— Another reason the relationship with Cohn mattered: Roger Stone, his longtime political consigliere, first met Trump through Cohn. Stone seemed to have inside knowledge on the WikiLeaks document releases during the campaign….

— Not much has changed in how Trump does damage control over the past four decades, but one big thing is different: He now controls the very Justice Department that he and Cohn once countersued….

BUT, BUT, BUT:

— Here’s the rub: Trump is not as cunning as he thinks. He’s playing checkers, not chess. (Or maybe it’s Connect Four.) While he’s proven adept at manipulating the New York tabloid world for decades, as the first president in American history with no prior political or military experience, he’s a rookie at playing the inside game. And it is coming back to haunt him. Bigly.

Cohn’s chapter in Washington didn’t end well. He overreached with his witch hunt, prompting Dwight Eisenhower to come after him. After being bested in the 1954 Army-McCarthy hearings, he escaped to New York. McCarthy died of alcoholism after his Republican colleagues in the Senate voted to censure him.

SIX MAJOR WAYS THAT TRUMP’S WIRETAPPING CLAIMS COULD BACKFIRE:

1. Turning the FBI director against him:

James B. Comey asked the Justice Department this weekend to issue a statement refuting Trump’s claim that Obama ordered a wiretap, but the department did not do so. “The revelation underscores the fraught nature of the FBI’s high-profile investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election,” Abby Phillip and Ellen Nakashima note. “A key question fueling that inquiry is whether Trump associates colluded with Russian officials to help Trump win. … It is not clear why Comey … did not himself issue a statement to refute Trump’s claims.”

“Mr. Comey’s request is a remarkable rebuke of a sitting president, putting the nation’s top law enforcement official in the position of questioning Mr. Trump’s truthfulness,” notes the New York Times, which first reported the news. “The confrontation between the two is the most serious consequence of Mr. Trump’s weekend Twitter outburst, and it underscores the dangers of what the president and his aides have unleashed by accusing the former president of a conspiracy….”

2. Prodding the White House counsel to take risks he otherwise would not:

Trump’s tweets caught his top aides by surprise, and they spent Saturday trying to figure out how to respond and looking for any backup.

A senior White House official told The New York Times on Saturday that Donald McGahn was working to secure access to what he believed to be an order issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court authorizing some form of surveillance related to Trump and his associates. “The official offered no evidence to support the notion that such an order exists,” Michael D. Shear and Michael S. Schmidt reported. “It would be a highly unusual breach of the Justice Department’s traditional independence on law enforcement matters for the White House to order it to turn over such an investigative document. Any request for information from a top White House official about a continuing investigation would be a stunning departure from protocols intended to insulate the F.B.I. from political pressure. It would be even more surprising for the White House to seek information about a case directly involving the president or his advisers.” After the Times story blew up, another administration official walked back the earlier statements.

3. Trump has become the boy who cried wolf:

The president’s claims about Obama wiretapping were so indefensible that even his aides would not defend them directly, Aaron Blake notes, pointing to tweets from press secretary Sean Spicer and a Sunday show appearance by deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders. “Let’s look into this,” Sanders said. “If this happened, if this is accurate, this is the biggest overreach and the biggest scandal.” Trump, of course, didn’t equivocate; he stated it as fact.

Trump has a very long history of making very serious allegations with no facts to back them up. Beyond his multi-year quest to prove Obama was not born in the United States, the president has said that his predecessor did not really attend Columbia University, insinuated last year that Obama bribed the New York attorney general to investigate Trump University and called him “the founder of ISIS.”

Among the other fallacious claims that Trump made during the campaign which he never offered any substantiation for:

  • The IRS might be auditing his tax returns “because of the fact that I’m a strong Christian.”
  • He suggested that Ted Cruz’s father was somehow involved with Lee Harvey Oswald.
  • He said there’s something « very fishy » about Vince Foster’s death.
  • He trafficked in rumors that Antonin Scalia may have been a victim of foul play. “They say they found a pillow on his face,” Trump said in one radio interview, “which is a pretty unusual place to find a pillow.”
  • He said vaccines may cause childhood autism.
  • He maintained that thousands of Muslims in New Jersey celebrated the Sept. 11 attacks.
  • He insisted that a man who charged the security barricades at one of his rallies in Ohio was a member of the Islamic State. He based this false statement on a hoax Internet video he and his staff saw online.

What happens in the aftermath of a terrorist attack, during a natural disaster or amid an economic crisis? He’ll desperately need the American people to trust and rally behind him, but he will have drained the reservoir of goodwill. That is when Trump’s credibility gap is going to become a cataclysmic problem for his presidency and, frankly, for the country.

4. Making his White House look dysfunctional:

“Trump’s presidency has veered onto a road with no centerlines or guardrails,” Karen Tumulty writes in a smart analysis. “Trump’s response also has deepened doubts about his own judgment, not just in the face of the first crisis to confront his young presidency but in dealing with the challenges that lie ahead for the chief executive of the world’s most powerful nation. … The voice of a U.S. commander in chief carries much greater weight than that of just about anyone else on the planet. Trump’s detractors say the way he uses that platform has worrisome implications that go far beyond the sensation he creates on social media and his ability to dominate the news. … Nor does Trump appear to have a governing apparatus around him that can temper and channel his impulses.” Two quotes:

“We have as president a man who is erratic, vindictive, volatile, obsessive, a chronic liar, and prone to believe in conspiracy theories,” said conservative commentator Peter Wehner, who was the top policy strategist in George W. Bush’s White House. “And you can count on the fact that there will be more to come, since when people like Donald Trump gain power they become less, not more, restrained.

“When the president goes off and does what he did within the last few days, of just going ahead and tweeting without checking on things, there’s something wrong. There’s something wrong in terms of the discipline within the White House and how you operate,” said Leon Panetta, a White House chief of staff for Bill Clinton and CIA director during the Obama administration, on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

5. Emboldening conservatives to call for a full investigation:

Many congressional Republicans are already fatigued with having to defend Trump when he makes these kinds of claims, and the charges of illegal eavesdropping may prompt some to support something more aggressive than the ongoing probes by the House and Senate intelligence committees.

« I’m very worried that our president is suggesting that the former president’s done something illegally, » Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said at a town hall meeting in his state on Saturday night. « I would be very worried if, in fact, the Obama administration was able to obtain a warrant lawfully about Trump campaign activity with foreign governments. So it’s my job as a United States senator to get to the bottom of this. I promise you I will. »

« We are in the midst of a civilization-warping crisis of public trust, and the President’s allegations … demand the thorough and dispassionate attention of serious patriots,” said Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) in a statement. “A quest for the full truth, rather than knee-jerk partisanship, must be our guide if we are going to rebuild civic trust and health.”

“The president put that out there, and now the White House will have to answer as to exactly what he was referring to,” Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) said on « Meet the Press.” “Look, I didn’t make the allegation. I’m not the person that went out there and said it.”

6. Ensuring, more broadly, that the Russia connections continue to overshadow his domestic agenda:

If they have nothing to hide, why haven’t they been forthcoming? Trump and his spokeswoman categorically denied that any communication took place between the campaign and any foreign entity. “In fact, it is now clear it did happen,” Rosalind Helderman notes. “The past few days have brought a growing list of confirmed communications between Trump campaign aides and Russian officials, with each new revelation adding to a cloud of suspicion that hangs over the White House.… It is unclear why the White House has consistently denied contacts with Russian officials if the meetings that took place were innocuous. As a result, the confirmations of the encounters have trickled out through a series of news stories that have proved increasingly damaging to the Trump administration.”

Tomorrow’s confirmation hearing for Rod Rosenstein to become deputy attorney general will now be must-see TV. Because Sessions has recused himself, he will now oversee anything that comes from election-related investigations. Democrats will press him hard on everything related to the recusal and Russia:

All of the heat on Trump is starting to have an impact on his foreign policy, as well: “Trump is telling advisers and allies that he may shelve, at least temporarily, his plan to pursue a deal with Moscow on the Islamic State group and other national security matters,” the Associated Press’s Julie Pace reports. “The reconsideration of a central tenet of his foreign policy underscores the growing political risks in forging closer relations with Russia.”

WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING:

— The Supreme Court this morning vacated a lower court’s ruling in favor of a Virginia transgender student after the Trump administration withdrew the federal government’s guidance to public schools about the controversial bathroom policy. From Robert Barnes: « The justices were scheduled to hear the case later this month. But after the federal government’s position changed, the court said the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit should reconsider the dispute between the Gloucester County school board and 17-year-old Gavin Grimm. The 4th Circuit had relied on the federal government’s guidance that school should let transgender students use the bathroom that corresponds with the student’s gender identity. The Trump administration withdrew that guidance, which was issued by the Obama administration. Both the school board and Grimm’s attorneys had asked the Supreme Court to let the case proceed, saying it presented a reading of the civil rights law Title IX that the court ultimately will have to settle. »

THE WORLD IS ON FIRE:

— North Korea launched four missiles on Monday morning, firing a provocative barrage that coincided both with joint U.S.-South Korean military exercises on the southern half of the peninsula  and with the opening of the annual National People’s Congress in China. Anna Fifield reports: “The launches follow a remarkable month in which Kim Jong Un’s regime tested a solid-fuel rocket that it says is part of an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of hitting the United States and in which the regime is accused of assassinating the leader’s half brother. Both actions have angered allies and adversaries in the region, and Monday’s launches will only exacerbate that.” The government in Japan said three of the missiles landed “perilously close,” splashing down “within about 200 miles” of its coastline.

— “Russian Hackers Said to Seek Hush Money From Liberal U.S. Groups,” by Bloomberg’s Michael Riley: “Russian hackers are targeting U.S. progressive groups in a new wave of attacks, scouring the organizations’ emails for embarrassing details and attempting to extract hush money, according to two people familiar with probes being conducted by the FBI and private security firms. At least a dozen groups have faced extortion attempts since the U.S. presidential election, said the people, who provided broad outlines of the campaign. At least some groups have paid the ransoms even though there is little guarantee the documents won’t be made public anyway. Demands have ranged from about $30,000 to $150,000, payable in untraceable bitcoins, according to one of the people familiar with the probe. The ransom demands are accompanied by samples of sensitive data in the hackers’ possession. Along with emails, the hackers are stealing documents from popular web-based applications like SharePoint, which lets people in different locations work on Microsoft Office files.”

GET SMART FAST:​​

  1. The Marine Corps is investigating allegations that an “unknown” number of current and former service members shared illicit and compromising photos of female colleagues on a private Facebook group. (Thomas Gibbons-Neff)
  2. Exposure to polluted environments is associated with more than one in four deaths among children younger than five, according to new World Health Organization reports. The research finds that some 1.7 million children’s deaths across the globe are attributable to environmental hazards such as exposure to contaminated water, pollution, and other unsanitary conditions. (Jia Naqvi)
  3. A severe drought in Somalia killed at least 110 people from a single region in the past 48 hours, striking down members of an already acutely malnourished population as livestock continue to perish. Hope is in short supply: U.N. officials estimate they need $6 billion in the next few weeks to thwart disaster. So far, they’ve received just half a billion dollars. (Amanda Erickson)
  4. Diamond Reynolds, who live-streamed the aftermath of her then-boyfriend Philando Castile’s fatal shooting at the hands of police in Minnesota, is back in the spotlight  but for much different reasons: She and an accomplice are accused of attacking someone with a hammer and bear spray. (Cleve R. Wootson Jr.)
  5. The size of Colombia’s illegal coca crop has exploded in recent years, and it could be to blame for a giant cocaine comeback on U.S. streets. Test samples show that 90 percent of cocaine for sale in the United States is of Colombian origin. Alarmingly, the number of young Americans who admit to trying the drug rose 61 percent from 2013 to 2015. (Nick Miroff)
  6. The State Department is slated to resume its daily briefings today, a department spokesman confirmed, ending a temporary communication hiatus from Foggy Bottom. (USA Today)
  7. A bluegrass guitarist and political newcomer won the Democratic nomination for the special election to replace Ryan Zinke in Montana, which basically ensures that the GOP holds the seat in the May 25 special election. (Great Falls Tribune)
  8. General Motors is selling its European car business to Peugeot, giving up brands Opel in Germany and Vauxhall in Britain to the French automaker in a $2.33 billion deal. The move marks the American company’s retreat from a major market and raises concerns about job cuts. (AP)
  9. A Michigan college is investigating a hazing incident in which a student with severe peanut allergies had a glob of the condiment shoved in his face at an off-campus party. The incident spurred a severe reaction. “He could have been killed,” she wrote, posting a photo of her son’s distorted face on social media. (New York Times)

THE KNIVES ARE REALLY COMING OUT FOR REINCE:

— Priebus has become a “singular target of criticism” in the Trump administration, Politico’s Alex Isenstadt and Josh Dawsey report: “In interviews, over a dozen Trump aides [and] allies … described a micro-manager who sprints from one West Wing meeting to another, inserting himself into conversations big and small and leaving many staffers feeling as if he’s trying to block their access to Trump. They vented about his determination to fill the administration with his political allies. And they expressed alarm at what they say are directionless morning staff meetings Priebus oversees that could otherwise be used to rigorously set the day’s agenda and counterbalance the president’s own unpredictability. The focus on Priebus comes at a time of growing distress for the president …. Priebus did not accompany Trump on a trip this weekend to Florida, an absence that left many wondering if Trump …. had put his chief of staff in the doghouse. »

— Priebus is obsessed with his public image. From Rucker, Parker and Costa: When reporters began to hear about that Oval Office meeting at which senior staff got upbraided, the chief of staff interrupted his Friday afternoon schedule to dedicate more than an hour to calling reporters off the record to deny that the outburst had actually happened, according to a senior White House official. “Every time there’s a palace intrigue story or negative story about Reince, the whole West Wing shuts down,” the official said. Ultimately, Priebus was unable to kill the story. He simply delayed the bad news.

IMMIGRATION WILL DRIVE THE DAY:

— The White House is expected to announce an updated version of Trump’s executive order today, unveiling a revised version of his controversial policy which sought to bar entry to the United States from residents of seven majority-Muslim countries before it was blocked in federal court. The new rollout is expected to address of the concerns raised by federal judges, and comes after both Jeff Sessions and DHS Secretary John Kelly — key players in the implementation of the order — met with Trump at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday. (Abby Phillip and Robert Costa)

— Expect three changes in the new order: Among other things, it’s expected to exempt current visa holders — a significant departure from Trump’s first order. And it removes an exception to the refugee prohibition for religious minorities — which critics said was discriminatory because it allowed only Christians into the country. And, to soothe tensions with Baghdad, the new order will not include a blanket ban on citizens from Iraq. (Matt Zapotosky)

— “It’s not just deportations and the border: Trump seeks to remake the immigration system,” by David Nakamura: “For half a century, U.S. immigration laws have favored family reunification, allowing immigrants who gain legal permanent residence to bring over their children, spouses, parents and siblings. Critics of the process have argued that so-called chain migration has … fostered an influx of those who are competing with native-born Americans for low-wage, low-skilled jobs. In Trump’s view, a new immigration system would curtail entry to the country among foreigners who cannot ‘support themselves financially,’ although he did not define what that means. … To immigrant rights groups, Trump’s talk of a merit system is code for slashing legal pathways into the country and focusing them on highly educated immigrants from advanced nations — a strategy that harks back to a 1920s backlash against a wave of immigrants who entered the country during the Second Industrial Revolution.” 

GOP DIVIDED ON OBAMACARE:

— Is Tom Price being marginalized? From the Rucker, Costa and Parker story on tumult inside the White House: “The administration intends to introduce a legislative plan later in the week to repeal and replace Obama’s health-care law. … The rest of Trump’s legislative plan, from tax reform to infrastructure spending, is effectively on hold until Congress first tackles the Affordable Care Act. White House legislative staffers concluded late last week that the administration was spinning in circles on the health-care plan, amid mounting criticism from conservatives that the administration was fumbling. With Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price on the road with Vice President Pence, a decision was made: Mick Mulvaney, director of the Office of Management and Budget, would become the point person, though officials insisted Price had not been sidelined. On Friday, Mulvaney convened a meeting at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building with top administration officials and senior staff of House and Senate leaders to hammer out the final details of the proposal to replace the Affordable Care Act…

« On Capitol Hill, Price is seen by some Republicans as more knowledgeable about health-care policy than Mulvaney, given his experience as a physician and his time as chairman of the House Budget Committee. But Mulvaney benefits from the close relationships he has forged with Trump’s top advisers and with the House’s conservative wing. » 

— “Patience Gone, Koch-Backed Groups Will Pressure G.O.P. on Health Repeal,” by the New York Times’s Jeremy W. Peters: “Saying their patience is at an end, conservative activist groups backed by the billionaire Koch brothers and other powerful interests on the right are mobilizing to pressure Republicans to fulfill their promise to swiftly repeal the Affordable Care Act. Their message is blunt and unforgiving, with the goal of reawakening some of the most extensive conservative grass-roots networks in the country. It is a reminder that even as Republicans control both the White House and Congress for the first time in a decade, the party’s activist wing remains restless and will not go along passively for the sake of party unity. The Koch groups are calling their campaign ‘You Promised,’ and are prepared to spend heavily, they said. The initial phase, which will cost in the low six figures, will include a nationwide digital advertising campaign featuring testimonials from people who say they were harmed by the Affordable Care Act. On Tuesday, the groups will kick off the effort with a rally near the Capitol … [and] beyond that, Americans for Prosperity said it was prepared to bring ‘significant resources’ to bear as needed.”

TRUMP’S AMERICA IS DEEPLY DIVIDED:

— Sales of guns and ammunition in the U.S. have seen a sharp decline since Election Day, according to a spate of recent data from the FBI and consumer groups. BUT that overall decline has been accompanied by some unusual growth: Gun clubs and shops that cater to black and LGBT clients say there has been an uptick in interest in firearms since November among those who fear that racial and gender-based violence could increase during Trump’s presidency. T. Rees Shapiro and Katie Zezima report: « Philip Smith, president of the National African American Gun Association, said his group has seen a recent surge that appears to be driven by fear that the nation’s divisive politics could spiral into violence. ‘Trump is some of that reason, and rhetoric from other groups that have been on the fringe,’ Smith said. ‘It’s like being racist is cool now.’ Smith said the group has added more than 7,000 members since Election Day and new chapters are popping up all over the country. »

— Seattle-area police have been asked to investigate the shooting of a 39-year-old Sikh man as a suspected hate crime, after he was shot in the arm on Friday by a masked man who apparently told him, “Go back to your own country,” before pulling the trigger. (Cleve R. Wootson Jr.)

— Three Muslim students who tried to visit an Oklahoma lawmaker at the state capitol said they were surprised when they were told they must fill out a questionnaire before being allowed to make an appointment. They were then handed a list of “hateful, bigoted” questions that “intentionally misinterpreted ideas from the Koran to slander Muslims,” according to an officer with the Oklahoma chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. One question invokes a Koran passage before asking, “Do you beat your wife?” (Amy B Wang)

— A pro-Trump rally in Berkeley, Calif., turned violent this weekend after protesters clashed with the president’s supporters, leading to at least 10 arrests. Footage from the event showed police outfitted in riot gear and engaging in shouting matches with several hundred people in the crowd. Many could be seen kicking and hitting one another. Authorities confiscated metal pipes, baseball bats, two-by-four blocks of wood and bricks from the crowd. (Amy B Wang)

— Conservative author Charles Murray said he faced down one of the most angry, chaotic crowds of his career as he attempted to give a lecture on his book “The Bell Curve” at Middlebury College in Vermont. School officials and witnesses said an event that began with several hundred organized protesters packed into a protest hall turned violent – ending with Murray being forced to cancel his lecture and later “swarmed” by an unruly mob as he attempted to flee the event. Witnesses said the confrontation said it felt as though it was edging “frighteningly close” to outright violence. (Peter Holley)

— Concerns about traveling to the U.S. have spiked in India after a spate of high-profile violent incidents in recent days – including the recent shooting attack on two Indian computer engineers, as well as a convenience store owner who was fatally shot in South Carolina. (Annie Gowen)

— A student born and raised in the Washington area has filed a federal lawsuit after she was reportedly denied a tuition assistance grant because of her mother’s immigration status. The suit alleges that the program unfairly discriminates against U.S. citizens with immigrant parents, including those in the U.S. legally – thus making it harder for them to receive a college degree. (Janell Ross)

— Tens of thousands of immigrant detainees allege in a lawsuit that they were forced into labor by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — saying they were forced to work for $1 a day, or nothing at all, in violation of anti-slavery laws while held at private prisons. Kristine Phillips reports: “The lawsuit, filed in 2014 against one of the largest private prison companies in the country, reached class-action status this week after a federal judge’s ruling. That means the case could involve as many as 60,000 immigrants who have been detained. It’s the first time a class-action lawsuit accusing a private U.S. prison company of forced labor has been allowed to move forward…At the heart of the dispute is the Denver Contract Detention Facility, a 1,500-bed center in Aurora, Colo., owned and operated by GEO Group under a contract … to house immigrants who are awaiting their turn in court. The original nine plaintiffs claim that detainees at the ICE facility are forced to work without pay — and that those who refuse to do so are threatened with solitary confinement. GEO Group also is accused of violating Colorado’s minimum wage laws by paying detainees $1 day instead of the state’s minimum wage of about $9 an hour …. The lawsuit claims that the practice violates the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act, which prohibits modern-day slavery.”

THE DECONSTRUCTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE:

— “Leashes Come Off Wall Street, Gun Sellers, Polluters and More,” by The New York Times’s Eric Lipton and Binyamin Appelbaum: “Giants in telecommunications, like Verizon and ATT, will not have to take ‘reasonable measures’ to ensure that their customers’ Social Security numbers, web browsing history and other personal information are not stolen or accidentally released. Wall Street banks … will not be punished, at least for now, for not collecting extra money from customers to cover potential losses from certain kinds of high-risk trades that helped unleash the 2008 financial crisis.  And Social Security Administration data will no longer be used to try to block individuals with disabling mental health issues from buying handguns.… These are just a few of the more than 90 regulations that federal agencies and the Republican-controlled Congress have delayed, suspended or reversed in the month and a half since [Trump] took office.… The emerging effort — dozens more rules could be eliminated in the coming weeks — is one of the most significant shifts in regulatory policy in recent decades.« 

— As Trump continues to jet off to sunny Mar-a-Lago each weekend, some are criticizing his recent rollback of an Obama-era water rule that could help his golf course. The AP reports: “The executive order calling for a review of a rule protecting small bodies of water from pollution and development is strongly supported by golf course owners who are wary of being forced into expensive cleanups on their fairways. It just so happens that Trump’s business holdings include a dozen golf courses in the United States, and critics say his executive order is par for the course: yet another unseemly conflict of interest that would result in a benefit to Trump properties if it goes through. Trump’s order targets a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency rule — released under former President Barack Obama in 2015 — that designates many smaller creeks and wetlands as protected under the Clean Water Act of 1972. ‘The conflict is disturbing and his failure to completely step away from his business raises questions about his White House actions,’ said Scott Amey, general counsel for the Project on Government Oversight.”

THE WORLD ADJUSTS TO TRUMP:

— “In the era of Trump, Germans debate a military buildup,” by Anthony Faiola: “As the Trump administration ratchets up the pressure on allied nations to shoulder more of their own defense, no country is more in the crosshairs than Germany. If it meets the goals Washington is pushing for, Germany — the region’s economic powerhouse — would be on the fast track to again become Western Europe’s biggest military power. Since the November election in the United States, the Germans — caught between Trump’s America and Vladimir Putin’s Russia — are feeling less and less secure. Perhaps nowhere is the prospect of a new future playing out more than here in Lithuania — where nearly 500 German troops, including a Bavarian combat battalion, arrived in recent weeks for an open-ended deployment near the Russian frontier. The NATO deployment marks what analysts describe as Germany’s most ambitious military operation near the Russian border since the end of the Cold War. Yet … the deployment is also offering a window into the risks of renewed German strength — as well as the Russian strategy for repelling it by dwelling on Germany’s dark past. In the 21st-century world of hybrid warfare, the first proverbial salvos have been fired.”

— The New Yorker, “Donald Trump’s Worst Deal,” by Adam Davidson:Throughout the Presidential campaign, Trump was in business with someone that his company knew was likely a partner with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. … The Baku deal appears to be the second time that the Trump Organization has turned a blind eye to U.S. efforts to sanction Iran … [and] to this day, the Trump Organization has not provided satisfying answers to the most basic questions about the Baku deal…. More than a dozen lawyers with experience in F.C.P.A. prosecution expressed surprise at the Trump Organization’s seemingly lax approach to vetting its foreign partners. But, when I asked a former Trump Organization executive if the Baku deal had seemed unusual, he laughed. ‘No deal there seems unusual, as long as a check is attached,’ he said.”

— Mike Pence is quickly becoming a major player in foreign policy. “The role and influence of the vice president, not enshrined in any law, is determined in any administration by three things: his direct relationship with the president, his building of a personal portfolio of issues, and the effectiveness of his team. When it comes to foreign policy, Vice President Pence is quietly succeeding on all three fronts,” Josh Rogin writes. “Pence, a traditional hawk influenced heavily by his Christian faith, is carefully and deliberately assuming a stance that fits within the president’s agenda while respecting the prerogatives of other senior White House aides who also want to play large foreign policy roles … [and] is seen by many in Washington as a figure who might stand up for the traditionally hawkish views he espoused while in Congress … It’s a tricky balancing act, but if Pence can keep the president’s trust, stay above the internal politics and build out his portfolio, he will be able to continue to increase his influence on foreign policy inside the White House and on the world stage.”

— “Little-known governor runs as the hope and change candidate in South Korea,” by Anna Fifield: “He’s styling himself as the ‘hope and change’ candidate competing against an establishment figure in South Korea’s Democratic Party primary contest. So what’s An Hee-jung calling himself? ‘An-Bama,’ of course. At 52, An is a youngster by South Korean political standards, and his good looks and happy demeanor have fans comparing him to K-pop boy-band stars. He’s an active user of social media, posting photos of himself jumping in the air, hugging happy children or relaxing in his pajamas with his cat. In a nation of suits, he often wears turtlenecks, and he has proved to be a good sport on talk shows, even carrying a comedian onstage and ending up in a pile on the floor. …. The Constitutional Court is set to decide whether to impeach President Park Geun-hye … by March 13. If she is ousted, the election must take place within 60 days. ‘I think changing the public’s attitude from frustration and pessimism to excitement is the biggest gift that a politician can give to the people,’ An, a progressive positioning himself as a centrist on foreign policy, said recently. »

SUNDAY SHOW HIGHLIGHTS:

— Louisiana Rep. Cedric Richmond (D) has finally apologized for a crude joke he made at a media dinner about Kellyanne Conway, implying that she “looked kind of familiar” kneeling casually on an Oval Office couch while attempting to take a photograph of attendees.. Richmond’s joke was “interpreted by many as having sexual overtones” – a characterization which the Louisiana Democrat continued to insist was not the case before ultimately delivering an apology, Emily Heil reports. « After a discussion with people I know and trust I understand the way my remarks have been received by many,” he said in a statement last night. “I have consistently been a champion for women and women’s issues, and because of that the last thing I would want to ever do is utter words that would hurt or demean them. I apologize to Kellyanne Conway and everyone who has found my comments to be offensive. »

— House Speaker Nancy Pelosi deflected questions about Richmond’s crudeness on Sunday, telling CNN’s Jake Tapper she was “unaware” of his comments, even as the host called them “sexist” and “disgusting.” “I wasn’t at the dinner,” she said. “I’m just finding out about this, but the fact is I’m still in a sort of a state of ‘What is going on here?’”

— Conway minimized her “alternative facts” gaffe by comparing it to last week’s botched announcement over the “best picture” Oscar. She said both events were « just a mistake.” “Well, it was alternative information and additional facts. And that got conflated, » she said on CBS Sunday Morning, seeking to explain her mistake. « I see mistakes on TV every single day and people just brush them off. Everybody thinks it’s just so funny that the wrong — the wrong movie was, you know, heralded as the winner of the Oscars. »

— “Elite law schools are really tough to get into. But what if you’re Tiffany Trump?,” by Roxanne Roberts: “Tiffany Trump wants to go to law school. If she gets in, the 23-year-old will join the very short list of presidential children who attended law school while their fathers were serving in the White House. Tiffany graduated from Penn … [and] her father has described her as ‘a great student,’ although she was not listed in the commencement program as … [receiving any academic honors]. If her name were, say, Tiffany Smith, she’d need stellar grades for a shot at any of the top-ranked law schools. Most of those admitted have college GPAs of 3.75 or higher and LSAT scores of 172 or higher out of a perfect 180…. ‘The issue is how much a school would be willing to deviate from their normal LSAT standards for a famous person,’ says [Above the Law website founder David Lat].… The most elite universities always make a few exceptions for wealthy donors, celebrity students and, yes, presidents’ kids. But even if Tiffany graduated from Penn with straight A’s and earned an impressive test score, most people will say that it’s all about her name — which has worked both for and against her.”

SOCIAL MEDIA SPEED READ:

First, author Steven King trolled Trump on Twitter (fans of his novels will get the joke):

Lots of reaction on social media to the extraordinary weekend–

A former domestic policy adviser to Ronald Reagan and Treasury Department official under George H.W. Bush:

Bush 43’s speechwriter:

From the host of « Morning Joe » (a former Republican member of Congress):

From a Daily Show writer:

Thoughts from four journalists:

NYT:

CNN:

WaPo:

Politico:

Former Obama aides had a field day:

Favs piled on:

A Democratic congressman from Connecticut:

A Rhode Island Democrat:

A New York House Democrat:

Lots of comments on Sessions, who just recused himself from DOJ’s Russia probe, greeting guests at Mar-a-Lago:

Funny, from Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.):

Some humor from Mike Huckabee:

From Ivanka Trump:

SNL mocked Kellyanne:

GOOD READS FROM ELSEWHERE:

— The Wall Street Journal, « Charity Officials Are Increasingly Receiving Million-Dollar Paydays, » by Andrea Fuller:  » Charities are becoming a lot more generous with pay at the top. The tax-exempt organizations, which include many hospitals and colleges as well as traditional charities such as the United Way, provided seven-figure compensation to roughly 2,700 employees in 2014, an analysis of newly available data shows. While many of the big earners ran large enterprises, others were leaders of small charities, such as a couple who run an online ministry. Together, their $4 million in compensation equaled nearly half of the ministry’s revenue. The total is higher by a third than in 2011 …. [and] about three-fourths of the charities that provided million-dollar compensation packages in 2014 were involved in health care. About 10% were private colleges.”

HOT ON THE LEFT:

“‘The cleansing’ by ‘the Orientals’: Lawmaker uses offensive term to describe raucous town halls,” from Kristine Phillips: “In February 2016, Rep. Mike Bost (R-Ill.) voted on a bill to remove the term ‘Oriental’ from federal law, and to replace it with ‘Asian Americans.’    But a year later, he used the derogatory and antiquated term to describe the raucous town halls that have dogged conservative lawmakers. During a meeting with the editorial board of the Southern Illinoisan newspaper, Bost explained why he avoided in-person town hall meetings with constituents[:] ‘The amount of time that I have at home is minimal, I need to make sure that it’s productive,’ Bost … told the paper. ‘You know the cleansing that the Orientals used to do where you’d put one person out in front and 900 people yell at them? That’s not what we need. We need to have meetings with people that are productive.’”

 

HOT ON THE RIGHT:

“College Honors Program Pays Students To Take ‘White Privilege’ And BLM Courses,” from the Daily Caller: “An honors program at a public university gives students a scholarship and early course signup and lets them use laptops if they take classes on subjects like ‘white privilege’ and Black Lives Matter, which both have community engagement components. Sam Houston State University in Texas (SHSU) offers a scholarship of up to $2,800 to students who take these courses or others as part of its Elliott T. Bowers Honors College. Students who gain admission into the Honors College can sign up for courses earlier than their non-Honors peers, obtain access to a special computer center, and ‘automatically receive the Bowers Scholarship upon acceptance into the college.’ The Honors students also graduate with distinction and gain usage of cameras, video cameras, and laptops for their class projects.”

 

DAYBOOK:

— At the White House: In the afternoon, Trump will be joined for lunch by Mike Pence before meeting with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, and FCC Chairman Aijit Pai. Later, Trump will lead a National Economic Council meeting and meet with VA Secretary David Shulkin, where he will be rejoined by Pence. In the evening, the President will have dinner with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget Mick Mulvaney and the Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Price.

— On Capitol Hill: The Senate will convene at 2:00 pm and resume consideration of H.J. Res.37.

 

NEWS YOU CAN USE IF YOU LIVE IN D.C.:

— D.C. is finally slated to receive the February-like chill we never really experienced in February – at least for today, according to the Capital Weather Gang forecast: “ It’s a cold start to the day with most areas below freezing. Flow from the south (winds of 5 to 10 mph) tries to warm us up but a shallow wedge of cold air may interfere. So highs may struggle to get much past 50, especially in our northern areas. Partly cloudy skies in the morning become mostly cloudy in the afternoon.”

— Redskins linebacker Trent Murphy is currently facing a potential four-game suspension for reportedly violating NFL policy on performance-enhancement drugs during his breakout 2016 season. The suspension is currently being appealed by Murphy, and, if upheld, would cause him to miss the first four games of the 2017 NFL season. (Master Tesfatsion)

VIDEOS OF THE DAY:

The same scientists who uncovered why zebras have stripes have turned their black-and-white research to pandas:

Check out Kate McKinnon as Jeff Sessions/Forrest Gump:

See Eric and Donald Trump Jr. on SNL’s Weekend Update:

Watch SNL’s version of a GOP movie trailer:

This « March 4 Trump » turned violent at Berkeley:

Watch Jimmy Kimmel’s full interview with George W. Bush:

Watch Conan train as a « Luchador » (Mexican wrestler):

Conan also became the godfather of a Mexican girl at her 15th birthday:

Revised executive order bans travelers from six Muslim-majority countries from getting new visas

President Trump signed a new travel ban Monday that administration officials said they hope will end legal challenges over the matter by imposing a 90-day ban on the issuance of new visas for citizens of six majority-Muslim nations, authorities said.

In addition, the nation’s refu­gee program will be suspended for 120 days, and it will not accept more than 50,000 refugees in a year, down from the 110,000 cap set by the Obama administration.

Trump signed the new ban out of public view, according to White House officials. The order will not take effect until March 16, officials said.

The new guidelines mark a dramatic departure from Trump’s original ban. They lay out a far more specific national security basis for the order, block the issuance of only new visas, and name just six of the seven countries included in the first executive order, omitting Iraq.

The order also details specific sets of people who would be able to apply for case-by-case waivers to the order, including those previously admitted to the U.S. for “a continuous period of work, study, or other long-term activity,” those with “significant business or professional obligations” and those seeking to visit or live with family.

“This executive order responsibly provides a needed pause, so we can carefully review how we scrutinize people coming here from these countries of concern,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in announcing the order had been signed.

Even before the ink was dry, though, Democrats and civil liberties groups asserted the new order was legally tainted in the same way as the first one: it was a thinly disguised Muslim ban.

“While the White House may have made changes to the ban, the intent to discriminate against Muslims remains clear,” said New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman (D), who had joined the legal fight against the first ban. “This doesn’t just harm the families caught in the chaos of President Trump’s draconian policies – it’s diametrically opposed to our values, and makes us less safe.”

Said Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project: “The only way to actually fix the Muslim ban is not to have a Muslim ban. Instead, President Trump has recommitted himself to religious discrimination, and he can expect continued disapproval from both the courts and the people.”

State Department, Homeland Security and Justice Department officials defended the new order as a necessary measure to improve public safety. They said the countries implicated — Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Syria and Yemen — were either state sponsors of terror, or their territories were so compromised that they were effectively safe havens for terror groups. Iraq was omitted, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said, because it is “important ally in the fight to defeat ISIS,” and its leaders had agreed to implement new security measures.

President Trump signs his original executive order to impose tighter vetting of travelers entering the United States. (CARLOS BARRIA/REUTERS)

A Department of Homeland official, speaking on the condition of anonymity on a call with reporters, said Iraq was “treated differently” in part because the country had agreed to “timely repatriation” of their citizens if they were ordered deported from the United States.

The new order provides other exceptions not contained explicitly in previous versions: for travelers from those countries who are legal permanent residents of the United States, dual nationals who use a passport from another country and those who have been granted asylum or refu­gee status. Anyone who holds a visa now should be able to get into the country without any problems, though those whose visas expire will have to reapply, officials said.

The order claims that since 2001, hundreds of people born abroad have been convicted of terrorism-related crimes in the United States, and more than 300 people who entered the country as refugees were the subject of counterterrorism investigations. It cites two specific examples: two Iraqi nationals who came to the United States as refugees in 2009, it says, were convicted of terrorism-related offenses, and in October 2014, a Somali-native brought to the country as a child refu­gee was sentenced to 30 years in prison for plotting to detonate a bomb at a Christmas tree-lighting ceremony in Oregon. That man became a naturalized U.S. citizen.

“We cannot risk the prospect of malevolent actors using our immigration system to take American lives,” Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly said.

U.S. officials declined to say from which countries the 300 refugees now being investigated in terror cases came, and they declined to detail the people’s current immigration status.

A Department of Homeland Security report assessing the terrorist threat posed by people from the seven countries covered by President Trump’s original travel ban had cast doubt on the necessity of the executive order, concluding that citizenship was an “unreliable” threat indicator and that people from the affected countries have rarely been implicated in U.S.-based terrorism.

The Department of Homeland Security official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, criticized the report as being incomplete and not vetted with other agencies, and he also asserted the administration should not be pressed by the judiciary to unveil sensitive national security details to justify the ban.

“This is not something that the Department of Justice should have to represent to a federal-district court judge,” the official said.

The order represents an attempt by the Trump administration to tighten security requirements for travelers from nations that officials said represent a terrorism threat. A more sweeping attempt in January provoked mass protests across the country as travelers en route to the United States were detained at airports after the surprise order was announced. The State Department had provisionally revoked tens of thousands of visas all at once.

Officials sought to dismiss the idea that there would be any confusion surrounding the implementation of the new order. Officials said they delayed implementation so the government could go through the appropriate legal processes and ensure that no government employee would face “legal jeopardy” for enforcing the order.

“You should not see any chaos, so to speak, or alleged chaos, at airports. There aren’t going to be folks stopped tonight from coming into the country because of this executive order. If they are, it’s pursuant to our ordinary screening procedures,” the Department of Homeland Security official said. “We’re going to have a very smooth implementation period.”

A federal district judge in Washington state first suspended the travel ban Feb. 3, and a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit later upheld that freeze.

That setback was a blow to the White House, which was criticized for failing to include lawmakers and stakeholders in its deliberations.

The revisions to the order will make it more defensible in court — limiting the number of people with standing to sue — though they might not allay all the concerns raised by judges across the country. The three-judge panel with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, for example, said that exempting green card and current visa holders from the ban would not address their concern about U.S. citizens with an interest in noncitizens travel.

The administration, too, will have to wrestle with comments by the president and top adviser Rudolph W. Giuliani seeming to indicate the intent of the order was to ban Muslims from entering the United States, which could run afoul of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

On the campaign trail, Trump called for a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.” After the election, former New York City Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani said: “So when [Trump] first announced it, he said, ‘Muslim ban.’ He called me up. He said, ‘Put a commission together. Show me the right way to do it legally.’ ”

A federal judge in Virginia referenced those comments in ordering the ban frozen with respect to Virginia residents and institutions, calling it “unrebutted evidence” that Trump’s directive might violate the First Amendment.

Abigail Hauslohner contributed to this report.