Archives par mot-clé : video

40 Reasons Video Will Be Essential in Ecommerce Marketing in 2017

Miljana Mitic, VP Marketing of Goodvidio, shares insights about the growing importance of video content for ecommerce marketing, reflecting on the 40 stats about video trends in ecommerce, from the soaring popularity of product-related UGC on YouTube, to why videos matter for mobile shoppers

It’s been already fours years since “selfie” was proclaimed as the Oxford Dictionary’s word of the year. “Emojis”,“gifs”, and “memes” have become somewhat of a norm in B2C marketing, used unapologetically by brands that want to say to younger audiences they’re still relevant and hip. What do these terms have in common? They’re all essentially visual content.



It’s no secret that visuals reign social media. They’re the key ingredient behind the success of Instagram, Snapchat, YouTube, and Pinterest. What’s interesting is how consumers’ insatiable appetite for visual content affects other aspects of their digital lives, such as online shopping. Ecommerce is placing high bets on visual content to drive shopper engagement and sales, with video as a top priority.

Video content will be one of the top priorities for ecommerce in 2017 – here are some key indicators of this trend.

Video helps drive traffic and purchases in ecommerce

Number one issue in ecommerce is generating traffic to the site and then converting visitors into paying customers. Data suggests that having videos on a site can bring 157% increase in organic traffic from search engines. According to Goodvidio, when a video is placed directly on a product detail page, visitor engagement rises 340%. What’s more interesting, visitors feel 85% more likely to purchase if they’re exposed to video content.

Millennials rely on video when shopping online

Consumers aged 18-34 are especially predisposed to factor-in the influence of videos on their shopping decisions. According to Animoto, 4 in 5 millennials find videos helpful when researching what to buy online, and 1 in 3 say their purchases are directly attributed to watching videos.

Look at Gen C for video trends you can use in ecommerce

You’ve heard of the term social media influencer, but have you heard of Gen C? It’s a growing sub-segment of millennial consumers who actively create and share video content on YouTube. Big portion of this content focuses on product review videos and shopping hauls. Gen C are 3.6 times more likely to buy after watching videos on YouTube and 1.8 times more likely to advise others about products and brands. This makes them an indispensable source of trend-setting insights for ecommerce.

Mobile users want video

Creating a frictionless shopping experience for consumers on-the-go is a number one priority for ecommerce retailers in 2017. How do videos fit into this? Over 50% of consumers who watch videos on their mobile devices use videos to guide their shopping. This means that videos should be a part of the mobile commerce strategy for retailers and brands.

Bottomline: Video will be top priority for ecommerce marketing in 2017. For more evidence of this trend, check out these stats in this infographic made by Goodvidio.

Democrats continue to press Gorsuch for answers, but Republicans’ confidence of confirmation grows

Democratic senators more aggressively questioned Judge Neil Gorsuch on Wednesday in hopes of drawing him out on his potential independence from President Trump, while Republicans began easing off — signaling they anticipate his successful confirmation.

On the third day of his confirmation hearing, Gorsuch faced more questions on abortion rights, money in politics and a Supreme Court ruling issued on Wednesday morning that reversed one of his recent decisions. 

Early in the day, Gorsuch declined to answer several questions from Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) on the Constitution’s “emoluments clause,” which states the president cannot accept gifts from foreign agents without approval from Congress. and the notion of “high crimes and misdemeanors” — inquiries designed to put distance between the judge and Trump.

Given “ongoing litigation,” Gorsuch said, “I have to be very careful about expressing any views.”

Leahy also noted Gorsuch has strong support from Trump senior counselor Stephen K. Bannon, whom he accused of “giving a platform to extremists and misogynists and racists.” Another senior Trump aide, Reince Priebus, had said Gorsuch could change potentially 40 years of law, Leahy said.

“What vision do you share with President Trump?” the senator said.

“Respectfully, none of you speaks for me,” said Gorsuch. “I am a judge. I am independent. I make up my own mind.”

Channeling the frustrations of many Democrats, Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) criticized Gorsuch’s testimony as “pitifully short on substance.”

“The qualifications for Senate confirmation shouldn’t be skillful evasion of questions, it’s not how the process is supposed to work,” Schumer tweeted on Wednesday.

“If anyone doubts Judge Gorsuch could be an activist judge with strong conservative views, eschewing interests of average people, look how he was selected.”

Wednesday’s proceedings marked what is likely the last day of testimony for Gorsuch before the Senate Judiciary Committee, where he has made a particular effort to stress his independence from Trump and defend the integrity of the judicial system. If confirmed, Gorsuch would replace the late Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court.

At one point, Gorsuch seemed to reject a Feb. 13 comment from senior White House policy adviser Stephen Miller that Trump’s actions on national security “will not be questioned,” which some interpreted as a signal that Trump could ignore judicial orders.

“You better believe I expect judicial decrees to be obeyed,” Gorsuch said. He quoted an unnamed judge he called one of his heroes: “The real test of the rule of law is [whether] the government could lose in its own courts and accept those judgments.”

Gorsuch also declined to give his view on Scalia’s characterization of the Voting Rights Act as a “perpetuation of racial entitlement.” 

“I don’t speak for Justice Scalia. I speak for myself,” he told the committee.

“You have been very hesitant to even talk about various Supreme Court precedents,” Leahy told Gorsuch, noting that Justices John G. Roberts Jr. and Samuel Alito took positions on specific cases during their confirmation hearings. 

Sen. John Cornyn (Tex.), the Republican whip, rejected Leahy’s characterization. 

“I don’t know what they’ve been listening to, what they’ve been paying to, if that’s their conclusion,” he said. 

“Over the last three days we’ve heard a description of your legal philosophy and the reasoning behind it time and time again,” he added later.

Other Republicans have used their allotted time to defend Gorsuch and begin pushing back against Democrats who are still mulling whether to try blocking the judge’s confirmation. 

On Tuesday, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) credited Gorsuch for enduring the marathon hearings and said he was passing the test “with flying colors.”  

On Wednesday, Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah), who has been a part of 14 Supreme Court confirmation hearings, told Gorsuch, “I’ve seen an awful lot of great people in the law come before this committee. And I haven’t seen anybody any better than you.” 

“Why anybody in this body would vote against you, I’ll never understand,” Hatch said later.

Over the course of his hearings, Gorsuch also has refused to be pinned down on most of the issues that Democrats raised: his allegiance to Roe v. Wade, his views on money in politics, the extent of the Second Amendment. He portrayed what Democrats saw as controversial rulings in his 10 years on the Denver-based 10th Circuit as authentic attempts to interpret the laws that Congress writes.

“If we got it wrong, I’m very sorry, but we did our level best,” he said about a decision criticized by Durbin, but added: “It was affirmed by the Supreme Court.”

In an exchange with Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Gorsuch said he was “distressed that you think that judges or the Supreme Court is an organ of a party.” 

“I know you feel that way, and that distresses me,” Gorsuch said. 

“It distresses me, too, quite a lot,” Whitehouse replied. 

The latest hearing produced an emotional exchange between Gorsuch and Sen. Dianne Feinstein on the subject of women’s rights. 

“You are pivotal in this,” Feinstein (D-Calif.) told Gorsuch, saying that the “originalist’’ interpretation of the Constitution to which he adheres has been used in the past to say that the Constitution does not cover women and gays.

“No one is looking to return us to horse-and-buggy days,” Gorsuch responded. Supreme Court precedent has established that the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause is wide enough to encompass those who were not recognized when it was written.

“A good judge starts with precedent and doesn’t reinvent the wheel,” Gorsuch said, adding that it “matters not a whit” that some who wrote the Constitution were racists or sexists, “because they were.”

What matters, Gorsuch said, were “what the words on the page mean.”

Feinstein’s concern was abortion rights, and Gorsuch was not forthcoming on that. She said previous Supreme Court nominees have promised to keep an open mind on the subject, and yet “every Republican judge is a no vote.”

The two also discussed a book that Gorsuch wrote in which he opposed physician-assisted suicide, and said any taking of a human life was wrong.

Feinstein mentioned the death of her father and a close friend, which she said were agonizing. She mentioned California’s recent physician-assisted suicide law.

“My heart goes out to you,” Gorsuch said, and then appeared to choke up when he mentioned the death of his own father. He said his personal views would have no role in his duties as a judge, and noted the Supreme Court has ruled that states may allow laws such as California’s.

Democratic senators also raised questions about a decision that had just been issued across the street from the hearing room — literally — at the Supreme Court.

The eight sitting justices decided unanimously on Wednesday to boost the standards of education that public schools provide to learning-disabled students, rejecting an earlier ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit — the one that Gorsuch serves on — saying that it had set the bar too low for students. 

At issue was whether schools must provide disabled children “some” educational benefit — which several lower courts have interpreted to mean just more than trivial progress — or whether students legally deserve something more. Gorsuch serves on the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, which is among the majority of appeals courts that subscribe to the “some” benefit standard. A minority of circuit courts have set higher expectations for schools, and the Supreme Court used a case brought by the parents of a Colorado teenager with autism to set a uniform standard for the nation.

In response to questions by Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.), Gorsuch defended his court’s decision, saying that they were applying what the 10th Circuit had decided in a 1996 case, which adopted the standard that the services have to be more than de minimis .

“I was bound by circuit precedent,” Gorsuch said, saying that ruling against an autistic child and his parents was “heartbreaking.” He added that his circuit was unanimously taking the same position in all such cases. Now the Supreme Court has said that is the wrong standard: “Fine, I will follow the law.”

Durbin said Gorsuch had made the precedent worse by adding the word “merely” to the standard.

“To suggest I have some animus against children,” Gorsuch started, his voice trailing off.

“Please,” Durbin said, no one was suggesting that — just a wrong reading of the law.

Republicans are hoping to refer Gorsuch to the full Senate by April 3 and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has said that the judge will be confirmed to the Supreme Court before Easter.  

Schumer (D-N.Y.) said this week that it would be “unseemly” for the Senate to confirm Gorsuch while the FBI is investigating whether Trump’s presidential campaign was swayed by Russian interference.  

But Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W. Va.), a key moderate and a member of Schumer’s leadership team, said on Wednesday that the ongoing FBI investigation “shouldn’t’ have any bearing” on Gorsuch’s confirmation. 

“I want to get a working court, okay? What they did to Merrick Garland was wrong. I don’t want to do the same. Two wrongs don’t make a right,” Manchin said at a Washington Post Live event on Trump’s early weeks in office.  

Manchin later visited the Judiciary Committee room to watch the proceedings for a few minutes — a notable appearance given that he is one of several moderate Democrats facing reelection next year who are the targets of a multimillion-dollar ad campaign bankrolled by conservative groups in hopes of securing Gorsuch a filibuster-proof vote tally. Sen. Angus King (I-Maine), another potential vote for Gorsuch, made a similar visit on Tuesday.  

Manchin said at the Post event that he plans to meet again with Gorsuch before deciding how to vote.  

“If Gorsuch is the right person or not, I can’t say that as of yet,” he said. “Is there 60 votes as of yet, I don’t think, I don’t see it. Can it happen? Anything can happen.” 

Attacker kills 3, injures 20 in vehicle and knife assault near British Parliament

An assailant fatally stabbed a police officer at the gates to Britain’s Parliament compound Wednesday after plowing a vehicle through terrified pedestrians along a landmark bridge. The attacker was shot and killed by police, but not before claiming a total of three lives in what appeared to be Europe’s latest high-profile terrorist attack.

Personal details about the suspected attacker were not immediately made public. Police said the man traced a deadly path across the Westminster Bridge, running down people with an SUV, then ramming the vehicle into the fence encircling Parliament. More than 20 people were reported injured.

Finally, the attacker charged with a knife at officers stationed at the iron gates leading to the Parliament grounds, authorities said.

The dead and injured were left scattered on some of London’s most famous streets.

Crumpled bodies lay on the Westminster Bridge over the River Thames, including at least two people killed. Outside Parliament, a Foreign Office minister — covered in the blood of the stabbed police officer — tried in vain to save his life.

Parliament chambers and offices were put on full lockdown for more than two hours and officials shut down the famous London Eye Ferris wheel, which overlooked the scene.

“This is a day that we planned for but hoped would never happen. Sadly it has now become a reality,” said the assistant Metropolitan Police commissioner, Mark Rowley, outside Scotland Yard’s headquarters.

As he spoke, the bells of Big Ben tolled six times to mark the hour.

Later, after chairing a meeting of the government’s emergency committee, British Prime Minister Theresa May said: “The location of this attack was no accident. The terrorist chose to strike at the heart of our capital city, where people of all nationalities, religions and cultures come together to celebrate the values of liberty, democracy and freedom of speech.”

But “any attempt to defeat those values through violence and terror is doomed to failure,” she vowed, adding: “Tomorrow morning, Parliament will meet as normal.”

Even before full details emerged, the attack and resulting chaos appeared certain to raise security levels in London and other Western capitals and bring further scrutiny to counterterrorism measures.

“We are treating this as a terrorist incident until we know otherwise,” said a Twitter message from London Metropolitan Police.

The attack occurred on Parliament’s busiest day of the week, when the prime minister appears for her weekly questions session and the House of Commons is packed with visitors.

The Palace of Westminster, the ancient seat of the British Parliament, is surrounded by heavy security, with high walls, armed officers and metal detectors. But just outside the compound are busy roads packed with cars and pedestrians.

The attack — a low-tech, high-profile assault on the most potent symbol of British democracy — fits the profile of earlier strikes in major European capitals that have raised threat levels across the continent in recent years.

It was apparently carried out by a lone assailant who used easily available weapons to attack and kill victims in a busy, public setting.

British security officials have taken pride in their record of disrupting such attacks even as assailants in continental Europe have slipped through. But they have also acknowledged that their track record would not stay pristine, and that an attack was inevitable.

When it happened, it was shocking nonetheless. Cellphones captured scenes of carnage amid some of London’s most renowned landmarks.

The target — Westminster — was heavily guarded. But the weapons of choice — an SUV and a knife — made the attack difficult to prevent, requiring the assailant neither to acquire illegal weapons nor to plot with other conspirators.

Rowley said investigators believe that just one assailant carried out the attack, but he encouraged the public to remain vigilant.

Britain has been on high alert for terrorist attacks for several years. But until Wednesday, the country had been spared the sort of mass-casualty attacks that have afflicted France, Belgium and Germany since 2015.

David Lidington, a member of Parliament, said a police officer was stabbed and the suspected assailant was shot.

“Suddenly police cars drove down the road and locked it down. People threw themselves to the ground and hid behind trash cans, walls and in cafes. But the situation seemed to be under control fairly quickly,” said Lee Stevens, 34, who was standing outside Downing Street, about 500 yards from Parliament and near the prime minister’s offices.

Among those providing emergency aid was Tobias Ellwood, a senior official at the Foreign Office and a British military veteran. Photos showed Ellwood’s face streaked with blood after attempting to revive a police officer who had been stabbed just inside the gates of the parliamentary compound.

French Prime Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said that among those wounded in the vehicle attack were members of a group of French students. News media in France reported that three of the students, on a school trip from a high school in Brittany, were in serious condition and that their parents were being flown to London immediately.

King’s College Hospital in south London tweeted Wednesday evening that its emergency department was treating eight victims, two of whom were in critical condition.

In Washington, White House press secretary Sean Spicer said President Trump has been briefed on the London attack and spoke by phone with Prime Minister May. 

“We condemn today’s attack in Westminster,” Spicer told reporters. “We applaud the quick response of the British police and the first responders.” He pledged “the full support of the U.S. government in responding to the attack and bringing to justice those who are responsible.”

May later chaired a meeting of the government’s emergency committee to discuss the assault.

Raffaello Pantucci, director of international security studies at the Royal United Services Institute think tank, said the rapid response suggested that police “were expecting that an attack was highly likely for some time.”

Images from the bridge showed a man dressed in a suit lying on his back, his legs splayed to either side, as pedestrians huddled around him administering first aid. The shoe was off his right foot, and blood stained the sidewalk beneath his left.

In another image, a woman with long blond hair and running shoes lay in a pool of blood on the bridge’s sidewalk. Blood stained the corner of her mouth as another pedestrian cradled her head.

Other photos showed people sitting on the sidewalk looking dazed amid broken glass and bits of automotive debris, with Big Ben looming beyond.

A spokesman for the Port of London Authority said a woman was pulled alive from the River Thames, and he confirmed reports that she had serious injuries.

As police investigated, much of the activity in the area around Westminster came to a standstill.

A nearby hospital was put on lockdown and the London Eye — the enormous Ferris wheel above the River Thames — was stopped and visitors were slowly let off hours later. Those who were locked inside the Eye’s capsules at the time of the attack were kept there, hovering above as emergency responders swarmed the scene below.

In a brief news conference just before 5 p.m. outside the nearby headquarters of Scotland Yard — London’s police force — a spokesman said he was “not going to speculate” on whether the incident was over.

Another witness, Kirsten Hurrell, 70, said she first heard the crash of a car hitting the fence outside parliament.

“I thought initially it was some kind of accident,” Hurrell told the Guardian newspaper. “Then I heard a couple of sharp noises. It could have been gunshots. I wasn’t sure.”

“There was a lot of steam from the car,” added Hurrell, who runs a newspaper kiosk in Parliament Square. “I thought it might explode.”

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security said it was in “close contact with our British counterparts to monitor the tragic events and to support the ongoing investigation.” It noted that U.S. security threat levels remained unchanged.

A year ago to the day, attackers carried out three coordinated suicide bombings in Belgium, killing 32 civilians and injuring more than 300 others in two blasts at Brussels Airport and one at a metro station in the Belgian capital. The Islamic State claimed responsibility for the attacks, in which three perpetrators were also killed. Another bomb that failed to explode was found at the airport.

The attacks occurred shortly after Belgian police staged a series of raids targeting suspected terrorists. Those who carried out the bombings belonged to a cell that was involved in a series of gun and bomb attacks that killed 130 people in Paris in November 2015. The Islamic State also claimed responsibility for the Paris attacks.

In the aftermath of the attack in London, the Welsh Assembly and the Scottish Parliament both suspended their sessions. Scottish lawmakers had been due to debate legislation authorizing a new referendum on independence.

In July last year, a Tunisian resident of France perpetrated a new type of terrorist attack in the Riviera city of Nice, using a cargo truck to mow down revelers celebrating Bastille Day on a seaside promenade. Eighty-six people were killed and more than 400 injured before the driver was fatally shot by police. The Islamic State said the attacker was “a soldier” of the group who responded to its calls to use all means, including vehicles, to strike “behind enemy lines.”

The Nice attack apparently served as a template for another truck assault in December, when a Tunisian who had sought asylum in Germany plowed into a Christmas market in Berlin, killing 12 people and injuring more than 50 others before fleeing. The attacker, who had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State’s leader, was later killed by Italian police in a shootout near Milan.

In October 2014, a Canadian of Libyan heritage went on a shooting spree at the Parliament building in Ottawa, killing a soldier on sentry duty and engaging in a shootout with parliamentary security guards in what police described as a terrorist act. The attacker was fatally shot at the scene.

Specialists said the London attack Wednesday appeared to be in line with an emerging model of strikes involving simple, everyday instruments but carried out in locations sure to draw global attention.

“Terrorists rely on a lot of people watching — it can be even better than having a lot of people dead,” said Frank Foley, a scholar of terrorism and counterterrorism at the Department of War Studies at King’s College London.

Strict regulation of firearms in Britain — as compared to the United States, where such attacks have often involved gunfire — lowers the scale of possible violence, said Steve Hewitt, who studies surveillance and counterterrorism at the University of Birmingham.

“We live in a country where there are tight gun-control laws, as opposed to in the U.S., where a lone individual acquiring weapon often legally can cause major death and destruction very quickly,” Hewitt said.

Within a few hours of the attack, there were signs that normalcy was returning to London. Alongside police officers and journalists near Westminster were large numbers of tourists who had come to visit sites in the now cordoned-off area or just outside it.

At the London Eye near the Westminster Bridge, a large crowd of tourists stood by the ferris wheel. Some were waiting for friends and relatives to get off the ride, which was halted when the attack occurred, while others had turned up unaware of the commotion or had come to watch.

Linda Lim, a 22-year-old student from Chicago, had just arrived at the scene. While she had heard about the attack, she did not realize it happened so close to the London Eye and had not expected the crowds of police officers.

Charles Thompson, a 21-year-old chef from Canada, wondered if there would be more attacks. “Usually its a chain-reaction thing,” he said.

His friend, Enrique Cooper, a 32-year-old officer manager originally from Italy, said he would not let the day’s violence change his view of London. “I’m here all the time,” he said. “You can’t let something like this ruin your perspective.”

Witte reported from Madrid. Adam Taylor and Isaac Stanley-Becker in London, James McAuley in Paris and Brian Murphy, William Branigin and Mark Berman in Washington contributed to this report.

House Intelligence chair says ‘it’s possible’ Trump’s communications were intercepted during transition

House Intelligence Committee Chair Devin Nunes went to the White House on Wednesday afternoon to personally brief President Trump about intelligence he says he has seen regarding surveillance of foreign nationals during the presidential transition.

The surveillance could have inadvertently picked up the president or members of his transition team, the chairman said.

“What I’ve read seems to me to be some level of surveillance activity, perhaps legal. I don’t know that it’s right,” Nunes said to reporters outside the White House. “I don’t know that the American people would be comfortable with what I’ve read.”

“The president needs to know these intelligence reports are out there,” Nunes added. “I think the president is concerned, and he should be.”

Trump was asked whether he felt vindicated after his meeting with Nunes in his claims that he was wiretapped during the campaign at his Trump Tower headquarters by President Barack Obama’s administration. That claim has been roundly rejected by members of the intelligence community, including FBI Director James B. Comey and Nunes himself, who again dismissed the wiretapping allegation Wednesday outside the White House.

“I somewhat do. I must tell you I somewhat do,” Trump said when asked the question by reporters. “I very much appreciated the fact that they found what they found.”

Before heading to the White House, Nunes said he briefed House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) on what he learned, and he also spoke with reporters. He said that U.S. intelligence agencies may have picked up communications involving Trump as part of court-approved surveillance of foreign intelligence targets in the period between Trump’s election and his inauguration.

Nunes did not, however, brief his ranking member, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), about the contents of what Schiff said were intercepts.

Schiff said that he now has a “profound doubt” about whether the Intelligence Committee can conduct a credible investigation. He contended that Nunes’s actions in informing the White House before speaking to colleagues are proof that an independent commission should be formed to investigate Russia’s alleged interference in the 2016 election and possible ties between Trump associates and Russian officials.

“You don’t take information that the committee hasn’t seen and present it orally to the press and the White House before the commitee has even had a chance to vet whether it’s significant,” Schiff stated. “It casts quite a profound cloud over our ability to do our work.”

Schiff said that he hoped the latest developments were not part of an effort by the White House to divert attention from the fact that Comey denied that the previous administration had wiretapped Trump’s phones.

“I have to hope that this is not part of a broader campaign by the White House to attempt to deflect from the director’s testimony earlier this week.”

Nunes (R-Calif.) told reporters that Trump was one of various members of the Trump team whose communications probably were intercepted through “incidental collection,” or surveillance of the communications of foreign nationals who may be in contact with or talking about U.S. citizens.

The chairman would not answer the question of whether anyone associated with the White House was the source of the new information.

“From what I know right now, it looks like incidental collection,” Nunes said. “We don’t know exactly how that was picked up, but we’re trying to get to the bottom of it.”

He added that “it’s possible” that Trump’s personal communications were captured that way by the U.S. intelligence community.

Nunes stressed that he has no information that Russia had anything to do with the surveillance. The intelligence panel — along with the FBI — is investigating Russia’s alleged interference in the 2016 presidential campaign and the suspected ties of Trump’s associates to the Kremlin.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer said that Nunes was headed to the White House on Wednesday afternoon to brief the president. Spicer said he did not know anything more about the matter than what Nunes had just said on Capitol Hill.

“He briefed the media before he briefed us,” Spicer said at his daily news briefing, adding, “Hopefully, we can share more” after the meeting.

U.S. intelligence agencies targeting foreign nationals regularly pick up communications to, from or about U.S. citizens, permanent U.S. residents, and U.S. corporations and organizations, a category referred to as incidental collection.

Nunes said the situation will be clarified after he receives a full list of American citizens who were “unmasked” during the surveillance. He said he expects to receive such information by Friday from the National Security Agency, the FBI and the CIA.

The NSA sweeps up phone calls and emails around the world, looking for intelligence that might be of interest to U.S. officials. When they hear something or read something of interest in a call, an email or a fax, intelligence analysts will write up a report based on the information.

In those reports, the names of U.S. people are “minimized” to remove their identities and protect their privacy. But senior U.S. officials can ask the NSA and other intelligence agencies to provide them with the names if they believe the information would allow them to better understand the intelligence.

The House Intelligence Committee chairman emerged to make the new claims in a series of public statements on Wednesday afternoon, two days after a public hearing by his panel in which Comey rejected Trump’s allegations that he had been wiretapped by Obama during the campaign.

“President-elect Trump and his team were put into intelligence reports. It’s probably fine, but the president himself needs to see this because clearly there was surveillance that was conducted,” he said.

Nunes’s statements came on the same afternoon that House Republicans were struggling to secure enough votes to pass their health-care overhaul. Ryan and Trump have put their political muscle behind the plan, which Ryan hoped to get to the House floor by Thursday. More than two dozen conservatives do not support the plan, said a spokeswoman for the House Freedom Caucus, which would be enough to defeat the bill if they continue to oppose it.

Schiff explained that in his talks with Nunes on Wednesday afternoon, most of the names of American citizens were not “unmasked” in the intelligence reports to which Nunes referred, but were concealed in such a way that made it easy to ascertain their identities.

“Because the committee has still not been provided the intercepts in the possession of the Chairman, it is impossible to evaluate the Chairman’s claims. It certainly does not suggest — in any way — that the President was wiretapped by his predecessor,” Schiff stated.

Nunes delivered a series of statements to the press to explain what he described as new information. He said he was especially concerned with “who ordered the unmasking” of individuals in intelligence reports that were “disseminated widely” throughout the Obama administration.

“The unmasking really bothers me. There has to be a reason for the unmasking,” he told CNN after going to the White House. “We have to know who ordered the unmasking.”

Nunes said that Trump “has every right to get a hold of these reports just like the last administration was able to read them.”

Outside the White House on Wednesday, Nunes focused on the dangers inherent in incidental collection.

“The reason that we do this and that we have all these procedures in place is to protect American citizens” Nunes said, adding that there is a “certain threshold met to make it into intelligence products.”

“Maybe they didn’t meet the minimum qualifications. There are things to me that don’t reach the level of intelligence value. You have to ask yourself why did they end up in intelligence reports.”

On Monday, Comey denied publicly that Trump had been wiretapped in testimony before the House Intelligence Committee. Comey also stated that the FBI was investigating Russia’s alleged interference in the 2016 election and the suspected links of Trump’s associates to the Kremlin.

The intelligence chairman is the first high-ranking lawmaker to assert that intelligence agencies may have picked up conversations between Trump and foreign nationals. Nunes, who served on the Trump transition team, has focused more squarely in his rhetoric on leaks to the intelligence community about Russia’s alleged intent during the presidential campaign and communications between Trump aides and Russian officials. He has said the only “major crimes” he is aware of are the leaks to the news media on those topics.

At least one Trump adviser was caught up in the incidental collection. Michael Flynn was ousted as national security adviser after U.S. intelligence officials intercepted his communications with the Russian ambassador to the United States. The president dismissed him because Flynn misled Vice President Pence about the content of those calls.

John Wagner and Adam Entous contributed to this report.

Bang Digital Media Announces $250000 Marketing Contract

Submit the press release

Two-Year Multi-Channel, Multimedia Deal May Surpass $1 Million

DENVER, March 22, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bang Holdings Corp. (OTCQB:BXNG), through its subsidiary Bang Digital Media, is a digital advertising company that provides content and its influencer-based marketing network to the legal cannabis industry, today announced it has been awarded a two-year, $250,000 licensing and management contract from a Colorado-based cannabis company.

/EIN News/ — Slated for launch in April 2017, the contract includes performance bonuses that can increase its total value to over $1 million.  The contract provides for Bang Digital Media to develop and deliver social media management, content creation, video production, and the building of a unique social media website and app. The customer’s name is not being disclosed at this time for competitive reasons.

“Not only are we coordinating the entire digital strategy for this organization, but we are also promoting the launch of its 13,000 square-foot facility in Denver into a beautiful new brick and mortar space designed with a community theme,” said Steve Berke, Chief Executive Officer of Bang Digital Media. „We are thrilled to partner in this exciting project and are confident it will serve as a solid example of the multichannel, multimedia marketing initiative that Bang is uniquely qualified to successfully implement.

“I love this partnership because it rewards performance,” Berke said. “Bang will be compensated for every impression and video view, so this is a fantastic opportunity for Bang to showcase our talent, unique digital cannabis marketing platforms and, strategically, to further solidify our position and reputation in the U.S. cannabis community,” Berke concluded.

About Bang Holdings Corporation

Bang Holdings Corporation (OTCQB:BXNG), through its subsidiary Bang Digital Media, provides brand management, cannabis related digital content and influencer-based marketing for the cannabis industry. While major media providers restrict online marijuana advertising, Bang Holdings’ marketing networks allow cannabis companies to directly reach cannabis enthusiasts.

Since launching its digital channel 4TwentyToday across multiple digital platforms in 2014, Bang Digital Media’s network has grown to reach more than 1.5 million engaged enthusiasts and has generated around 620 million content views. Bang’s expanded network of marijuana-friendly social influencers reaches an additional 20 million potential customers. For more information, please visit www.bangholdings.com.

Forward-looking Statements
Certain matters discussed in this press release may contain statements, estimates and projections that involve risks and uncertainties in Bang Holdings’ business that may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by the statements made herein. Such statements, estimates and projections constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Bang Holdings undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The recipient of this information is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. No representations or warranties are made as to the accuracy of such forward-looking statements or whether any of the projections included herein will be realized.

Investor/Media Contact:
                    Brandon Thompson, Vice President, Investor Relations
                    Phone: 844-565-5665
                    bthompson@irpartnersinc.com
                    
                    Company Contact:
                    Lee Molloy
                    Phone: 303-681-4426
                    lee@bangholdings.com

Primary Logo

Chipotle launches kids’ video series

Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. has released an original video series to help educate families and kids ages 7 to 10 about where their food comes from and how it is prepared, the company said Wednesday.

The Denver-based fast-casual operator said the unbranded series, called “RAD Lands,” is available for download exclusively on iTunes. It was created in partnership with CAA Marketing and The Magic Store, which created the Emmy-nominated series “Yo Gabba Gabba!”

The series features such celebrity chefs, musicians and YouTube personalities, including Amanda Freitag, Michael Voltaggio, Duff Goldman, the Neon Trees, Wayne Coyne of the Flaming Lips and rapper Biz Markie. Segments also include instruction on preparing snacks and meals. 

“Chipotle is ensuring that better food is accessible to everyone,” Mark Crumpacker, Chipotle chief marketing and development officer, said in statement. “We created ‘RAD Lands’ to educate young eaters and their parents about food in an entertaining and engaging way.

“We don’t advertise to kids, so the show is completely unbranded. We hope that it sparks conversation and curiosity among families, ideally leading to smarter and more informed choices about food.”

“RAD Lands” episodes feature an animated segment called « The Cultivators » that follows a small rebel squad’s journey to help save the galaxy’s plants and animals.

Season one is available exclusively on iTunes in the United States and Canada for $4.99. Alternatively, families can download the first episode for free, and the remaining five episodes for $1.99 each. 

As part of the “RAD Lands” launch and to support school lunches, Chipotle will donate $100,000 to the Chef Ann Foundation, a nonprofit organization that works with schools nationwide to provide the tools and resources they need to serve healthful and nutritious meals to students. 

To enhance the program’s reach to educators and students, Chipotle has partnered with Discovery Education, a leading provider of digital education content for K-12 classrooms, for RAD Lands In School. That online program for elementary students will launch later this spring, pairing “RAD Lands” episodes with lesson plans and activities.

To see more about “RAD Lands,” visit chipotle.com/radlands.

Chipotle, which was founded in 1993, has more than 2,200 restaurants. 

Contact Ron Ruggless at [email protected]

Follow him on Twitter: @RonRuggless

Google’s YouTube losing major advertisers upset with videos

ATT, Verizon and several other major advertisers are suspending their marketing campaigns on Google’s YouTube site after discovering their brands have been appearing alongside videos promoting terrorism and other unsavory subjects.

The spreading boycott confronts Google with a challenge that threatens to cost it hundreds of millions of dollars.

YouTube’s popularity stems from its massive and eclectic library of video, spanning everything from polished TV clips to raw diatribes posted by people bashing homosexuals.

But that diverse selection periodically allows ads to appear next to videos that marketers find distasteful, despite Google’s efforts to prevent it from happening.

Earlier this week, Google vowed to step up its efforts to block ads on « hateful, offensive and derogatory » videos. But that promise so far hasn’t appeased ATT, Verizon and other advertisers.