Archives par mot-clé : video

Texas governor signs bill targeting sanctuary cities

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed a bill Sunday prohibiting the state’s cities and counties from enacting so-called « sanctuary » laws that prevent local law enforcement officers from inquiring about the immigration status of anyone they detain.

Abbott took the unusual step of signing the bill on Facebook with no advanced public notice. He said Texas residents expect lawmakers to « keep us safe » and said similar laws have already been tested in federal court, where opponents have already been hinting the bill will be immediately challenged.

« Let’s face it, the reason why so many people come to America is because we are a nation of laws and Texas is doing its part to keep it that way, » Abbott said. 

SANCTUARY CITIES BILL PUTS TEXAS COUNTY IN TIGHT SPOT

The timing of the signing caught Democratic lawmakers flatfooted. Democratic state Rep. Cesar Blanco said it looked like Abbott « wanted to get ahead » of any protests surrounding the bill signing. Abbott spokesman John Wittman said they chose to sign the bill on a Facebook livestream because that’s « where most people are getting their news nowadays. »

Protests over the bill have been intense for months and about 20 people were charged with criminal trespassing last week after staging a daylong sit-in at a state building where some of Abbott’s staff works. One Democratic state representative embarked on a three-day hunger strike in protest.

Teri Burke, executive director of the ACLU of Texas, said « we will fight this assault in the court » and the ballot box. Abbott said key provisions of the bill had already been tested at the U.S. Supreme Court, which struck down several components of Arizona’s law but allowed the provision permitting police to ask about immigration status.

Republicans say the bill is needed to ensure local jails honor requests from federal officials to keep dangerous offenders behind bars.

TEXAS, CALIFORNIA TAKE VERY DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO ‘SANCTUARY CITY’ DEBATE

The bill allows police to inquire about the immigration status of anyone they detain, a situation that can range from arrest for a crime to being stopped for a traffic violation. It also requires local officials to comply with federal requests to hold criminal suspects for possible deportation.

One of the bill’s most controversial provisions allows for criminal charges against city or county officials who intentionally refuse to comply with federal authorities’ attempt to deport people in the country illegally who already have been jailed on offenses unrelated to immigration. Elected officials could face up to a year in jail and lose their posts if convicted of official misconduct.

Opponents blasted the Texas bill as a version of Arizona’s immigration crackdown law, SB 1070, which launched protests, lawsuits and national controversy in 2010. The Arizona law went to the U.S. Supreme court, which voided much of the measure but allowed the provision permitting police to ask about immigration status.

But the Texas and Arizona bills are not identical. Whereas the Arizona law required police to try to determine the immigration status of people during routine stops, the Texas bill doesn’t instruct officers to ask. But it does allow Texas police to inquire whether a person is in the country legally, even if they’re not under arrest.

Every major police chief in Texas opposed the bill. Thomas Saenz, president of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, said millions in the nation’s second most populous state will now be subjected to racial profiling and suggested that worried Hispanic residents will now be less willing to cooperate with police investigations.

« Given the size of the state, this may well be the most costly gubernatorial signature in all of United States history, » Saenz said.

Some Democrats said the timing of the signing particularly stung after three recent federal court rulings that found intentional discrimination in Republican-passed voting laws.

« They did not connect the history of our culture or how closely that it is tied to Mexico, » Democratic state. Rep. Eddie Rodriguez said. « It’s just extremely personal. There is a lot of disconnect. They don’t really see this as affecting people. »

Texas doesn’t currently have any cities which have formally declared themselves sanctuaries for immigrants.

But Sally Hernandez, the sheriff of Travis County, which includes liberal Austin, enraged conservatives by refusing to honor federal detainer requests if the suspects weren’t arrested for immigration offenses or serious crimes such as murder. Hernandez softened her policy after Abbott cut funding to the county, saying decisions would be made on a case-by-case basis. She has said she will conform to the state’s ban if it becomes law.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Marketing Strategies Today: How to create engaging video content for Twitter

twitter_videos.jpg

By Mitch Carson

Now that Twitter has launched its own native live video service, they are prioritizing video content on their feed. This means that, now more than ever, Twitter is an excellent way for a savvy marketing executive to reach potential clients or customers.

mitch_carson.jpg

Mitch Carson has been a pitchman on Home Shopping Network, CBS Radio host, and is the CEO of Impact Products Marketing in Los Angeles, CA. Reach him at mitch@mitchcarson.com or http://www.mitchcarson.com

Reaching your potential client base is the most important function of marketing, of course, so it’s a good idea to learn more about the different styles of video upload allowed on Twitter, the various differences between them, and the ways in which you can use each of them to create more engaging content for your business Twitter account. This article will provide you with all the information you will need to start generating excellent video marketing content for your business Twitter.

The first option for generating a Twitter video for marketing purposes is to create a live video feed within the Twitter app itself. This allows the user to create content ‘on the go’, taking advantage of the live and in-real-time nature of Twitter. The live video feature is run by Periscope, but not to worry – you don’t need to download Periscope or have an account in order to use the feature. Note that this feature is only usable for public Twitter accounts.

To use the function, simply create a new tweet and press the ‘Live’ button. Once the camera opens, you may choose whether to film facing front or rear. You may also add a short description in the “what’s happening?” area, so that your viewers know what the video is about, giving them a reason to tune in. Once you have everything set up as you desire, tap the ‘Go Live’ button to start streaming.

While your viewers are watching your live broadcast, they can interact with you, leaving a comment or a heart emoji. You can even respond in real time, making the viewers a part of the broadcast. Once you have concluded your live video feed, simply swipe down and tap the ‘End Video’ button.

After your live feed ends, the video will appear as a tweet, and will remain in your timeline. This allows for repeated views of the same content, generating additional exposure for your business. The broadcast will also be available on Periscope, even if you don’t have an account. You will be able to see the difference between your live content and prerecorded content, by looking in the bottom left corner of the video. Prerecorded videos will have a video length in the corner of the screen, while live content will display the word ‘ENDED’ and the number of live viewers the video had at the time it was recorded.

Another popular method for video marketing through Twitter is by using prerecorded video content. Uploading content that has been previously recorded has several advantages. For instance, you can edit and re-edit your content until it is exactly the way you want it – one way in which live video feeds can be frustrating for marketers.

Uploading a prerecorded video is very similar in function to creating live video content. First you compose a tweet and open the camera icon. Then you choose a video file stored on your mobile device. This can be either MP3 or MOV format. The file may not be any larger than 512 MB, and cannot exceed 2:20 in length. This is fine, because if your video is too long, Twitter will prompt you to edit the length using their trimming tools. This function also works well for recording content directly through the Twitter app and then uploading it separately.

Simply record your content, and then add to it with a second or more recordings if you choose, then upload the entire video at once. The versatility of this method cannot be over stressed – you can use multiple clips to create one video, you can drag and drop various clips into whatever order you choose, or even remove a single clip altogether. Before you post your finished video, you can preview it to make sure it is the content you want, then simply click done and write a tweet to accompany the video.

Another method you can use for creating video marketing content for Twitter is by using video looping. Twitter recently removed the Vine app and replaced it with the Vine Camera app for iOS and Android systems. You can use this feature to create short video clips of up to six and a half seconds, which will then loop automatically. Simply hold your finger on the screen to record, and then upload the resulting video.

Just like with Vine, any video of that length or shorter will automatically loop, so you can actually use this function to promote your business across several platforms at once, such as posting short sections of video content taken from your Instagram and Snapchat apps.

Studies have shown that the most successful video content on various social media platforms play automatically in the viewer’s feed, play silently unless interacted with, and come in under fifteen seconds in length. With that being the case, it’s easy to see why looping short videos on Twitter can be so successful for marketing strategies.

Now that we’ve covered the different ways in which video marketing can be achieved on Twitter, let’s explore a few ways to get the most impact out of your video content. The first and most important thing to remember about video marketing on Twitter specifically is that it’s a mobile app, so you need to showcase your video with that in mind. Keep your videos short and to the point, to avoid boredom in your potential audience.

Also make sure to deliver the message in such a way that it will be understood without volume, as most Twitter users watch timeline-intruding videos on silent. In addition, remember that these videos need to be compelling within the first few seconds so that viewers will stop scrolling and pay attention. This can be achieved through the use of captions or text overlays on the video content.

Another great way to deliver video content to potential clients is to simply ask them what they want to see! This type of content is fairly difficult to quantify, but simultaneously easy to explain – there really is no explanation, because it is all dependent upon the type of business you are promoting.

Regardless, asking your potential customer base what content they would like to see can generate some surprising results. You can use a Twitter poll to ask your followers what they want to see from you, or you can even ask in a video promotion. Doing this will encourage people to keep paying attention, which will generate even more attention for your marketing campaign.

Another important thing you can do to promote your business using Twitter video marketing is to coordinate your video events with other marketing strategies. Timing a marketing campaign with several mixed media elements can be a bit of a hassle, but the real-time nature of Twitter makes it easy to coordinate the promotion of a particular video with real world events or other marketing notions.

In addition, generating video content that comes at the same time of day, or the same day each week, can help to create a following from people who eagerly await your next video offering. Much like a television show, this episodic style of content creation allows people to remain repeatedly engaged, and that directly translates into higher traffic and more people talking about your business.

Finally, an excellent use of Twitter’s video functionality is through answering customer questions, complaints, or problems, and also the use of ‘Welcome’ style video content for your new followers. You can use the Reply function on your video content to add a reply to your video, which means you’ll be able to update your video to reflect questions which you have answered. You can also collect all the various questions and then answer them all at once with a ‘FAQ’ style video.

Posting video content of this nature allows you to stay on top of any issues that might arise, giving you an edge when interacting with potential customers. Welcoming new followers with a special personalized video will make them feel included, and like you want them to be a part of what you are doing, which means you will have more engaging followers in the future.

By following these various methods, you can quickly and easily ensure that your video marketing content for Twitter is useful and brings you the added business you desire. Don’t forget, all content may not always be good, but having no content will always be bad, so get out there and start recording your marketing campaign now!

‘Scaling our reach’: Tough Mudder is creating video content for Amazon

Tough Mudder is opening a digital storefront on Amazon on Monday where in addition to selling fitness gear, it’s distributing video it’s creating solely for the e-commerce giant.

There are pre-race, race-day and post-race videos and guides featuring Tough Mudder’s fitness and active lifestyle experts. The store also sells fitness products from brands including Vega and Nexcare.

Amazon will also distribute “Coachified,” a weekly miniseries produced by Tough Mudder that features its trainer, Kyle “Coach” Railton, across its channels. The series has been produced and distributed by Tough Mudder across Facebook and YouTube since 2015, but will now be co-branded and highlight fitness and wellness experts and sponsored products, focusing on training, nutrition and health.

Amazon has encouraged publishers to self-distribute their content through Amazon Video Direct. Donna Goldsmith, Tough Mudder’s svp of partnership marketing, corporate sales and merchandising, isn’t aware of another brand that’s produced exclusive content for Amazon to distribute.

For Tough Mudder, the Amazon partnership is part of an effort to turn its events business into a lifestyle and media brand. It’s already begun making more video and distributing it on media outlets and platforms including CBS Sports, The CW, Snapchat and Facebook.

“Our partnership with Amazon expands our media portfolio and allows us to scale our reach,” said Goldsmith. “It gives us another platform to share exclusive content and provide a trusted resource for training and wellness content.”

For Amazon, an arrangement like this is a way to own the consumer journey, as it’s begun to do with Prime Music and Video, said Tom Buontempo, president at social agency Attention.

“They undoubtedly own the bottom of the funnel — the people who are on their site or leveraging search have already expressed intent to purchase,” he said. “Now they’re trying to figure out how to work their way up the funnel, leveraging a richer set of signals about its audience’s interests and motivations.”

Amazon declined to comment.

Infographic: How 2017 is the year of video content

This year is more than a quarter of the way over, and many predicted
marketing trends—such as more video and increased interactive and
personalized content—have proven out.

Still, video remains the trendiest of the marketing trends.

[RELATED:


Join us at Microsoft Headquarters, and learn tactics and strategies
to conquer all your biggest communications challenges
.]

Did you know:

· One third of all online activity is spent watching videos.

· Every minute, 5.5 million Facebook videos are watched.

· After watching a video, 64 percent of viewers are likely to buy a product
online.

These are just some of the stats that highlight how video has completely
taken over the web and powered marketers’ campaigns (while capturing their
hearts).

For more, check out the infographic below from Social Paragon:

North Korea detains another US citizen amid rising tensions, state media reports

North Korea claimed it detained another U.S. citizen on Sunday, stoking further discord as the two countries face their biggest tensions in years.

The North’s state media said Kim Hak Song, who worked at Pyongyang University of Science and Technology, was arrested on Saturday on charges of “hostile acts” against the country. This would bring the tally to four U.S. citizens held by the reclusive nation.

“The relevant authority is currently carrying out a detailed investigation into the crime of Kim Hak Song,” Korean Central News Agency said. The report did not specify the nature of the “hostile acts” or offer any further information about Kim.

Officials confirmed Wednesday they also were holding an accounting instructor tied to the school, which was founded by evangelical Christians in 2010. They said Kim Sang Dok, who also goes by the name Tony Kim, was arrested at the Pyongyang airport for “hostile criminal acts” intended to subvert the country.

90 seconds: 4 stories you can't miss
Man shot after leaving Spring Valley pot dispensary

Caption Man shot after leaving Spring Valley pot dispensary

A man was shot when he and his car were struck by 10 bullets soon after he left a Spring Valley marijuana dispensary.

A man was shot when he and his car were struck by 10 bullets soon after he left a Spring Valley marijuana dispensary.

U.S. labor market rebounds as employers add 211,000 jobs

Caption U.S. labor market rebounds as employers add 211,000 jobs

The unemployment rate dropped to 4.4% last month, its lowest level in nearly a decade. (May 5, 2017) (Sign up for our free video newsletter here http://bit.ly/2n6VKPR)

The unemployment rate dropped to 4.4% last month, its lowest level in nearly a decade. (May 5, 2017) (Sign up for our free video newsletter here http://bit.ly/2n6VKPR)

90 seconds: 4 stories you can't miss

Times staff writer Laura King in Washington contributed to this report.

Meyers is a special correspondent.

Twitter: @jessicameyers

ALSO

In a rare direct criticism, North Korea says China’s ‘reckless remarks’ are testing its patience

Here’s what’s driving North Korea’s nuclear program — and it might be more than self-defense

Passing 100-day mark, Trump offers mixed signals on healthcare, taxes and North Korea


UPDATES:

10 a.m.: This article has been updated throughout with staff reporting.

This article was originally published at 6:50 a.m.

House healthcare bill faces upheaval in Senate

The House Republican bill repealing and replacing ObamaCare faces high procedural hurdles in the Senate that will likely force GOP negotiators to throw out key portions of the legislation.

Republicans are using special budget rules to prevent Democrats from filibustering the legislation. But the Senate has long warned the House that the rules could prohibit certain things in the bill from being included.

GOP senators have already flagged two problems: language allowing states to opt out of regulations defining what healthcare services insurers must cover, and a provision banning them from discriminating against people based on their health.

Another part of the House bill that allows health plans to charge older policyholders five times what they charge young adults — a shift from the 3-to-1 ratio mandated by ObamaCare — could also be a problem.

Language that allows insurers to place a 30 percent surcharge on people who let their coverage lapse also poses procedural problems.

The House bill also makes reforms to Medicaid, such as allowing states to impose work requirements, and caps federal payments to states. Both provisions could run afoul of Senate rules.

Senate Republican Whip John CornynJohn CornynCollins on all-male healthcare working group: ‘The leaders obviously chose the people they want’ Congress compares French presidential candidate email hack to US Feinstein slams all-male group of senators working on ObamaCare repeal MORE (Texas) said this week the House bill « will be modified here if for no other reason than the rules, the reconciliation rules, would require it. »

Cornyn said he doesn’t yet know whether the House-proposed changes to insurance regulations — the centerpiece of the compromise between members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus and moderate Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-N.J.) — will survive procedural challenges.

“That’s a good question that I don’t know the answer to,” he said. “That just shows that the House doesn’t operate under the same constraints we do and so we’ll have to work that out.”

The Senate rules are a problem for Republicans because they need to pass the bill repealing and replacing ObamaCare through a special budgetary process known as reconciliation.

The upside of this strategy is that it will allow them to pass it with a simple majority vote, instead of having to overcome the usual 60-vote threshold to get around a filibuster.

Republicans control only 52 seats, and there are not close to eight Democrats willing to vote for the GOP healthcare plan. That means using reconciliation is really the only option for getting a bill out of the Senate.

The drawback is that any legislation advanced on this track must pass a multi-part test known as the Byrd Rule, which requires that all provisions either change spending outlays or revenues — in other words, have an impact on the budget.

And the rule states that the budgetary impact cannot be merely incidental to the nonbudgetary components of the provision.

The Senate parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, who was appointed to the post by former Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidHouse healthcare bill faces upheaval in Senate Democrats turn tables on GOP in ObamaCare messaging war Democrats and Republicans share blame in rewriting the role of the Senate MORE (D-Nev.) in 2012, will decide what does and does not pass the Byrd Rule.

So far, she has stayed out of the partisan fray in the Senate — not drawing any public complaints from either side of the aisle.

Earlier this year, conservative Sens. Ted CruzTed CruzCollins on all-male healthcare working group: ‘The leaders obviously chose the people they want’ Feinstein slams all-male group of senators working on ObamaCare repeal House healthcare bill faces upheaval in Senate MORE (R-Texas) and Rand PaulRand PaulHouse healthcare bill faces upheaval in Senate Kushner, Trump and Congress need to put an end to federal ‘no-bid’ contracts THE MEMO: Trump faces long war on healthcare MORE (R-Ky.) suggested that Vice President Pence, who serves as the ex officio president of the Senate, ignore the advice of the parliamentarian if it is detrimental to passing the GOP healthcare bill.

But that idea has gained little traction with other Republicans.

There’s also doubt over whether the Senate parliamentarian will approve $138 billion in funding to set up high-risk pools for older, sicker Americans in states that opt out of ObamaCare’s insurance requirements. There’s partisan disagreement on this point, with Republicans saying it’s OK and Democrats saying it’s not.

Language scrapping the mandate on employers to provide health insurance if they have at least 50 workers and to count employees who work 30 hours a week as eligible for coverage could also face procedural objections.

On this point, Republicans note that the parliamentarian has ruled on the reconciliation bill that passed in 2015 that lawmakers could eliminate the penalty for not complying with the employer mandate, rendering it toothless.

The provisions allowing states to opt out of ObamaCare’s regulatory requirements — specifically the waivers related to pre-existing conditions and defined essential health benefits — have popped out as the most problematic under the Byrd Rule, according to Republican and Democratic experts.

“That one could be challenged. Here’s the reason: I don’t know that the [Congressional Budget Office] can say what a state would do,” said Bill Hoagland, an expert on the Senate’s reconciliation rules, who worked for former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) and served as Republican staff director of the Senate Budget Committee.

“They’re going to be hard-pressed to say whether states will take the opt out,” he added.

Hoagland explained that because it’s hard for the Congressional Budget Office to predict how states would react to the language, it’s very difficult to predict what the budgetary impact of the language would be. If it doesn’t score as saving or losing money, then it doesn’t have a more-than-incidental budgetary impact.

“If it has no score, then technically it would violate the Byrd Rule,” he said.

Hoagland, however, said he did not think the $138 billion in funding for high-risk pools or the scrapping of the employer mandate would be a problem — noting it would have a significant budgetary impact. 

Former Sen. Kent Conrad (N.D.), the former Democratic chairman of the Budget Committee, disagrees. He said the insurance regulatory reforms, the set up of high-risk pools and the elimination of the employer-provided insurance rule are “ripe” for challenge before the parliamentarian.

“You’re not just raising revenue, cutting revenue, cutting spending or raising spending, you’re obviously doing something that has a heavy policy component,” he said.

“It would seem to me that’s ripe for Byrd Rule challenge. What the parliamentarian would decide, I don’t know,” he said. “It has such a heavy policy component.”

Sarah Binder, an expert in congressional procedure and professor of political science at George Washington University, highlighted the provisions allowing states to opt out of regulations for essential health benefits and pre-existing conditions and letting insurance companies charge a 30-percent penalty for lapsed coverage.

She said the insurance regulations seem to have “merely incidental” consequences for revenue and outlays and predicted “a challenge as well on the provision mandating the 30 percent surcharge paid to the insurance company for lapsed coverage.”

Warren Buffett Identifies What Went Wrong at Wells Fargo

How does a company that’s had a sterling reputation since the California Gold Rush in the 1850s sully its image after more than a century and a half of prudent and profitable operations?

The answer in the case of Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC), says Warren Buffett, is a combination of hubris and procrastination.

Chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway.

Warren Buffett, Chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway. Image source: The Motley Fool.

« At Wells Fargo, there were three very significant mistakes, but there was one that dwarfs all the others, » said Buffett at Berkshire Hathaway‘s (NYSE:BRK-A) (NYSE:BRK-B) annual shareholder meeting. « At some point if there’s a major problem, the CEO gets wind of it, and the CEO has to act. They didn’t act when they learned about it. »

Buffett is talking about Wells Fargo’s fake-account scandal, in which thousands of its employees opened millions of fake accounts in customers’ names. The scandal came to light last September, when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced that it had fined the nation’s third biggest bank by assets $100 million.

« Wells Fargo employees secretly opened unauthorized accounts to hit sales targets and receive bonuses, » said CFPB Director Richard Cordray at the time. « Because of the severity of these violations, Wells Fargo is paying the largest penalty the CFPB has ever imposed. Today’s action should serve notice to the entire industry that financial incentive programs, if not monitored carefully, carry serious risks that can have serious legal consequences. »

Wells Fargo’s executives knew of the illicit sales practices for years yet allowed them to go on. A report issued by its board of directors in April found that the sales abuses date back to at least 2002. I’ve opined that they probably go back to 1998. Either way, beginning in 2011, Wells Fargo began firing 1,000 employees a year for opening up accounts for customers without their knowledge or approval.

Yet despite ultimately terminating around 5% of its branch-based employees, Wells Fargo’s executives refused to address the root of the problem: the bank’s overly aggressive sales quotas. Employees were forced to work nights and weekends, not infrequently without pay, to increase their cross-sales. And when that didn’t work, they cut to the chase and opened accounts for customers without their approval to do so.

Since the current lineage of leaders took over following Wells Fargo’s 1998 merger with Norwest, they’ve put cross-selling at the center of the bank’s culture. They refer to its branches as « stores, » they proudly announced the bank’s cross-sell ratio on its quarterly conference calls, and they aspire to sell every customer at least eight of its financial products — checking and savings accounts, mortgages, car loans, and so on.

« Clearly at Wells Fargo there was an incentive system built around cross-selling a number of services per customer, » Buffett told Berkshire Hathaway shareholders on Saturday. « There’s nothing wrong with incentive systems, but you have to be very careful about what you incentivize. »

A Wells Fargo branch sign.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Wells Fargo’s now-former chairman and CEO, John Stumpf, fumbled his first public comments on the scandal, laying the blame on low-level employees in a CNBC interview with Jim Cramer. Then, Stumpf, in Congressional testimony, came across as unprepared and unrepentant. « They totally underestimated the impact » of the issue, Buffett said of the bank’s response.

To make matters worse, after the sales scandal came to light, the media was awash with stories of whistleblowers inside the bank who had been bringing the issue to executives’ attention for years, sometimes emailing Stumpf directly. But instead of rewarding these employees, or at the very least protecting them against adverse employment actions, Wells Fargo engaged in a systematic effort to retaliate against them, generally firing whistleblowers in such a way that they had no chance of ever again getting a job in the financial-services industry.

Buffett is the first to admit that no company is perfect. And when you employ hundreds of thousands of people, as both Wells Fargo and Berkshire Hathaway do, it’s inevitable that inappropriate behavior will take place. « You’re going to have problems. We have around 367,000 employees, » said the 86-year-old billionaire. « People are doing something wrong as we talk about it today – there’s no doubt about it. »

To Buffett’s point, however, while a company’s executives can’t police everything its employees do, once they are made aware of inappropriate behavior, there’s a duty to stop it. That didn’t happen at Wells Fargo.

The insider and the outsider: McConnell and Trump try for a deal on health care

President Trump’s administration was still in its first hours when Mitch McConnell snagged an open seat next to him for a private chat at his inaugural luncheon. For more than 15 minutes, McConnell did most of the talking. The new president listened keenly.

Eleven days later, McConnell had a front-row seat as Trump announced Neil M. Gorsuch as his pick for the Supreme Court, the culmination of the Senate majority leader’s advice during the campaign on how to handle the court vacancy: Consult the Federalist Society, and make a list of prospects. Trump did that.

For months, McConnell, the consummate political insider, has been dispensing his counsel to Trump, the ultimate outsider, who has been absorbing the Kentuckian’s words. The dynamic has provided a degree of stability in the still-forming relationship between the low-key Senate leader and the loquacious president, who are starkly different types of people.

But cracks have also emerged in their partnership, most notably when Trump has casually suggested that McConnell change the long-standing rules of the Senate and McConnell has bluntly brushed him off.

Their fragile alliance is about to face its biggest challenge yet in the next phase of the Republican effort to overhaul the nation’s health-care laws. The work of revising major parts of the act known as Obamacare is now in the Senate’s hands after the House narrowly passed its own bill following months of destructive Republican infighting.

Trump, then the president-elect, walks through the Capitol Building with his wife Melania, left, Nov. 10 after meeting with McConnell, right. (Bill O’Leary/The Washington Post)

At stake is the long-term future of the American health-care system and the near-term future of the new Republican-controlled government — which has yet to shepherd any major legislative proposals into law.

“Whether or not they are able to forge a positive, personal and working relationship will be one of the early tests of this,” said former Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele.

It will be as much a make-or-break moment for McConnell as for Trump. The Senate leader has so far been able to fly below the radar on health care as House Republicans worked through their disagreements before ultimately passing a bill. If he cannot do the same, he is likely to be blamed for the collapse of the effort to fulfill a signature GOP campaign promise.

McConnell is cool and deliberative while Trump is hot and impetuous. But they have privately developed what people close to them say is a respectful relationship.

In the 75-year-old majority leader, Trump, 70, sees a senior player in navigating the ways of Washington, in both age and experience. He views him as someone on his level — or at least more on his level than many other Republicans, including House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.).

In some regards, McConnell has become a tutor to Trump. The two men speak regularly, with McConnell initiating some calls to guide the novice president.

“Leader McConnell has been a great resource in giving guidance and counsel on a myriad of issues in the first few months,” said one senior administration official — talking generically about McConnell — who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the relationship candidly.

It was McConnell, after all, who helped hand Trump his only major congressional victory during his first 100 days in office: the confirmation of Gorsuch to the high court. In nominating Gorsuch, who won wide praise in conservative circles, Trump also aided McConnell by helping him pay off his gamble to hold the seat open during the presidential campaign.

Those close to McConnell say that his relationship with Trump is rooted in trying to accomplish the things Republicans campaigned on last year — no more, no less.

“The funny thing — everybody used to ask McConnell if he got along with Barack Obama,” said Josh Holmes, McConnell’s former chief of staff. “And he said it’s irrelevant if he got along. It’s, ‘Can we work together?’ ”

But Holmes said McConnell is “allergic to drama” and “does not see the business of governing as a soap opera. It’s a business that should be handled professionally.” That ideal has been complicated time and again by Trump’s controversial policies and pronouncements.

That is one area where McConnell’s private lobbying has made little difference. In an interview with The Washington Post earlier this year, McConnell made it clear that he was not a fan of Trump’s hostile Twitter habits. He said that he liked what Trump was doing a lot more than what he was writing on social media.

“We’ve had very candid conversations about that. And as you can see, my advice has not made a bit of difference,” McConnell said.

The health-care debate in the Senate is expected be a more-complicated endeavor than Gorsuch’s confirmation or the short-term government-spending deal the White House recently reached with Congress. It will test McConnell’s ability to influence Trump behind the scenes as never before.

McConnell aides and allies are hoping that the White House will let the Senate work through its differences on health care without setting artificial deadlines or trying to hurry the process ahead.

“We’re not going to rush it,” said Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), one of McConnell’s top lieutenants.

Senate Republicans have shown little regard for the controversial House bill, signaling that they are going to write their own measure. A working group of 13 GOP senators from different parts of the ideological spectrum is meeting twice a week to talk about how to move ahead.

“The Senate is the place, still, in my view, where you deliberate, you have a say, you vote,” said Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.).

The Trump administration has been working with the Senate and House along “dual tracks” on health care, according to the senior administration official. McConnell aides and allies said that they expected the president’s team to be heavily involved in the process moving forward.

But part of McConnell’s challenge will be convincing Trump that the methodical pace at which the Senate moves is necessary.

“Here [in Congress], it’s just the slow pace that is very hard for anyone coming out of the private sector as a CEO to become comfortable with,” said Rep. Chris Collins (R-N.Y.) a Trump ally, in a recent interview.

But some of the long-standing Senate norms and customs to which McConnell claims to be committed have been shrugged off by Trump as mere inconveniences in the lawmaking process. Trump suggested Tuesday on Twitter that it might be time to do away with the 60-vote Senate threshold on legislation, which empowers the minority party.

“We’re not going to do that,” McConnell said dismissively later that day, arguing that “it would fundamentally change the way the Senate has worked for a very long time.”

Even as the relationship between McConnell and Trump has seen its share of tensions, it has generally been better than Trump’s relationship with Ryan, who wavered in his support of Trump during the campaign.

McConnell was never Trump’s biggest cheerleader in 2016, but he supported him and generally kept his criticism narrowly focused on words Trump spoke or actions he took that bothered him.

That small measure of loyalty in the trenches has been remembered in the West Wing. McConnell, unlike Ryan, has not been saddled with a reputation as a fair-weather friend.

“McConnell never took his eye off the ball and lost sight of the fact that at the end of the day, no matter what individual issue was happening, it was going to be Trump or [Democratic nominee Hillary] Clinton,” said Scott Jennings, a former McConnell strategist, noting that he “far preferred Trump.”

Even in Trump’s administration, which is filled with political newcomers, the reach of McConnell’s vast network of former staffers and allies from more than 32 years in the Senate can be felt. McConnell’s wife, Elaine Chao, is Trump’s transportation secretary. Amy Swonger, Trump’s head of the Senate legislative affairs team, is a former McConnell aide. So is Andrew Bremberg, director of the Domestic Policy Council.

On the whole, though, Trump’s team is largely bereft of experienced Senate tacticians. In addition to dealing with Trump, McConnell deals mainly with Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, budget director Mick Mulvaney and Vice President Pence, according to a person familiar with the situation.

For Trump, the health-care debate in the Senate will not only depend on how well he can work with McConnell. It is also likely to rest on his interaction with rank-and-file Republican senators.

As the House was working on its health-care bill, Trump held meetings with centrist and conservative GOP members as he sought to build support for the measure. But some McConnell allies doubt that kind of courtship will work as well in the Senate.

“I’m not sure that U.S. senators that have been in office for a long time and have their own opinions and ideas on legislation need some hand-holding from outside entities,” said Jennings, the former McConnell strategist. In the House, he added, “maybe they needed a little more prodding and guiding.”