Archives par mot-clé : video

Trump raises stakes for next shutdown fight

Less than 48 hours after Congress reached a bipartisan deal on 2017 spending, President Trump warned the next round might not be so easy.

The president on Tuesday roiled the debate over a 2018 spending package — five months before Congress’s deadline to pass it — by promoting the notion that a “good shutdown” in September would go a long way toward fixing the “mess” in Washington.

Arriving by tweet just after 9 a.m., the comment — unprecedented for a sitting president — was seen as no threat to the 2017 omnibus funding package, which Congress is expected to send to Trump this week to prevent a shutdown on Saturday. 

But it appears to reflect Trump’s frustration with reports and analyses, many from conservative allies, that the Republicans were rolled during the negotiations over the current bill, which included almost none of the prominent policy riders the White House had initially demanded.

 

Democrats have been triumphant, claiming a lopsided victory in the debate, and both The New York Times and The Washington Post deemed Trump among the losers. 

Trump, the consummate ­deal-maker who puts a premium on winning, lashed out Tuesday morning, blaming Senate Democrats for forcing the Republicans’ hands and urging an overhaul of Senate rules to empower the GOP majority.

“The reason for the plan negotiated between the Republicans and Democrats is that we need 60 votes in the Senate which are not there! We either elect more Republican Senators in 2018 or change the rules now to 51%,” Trump tweeted.  

“Our country needs a good ‘shutdown’ in September to fix mess!”

The comment created a new headache for GOP leaders on Capitol Hill, who control all levers of power in Washington for the first time in a decade and want to demonstrate that they can govern effectively. And Democrats, who have warned for months that Republicans would bear the political fallout of a government shutdown, took no time to pounce. 

Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerCharles SchumerFrom Russia to North Korea, the Democratic playbook is distort, distract, destroy McConnell shoots down Trump’s call to end the filibuster The press survived Obama’s persecution, and it will survive Trump’s mean words MORE (D-N.Y.) said Trump’s threat “disparages” the 2017 deal — a rare instance of bipartisan cooperation — simply “because he didn’t get 100 percent of what he wanted.” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) accused the president of “recklessly threatening chaos in the lives of millions of Americans.” And Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-N.Y.), head of the House Democratic Caucus, said Trump is crying “shutdown” simply because he lost the first round.

“I guess maybe some of the victories we had in this … omnibus is maybe getting under the president’s skin a little bit,” he told reporters in the Capitol.

The White House insisted the negotiation did not go poorly for Trump. Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly and White House Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney both made surprise appearances during Tuesday’s daily press briefing to rattle off campaign promises that were kept in the deal. 

Mulvaney also sought to explain Trump’s call for a shutdown later this fall. 

“I think the president is frustrated with the fact that he negotiated in good faith with the Democrats and they went out to try and spike the football and make him look bad,” he said. 

Mulvaney, a former House lawmaker who had championed the last government closure in 2013, went on to explain what a “good shutdown” might look like.

“It’s not a goal, and it’s not a negotiating tool,” he said. “But to the extent that the president advocated for one today, if you want to imagine what a good shutdown was, it’s one that fixes this town.”

Many Republicans on Capitol Hill, however, were quick to push back. The GOP was blamed politically for the 16-day shuttering in 2013, and few appear eager to repeat the episode, particularly for a president with historically low approval ratings. 

“I don’t think there’s a good government shutdown,” Sen. Bob CorkerBob CorkerTrump raises stakes for next shutdown fight Overnight Cybersecurity: IT modernization bill clears panel | McCain seeks new path on Russian sanctions | House Republican aims to boost feds’ cyber workforce Overnight Finance: Trump raises stakes for next shutdown fight | Senate confirms SEC pick | Dems drag out markup of Dodd-Frank overhaul MORE (R-Tenn.), the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told reporters. “Really, it shows our inability to solve our nation’s problems in a normal way.” 

Sen. John CornynJohn CornynTrump raises stakes for next shutdown fight GOP senators dismiss Trump filibuster change Overnight Tech: Republicans offer bill to kill net neutrality | Surveillance, visa reforms top GOP chair’s tech agenda | Panel pushes small biz cyber bill MORE (Texas), the second-ranking Senate Republican, piled on, saying a shutdown would be an “abdication of responsibility, particularly if you’re in the majority.”

“Our voters, the people who elected Republican majorities in both houses and elected this president, did not vote for us in order to shut down the government,” he said. “They voted for us to govern, as hard as it is.”

If GOP lawmakers are frustrated with Trump, however, the feeling may be mutual.

The businessman-turned-president has vented frustration with the slow pace of work on Capitol Hill. 

“I’m disappointed that it doesn’t go quicker,” Trump told Fox News last week when asked about the Republican effort to repeal and replace ­ObamaCare.

In the end, Trump’s shutdown threat seems designed to send an early warning to the Democrats that the White House won’t back down in September, when the 2017 spending package expires. But the effectiveness of that strategy will hinge on the reaction of Democrats, whose votes the Republicans will need to pass the 2018 spending package. 

With the Republicans likely to shoulder the blame for a shutdown, Democratic leaders are already warning Trump that his gambit will backfire. 

“They’ve not been real successful to this point in going it alone,” Rep. Linda Sánchez (D-Calif.), vice chairwoman of the House Democratic Caucus, said Tuesday. “We’re ready to have those battles if they come in September.”

2017 – The Year of Video

Lori Turner

Lori Turner-Wilson

BY TRICIA WARREN

Updated 2:37PM

If marketers had a zodiac calendar, we might call 2017 “The Year of the Video.”

Why is that? Online video is enjoying the spotlight, due in part to its increasingly crucial role in social media. Online video consumption is also at an all-time high, and that is a definite plus for video marketing.

There’s never been a better time for businesses to take advantage of video’s popularity. In January, eMarketer estimated that 62 percent of the world’s internet users would view digital video in 2017. That staggering number should pique any business owner’s interest in video as a persuasive marketing tool.

Let’s consider three of the most common reasons consumers engage online. People are curious creatures and seek to engage with media for inspiration, information and innovation. Take a moment to let those three desires sink in. Now, let’s look at online video marketing applications that deliver on each.

Our desire for inspiration includes not only motivational stories but stories that are purely entertaining. A 2017 article in The Huffington Post reports that businesses are “embracing online video as a more personal and engaging way to connect with audiences.”

Videos that weave together a compelling story through testimonials from satisfied customers who are passionate about your brand and willing to be bona fide spokespeople are a perfect example of how you can leverage video to gain some inspirational marketing traction.

Since well-crafted video boosts brand awareness and trust, then the opportunity to provide information to your market about your services or products with video is a great move. A corporate identity video relating the story of your company’s history, core values, goals and future plans is a great way to provide information that inquiring customers want to know.

Innovation is a constant craving of the online audience and a great marketing opportunity for your business. Which of your new or upcoming innovations lend themselves well to video? Has your company produced an interesting new product or process that eases customer frustration?

Once you’ve created your video, be sure to invest enough in the promotion of it to ensure you generate ROI on the overall investment. Too many marketers focus too much on the video and little time on how they intend to promote it – whether that be through purchased media, email marketing, social marketing, etc.

Like many things, less is more when it comes to the total length of your video. You’re seeking a balance in effective storytelling and likely viewership; the longer the video, generally the lower the viewership. Consult with your marketing firm to find the right-targeted length for your purpose and audience.

Video marketing is effective, persuasive, wildly popular and in demand. It should, however, be a part of an overall marketing investment and a plan that you make with a trusted marketing partner to ensure video viewership brings the results you deserve.

Tricia Warren, marketing strategist at RedRover Sales Marketing Strategy, can be reached at redrovercompany.com.

Twitter Goes Big On Live Video With Bloomberg Partnership: #NewFronts 2017

I went to the 2017 Digital Content NewFronts expecting to hear presenters talk about “fake news,” which is one of the latest trends in the digital video marketing business. But, I was surprised to actually hear real news while attending the event held Monday afternoon at the Bloomberg LP headquarters. Bloomberg Media and Twitter announced a global live video breaking news network, which will debut this fall. I’ve got to admit that ‘Twitter Live Video’ wasn’t one of the trends on my buzzword bingo card.

Now, I don’t normally report news. But the moment that Bloomberg Media and Twitter announced that they are partnering to create the first-ever 24/7 breaking news network that will be global, live, social and streaming I knew that I needed to make an exception to that rule. And to drive home the significance of the breaking news about the launch of a video breaking news network, it was made by Bloomberg founder and CEO Michael R. Bloomberg and Twitter founder and CEO Jack Dorsey. That’s when this columnist for Tubular Insights reverted back to his early days as a radio reporter rushing to cover a 5-alarm fire.

Twitter Live Video: All The News

So, here’s what video marketers need to know: The new live streaming news network will combine the global editorial and newsgathering capabilities of Bloomberg with the digital power of Twitter, which has become one of the world’s fastest and primary news distribution channels. Bloomberg will collaborate with Twitter to provide a live experience for video news consumers around the world.

The new network, which has been in development for months, will launch in fall 2017. It will feature a mix of user-generated breaking news video from citizens, curated and verified by Bloomberg editors, along with live video and reporting from Bloomberg journalists around the world. Combining the speed and immediacy of Twitter with the editorial rigor of Bloomberg, the network aims to be interactive, rich with social content, and consumable on any device.

Appropriately, the breaking news was broken during a live interview with Bloomberg and Dorsey by Bloomberg Television anchor Emily Chang. Following their live interview, Bloomberg Media CEO Justin B. Smith took the stage and provided more context. He said:

“Today’s global news consumer wants and needs more than what’s currently available. In an era when most viewers are choosing immediacy over quality in breaking news, traditional media hasn’t kept up. With this new network, we are setting out to reinvent the digital breaking news experience. The powerful combination of Bloomberg’s high-quality journalism and data-backed objectivity with Twitter’s global immediacy, interactivity and reach will create the world’s fastest and most credible modern news source.”

Now, that’s a different approach to fighting fake news. And it felt like I was witnessing the first rough draft of history to be in the room when this new trend in the digital video marketing business was born. In fact, I took photos of the photographers who moved in front of me to document the moment.

Smith was followed by a joint presentation by Bloomberg Editor-in-Chief John Micklethwait and Anthony Noto, COO of Twitter. Did I mention that it’s a partnership?

Micklethwait said, “This is a great opportunity to extend our global news gathering capabilities to Twitter’s 328 million monthly users.” He added, “Combining the journalism, data and editorial rigor of Bloomberg with the social content of Twitter will enable us to cover the world in a very new and exciting way.”

Noto said, “The stage is set for innovation in news and Bloomberg is taking on that challenge. Twitter’s speed and vast global network of content and commentary combined with the high quality, editorial rigor of Bloomberg is a unique and powerful combination. Our collaboration will bring these forces together through live video and the related conversation.”

Following the announcement, there was a cocktail party for media buyers. And, yes, there were lots of media buyers there. Now, that’s a column for another day, but let me admit that I’ll soon be shopping for a Yankees sweater to wear the next time that I speak in public. But, my tactic of wearing a bright red sweater with the “hanging sox” logo of the Boston Red Sox over the heart not only helped media buyers spot me at the event, it also generated some unintended consequences. As I was walking down a hallway to get my bags from the hatcheck room, Mike Bloomberg and an aide were walking in the opposite direction. He saw my sweater and asked, “Are you from Boston?”

We chatted briefly about the Boston area. (He was born in the Brighton neighborhood of Boston and lived in Allston until he was two years old. His family moved to Brookline for a couple of years, and then settled in Medford.) I told him that I thought the partnership with Twitter was a smart move.

But, his handler obviously wanted him to schmooze with the crowd that was down the hall, so she diplomatically offered to take our photo so that my new buddy Mike could continue to the cocktail hour with literally hundreds of media buyers. Hey, check it out and, if you tweet about it, use the hashtag #NewFronts2017 and call me out by adding @gregjarboe.

Get Your #NewFronts2017 Tear Sheets Today

If you are at NewFronts, or just want our exclusive insights into the publishers attending, then download our exclusive Tubular Tear Sheets: NewFronts 2017 Edition by filling in the form below. See you there!

 

Exults’ Expert Analysis of Google Parent Alphabet’s Latest Quarterly Earnings

Exults takes a look at the impact Google has made on the shift of technology and marketing as it continues to change traditional media.


Fort Lauderdale, FL – May 2, 2017 – (Newswire.com)

With the latest Google earnings, it is clear that digital channels are continuing to be a front-runner for companies looking to target more qualified audiences.

“With over 50% of Google searches coming from mobile devices, targeting that engaged audience should be a gold mine for companies,” says Zach Hoffman, CEO and Founder of Exults. Most users are skipping desktops and remaining on their mobile device, which has encouraged Google to shift their focus from desktop to multi-device advertising, which includes mobile, tablet, and desktop. While Google still serves ads on desktop, they have seen higher growth in mobile device usage and ad servicing.

By shifting to multi-device advertising, Google also continues to put an emphasis on mobile responsive websites. This ensures that a webpage looks great and is easy-to-use in any environment, which goes hand-in-hand with ads on Google that may be served on any device. When a company has a mobile responsive website, this also enables users to engage more effectively with their advertisers across any device. Since Google has accounted for 77% of U.S. online advertising in 2016, Hoffman says: “Advertising and marketing with Google should be in every company’s marketing plan.”

In April 2017, Google parent Alphabet posted a 29% rise in their quarterly earnings, which was driven in part by their YouTube video service. As they continue to surpass their year-over-year earnings, Google is adding YouTube to their focus of digital advertising as another tool to reach an even wider audience. Hoffman states: “Increasing your digital presence with video advertisements is a great way to stay ahead of competitors that are stuck in their traditional advertising ways and gain additional brand impressions in front of your target audience.”

Exults is a full-service internet marketing agency that is results-driven for its clients and offers a complete range of internet marketing services to reach its clients’ goals. For over 10 years, Exults has offered premier services including Website Design, Search Engine Optimization, Pay Per Click Management, Social Media Marketing, Video Optimization, Image Enhancement, and Digital PR. Exults CEO and Founder Zach Hoffman oversees and manages the day-to-day operations of the growing Fort Lauderdale-based internet marketing company.

For more information, please visit the Exults website or call 866-999-4736.

Press Release Service
by
Newswire.com

Original Source:

Exults’ Expert Analysis of Google Parent Alphabet’s Latest Quarterly Earnings

What Digital Video Trends Will Power #NewFronts 2017?

The 2017 Digital Content NewFronts starts today ( Monday, May 1), and runs through Friday, May 12. At last count, there were a total of 36 presentations at various locations around New York City on the schedule. What can video marketers who get invitations to the invitation-only events expect to hear from the presenters? Well, as Winston Churchill once said, “It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key.” That key to successfully predicting the likely news announcements days or weeks ahead of time is to understand the latest trends in the digital video marketing business.

#NewFronts 2017: Latest Digital Trends

Yes, it also helps if there have been a couple of winks, hints, or teasers. For example, back in February, Bill Shaw, the CRO of Entrepreneur Media told Sami Main of Adweek, “We’re not just ‘Entrepreneur Media’ as you’ve known us.” After working with YouTube last year to create a premium video network, called Entrepreneur Network, Shaw said (wink, wink), “You’ll see a variety of content and energy, just like we’ve shown through the Entrepreneur Network already.”

So, we can expect news announcements on Tuesday, May 9, of new content about the “people who solve problems, or who use their jobs to give inspiration, or who use their tools to make big things happen for others,” instead of Entrepreneur magazine’s traditional coverage of companies. For example, the Entrepreneur Network has a series by Gerard Adams, the co-founder of Elite Daily, entitled “Leaders Create Leaders,” that follows Adams as he travels to “underprivileged areas to help people turn kids into leaders, while featuring other celebrities in a really dynamic way.” We can expect announcements of more new projects like that one.

Here’s another hint that was made “bigly” in March: Twitter’s vice president of global revenue and operations, Matthew Derella, told Ken Yeung of VentureBeat that it will be showcasing new original content and live programming for the 2017 season at its first ever Digital Content NewFronts event.

What exactly Twitter will reveal on Monday, May 1, remains unknown, but the company could tout more of the type of programming it had in 2016, namely news, entertainment, sports genres, and possibly creator-inspired content. Or, Twitter could unveil more details about its plans to air live video 24 hours a day, 7 day a week inside its apps and desktop site, building on the 800+ hours it aired in the first three months of 2017. But, after just announcing that average monthly active users (MAUs) has reached 328 million worldwide, up 6% year-over-year, we can expect Twitter to try to pull a rabbit out of their hat in order to get brands and their agencies interested in increasing, instead of decreasing, their advertising on the video platform.

Finally, here’s a third teaser about what we can expect to hear: Back in March, BBC.com issued a press release that can only be described as “short, unsubstantial, or otherwise lacking in helpful specifics.” How short was it? Well, if you don’t count the 11 words in the headline, the body copy was only 115 words long.

It said, “BBC.com, the award-winning international news website, has today announced it will be hosting a breakfast and ad sales presentation event, for the first time ever, at the sixth annual Digital Content NewFronts on Monday, May 8, 2017 from 9:00am – 11:00am ET in New York. BBC.com joins a long line of leading digital brands in showcasing their dynamic content to the media community. Further details will be announced in due course. During the event, BBC.com, one of the most trusted news sources in the world, will explore how its editorial expertise and values can enhance its commercial offerings, as well as how news organizations like the BBC can play an integral role in combating fake news.”

So, there you have it. All the news that’s fit to print … in advance of 36 events by media powerhouses and digital innovators. Frankly, I’m shocked, shocked that they are so good at keeping their upcoming announcements secret. Maybe that’s to ensure that brands and media buyers have to come to their events to hear the new news from the presenters themselves.

NewFronts 2017: Buzzword Bingo

But, I don’t need anyone to leak more details about what the presenters will be talking about. Why? Because I know that whatever it is, it needs to be relevant and timely – which means it needs to address the latest trends in the digital video marketing business. So, while most columnists will wait until after the last event has been held before analyzing what has been said, let me confidently predict what we can expect to hear from the Digital Content NewFronts presenters. Heck, if you want to create a buzzword bingo card and bring it with you (along with your Tubular Tear Sheets), then go right ahead. When you get five buzzwords in a row (up/down, left/right, or diagonally), you’ve won!

First, the IAB announced in January that the “IAB Cross-Media Ad Effectiveness Study” found that media plans which include mobile and desktop advertising executed simultaneously with traditional offline media consistently drive greater lift across brand impact metrics than traditional offline media alone. So, expect at least one presenter from a traditional media company to cite that research.

Second, the IAB also announced in January that “The Outlook for Data 2017: A Snapshot into the Evolving Role of Audience Insight” found that marketers, media buyers, publishers, and digital advertising technology executives said that “better reporting, measurement or attribution” will be the top industry issue this year. So, expect at least one presenter to address this topic.

Third, IAB President and CEO Randall Rothenberg called for the industry to rid the digital marketing and media supply chain of “fake news” and restore the trust that is essential for a thriving democracy and a free market at the IAB Annual Leadership Meeting in January. Hey, we already know BBC.com plans to talk about this subject, so count this as the “free” square on your buzzword bingo card.

Fourth, there were 536 articles in March about ATT, Johnson Johnson, and other big brands boycotting YouTube because they didn’t want their ads running on “hateful, offensive and derogatory content.” So, you can bet dollars to donuts that brands and media buyers will get an update on Google’s commitment to improve its brand safety controls at YouTube Brandcast on Thursday, May 4.

And fifth, the latest IAB Internet Advertising Revenue Report, which was released in April, revealed that video revenue on mobile devices accounted for close to half (46%) of the record-breaking $9.1 billion spent on digital video in 2016. So, it’s a safe bet that several presenters at the 2017 Digital Content NewFronts will talk about “mobile video.”

Now, whatever you do, please don’t shout “Bingo” when you hear the fifth buzzword. Just use the hashtag #Newfronts2017 and call me out by adding @gregjarboe in a tweet. Let me know which event you were attending when you completed your buzzword bingo card. What will you win? I don’t know, but I’m confident that Tubular Insights can come up with something.

Get Your #NewFronts2017 Tear Sheets Today

If you are on your way to NewFronts, or just want our exclusive insights into the publishers attending, then download our exclusive Tubular Tear Sheets: NewFronts 2017 Edition by filling in the form below. See you there!

B2B video marketing turns your CRO into your BFF (VB Live …

B2B video marketing is officially a Big Deal, because in every stage of the funnel videos educate, entertain, and inspire in ways other marketing techniques can’t touch. Find out how you can connect, engage and convert customers with video in our latest VB Live event!

Register for free right here.


Social integration, investments by internet giants like Google and Facebook, and vanishing-to-a-point attention spans has made video marketing one of those trends that is actually never going anywhere — so you need to get good at it, fast.

But you’re going to want to make it the star of your strategy. Conversational video marketing has a powerful impact on viewers at every stage of the customer funnel, and can be used in every facet of your marketing mix, from social marketing to email to push notifications. They drive traffic, boost engagement, and break it down for customers better than almost any other type of content you put out there. And your customers really want you to put it out there.

By the end of 2017, 74 percent of all Internet traffic will be video. And if you go ahead and drop the word “video” in the subject line of your marketing email, you’ll see open rates increase by 19 percent, 65 percent higher click-throughs, and unsubscribes cut short by 26 percent.

Videos are all over your customers’ social media feeds, too, and users love them. According to Twitter, videos and photos get the most retweets. Videos from YouTube, the Google-owned video search engine, tend to get bumped up to the top of search results by search algorithms that favor rich media.

And Facebook is devoting its resources toward expanding its video infrastructure, in the wake of the boom in video popularity. Last year, video viewership on Facebook doubled from 4 billion views per day to 8 billion views in just seven months. The company launched picture-in-picture viewing last year, and is testing dedicated video feed stream so users get the content they want, when they want to see it.

This staggering growth of video viewership highlights the immense potential of conversational video marketing to change your customer relationships and turn views into conversions.

But you can’t forget that users are in control, and they’ve got ad blockers to back up their lack of interest. You need to create fresh, innovative experiences that matter, are meaningful, and are worth their time and earn their attention.

How do you delight, excite, and make potential customers think you’re more than all right? Join our latest interactive VB Live event where we’ll break down the A to Zs of B2B video content marketing to drive leads and close the sale.


Don’t miss out!

Register here for free.


In this VB Live event, you’ll:

  • Learn how to optimize your audience takeaways for video content
  • Get tips from the savviest sales and marketing people on their video content strategy
  • Focus your energy on the right distribution channels for your adverts
  • Learn how to personalize video content to lock in the close

Speakers:

  • Stewart Rogers, Director of Marketing Technology, VentureBeat

More speakers to be announced soon.

Schumer turns GOP tactics on Trump

Sen. Charles SchumerCharles SchumerOvernight Finance: Spending deal winners and losers | Seven things to know about the deal | Trump mulls breaking up big banks Dems to Trump, GOP: Work with us after spending deal This week: Congress seeks to avoid shutdown MORE (D-N.Y.) capped off his first 100 days as Senate Democratic leader under President Trump with a big win on spending, signaling how he plans to deal with Republicans in the months ahead.

Schumer and former Senate Democratic Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidSchumer turns GOP tactics on Trump How Dems have evolved on border security Judd Gregg: An American Parliament MORE (D-Nev.) blasted Senate Republicans throughout President Obama’s presidency for obstructing his agenda.

But just over three month’s into Trump’s first term, Schumer’s playbook looks similar to the one Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnellMitch McConnellSchumer turns GOP tactics on Trump Trump, GOP off to a rocky start Pence follows George H.W. Bush as vice president model MORE (R-Ky.) used against Obama eight years ago.

It’s a flashback to 2009: keep the minority unified and use every opportunity to slow down the president’s agenda. 

Frustrated, Trump has lashed out at Schumer in recent days. 

“Senator Schumer is a bad leader. I’ve known him for a long time. Senator Schumer is a bad leader, not a natural leader at all,” Trump told supporters at a rally in Harrisburg, Pa., Saturday.

On Sunday, Trump blasted Democrats in a CBS News interview as “extremely obstructionist” and slammed Schumer again on Monday during a sit-down with Fox News.  

“If slowing things and pitching a fit is successful, he was very successful,” Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin HatchOrrin HatchSchumer turns GOP tactics on Trump White House tax-reform push is ‘game changer,’ says ex-chairman Trump’s tax plan a new death tax for the middle class? MORE (R-Utah) said of Schumer.

Republicans say he exceeded McConnell by slowing the confirmations of Trump’s Cabinet nominees to a crawl. Democrats held three all-night talk-a-thons to protest Attorney General Jeff SessionsJeff SessionsSchumer turns GOP tactics on Trump Medical marijuana supporters hopeful about government funding bill Pro-pot provisions survive spending deal negotiations MORE, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos and EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt. 

Schumer also launched the first partisan filibuster of a Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, something McConnell never did. 

“They dislike Trump so much that they literally did everything to try and destroy his presidency right off the bat,” Hatch said of Schumer and other Democrats.

Schumer’s hardball tactics sent a message: he and his colleagues were dead serious about pulling out all the stops to fight Trump. It gave him leverage in the recent spending talks, since Republicans had little doubt Schumer would force a shutdown if they didn’t back off their demands.

“We made it clear that if the government shut down it would be on the Republicans’ backs,” Schumer told reporters at the Capitol Monday. “That became the general consensus and that gave us real leverage even though we were in the minority to get things done.”

Fearing a shutdown would delay tax reform and derail any hopes of reviving healthcare reform legislation, Republicans abandoned Trump’s request to fund construction of a border wall as well as various riders to loosen environmental and financial regulations. 

Schumer was exultant, touting it as “a very good deal for the American people.”

He sees the budget as a roadmap for upcoming talks on other major issues. 

“I hope this is a metaphor for the future. When Republicans work with us, we can get things done,” Schumer said Monday.

Schumer’s plan is to keep his Democrats unified in hopes of exploiting divisions within the Republican Party — just as he did by picking off GOP senators who opposed the border wall or who wanted to see more funding for the National Institutes of Health and Pell Grants.

He hopes it will push Trump to reach out to Democrats on tax reform and infrastructure, after a healthcare debate that saw Trump avoid cutting deals with Democrats. 

But Republicans say Schumer’s opposition likely to do the opposite.

A senior GOP strategist said that after the way Schumer treated Gorsuch, a judge rated well-qualified by the American Bar Association, there’s no chance of Democrats working with Trump on tax reform. He said that’s all the more reason to overhaul the tax code with a party-line vote under a special budgetary process known as reconciliation, which will enable Republicans to bypass the traditional 60-vote threshold required to beat a filibuster.

Democrats say a key difference between Schumer in 2017 and McConnell in 2009 is that Obama spent his first year in office trying to woo GOP support for the economic stimulus and healthcare reform.

Tax cuts made up 40 percent of the cost of Obama’s first stimulus proposal, and Democrats spent almost a year trying to woo Republicans such as former Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) to support ObamaCare, they note.

By contrast, centrist red-state Democrats such as Sens. Joe ManchinJoe ManchinSchumer turns GOP tactics on Trump Overnight Energy: Trump open to gas tax increase Seven things to know about the government funding deal MORE (D-W.Va.), Heidi HeitkampHeidi HeitkampSchumer turns GOP tactics on Trump This week: Congress seeks to avoid shutdown Dems struggle with abortion litmus test MORE (D-N.D.) and Claire McCaskillClaire McCaskillSchumer turns GOP tactics on Trump Seven key players for Trump on immigration Five takeaways from the Georgia special election MORE (D-Mo.) say there has been little serious outreach from the president to date.   

Under heavy pressure from the Democratic base, Schumer has dug in against Trump’s agenda, defying predictions that he would be a pragmatic dealmaker who couldn’t be trusted by liberals. 

A week after Trump’s surprising victory over Hillary ClintonHillary Rodham ClintonSchumer turns GOP tactics on Trump House GOP’s new challengers: Scientists mulling campaigns Poll: Majority of voters in 13 GOP districts oppose defunding Planned Parenthood MORE, The New York Times highlighted what it called the “Senate Democrats’ Surprising Strategy: Trying to Align with Trump.” 

Schumer announced a week after the election that Democrats were “ready to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Republicans — working with soon-to-be President Trump on issues where we agree” while cautioning he wouldn’t be afraid to “go toe-to-toe” against the president when their values clashed.

So far, though, there has been lot more clashing than cooperation. Amazingly, Schumer has kept his caucus unified, even though ten Democratic colleagues face re-election in states Trump carried in November.

The bottom line for Trump is that he has not been able to put much pressure on Democrats facing re-election in states he won by big margins, forcing him to rely on his own party at a time when it’s riven by divisions between the leadership and conservative rebels.

“I think Chuck’s done a good job,” said Sen. Jon TesterJon TesterSchumer turns GOP tactics on Trump Leading the charge to ‘keep it public’ This week: Congress seeks to avoid shutdown MORE (D-Mont.), who is running for re-election in a state won by 20 points. “The caucus isn’t the easiest to work with because you’ve got all sorts of differences of opinions.” 

He disputed that Schumer has become too beholden to the liberal base.

“I don’t buy that,” he said. “Chuck listens to people and I think thus far he has reacted appropriately.”

The challenge for the GOP is whether they will be able to inflict enough damage on Democrats by calling them obstructionist to either force more cooperation or win more electoral victories.

Democrats tried for years to paint Senate Republicans as obstructionist, but it didn’t save their 60-seat majority in 2009 from becoming a 46-seat minority in 2015. 

Some of Schumer’s other decisions have been criticized, too.

Republicans say the filibuster of Gorsuch backfired because it resulted in a rules change, stripping Democrats of the power to filibuster a future Trump nominee to the high court when the stakes might be higher or the political environment changed.

But Democrats argue that McConnell would have employed the nuclear option to change the rules even if a liberal seat on the court became open in 2020, the next presidential election year.

“It was the right move because Gorsuch wasn’t the right guy for the court,” said Tester, who voted to filibuster Gorsuch.

“Either we come out of this with a base motivated, engaged and energized, or one that is deflated,” a senior Democratic aide said of the decision to filibuster Gorsuch.

Schumer’s and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) choice of former Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear (D) to deliver the response to Trump’s first address to a join session of Congress elicited mockery from the GOP and grumbling from some liberal sectors like the Huffington Post, which portrayed Beshear’s selection as a symbol of the party’s struggle to move forward. 

A senior Democratic aide acknowledged that Beshear “flubbed” some of his lines, but argued that he was uniquely positioned to highlight the success of ObamaCare in providing health insurance to low-income Americans in red states such as Kentucky.

Republicans also highlight the 13 Obama-era regulations they rolled back under the Congressional Review Act on Schumer’s watch. They argue that Schumer has failed to pick off enough Republican votes to defeat the measures, revealing his limited traction with GOP colleagues.

But Democrats say these are minor victories as they only repealed regulations from the last few months of Obama’s tenure. Furthermore, they argue that there are several rules that Republicans don’t dare challenging for fear of losing.

A Democratic aide noted that Senate Republicans have not acted on resolutions to overturn a Department of Labor regulation designed to promote broader access to workplace retirement savings plans, a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rule for prepaid credit cards and a Bureau of Land Management Regulation limiting the venting, flaring and leaking of methane from oil and gas operations on public lands.  

Schumer says Republicans will need to start working with his caucus, or face more problems with their agenda. 

“If on healthcare or if it occurs on the tax bill, they just try to do things on their own, they’re not going to be able to accomplish anything,” he said.

Atkins: Elizabeth Warren lamenting Ivanka Trump conflicts a fool’s errand, experts say

WASHINGTON — A battle between Elizabeth Warren and first daughter Ivanka Trump could be futile for the Bay State senator.

At issue is Ivanka Trump’s role as a West Wing employee. Ethics rules allow the White House to self-police its practices, and the only outcome is just another partisan duel, experts said.

“I simply do not understand why Sen. Warren is needlessly attacking Ivanka Trump,” said Republican strategist Matt Mackowiak. “She isn’t going anywhere, and Sen. Warren must know that, so the only explanation is that attacking anyone named Trump riles up the left-wing base.”

Responding to an inquiry by Warren and U.S. Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), the Office of Government Ethics Director Walter M. Shaub said Ivanka Trump’s formal position as assistant to the president removes any ambiguity that ethics rules and regulations apply to her.

No one from the White House consulted ethics officials before naming her as an adviser before OGE contacted the White House, according to Shaub.

The first daughter owns an eponymous fashion label and holds as much as a $25 million stake in a Trump International Hotel just down the street from the White House, according to financial disclosures. She handed over daily operations of her business to another executive and placed its assets in a trust, but not a blind trust, a move that would have required her to sell the company.

Watchdog groups have raised flags over Ivanka Trump’s business ties, noting potential conflicts including patent petitions by her company in China and the Philippines as she and other White House officials hold meetings with the heads of those nations.

But despite OGE’s warning that she should recuse herself from any matter which could benefit her business interests and create a blind trust, it appears pointless because enforcing those rules rest with her boss — her dad.

“It’s kind of like a toothless watchdog organization,” said Scott Amey, general counsel at the Project on Government Oversight of the OGE. “It’s very good with education and advising and certain things it has the power to do, but it needs additional power to add enforcement.”

Boosting the OGE’s enforcement power would require legislation that, even if passed by Congress, would require the president’s signature. Warren introduced a bill to toughen ethics standards for the president and vice president, but it’s unclear whether other bills will follow that would apply to other employees.

“I understand why Warren wants to attack her,” said GOP strategist John Feehery, “If you can somehow diminish her ability to be a positive influence, you can somehow weaken the Trump presidency. It’s very partisan and not particularly helpful for the country, but that’s how Warren rolls.”

What on Earth might a Trump-Kim Jong Un meeting look like?

BANGKOK — In one corner: the unpredictable dictator, the third-generation family ruler whose nation has a seven-decade reputation of being erratic, quick to take umbrage and insistent that it is powerful enough to upend the planet. In the other corner: a sandpaper-tongued American president like no other, barely past his first 100 days as leader of the free world, liable to say just about anything — including a handful of conciliatory words at the most unexpected of moments.

On Monday, those conciliatory words from the mouth of Donald Trump included some extraordinary ones about North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, long an object of American scorn and suspicion.

There were these words from Trump: “Obviously, he’s a pretty smart cookie.”

And, even more so, there were these: “If it would be appropriate for me to meet with him,” Trump told Bloomberg News, “I would absolutely, I would be honored to do it.”

Wow, says an astonished world: What if?

In the annals of diplomatic history, such a tete-a-tete, unlikely as it is, would tumble into a category that offers few possible comparisons.

There are the ones that never happened — Roosevelt sitting down with Hitler during World War II, George Bush (whichever one) facing Saddam Hussein while in office. And there are those that did: Kennedy meeting Khrushchev in Vienna, Nixon arriving in Beijing at the dawn of the U.S.-China thaw and immediately heading to a meeting with Mao.

Even those, however, were before many things we take for granted today — perhaps most notably the internet, live television and the instantaneous social-media pipelines that Trump knows and uses so fluidly.

The notion of a substantive sit-down between two of the most gazed-upon figures of this moment in the planet’s history is a staggering prospect — and a potential logistical nightmare if the two countries ever tried to make it happen.

Presuming that such a trial balloon is to be taken seriously, what, in fact, would it take to pull off? The loose contours of it could play out as follows:

THE VENUE

Possible locations could include the DMZ, which would be about as cinematic a piece of drama as human geopolitics could offer up, with a room featuring negotiation tables that sit halfway in the North and halfway in the South.

The benefit of this location would be the presence of existing security. It’s already the nucleus of one of the most tense patches of the planet, and it’s effectively already wired for such an event. Somewhere in China would be a possible, though highly unlikely, location as well.

But could it be elsewhere? Perhaps famously neutral Switzerland, where the now-infrequent world traveler Kim Jong Un almost certainly spent part of his upbringing attending school? Could it possibly even be the White House, where Trump has already caused uproars by hosting the president of Egypt and by calling the president of Turkey, both perceived in the West as hardly the most robust upholders of American values. That would be highly controversial and even more unlikely — just getting Kim a visa would be an interesting proposition — but stranger things have happened.

Or perhaps, gaming it out, things might take place in an unexpected or even unknown place. In 1989, George H.W. Bush and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev met on a ship off Malta to discuss the changes taking place in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, and it propelled the tiny Mediterranean island into notoriety for several years. Malta was itself a follow-up in some ways to the fabled Yalta conference, in which Roosevelt, Winston Churchill and Joseph Stalin met in Crimea in early 1945 to plot out Europe’s postwar configurations.

The United States has been the site of such sensitive meetings, too, with Camp David being the most notable locale for its Carter-administration peace talks between Israel’s Menachem Begin and Egypt’s Anwar Sadat. The history of such things is lengthy; in 1905, Theodore Roosevelt helped broker peace between the warring nations of Japan and Russia in the unlikely locale of a small New England town. More recently, the unlikely venue of Dayton, Ohio, became the site in 1995 of peace accords to end the Bosnian war. But those were other nations in conflict, not the United States itself.

And what about Pyongyang? There would be precedent for that — from U.S. envoys like Madeleine Albright to a previous Japanese prime minister to faded basketball star Dennis Rodman — and the Kims are not known for their love of foreign travel, which carries them away from turf and situations they can completely control.

Whatever the case, barring it taking place at the DMZ, such a high-stakes, high-security Trump-Kim meeting would change a place for a long time, if not forever.

THE TOPICS

Nuclear disarmament — North Korea’s — would be first on the table. You’d think. But with two such unpredictable rulers, no one could be absolutely certain.

Given Trump’s style so far, time might be given to developing some sort of rapport between the two men before any negotiations began. But major topics would surely emerge before too long.

Among them: Aid to the North, which has played the brinkmanship game many times before with an eye toward getting assistance for its poor, sometimes hungry populace. Relations with the South. And weapons tests — missile and in particular nuclear, which make the United States and China, not to mention the South, very uncomfortable.

THE REACTION

The wildcards here would be South Korea, Russia, and, of course, China — the North’s patron for many decades and, of late, its increasingly wary and irritated neighbor.

In South Korea’s case, such a meeting would be an existential event. Most agree that Kim’s arsenal has enough accuracy and firepower to devastate the South, and so a meeting between the United States, South Korea’s military protector, and the North would have serious security implications for Seoul even if virtually nothing of substance was discussed.

China is wary of any U.S. involvement in its sphere of influence, and is already at odds with Washington about territorial claims in the South China Sea, while the perennial issue of Taiwan’s autonomy always lurks in the background. Beijing has courted South Korea in recent years more than before, with Chinese President Xi Jinping visiting Seoul in 2014 in what was seen as a hint to the North. (Recent Chinese trepidations over THAAD, the U.S.-made missile system being set up in South Korea, have restored some of the tension with Beijing.)

Against this backdrop, any Trump-Kim sit-down would, using conventional wisdom, have to involve China and the pressure it can exert on the North — something the Trump White House has always said was necessary. But protocol does not always seem to be the order of the day, as Trump’s unexpected, pre-inauguration call to Taiwan’s new president underscored.

Finally, Russia and its leader, Vladimir Putin, would watch from afar with great wariness and probable dismay. Such a meeting could alter Moscow’s relationships with both Beijing and Washington, and probably Pyongyang as well.

Oh, and let’s not forget the media reaction. Obviously any such meeting would be THE visual of the year for news organizations. Setting it up as a media event would draw hundreds if not thousands of news outlets. That would mean a major infrastructure setup that’s on par with a summit meeting of leaders or an Olympics.

THE ALLURE

Whatever the political implications, this much is certain: Any meeting with Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un, anywhere in the world, would be — if it ever actually happened — one of the most dramatic events of the 21st century thus far.

It would encompass three major global narratives at once: The United States under Donald Trump, and what his administration means; the Kim family and the unique, mercurial way they have ruled North Korea and projected themselves to the world; and the regional security and defense of East Asia, one of the most strategically pivotal regions in the world.

It would be big. It would be loud. It would be momentous, somewhat surreal and entirely unexpected. All things quite familiar to the worlds of two singular, bound-to-change-the-world men named Kim Jong Un and Donald J. Trump.

Then again, you might not want to hold your breath. This came in Tuesday afternoon from the official news agency for North Korea, which goes by the formal name Democratic People’s Republic of Korea: “The Trump administration that newly took office in the U.S. is provoking the DPRK with no reason, not knowing what rival it stands against.”

___

Ted Anthony, director of Asia-Pacific News for The Associated Press, is based in Bangkok, Thailand. He has covered Asia for nearly a decade over his career and traveled to North Korea six times since 2014. Follow him on Twitter at @anthonyted

Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Trump keeps praising international strongmen, alarming human rights advocates

It’s no longer just Vladi­mir Putin.

As he settles into office, President Trump’s affection for totalitarian leaders has grown beyond Russia’s president to include strongmen around the globe.

Egyptian President Abdel ­Fatah al-Sissi has had his opponents gunned down, but Trump praised him for doing “a fantastic job.” Thailand’s Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha is a junta chief whose military jailed dissidents after taking power in a coup, yet Trump offered to meet with him at the White House. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has eroded basic freedoms, but after a recent political victory, he got a congratulatory call from Trump.

Then there’s the case of Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte. He is accused of the extrajudicial killing of hundreds of drug users, and he maligned President Barack Obama as a “son of a whore” at an international summit last year. Yet on Sunday, in what the White House characterized as a “very friendly conversation,” Trump invited Duterte to Washington for an official visit.

In an undeniable shift in American foreign policy, Trump is cultivating authoritarian leaders, one after another, in an effort to reset relations following an era of ostracism and public shaming by Obama and his predecessors.

For instance, it has become an almost daily occurrence for Trump to gush about Chinese President Xi Jinping since their Mar-a-Lago summit last month. Trump has called Xi “a very good man,” “highly respected” and a “gentleman,” as he tries to persuade Xi to convince North Korea that it should scale back or give up its pursuit of nuclear weapons.

Trump’s praise is not limited to potential U.S. allies. Even as North Korean leader Kim Jong Un ratchets up his provocations, Trump called Kim “a smart cookie” in a CBS News interview over the weekend. On Monday, Trump told Bloomberg News he would be “honored” to personally meet with Kim “under the right circumstances.”

Every American president since at least the 1970s has used his office at least occasionally to champion human rights and democratic values around the world. Yet, so far at least, Trump has willingly turned a blind eye to dictators’ records of brutality and oppression in hopes that those leaders might become his partners in isolating North Korea or fighting terrorism.

Indeed, in his first 102 days in office, Trump has neither delivered substantive remarks nor taken action supporting democracy movements or condemning human rights abuses, other than the missile strike he authorized on Syria after President Bashar al-Assad allegedly used chemical weapons against his own citizens.

“He doesn’t even pretend to utter the words,” said Michael McFaul, a U.S. ambassador to Russia under Obama. “Small-d democrats all over the world are incredibly despondent right now about Donald Trump — and that’s true in China, in Iran, in Egypt, in Russia. They feel like the leader of the free world is absent.”

A tipping point for many Trump critics was his invitation to Duterte to visit the White House. Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin (Md.), the ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said he was “deeply disturbed” by Trump’s “cavalier invitation” and called on him to rescind it.

“This is a man who has boasted publicly about killing his own citizens,” Cardin said of Duterte in a statement. “The United States is unique in the world because our values — respect for human rights, respect for the rule of law — are our interests. Ignoring human rights will not advance U.S. interests in the Philippines or any place else. Just the opposite.”

Yet Trump’s advisers said the president’s silence on human rights matters is purposeful, part of a grand strategy to rebuild alliances or create new ones. Trump’s outreach is designed to isolate North Korea in the ­Asia-Pacific region and to build coalitions to defeat the Islamic State in the Middle East and North Africa, senior administration officials said.

Inside the Trump White House, the thinking goes that if mending bridges with a country like the Philippines — historically a treaty ally whose relationship with the United States deteriorated as Duterte gravitated toward China — means covering up or even ignoring concerns like human rights, then so be it.

“The United States has a limited ability to direct things,” said Michael Anton, the National Security Council’s director of strategic communications. “We can’t force these countries to behave certain ways. We can apply pressure, but if the alternative is not talking, how effective would it be if we had no relationships? If you walk away from relationships, you can’t make any progress.”

Anton explained that Trump is trying to “balance” interests. He said the decision to invite Duterte to the White House — a symbolic gesture that gives credibility to the autocrat’s rule — was agreed to by most of Trump’s advisers.

“It’s not binary,” he said. “It’s not that you care about human rights so you can’t have a relationship with the Philippines, or if you have a relationship with the Philippines you don’t care about human rights.”

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) described the Trump strategy as establishing commonality with offending nations before publicly chastising them for ­offenses.

“Their approach is to obviously continue to hold up the values that we have here in America,” Corker said in a recent interview. “But their approach is to build some commonality — never let go of that as an American cause, but to work on it in ways where they achieve a result, and to not go in on the front end.”

White House officials cite the release last month of Aya Hijazi — an Egyptian American charity worker who had been imprisoned in Cairo for three years amid Sissi’s brutal crackdown on civil society — as evidence that their strategy is paying dividends.

Trump and his aides worked for several weeks with Sissi and his government to secure Hijazi’s freedom. The Obama administration had pressed unsuccessfully for her release, but once Trump moved to reset U.S. relations with Egypt by embracing Sissi at the White House, Egypt’s posture changed.

Tom Malinowski, assistant secretary of state for human rights and democracy under Obama, said Trump appears to be living up to his campaign promise.

“The whole idea of ‘America First’ is that we’re not trying to make the world better,” Malinowski said. “We’re trying to protect the homeland and the domestic economy, and the rest is all cutting deals with whoever is willing to cut deals with us. There’s not much room in that equation for standing up for the rights, freedoms and well-being of other people.”

Human rights activists are concerned that Trump is condoning the actions of dictators when he is warm to them or extends invitations to visit.

“Inviting these men to the White House in effect places the United States’ seal of approval on their heinous actions,” said Rob Berschinski, senior vice president at Human Rights First. He went on to say, “Nothing excuses President Trump’s clear inclination to reward mass murderers and torturers with undeserved honors.”

Asked at the daily White House press briefing whether Trump had “a thing” for totalitarian leaders, press secretary Sean Spicer suggested he was cultivating such leaders with the explicit aim of weakening North Korea.

“The president clearly, as I said, understands the threat that North Korea poses,” Spicer said. “Having someone with the potential nuclear capability to strike another country — and potentially our country — at some point in the future is something that the president takes very seriously.”

But McFaul posited that the Trump administration may be ­naive in calculating that personal outreach and warm praise will convince authoritarian leaders to support U.S. interests.

“The converse of that is that these leaders are taking him for a ride,” McFaul said. “He tends to over-personalize relationships between states. He says China’s ‘raping’ us, then he meets President Xi and suddenly he’s this wise man with whom he has a good chemistry. I hope this will produce outcomes that are good for us, but right now it’s producing outcomes that are good for China.”

Karen DeYoung contributed to this report.