Archives par mot-clé : video

Daily Research News Online

Video-Based BI Analysis Service Launches

In the US, the founders of marketing firm FoundSimply have set up a business intelligence service called KPIspy, offering video-based reporting of analysis of business metrics, conducted by consultants.

KPIspy specializes in interpreting data and understanding how to apply it to achieve business growth. Its new service uncovers data on a variety of business measures ranging from web site traffic, to social media traction, to competitive marketing activity. It also includes video and supplementary metrics reports called ‘Your Brand. Your Market’, delivered weekly or monthly and offering company owners help with business decisions and team management.

Co-founder Clayton Griffith (pictured) comments: ‘Not everyone works analytically on a regular basis where digging deep into the data is part of the daily job. Most business leaders don’t have time, many don’t know where to look, or even how to interpret the data once they receive it. KPIspy was created with that in mind, to keep business owners informed without spending hours trudging through spreadsheet hell. It’s kind of like the executive summary slide of a PowerPoint presentation, only modernized, in video format, human guided, and way more useful’.

Web sites: www.foundsimply.com and www.kpispy.com .

Register (free) for Daily Research News

Simple printable version of this article

Email this article to a friend

YuMe Offers Audience Targeting, Sequential Ads Across Devices



Getting the right ad in front of the right viewer is only the beginning. Today, online video advertising company YuMe unveiled its latest offering, the People-Based Marketing Suite, and it’s an attractive proposition for online marketers. The suite lets buyers use audience targeting to get their video ads in front of their desired buyers on a range of devices. It also lets them create sequential messages that display in the proper order across devices, so buyers can take viewers from awareness to the value proposition of specific features no matter where they’re watching.

audience targetingBecause super-saturation is not a good ad experience, the suite includes universal frequency capping, so buyers can be sure their target audience will only see ads a set number of times no matter what devices they use. Finally, the suite offers cross-screen attribution and reporting, so buyers can see standardized metrics for views on every device.

“Brand marketers recognize that now more than ever, consumers’ relationships with the media they consume is uniquely their own,” says Michael Hudes, chief revenue officer at YuMe. “Personalized one-to-one marketing is expanding from its digital display roots into video, and from the confines of desktop and mobile to all screens, including CTV. YuMe’s innovative approach to people-based marketing reflects advertising trends in broadening consumer choices and building better connections. Our solutions help our brands develop and nurture relationships across all devices through thoughtful engagement and retargeting.”

To make this cross-device audience targeting a reality, YuMe is partnering with Drawbridge and using its Connected Consumer Graph. This lets the suite reach the same viewers no matter if they’re on computers, mobile devices, or connected TV sets. The graph counts 1.3 billion consumers using 3.3 billion devices. That’s 75 percent of the active devices used worldwide on the internet, YuMe says.

The People-Based Marketing Suite is available now as part of YuMe’s programmatic and managed-service media buying options.


Spot On Insurance to Release Podcasts Focused on Sales & Marketing in November

Cover art for Spot On Insurance Episode 32, Sales Success with Michael Tracy

Michael Tracy shares his secrets for « Sales Success » on November 15th.

Spot On Insurance (« SOI »), hosts a free podcast series developed specifically for insurance industry professionals, featuring industry professionals, that showcases topics that are both relevant and timely. In November, SOI will publish podcasts focusing on techniques and technologies for insurance sales and marketing.

On Wednesday, November 8, 2017, Melissa Agnes discusses brand protection in « Managing Your Reputation on Social Media. »

November 14,, 2017, Kelly Donahue-Piro of Agency Performance Partners discusses « Proactive Renewal Calls. »

On November 15, Michael Tracy shares his secrets for “Sales Success. »

Tuesday, November 28, 2017, Michael Jans of Agency Revolution explains “Key Principles for the ‘New Market’.”

Then on November 29, Mike Demko of My Insurance Videos talks about “Using Video to Drive Growth Retention.”

SOI also offers episodes targeted to specific markets as well as special situations that can affect any insurance agency.

On November 1, 2017, Stan “The Annuity Man” Haithcock provides an “Overview of the Annuities Market.”

November 7, Joyce King of Insurance Licensing Services of America, Inc. (ILSA) explains “Mergers Acquisitions Licensing and Compliance.”

On Tuesday, November 21, 2017, Dan Oberdorfer and Nicole Faulkner of Stinson Leonard Street discuss “Marijuana in the Workplace” and its Human Resources implications.

And on November 22, 2017, “License Types and Lines of Authority Explained” features Stefanie Cantu from ILSA.

All Podcasts released on YouTube, iTunes, Google Play, and Stitcher Radio. SOI founders and industry experts Arleen and Ted Taveras also appear LIVE on Facebook every Friday at 11:00 AM ET to answer questions from listeners and explore topics raised in the week’s podcasts in greater depth.

About Spot On Insurance:

Spot On Insurance, which debuted in August 2017, is a twice-weekly podcast series. It brings together compliance experts, regulators and industry leaders to discuss the latest trends in insurance and financial services. Spot on Insurance is owned by Arleen Ted, Taveras, co-founders of Insurance Licensing Services of America, Inc., which offers full service insurance licensing and compliance services to industry professionals, nationwide. Individuals interested in appearing on a podcast should contact Spot On Insurance. For more information, visit spotoninsurance.com.

Innovid Appoints Industry Veteran Bryan Simkins as Senior Vice President of Brand Solutions

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Innovid,
the world’s leading video marketing platform for advertisers to engage
consumers across all screens and channels, today announced the
appointment of Bryan Simkins as senior vice president of brand
solutions. Simkins will be responsible for growing and cultivating
Innovid’s brand partnerships and helping them implement data-driven
video marketing – a key element in marketer’s campaigns and strategies
for 2018. Simkins will help connect brands with their consumers more
effectively, particularly in this time of rapid transformation of the TV
industry.

Simkins brings more than 15 years of media and marketing technology
expertise, including senior roles at Starcom MediaVest Group (SMG),
where early on he recognized the importance of Innovid as a media
agnostic video marketing platform. He also held roles at Digitas,
Accuen, BBDO, FedEx, and most recently at Transparent, a marketing
technology consultancy, where he was a founding partner and provided
services to senior industry leaders—from strategy development to
implementation of marketing technologies, as well as amplification and
education across the industry.

“Innovid is an undisputed leader in creating and executing strategic,
data-driven video marketing across all screens,” said Simkins. “In a
time where transparency is critical, the largest global brands in
consumer packaged goods, auto, financial services and more, are using
the Innovid platform to get a single view of their entire digital video
investment. I am excited to work with them to grow their businesses, and
create strong customer relationships through technology.”

“With hundreds of Innovid campaigns in 2017 being data-driven and 79
percent of brand marketers stating that data would be key in their 2018
video strategy, having Bryan on board couldn’t come at a better time,”
said Beth-Ann Eason, president of Innovid. “Bryan’s expertise in
addressability will help us to support more marketers in their quest for
better business outcomes through data-driven video marketing, and will
help shape the industry development of the future of TV. Bryan’s
experience and knowledge of a marketer’s needs is a huge asset to us and
will put Innovid in an ideal position for future growth.”

For more information about Innovid, please visit www.innovid.com
or follow us on Twitter @Innovid.

About Innovid

Innovid is the world’s #1 online video marketing platform, delivering
more video than any company across PCs, tablets, mobile phones, smart
TVs and streaming devices. Innovid helps leading advertisers and
agencies leverage the power of data to create interactive and
personalized video that delivers 80 percent higher performance than
traditional pre-roll. Most recently, Innovid was featured in Business
Insider’s 19 Most Interesting Ad-Tech Startups of 2017
. Please visit www.innovid.com
for more information.

The Three Things Keeping Your Business From Video Marketing And How To Get Past Them

Shutterstock

The hardest part of video marketing is getting started, but don’t let your doubts keep you from reaching your audience. Here are some of the most common worries keeping businesses from video marketing and how to conquer them.

1. I’m not funny or creative

Here’s a secret — not every brand has to be funny and not every video has to be overly creative. Instead of thinking of video marketing as entertainment, think of it as a way to inform. You know your product; you know what you do. Focus on your message — that’s how you reach the customers who are the right fit for your business.

Still have writer’s block? Sometimes choosing the specific type of video you want to make can help you organize your ideas. Here are a few videos that are easy to make and tailored for social media.

Share blog teasers.

Drive traffic back to your site with highlights from an interesting or high-performing blog post. Use text to convey the blog post’s main points, then add a few images or video clips for visual interest. Keep your video under a minute and share on social media, as HubSpot did in this video.

Feature promotions and special events.

Is your business doing something new? Spread the word! Whether it’s a big sale or a customer appreciation event, creating a video lets your audience know what you’re doing, when it’s happening and how they can participate.

A promo doesn’t have to be long — just a few seconds is plenty. For example, when my company wanted to promote our Social Video Marketing Summit, we created a 25-second video that showcased our speakers and gave viewers the info they’d need to attend. No fuss, no muss.

Create a product video. 

Often the best sales technique is just showing what you’ve got. Grab a few images of your products, add your tagline and voila! You have a video catalog or a product intro. See how Brooklyn Grooming introduced its new product with just three images and a little text.

2. I don’t have images or video clips.

You don’t need a pro to produce content for your marketing videos. As a business, you probably already have more than you think. Look for photos of your products, your logo, images from events or pictures of employees. Even if you don’t have any images at all, you can still make a video. Here are a few options:

Create an all-text video. 

For shorter videos, sometimes plain text is enough to cut through the clutter on social media. The clean, image-free look is both easy to read and offers just a little bit of mystery, especially if you’re teasing an upcoming event.

Trump pressures Justice Department to investigate ‘Crooked Hillary’


President Trump speaks during a Cabinet Meeting at the White House on Nov. 1. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)

President Trump on Friday pressured the Department of Justice — and specifically the FBI — to investigate Hillary Clinton, ticking through a slew of issues involving the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee and her party, and urging law enforcement to “do what is right and proper.”

Trump’s advocacy for criminal probe of his political opponent marked a significant breach of the traditional boundaries within the executive branch designed to prevent investigations from being politicized.

In a Thursday radio interview, Trump said “the saddest thing” about being president is that he is not supposed to give orders to the Justice Department or FBI. The president said he was “very frustrated” that he could not be involved with those agencies, and said it was “very discouraging to me” that they were not “going after Hillary Clinton.”

“Hopefully they are doing something and at some point, maybe we are going to all have it out,” Trump said Thursday on “The Larry O’Connor Show.”

Trump has long been annoyed, and at times angry, with Attorney General Jeff Sessions for not taking on Clinton more aggressively and for not better protecting him from the wide-ranging Russia probe led by Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III, the president’s advisers have said.

As he departed the White House Friday morning for an 12-day trip to Asia, Trump told reporters: “A lot of people are disappointed in the Justice Department, including me.”

In a series of Friday morning tweets, Trump claimed there was mounting public pressure for the Justice Department to investigate Clinton. Trump suggested law enforcement reopen its probe of the deleted emails from Clinton’s private server while she was secretary of state, as well as a Russian uranium sale and the international business of Democratic super-lobbyist Tony Podesta.

Trump also raised the Clinton campaign’s joint fundraising agreement with the Democratic National Committee that effectively gave her control over the party’s finances, strategy and staffing before the primaries began. The details were outlined in a new book by former DNC interim chair Donna Brazile.

Trump tweeted: “Everybody is asking why the Justice Department (and FBI) isn’t looking into all of the dishonesty going on with Crooked Hillary the Dems . . . New Donna B book says she paid for and stole the Dem Primary. What about the deleted E-mails, Uranium, Podesta, the Server, plus, plus . . . People are angry. At some point the Justice Department, and the FBI, must do what is right and proper. The American public deserves it!”

In a fourth tweet, Trump alleged that “the real story on Collusion” is the fundraising agreement noted in Brazile’s book. The president appears to be conflating collusion with a foreign government, which is a subject of Mueller’s Russia investigation, with the financial arrangement Clinton’s campaign made with the DNC.

And in a fifth tweet on the subject, Trump invoked Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who said Thursday on CNN that she believed the Democratic primaries were rigged in Clinton’s favor. Using his pejorative nickname for Warren, the president tweeted (apparently misspelling the word led): “Pocahontas just stated that the Democrats, lead by the legendary Crooked Hillary Clinton, rigged the Primaries! Lets go FBI Justice Dept.”

This marks only the latest attempt by Trump to use his presidential bully pulpit to influence the criminal justice process. He has delivered off-the-cuff remarks this week recommending punishment for Sayfullo Saipov, the suspect accused of killing eight people with a rental truck in New York. Trump at first said he was considering sending Saipov to the military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, but then reversed course and advocated a civilian trial in federal court for the terrorism suspect he called “an animal.”

The Justice Department is a part of the executive branch; the attorney general is nominated by the president. So it is normal for the White House to direct the Justice Department on broad policy goals.

But unlike other executive branch agencies, the Justice Department traditionally enjoys a measure of independence, especially when it comes to individual criminal investigations. Government lawyers have long sought to enforce a clear line preventing White House officials from influencing specific investigations or prosecutions to ensure such work is not politicized.

The president directing a particular investigation — especially of a former political rival — would be viewed by most in law enforcement as inappropriate. When Trump made similar comments on the campaign trail a year ago, even former Republican attorney general Michael Mukasey, a vocal Clinton critic, said Trump ordering a prosecution of her would be “like a banana republic.”

A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment Friday.

In his Thursday radio interview, Trump said, “You know, the saddest thing is, because I am the president of the United States I am not supposed to be involved with the Justice Department. I’m not supposed to be involved with the FBI. I’m not supposed to be doing the kind of things I would love to be doing and I am very frustrated by it.”

Trump continued by referencing a salacious research dossier detailing Trump’s ties to Russia, which was initially sponsored by the conservative Washington Free Beacon and later paid for by the Clinton campaign and DNC, through the Perkins Coie law firm.

Trump added on the radio show: “I look at what’s happening with the Justice Department, why aren’t they going after Hillary Clinton with her emails and with her dossier, and the kind of money . . . I don’t know, is it possible that they paid $12.4 million for the dossier . . . which is total phony, fake, fraud and how is it used? It’s very discouraging to me. I’ll be honest.”

Trump has not provided evidence to support his $12.4 million figure, and he may have grossly exaggerated how much the dossier cost. Fusion GPS, the firm that commissioned the dossier, has said it paid former British spy Christopher Steele $168,000 for his research, according to Reuters.

The Washington Post has reported that the Clinton campaign paid Perkins Coie $5.6 million in legal fees from June 2015 to December 2016, and the DNC paid the firm $3.6 million since November 2015, according to campaign finance records. But the filings do not detail how that money was spent, so it is impossible to tell how much work was related to the dossier research and how much was for legal services.

Devlin Barrett and Matt Zapotosky contributed to this report.

 

Bowe Bergdahl, the former hostage who pleaded guilty to desertion, avoids prison

FORT BRAGG, N.C. — Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, who in 2009 walked off a U.S. military outpost in eastern Afghanistan and spent the next five years in enemy captivity, was sentenced Friday to a dishonorable discharge from the Army but will avoid prison time.

Bergdahl, 31, pleaded guilty in October to charges of desertion and misbehavior before the enemy and had faced a maximum life sentence. He exhibited no emotion as the judge, Army Col. Jeffery R. Nance, read his sentence, only clenching his jaw as he’d done throughout the proceedings.

It’s unclear how Nance arrived at his decision. The judge made no remarks after making the announcement and promptly left the courtroom.

Bergdahl’s case sparked ferocious debate over his actions and the controversial prisoner exchange that led to his release in 2014, challenging the military’s bedrock principle of never leaving a soldier behind. It was also overshadowed by President Trump’s accusation that Bergdahl is a traitor.

Bergdahl will lose all benefits, including medical care, afforded to military veterans and pay a fine of $1,000 a month for the next 10 months. His rank will be reduced to from sergeant to private.

Gen. Robert Abrams, who convened Bergdahl’s court-martial as commander of Army Forces Command, will review the sentence and could potentially reduce, but not increase, the punishment.

The sentence closes a major chapter in what’s become an eight-year odyssey. Bergdahl, the sole U.S. service member to be captured in Afghanistan, became a political lightning rod across two administrations. The episode drew in Trump and former President Barack Obama, who was roundly criticized for holding a Rose Garden ceremony to celebrate Bergdahl’s return even as details of the soldier’s voluntary abandonment had begun to circulate.

Trump said on the campaign trail Bergdahl was a “dirty, rotten traitor” who should be executed. Bergdahl’s sentencing hearing began Oct. 23 with a motion from Bergdahl’s attorneys to dismiss the case on grounds Trump improperly used his position as commander in chief to interfere in the process. Trump recently referred back to his inflammatory statements made during the presidential campaign. Nance denied the motion, though, saying he felt no pressure to deliver a harsh sentence.

Bergdahl walked away from his combat outpost just before midnight June 29, 2009, in what an Army investigation determined was an attempt to cause a crisis and draw attention to concerns that Bergdahl had about his leaders.

While Bergdahl and his lawyers have said it was a decision he later regretted, prosecutor Maj. Justin Oshana said Thursday that “it wasn’t a mistake, it was a crime.”

Bergdahl was captured within hours by armed Taliban fighters on motorcycles and turned over to the Haqqani network, a group in Pakistan that tortured him on and off for years. His release was secured as part of a controversial prisoner exchange initiated by the Obama administration in 2014, in which five Taliban militants were swapped for the U.S. soldier.

Bergdahl’s attorneys maintained that psychological conditions, which according to expert testimony impair his reasoning skills and existed before his military service, led to Bergdahl’s fateful actions and that he should be granted leniency. Additionally, five years of brutal captivity was sufficient punishment, his attorneys said. They did not dispute their client committed serious offenses.

Capt. Nina Banks, a member of the defense counsel, told Nance a dishonorable discharge from the Army was a suitable punishment instead.

“Justice is not rescuing Sgt. Bergdahl from his Taliban captors, in the cage where he was for years, only to place him in a cell,” she said Thursday.

The prosecution has said Bergdahl’s decisions contributed to grim injuries as the war effort in eastern Afghanistan ground to halt so that thousands of U.S. and Afghan troops, charged with rolling back Taliban influence and securing polling stations for upcoming elections, could instead look for Bergdahl. But the trail quickly grew cold. Later they would learn he had been spirited away to Pakistan.

James Hatch, a former Navy SEAL, said in court that he was shot in the leg during a rescue mission and saw a militant kill a military working dog. Shannon Allen, the wife of former soldier Mark Allen, said her husband was shot in the head while looking for Bergdahl. Allen is now almost totally paralyzed and cannot talk, walk or care for himself, she said in emotional testimony for the prosecution.

Oshana keyed on Allen’s injuries in anticipation that Berghdal’s defense team would focus on the physical ailments Bergdahl suffered while in captivity, including nerve damage and a shoulder injury.

“Mark Allen is in pain all of the time,” Oshana said. “The only difference is that Sergeant Bergdahl can tell someone where his pain is. Master Sergeant Allen cannot.”

Yet in a strange way, Bergdahl’s experience in captivity, enduring extreme conditions and some of the worst torture inflicted on an American service member since the Vietnam War, resulted in positive outcomes for the U.S. military and intelligence community.

Two experts who debriefed Bergdahl testified that his detailed recollections of militant procedures and observations of the prisoner network system was a “gold mine” of intelligence that greatly enhanced understanding of how the Haqqanis operate. Bergdahl’s meticulous notes detailing his cage design and the other restraint methods his captors used helped contribute to U.S. doctrine and procedures of escaping and surviving enemy captivity, one expert said.

Lt. Gen. Kenneth Dahl, a senior Army officer who interviewed Bergdahl, testified in 2015 that he found Bergdahl “unrealistically idealistic” and believed a jail sentence would be inappropriate, given the circumstances of the case. A military doctor determined that Bergdahl, who had previously washed out of the Coast Guard, exhibited symptoms of schizotypal personality disorder, considered a variant of schizophrenia that has less frequent or intense psychotic episodes.

Bergdahl’s punishment will have an effect long after his sentence is complete. Veterans with an honorable discharge gain access to a suite of resources like care and education benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs.

That is not true in Bergdahl’s case. A dishonorable discharge from the Army is socially stigmatizing, Nance told Bergdahl following the defense’s closing remarks on Thursday.

Jaguar Land Rover wants to bring relevancy to its YouTube buys

Jaguar Land Rover is coming around to the idea that appearing next to fewer but more relevant videos on YouTube won’t come cheap.

The irrelevancy of ad placements on the video site is a pressing issue for the car manufacturer, perhaps even more of one than its brand-safety fears. JLR isn’t spending as much as it did on YouTube since it was revealed as one of the brands that had its ads misplaced on the site, but it wants to — it’s just cautious about the returns from its spend there. When JLR’s spending on YouTube returns to the previous levels, it will focus more on knowing where its ads run.

Dominic Chambers, JLR’s global head of digital marketing, said if that means the brand’s videos appear on a smaller pool of channels, then so be it. There’s no point in a JLR ad appearing next to gaming content when those videos are mainly watched by kids, for example. It’s not like TV, where a carmaker could justify a similar placement with the likelihood that an adult and their child would watch the program.

Chambers doesn’t control JLR’s media budget directly, but he does influence how it’s spent, which will increasingly lead to his peers accepting that greater relevance on YouTube will cost more. In other words, through services like Google Preferred or via private programmatic exchanges, the brand is removing channels that may be brand-safe yet aren’t relevant — the so-called long tail of content that would have bloated previous campaigns to maximize reach. Chambers said costs have increased when the brand bought ads on a smaller number of channels, but he believes sharper targeting and “a better-quality experience” offset the additional expense.

“There’s lots of data to prove that if you’re in a relevant context, then you have much higher engagement and action,” he said.

There aren’t many brands with the resources to sift through thousands of YouTube URLs, monitoring what is uploaded to the channels they want to appear on. It is difficult but possible, using technology, to pick the specific YouTube videos you want your advertising to appear against. JLR is working with Google and analytics company OpenSlate to do this and ensure its cost-per-video rate doesn’t increase too much, Chambers said.

Digital agency Jellyfish set up a similar service for its own clients, and its KPIs are off the chart because it’s targeting the consumer based on their viewing habits and not targeting a cookie, said Daniel Wilkinson, head of paid media at Jellyfish.

YouTube is too big to avoid for a long stretch of time, and it has become a key destination for people preparing to buy a car. Like many of his peers, Chambers has pressured the business the video site to ease the tension between reach and relevance. “It was unfortunate about the [brand-safety] issues we had earlier in the year,” he said, “but Google [is] putting in account-level controls [so] that as long as we can set them up globally, [that] will mean we’ll be back on it.”

JLR’s future on YouTube is likely a key talking point in its current media review. While its incumbent media agency Mindshare buys YouTube inventory in the U.K., a significant chunk of its European spend on the site goes through DBM directly. Whether JLR sticks with Mindshare or looks elsewhere hasn’t been announced, though Chambers said its contract will change to create a more transparent model. JLR started the review just days after The Times of London revealed that ads for a number of major brands, including JLR, had appeared on extremist videos or sites.

Image courtesy of Jaguar Land Rover

How to Increase Engagement on Sponsored Video Campaigns

Sponsored content is a form of advertising media intended to educate, entertain, and engage consumers by delivering an intentional message about a brand’s product or services. But what’s the secret sauce for increasing engagement on your sponsored video content?

Brands That Get the Views and the Engagement on Sponsored Video Content

Is it even possible to get high views and high engagement on a video ad campaign or promoted video content? Let’s look at the numbers to find out.

According to Tubular Intelligence, there are 181 videos from 91 brands that have more than 1 million engagements as well as 5 million views. Okay, that thins the herd. And one of the top ones is “Shell | Best Day Of My Life,” which has 164 million views and 2.9 million engagements. It features superstars Jennifer Hudson, Luan Santana, Pixie Lott, Yemi Alade, Steve Aoki  #TanWeiWei, so this an example of “trackvertising,” so maybe that’s not the example that you were looking for.

So, check out “This Unicorn Changed the Way I Poop,” which was created by the Harmon Brothers. The Facebook version has 139 million views and 2.5 million engagements. Oh, and the YouTube version has another 32.4 million views and 821,000 engagements.

“This Unicorn Changed the Way I Poop” also generated more that lots of likes, comments, and shares. The campaign also increased online sales of Squatty Potty by more than 600% and retail sales of the toilet stool by over 400% helping the company to sell more than 4 million products in the U.S. to date. So, maybe your objective should be high engagement/high sales.

So that’s a quick look at video ads, but what about sponsored content?” Well, it’s true. Sponsored content is a form of advertising media intended to educate, entertain, and engage consumers by delivering an intentional message about a brand’s product or services.

So, let’s look at sponsored videos with more than 5 million views and 1 million engagements. There are 26 of them from 16 accounts. Now, let’s sort them using ER30, which measures a video or publisher’s engagement rate benchmarked across all content.

“FIFA 18 | FUELED BY RONALDO,” which has 10.5 million views, 1 million engagements, and is sponsored by EA SPORTS FIFA on Cristiano Ronaldo’s Facebook page, has and ER30 of 4.0x, which means it is 4 times more engaging than average. The YouTube version, which isn’t sponsored but is on the EA SPORTS FIFA channel, has an additional 7.8 million views, 185,000 engagements, and an ER30 of 2.2x.

So, according to data that is independent, impartial, and unbiased, video ads, branded videos, and sponsored videos can get high views, high engagement, and even a high engagement rate. But, they are as rare as hens’ teeth.

However, as I pointed out in my column on Red Bull quietly changing its video marketing strategy, trying to create monster tent-pole event like “Felix Baumgartner’s supersonic freefall from 128k” is so five years ago. The new-new strategy is to create scores of small tent-peg events that are held throughout the year.

Find the Right Partner to Work With

Or, the latest trend in the digital video business is to identify a large portfolio of micro influencers who can give you more bang for you buck. If you need an example, check out “9 Things You NEED To Know Before College!” from Mikey Murphy. It’s one of four sponsored videos created by three partners for Bed Bath Beyond. Now, it’s only got 149,00 views, but it also has 17,700 engagements. That gives it an ER30 of 9.6x. And another sponsored video, “BACK TO SCHOOL ADVICE” from Andrew Lowe, only has 89,900 views, but it also has 9,341 engagements. That gives it an ER30 of 10.0x. Get it? Got it? Good.

Strategic Insights for Raising Engagement

Based on the critical data above, here are 3 strategic insights:

#1 Most video marketers are focused on telling a story visually, but the sound track can also have a huge impact on engagement. In fact, viewers discover, watch, and share a ton of music videos and lots of savvy marketers have created some very successful “trackvertising” to tap into this phenomenon. So, use your ears as well as your eyes with creating and editing video advertising.

#2 It’s also worth noting that “This Unicorn Changed the Way I Poop” is 2:53, “FUELED BY RONALDO” is 0:49,  and “BACK TO SCHOOL ADVICE” is 8:58. So, maybe we’ve identified a hidden barrier to your success. If your pre-conceived notion of “video ad campaigns” is repurposed “30-second commercials,” then maybe you shouldn’t be surprised if the vast majority of your paid video campaigns have high views/low engagement. “You must unlearn what you have learned.”

#3 If your goal is to get lots of views, then you can run a massive campaign for an extended period of time and bludgeon viewers into watching your video ad for more than 3 second on Facebook or 30 seconds on YouTube (or the duration if it’s shorter than 30 seconds). But if your goal is also to get high engagement, then your content needs to draw “a high-arousal positive emotional response,” as Karen Nelson-Field observed in Viral Marketing: The Science of Sharing.

3 Key Steps to Boosting Engagement on Paid Video Campaigns

So, what can you do to boost engagement on paid video campaigns?

#1 First, make great video content. That’s right, stop thinking that you’re producing are ads. Focus instead on making videos worth watching. And then use data and insights when creating content worth sharing. Why? Because you are competing directly or indirectly with 17.1 million other videos that were uploaded during the past week, according to Tubular Insights. So, paid video campaigns – even ones backed by big budgets – aren’t going to get lots of engagement or high engagement rates if you’ve got run-of-the-mill video content.

Suzie Reider, an old friend and former colleague who is now the Managing Director Brand Solutions at Google, shared this concept back in 2008 when she gave a presentation to The Ad Club in Boston that was entitled, “Marketing with Video.” Back then, she advised advertisers to “create ads that work as content.” And as an example, she showed “Amazing Ball girl catch,” a Gatorade commercial directed by Baker Smith of Harvest Films.  Today, this “video content” has 6.4 million views and 19,600 engagements.

If you’re looking for more tactical advice for making compelling and effective video content, then read the “guidelines for great creative” section in the YouTube Playbook for Creative Advertising. Or, watch “Facebook Video: Data-Driven Insights Best Practices” webinar replay, which features Carla Marshall, my editor-in-chief, and Mark Robertson, the founder of ReelSEO (now Tubular Insights).

So, where can you find data and insights on the kind of video that’s worth watching as well as the type of content that is engaging enough to generate likes, comments, and shares? Well, start with YouTube Analytics. (It’s free.) The first thing to look at is your top 10 videos as measured by watch time. I know, we normally talk about watch time when discussing video SEO. But, the watch time reports in YouTube Analytics – including relative audience retention – are the right metrics to gage if your videos are worth watching.

Next, look at your interaction reports in YouTube Analytics. These will let you know if your content is generating subscriptions, likes and dislikes, videos in playlists, comments, or sharing. If you are trying to drive traffic to your website, your interaction reports will also tell you if your content is generating clicks on annotations, cards, or end screens. These are the right metrics to use to measure engagement.

All of these YouTube Analytics metrics (watch time, likes, comments, and shares) provide a basic barometer showing how your audience is responding to your videos. However, the effectiveness of an ad campaign can also evaluated by using Google’s Brand Lift solution. Brand Lift measures the direct impact your YouTube ads on perceptions and behaviors throughout the consumer journey. Within a matter of days, Brand Lift can give you insights into how your ads are impacting metrics like lifts in brand awareness, ad recall, consideration, favorability, and purchase intent (as measured in surveys), as well as brand interest (as measured by organic search activity). This enables you to optimize your campaigns mid-flight, if necessary.

In addition to YouTube Analytics and Google’s Brand Lift solution, you can also use Tubular Intelligence to track over 3 billion videos and analyze the viewing habits of more than 400 million consumers across multiple social platforms.

Download Our New Sponsored Video Insights Report Today! Get All the Latest Data on Sponsored Video Trends

#2 Find the right partners to build more engaging campaigns.

If you really want to boost the engagement of your paid video campaigns, then maybe it’s time to replace your traditional ad agency (which doesn’t have a clue why its repurposed 30-second commercial isn’t highly engaging) with a new generation of video content creators who know how to help brands develop content strategies that will resonate with 21st-century consumers.

Okay, maybe you don’t really need to fire your traditional ad agency. Maybe you just need tell them to refocus on TV advertising, where they still know what they’re doing. At the same time, you can let them know that you’re giving video advertising to someone who knows what they’re doing and will also allocate a portion of the digital video ad budget to sponsored video. And your old ad agency can find out later that the budget for TV advertising is falling through the floor, while the budget for video advertising is going through the roof.

Come on, the “Mad Men” era is over. As I mentioned back in April in the column entitled, “It’s Not YouTube’s Fault: Blame the ‘Magazine Format’ for the State of Video Advertising,” Sylvester Laflin “Pat” Weaver, Jr. came up with the idea of selling 60-second commercials in NBC-produced shows instead of 30-minute blocks of time that the advertiser controlled in the 1950s.

Before then, during radio’s Golden Age in the 1930s, the world of content creation was ruled by a system of advertiser-sponsored and agency-produced programming, which typified by that ever-popular program format, the soap opera. This system continued through most of the 1950s, typified by shows such as “The Hallmark Hall of Fame,” “The Colgate Comedy Hour”, and “Kraft Television Theater.”

Well, maybe we need to go “back to the future.” If brands want to create video content that has high engagement, then they need to find the right content partner to reach the right audience, build successful sponsored video campaigns with them, and get more engagement for less spend.

And, Tubular’s DealMaker can help them do that. Consider this: DealMaker’s data is independent, impartial, and unbiased. I’ve used it since June, and have learned that what Tubular’s website says about it actually understates what you can find.

Seriously. The website says DealMaker is tracking “140k sponsored videos, 30k campaigns 15k brand sponsors, and 15k content partners.” Well, I double-checked over the weekend and DealMaker has tracked 202k sponsored videos, 101k campaigns 41.4k brand sponsors, and 36.4k content partners across 24 industries, 21 genres, and 173 countries. And sponsored video content has tallied 38.9 billion views and 888 million engagements to date.

#3 Rethink your advertising formats and targeting.

YouTube introduced the TrueView family of ad formats back in 2010. Believe it or not, there were originally four ad formats, but over the years that was whittled down to two:

  • TrueView in-stream ads, aka skippable video ads, which play before the start of a YouTube video. Viewers see 5 seconds of your ad and then can choose to keep watching or skip it. You only pay a “cost-per-view” if viewers choose to watch at least 30 seconds of your ad.
  • TrueView in-display ads, aka video discovery ads, where your video appears in a special promoted section of the video search results pages on YouTube for a high-frequency query. You pay only when a viewer chooses to watch your video.

Since advertisers paid nothing if viewers skipped their in-steam ads, there wasn’t much incentive for most of them to spend a whole lot of time (because time is money) selecting relevant target audiences. Hey, who cares of if the wrong people see the first 5 to 29 seconds of your ad and decide to skip the rest? No harm, no foul, right?

Sure, but if lots and lots of viewers skipped your in-stream ads, was that because most of them weren’t the right target audience, or was it an indication that your video content wasn’t particularly engaging? We’ll never know because no video marketer in his or her right mind would survey people who abandoned their “free” ads – even if their CMO was obsessed with retargeting people who had abandoned their website’s shopping cart.

So, if you really, really want to boost your engagement as well as your views, then you might want to test different formats and spend more time on targeting – or change your approach to targeting altogether. For example, instead of using demographics, trying using topic or affinity targeting. Why? Because demographics don’t help you understand what you really need to know – consumer intent – what consumers are looking for in an exact moment they are looking to find it.

Is your audience interested in certain subjects? Topic targeting allows you to show your ad on topic-specific channels. For example, if you target the “automotive” topic, then your ad will show on YouTube to people watching videos about cars. Similarly, affinity targeting allows you to show your ad only to users with particular interests. For example, if you sell kitchen supplies, then you can target YouTube users who watch food videos.

Intent beats identity. Immediacy trumps loyalty. When someone has a want or need, they turn to their smartphone for help – whether it’s a karate newbie watching an expert do a move on YouTube or my wife, who did a search on Google three years ago for “Maytag washer leaking from bottom.” When a need arises, people turn to YouTube search to look for answers, discover new things, and make decisions. Google calls these intent-filled moments, micro-moments. And they’re the best opportunity video marketers have to connect with people at the exact moment they are looking for something.

If you plan to continue using TrueView in-stream ads, then understanding consumer intent and meeting their needs in the moment are the keys to boosting engagement as well as winning more hearts, minds, and dollars.  Otherwise, you could end up targeting the wrong audience – people who are kinda, sorta relevant, so they watch more than 30 seconds of your video ad, but not especially interested at the moment, so they don’t engage with it.

For example, Groupon used a different approach to targeting in its recent YouTube ads campaign. Instead of “spray and pray” marketing – where brands blast their ads at as many people as possible and hope the right audience notices, Groupon adapted its marketing approaches to the behavior and interests of the customers they were going after.

The company did this by aligning its audience targeting segments to Groupon’s deal categories based on what people are looking up on Search and Maps. They also used YouTube’s new Consumer Patterns to target “people who frequently visit salons,” “live event enthusiasts,” and “department store shoppers.”

Groupon then built contextually relevant creative tailored to each audience segment and the content they consume. For example, watch this travel-related creative for jetsetters.

Then, watch this family activity-related creative for parents.

Finally, watch this recipe-related creative for foodies.

But, targeting isn’t the only thing you need to rethink. You also need to rethink advertising formats.

As skippable video ads became more popular (because you could save time on targeting), the budgets for the other option, video discovery ads, got smaller and smaller (because it took more and more time to do keyword research). Ironically, showing your video ads based on the keywords or phrases that someone has just typed into the YouTube search box is one of the most effective ways to respond to consumer intent.

And after someone watches a video discovery ad, they get the time to think about liking it, adding a comment, and/or sharing it with their friends, family, and colleagues on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, and/or LinkedIn. After they watch a skippable video ad, it zooms along to the content video that the user originally wanted to watch. That undercuts the opportunity for high engagement.

To keep in-stream ads from sucking more than 90% of your overall video advertising budget away from in-display ads, put them into separate campaigns. And expand your list of relevant keywords that you target. To do this, try using the YouTube Keyword Tool offered by Key Tools Limited. It uses YouTube autocomplete feature to generate highly relevant long-tail keywords about a particular topic.

And keep your eye on some of the newer ad formats that YouTube has been rolling out over the past couple of years. This ranges from bumper video campaigns to TrueView for shopping campaigns. These enable you to match the right ad format to a wider range of marketing objectives. So, you can stop losing sleep over low engagement and start measuring brand lift/high engagement/high sales.

There you have it: The critical data, strategic insights, and tactical advice that you’ve come to expect from Tubular Insights. But, this is just my take on the topic. If you’ve got a better way or even just another way to boost engagement on paid video campaigns, then please share your tools, tips, and techniques with your colleagues in the online video and internet marketing industries. Seriously, we’re all in the same boat.