Archives par mot-clé : marketing

Getting social video shares is a balancing act

Everyone always wants to know how to get a video to “go viral”

While there’s no secret recipe or formula, there are some rules of thumb that can be applied to increase your chances of gaining traction in the world of social media.

bar
One of the primary rules is that you need to balance SEO and production. The SEO side of things ensures that your video is searchable and visible to the masses, while the production side ensures the quality is on par with something that people are actually interested in engaging with and sharing.

Getting the SEO Right

There are a lot of different ways people can come across a video you produce, but without a basic SEO strategy in place, it’s unlikely that you’ll ever gain any traction. Think of it like a beautiful waterfall in the middle of a forest.

Sure, someone could stumble upon it if they were lost in the woods and just happened to find themself in the right place.

But it’s much more likely that lots of people will arrive if there’s a clear map with conspicuous signposts directing hikers to the oasis.

A video SEO strategy is like a map. It tells people how to find your video in a sea of millions of other pieces of fragmented content.

There are plenty of different ways to optimize a video for search, but one of the most important aspects is the title.

“Crafting a compelling video title is a balancing act—you have to make the title SEO friendly and make it clickable,” says Puranjay Singh of Single Grain. “Ideally, you should follow the same convention in your video titles as you would in your blog posts: to get clicks and shares, include keywords as well as power words.”

You also want to pay attention to the video description, tags, and metadata.

Nailing Video Production

It’s not enough for people to find your video. If they simply watch it and move on without any further action, you’re extracting very little value from each individual view.

Using the previous example, even the best map in the world doesn’t do much if hikers arrive at the waterfall and are underwhelmed.

Once people get there, you want them to be captivated, take pictures, share with friends, and invite them to come with you the next time you visit.

Moving back to the marketing side of things, the hope is that people will see your video and share their experience with friends.

This is where you have to think about production.

Today’s best videos are optimized for the mobile experience.

For starters, this means short videos perform best.

As social media expert Donna Moritz puts it, “Short videos suit our busy lives, brief attention spans and the need to consume content easily and quickly. Because fans are consuming content via their mobile devices while they’re on the go, the shorter the content is, the better.”

You’ll also notice that a lot of today’s most viral videos feature subtitles, which is also aimed at maximizing the experience.

Social media users often access video content when they’re in public places where sound isn’t appropriate. Therefore, the subtitles allow for engagement in any situation.

Reaping the Rewards

All too often, marketers make the mistake of only focusing on SEO – or only worrying about production. The truth is that these two seemingly independent aspects must be appropriately leveraged and balanced in order to achieve optimal virality on any social media platform.

If you want to reap the rewards, you have to put in the work.

#GetWhatYouGive




Recommended for you


Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Video ads for direct response: What’s the best length?

Video advertising creative is perhaps the most painstaking for advertisers to deal with during the planning and production stages. While there’s no magic formula to creating the “best” video ad, direct response-focused advertisers are inherently test-oriented, and they will eventually find creative that works well with their target audiences to achieve their larger objective.

One thing we can learn from looking at aggregate advertiser data is that the best-performing video ads for a given vertical generally fall within a narrow duration and typically share a few commonalities.

As a note, the findings outlined in this column reflect data analyzed as part of my work at Nanigans. Specifically, the sample consists of Facebook video advertising activity originating from 10 of the highest-spending gaming and e-commerce video advertisers. Ads studied were those run by the sampled advertisers at any point from September 1, 2016, through February 28, 2017.

Let’s first focus on the gaming vertical, where you find collectively the largest spenders on video advertising within the direct response ecosystem.

What’s the best video ad length?

Video ad length for these advertisers is most frequently 11 to 20 seconds long, with 62 percent of all studied gaming video ad creative within this 10-second range. An additional 10 percent of video creative for gaming advertisers comes in at 31 to 35 seconds long.

While the above graph outlines how gaming advertisers structure the length of the creative, marketers care most about conversion rates. In the case of gaming, this relates to installs. To quantify this metric by video length, aggregated click-to-install conversion rates were calculated for each length of video, and then weighted by total spend for that video length across the studied advertisers.

The result pointed to some interesting findings. Despite 16- to 20-second videos being the most popular length for gaming advertisers by more than 150 percent, conversion rates were only moderately higher than 21- to 25-second, or 31- to 35-second ads.

Of course, these insights are correlative, not causative. Just making a poor-performing 14-second gaming ad a 20-second ad isn’t likely to increase your conversion rate by itself. However, in the course of the analysis, there were a few similar characteristics of the best-performing video gaming ads.

  • Focus creative on the game’s ‘greatest hits’ — Ads that simply showed game play in a continuous fashion, or as a kind of tutorial, weren’t as well received. Focusing on a series of exciting, colorful or dramatic sequences tended to be associated with increased conversion rates.
  • Minimal in-ad CTAs — Ads relying on the CTAs present within the Facebook ad unit itself tended to perform better.
  • In-market creative testing and segmentation — Better identify what creative resonates with different target user segments.

Unlike their gaming counterparts, the length of e-commerce video ads tends to be much more widely distributed and comparatively weights more toward longer lengths. The 16- to 20-second range is still popular, but only accounts for 20 percent of e-commerce video creative.

Meanwhile, 42 percent of ad creative in this group was between 21 and 35 seconds in length. This may be due to more complex value propositions in convincing someone to purchase or subscribe to a service, as compared to simply downloading a game.

For e-commerce advertisers, the 16- to 20-second length boasted the best conversion rate, but longer video ads weren’t far behind. Twenty-six- to 35-second lengths lagged behind the top conversion rate by moderate, but not significant, amounts in aggregate.

Video advertising best practices

With a wider variance in target markets and value propositions, the differences between ads were larger within e-commerce as compared to gaming. Regardless, there were a few qualitative aspects to the best-performing creative that were represented across a few advertisers in the sample.

  • Unique visuals — Some of the best-performing creative for e-commerce advertisers had a unique look and feel. This included a static image with a video playing within or some dramatically sped-up product usage.
  • Consider testing silent versions — A number of advertisers experimented with the same creative with and without sound, and the silent editions tended to perform better.
  • Experiential rather than descriptive — Videos visualizing the experience of using the product were generally well-received from a conversion standpoint.

These data points should help shape the direction of your video creative, particularly as you look to test against different audience segments. Just as with any ad type, be sure to test a few variations on length and format, as the effectiveness is likely to differ across your various user segments.


Some opinions expressed in this article may be those of a guest author and not necessarily Marketing Land. Staff authors are listed here.


About The Author

Nintendo Switch gamers milking cows? An udder challenge – Belleville News

Nintendo gamers may be better at virtually milking cows, but they say dairy farmers beat them at the real thing, hands down.

Two Nintendo employees on Wednesday beat two farmers at Vermont’s Billings Farm Museum during a game of 1-2 Switch, where players perform various minigames, for the new Nintendo console Switch.

The Woodstock farm challenged Nintendo to the competition.

A day before the head-to-head battle, the Nintendo employees got a lesson in actual cow-milking. But on the day of challenge, they agreed they were no competition for the farmers.

Nintendo’s David Young said « Games are fun, but actually working on a farm is hard work. »

The House just voted to wipe out the FCC’s landmark Internet privacy protections

House Republicans voted overwhelmingly Tuesday, by a margin of 215-205, to repeal a set of landmark privacy protections for Web users, issuing a sweeping rebuke of Internet policies enacted under the Obama administration. It also marks a sharp, partisan pivot toward letting Internet providers collect and sell their customers’ Web browsing history, location information, health data and other personal details.

The measure, which was approved by a 50-48 margin in the Senate last week, now heads to the White House, where President Trump is expected to sign it.

Congress’s joint resolution empowers Internet providers to enter the $83 billion market for online advertising now dominated by Google and Facebook. It is likely to lend momentum to a broader GOP rollback of Obama-era technology policies, and calls into question the fate of other tech regulations such as net neutrality, which was approved in 2015 over strident Republican objections and bans Internet providers from discriminating against websites. And it is a sign that companies such as ATT, Comcast and Verizon will be treated more permissively at a time when conservatives control both the executive and legislative branches.

Supporters of Tuesday’s repeal vote argued the privacy regulations, written by the Federal Communications Commission, stifle innovation by forcing Internet providers to abide by unreasonably strict guidelines.

« [Consumer privacy] will be enhanced by removing the uncertainty and confusion these rules will create, » said Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), who chairs the House subcommittee that oversees the FCC.

No longer satisfied with selling access to the Web, Internet providers are increasingly invested in the data their users generate as they visit one website after another. By understanding what content they consume — whether that be Netflix, WebMD or PornHub — providers may glean an enormous amount of information about Americans.

Because they can see all of the online activities of users as they browse different sites on the Web, critics of the legislation said, Internet providers enjoy an enormous degree. And unlike search engines or streaming video sites, which consumers can easily abandon if they do not agree with their privacy practices, it is far more difficult to choose a different Internet provider. Many Americans have a choice of only one or two broadband companies in their area, according to federal statistics.

Privacy advocates called the House vote « a tremendous setback for America. »

“Today’s vote means that Americans will never be safe online from having their most personal details stealthily scrutinized and sold to the highest bidder,” said Jeffrey Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy. “Donald Trump, by giving away our data to the country’s leading phone and cable giants, is further undermining American democracy.”

Industry groups said Tuesday’s vote does not diminish broadband companies’ commitment to user privacy.

« Our providers care very deeply and have a strong track record of operating in ways that protect and safeguard the privacy of their customers’ data, » said James Assey, executive vice president of NCTA — The Internet Television Association, a top cable trade association. « These are program features that are built in by design; they existed long before the FCC rules were adopted, and they will exist long after the FCC rules are withdrawn. »

The FCC’s new Republican chairman, Ajit Pai, called the legislation « appropriate » and blamed his predecessor for executive overreach. He also said that responsibility for regulating Internet providers should fall to the Federal Trade Commission, despite the fact that the agency currently lacks the legal authority to do so.

« Moving forward, I want the American people to know that the FCC will work with the FTC to ensure that consumers’ online privacy is protected though a consistent and comprehensive framework, » said Pai. « The best way to achieve that result would be to return jurisdiction over broadband providers’ privacy practices to the FTC, with its decades of experience and expertise in this area. »

Read more:

Republicans just rolled back landmark FCC privacy rules. Here’s what you need to know.

The Senate just voted to undo landmark rules covering your Internet privacy

It’s begun: Internet proivders are pushing to repeal Obama-era Internet privacy rules

The FCC just passed sweeping new rules to protect your online privacy

Dem states pledge climate action in face of Trump roll-back

Liberal-leaning states are promising to push forward with aggressive targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and developing renewable energy sources just as President Trump moved to roll back much of his predecessor’s efforts to combat climate change.

In state capitols from Albany to Sacramento, Democrats lambasted the executive order Trump signed Tuesday that begins the process of rolling back the Clean Power Plan, an Obama-era rule aimed at cleaning up coal-fired power plants.

“President Trump’s decision to ax the Clean Power Plan cedes U.S. global leadership and increases the risk that climate change will continue to damage our state. We can’t afford to slow our efforts, and we won’t,” Washington Gov. Jay Inslee (D) said Tuesday.

A coalition of 17 Democratic attorneys general and city attorneys from six cities said they would consider what legal actions could be taken to block Trump’s order.

“We’re very confident that the EPA cannot simply dismantle the CPP and leave nothing in its place,” New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman (D) said in a conference call Tuesday afternoon. “We regret the fact that the president is trying to bow back history. But it’s not going to happen. The markets are moving. The states are moving.”

Inslee, Oregon Gov. Kate Brown (D), California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) and the Democratic mayors of Seattle; Portland, Ore.; San Francisco; Oakland, Calif.; and Los Angeles said in a joint statement that the new executive order “moves our nation in the wrong direction and puts American prosperity at risk.”

Separately, Jerry Brown and New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) reaffirmed their states’ commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the coming years to well below previous highs. Both states have set goals of lowering greenhouse gas emissions by 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 and 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.

In both statements, the governors said collective action is necessary to combat a global problem. New York is a member of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a cooperation between Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic states that established a cap-and-trade program. Washington, Oregon, California and British Columbia, in northwest Canada, have signed a similar agreement.                 

“It doesn’t make sense for Oregon to do it alone. It makes sense when we [combat climate change] on a regional basis,” Kate Brown said Saturday in Seattle, where she and Inslee met to plot strategy.

Last week, California’s Air Resources Board voted to implement strict emission limits on automobiles and to require automakers to get more zero-emission vehicles to market. That vote came after Trump ordered the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reconsider greenhouse gas emission limits put in place by the Obama administration, limits in which California has a say under the 1970 Clean Air Act.

California must now seek a waiver from the EPA for its stricter limits. If that waiver is granted, as it was under the Obama administration, other states may adopt those same emissions limits.

Environmental groups say states taking action on climate change will enjoy the secondary benefit of cornering the market on renewable energy. New York has committed to developing wind turbines off Long Island. States like Washington and Oregon already get a huge percentage of their power from renewable hydro sources.

“Ultimately, states that lead like California, Washington and other, they are trying to capture as much of the clean energy market as possible,” said Bill Holland, state policy director at the League of Conservation Voters. “The governors of states like Washington and California are acting in the real world to create economic opportunity.”

But Republican-led states said the new executive order would reverse a rule that put an unfair onus on states and the energy industry.

“We’re heartened by the president’s latest action, which shows he’s serious about returning common sense and the rule of law to the EPA,” Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) said in a statement. “And we look forward to the EPA returning to the cooperative approach with the states that the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act expressly require as it reconsiders the unlawful Clean Power Plan.”

The Democratic opposition to Trump’s rollback represents a new front in a burgeoning legal war between the administration and blue states, one reminiscent of the battles fought by Republican attorneys general against the Obama administration’s climate actions in recent years.

In the case of the Clean Power Plan, Republican states are still fighting the Obama-era rule. A coalition of 19 Republican-led states asked the EPA earlier this month to reconsider several rules, including the Clean Power Plan, under a collaborative framework they said was envisioned by both the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act. 

Spotify acquires Tinder-like video content recommendation startup MightyTV

Music streaming service Spotify has acquired content recommendation startup MightyTV, a service that uses Tinder-style swiping to help guide users toward TV and film choices.

The terms of the deal are undisclosed but MightyTV has been shut down, as a result of the acquisition, and its team will join up with Spotify’s in New York City, Toronto and Stockholm.

Notably, MightyTV founder and CEO Brian Adams will join Spotify as VP of technology, focusing on advertising and marketing technology solutions. Adams founded Admeld, a publisher monetisation platform that was sold to Google in 2011. The sale saw Adams join Google to run its Doubleclick publisher platform before leaving in 2015 to found MightyTV.

MightyTV’s Android and iOS app presented users with video recommendations and let people swipe to ‘like’ or ‘dislike’ these suggestions. Based on these ‘likes’ and ‘dislikes’, MightyTV’s recommendations improved to match the user’s personal tastes.

“It’s an enormous opportunity for me and the team to help create native brand experiences that stay true to a product that millions love,” said Adams.

Jason Richman, VP of product at Spotify, added: “Brian and his team will help us continue to innovate on free monetisation and extend our leadership position in programmatic audio.”

Animaker Introduces First Animated Vertical Video Platform

While you may have been accustomed to watching videos horizontally thanks to the TV and movies, the next video marketing wave is vertical videos.

Vertical videos were historically shunned by creative agencies, marketers and video creators because they did not fit the aspect ratio of established moving image forms.

However, the rise of apps like Periscope and Snapchat that use the mobile-friendly “vertical” or portrait format have led to an explosion in vertical videos. And to help you easily create the vertical, animated marketing videos to fit this news trend, video platform Animaker is leading the way.

The company claims it is also first to create a vertical animated video format too.

The Animaker Vertical Video App

Animaker is a cloud-based DIY video animation software that comes in handy when you seek to create studio quality professional video.

In a blog post, the company says that they decided to upgrade their platform to allow the creation of vertical videos after 73 percent of of the 10,000 people asked in a targeted survey indicated a preference for vertical videos as the next big thing in video marketing.

So why the high demand for this type of video? “Living in the smartphone era, it is only a matter of time when vertical videos completely crush other formats,” Animaker’s content marketer Arvind Kesh stated. “There has been a tremendous spike in vertical videos online from a mere 5 percent to a whopping 30 percent in just five years!”

Kesh also went ahead to mention that vertical videos might be the right format for businesses that want to make marketing videos for Facebook, Snapchat, Instagram, Twitter and the like.

Animaker has three pricing plans: Personal, which is $9 per month billed annually; Startup, which is $19 per month billed annually; and Business, which is $39 per month billed annually.

Image: Animaker


Comment ▼


Reclick Ver 2.0 – New Monster Marketing Platform That Convert With A Single Line Of Code

Within the last 2 years, Precious Ngwu and his staff have been refining this software and in the past one year, they have completely overhauled it and put brand new features consisted of the « matting and sticky gum marketing technology » to redefine the way of online business development.

People can find more detailed features of ReClick Software version 2.0 when click in here.

ReClick 2.0 is a powerful marketing platform that helps its users to place a single code and take control of their traffic and convert more visitors particularly the ones about to exit the page into leads and buyers.

Let take a look at what features ReClick 2.0 Software has to offer its customers:

ReClick has more beautiful   high converting templates: Any smart marketer knows that template is everything when it comes to converting sales and leads online. With ReClick 2.0, people will possess dozens of beautiful templates ready to be deployed at the push of a button.

ReClick comes preloaded with a sleek, straightforward and flexible editor: Allow people to customize these templates and create campaigns at lightening speed with so much flexibility. Users can create anything from scratch within minutes.

ReClick Soft is Extremely Intelligent: There are over 50 potential combinations of ReClick 2.0’s automation rules in which people can configure their ReClick campaigns. All of these are 100% performance based yet that can not be found under other overpriced tools.

Lifetime membership without monthly payment: ReClick is a perfect marketing tool that can be used regularly in the online business to get more results without having to pay for it monthly.

No Throttling – Unlimited Traffic: With ReClick, Precious and his team only demand their users to pay one single fee and get access for life comes along with unlimited traffic.

Collaboration Technology is the unique feature that can only be found in ReClick: For any campaign or project, collaboration and teamwork are the primary key to success. However, the technology powering is usually very complicated, difficult and pricey to build. That is why only mega platforms like Google Docs, Trello, Dropbox, etc., have it. Fortunately, collaboration tech is also present in ReClick version 2.

Moreover, so many other bells and whistles such as Split testing, location-aware technology, deep avowing analytics, landers, reclinks, CTA hooks, customer-driven funnels, etc.

Here is how ReClick can help its users:

• On People’s Blogs and Websites: just copy a simple script code from ReClick campaign, paste it there and watch as it grows the online presence every day.

• On People’s Sales Pages: Place the code and the software does the whole work.

• On People’s Lead Capture  Landing Pages: use ReClick to stop visitors about to leave and recapture, even if people could only convert just 30% of those pre-sold visitors. Afterward, people will easily skyrocket their opt-in rate to 40 and 50% effortlessly.

• On people’s Shopify eCom Stores: integrate ReClick 2.0 in the stores to literally force visitors to add products to cart and make that purchase – Precious Ngwu and his team have lots of customizable eCommerce metrics.

• Video Marketers: Any place people market with videos, they can configure ReClick to show up at a certain point in the video, maybe just right at that second when the pitch has peaked and then close the sale because ReClick will handle the rest.

• To Maximize ROI on Paid Traffic (FB ads, Google Adwords, etc.)

• Any Place people Want to Capture Leads Buyers before the Visitors Leave the Site 

People can find more specific information about this product in ReClick 2.0 Review and Demo.

Media Contact
Company Name: Uzumaki Assistants Corp.
Contact Person: Gerald I. Smedley
Email: support@crownreviews.com
Phone: 415-277-4030
Address:1176 Lowndes Hill Park Road
City: Los Angeles
State: California
Country: United States
Website: CrownReviews.com

23 people ask the Justice Department to launch a criminal inquiry into its chief, Jeff Sessions


Attorney General Jeff Sessions (Alex Brandon/AP)

Nearly two dozen people from five states are accusing Attorney General Jeff Sessions of lying to the Senate Judiciary Committee about his communications with the Russian government and subsequently trying to cover up that lie, according to a complaint sent to the Department of Justice.

The complaint, which names 23 residents, states that Sessions gave false and misleading testimony during his confirmation hearing in January when he told the Senate committee that he “did not have communications with the Russians.” It further accuses the attorney general of covering up the alleged perjury by directing a spokeswoman to make a public statement saying he did not mislead the committee.

“We feel there is probable cause to charge him with a crime,” J. Whitfield Larrabee, a Massachusetts lawyer who represents the 23 residents, told The Washington Post. “We want indictments in the case. We want Attorney General Sessions to be treated just the same as anyone else. We don’t think that just because he’s the attorney general, that there should be a higher standard to bring charges against him.”

Larrabee said the complaint was sent Monday to three Justice Department divisions that investigate alleged crimes and misconduct by agency employees and public officials.

How the agency will handle a complaint against its leader is unclear. Larrabee said the department should appoint a special prosecutor to handle the investigation and prosecution.

A spokesman for one of the divisions, the Office of Inspector General, declined to comment on the allegations. Other Justice Department spokesmen haven’t responded to a request for comment.

The group of complainants, which includes three doctors and pastor, are from California, Maine, Massachusetts, Oregon and Vermont.

Earlier this month, The Washington Post revealed that Sessions met with Russia’s ambassador to the United States twice last year and did not disclose those communications when asked during his confirmation hearing. The report intensified calls for a congressional investigation into Russia’s involvement in the presidential election and also prompted ethics complaints calling for disciplinary actions against Sessions, who has been an attorney for more than four decades.

After The Post’s March 1 story, Sessions acknowledged that he briefly spoke with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland in July and again at his Senate office in September, but denied discussing President Trump’s campaign. The former Republican senator from Alabama, who became Trump’s nominee for attorney general in November, has also recused himself from Justice Department investigations related to the election, saying he was following the advice of the agency’s ethics officials.

The allegations in the complaint were partially over Sessions’s answer to a question by Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) during his Jan. 10 confirmation hearing. Franken asked Sessions what he will do if “anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign” had communications with the Russian government.

“I’m not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians,” Sessions responded.

Sessions submitted written statements a week later in response to questions by Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.). Leahy asked: “Several of the president-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after Election Day?”

His response: “No.”

The complaint further accuses Sessions of making additional false statements to cover up the “perjurious testimony.” It cited a March 6 letter he wrote to the Senate Judiciary Committee in which he defended his earlier testimony, as well as a statement posted on social media saying Sessions never discussed the presidential campaign with any Russian officials.

In the March 6 letter, Sessions said he “correctly” and “honestly” answered questions about a “continuing exchange of information” between Trump surrogates and intermediaries of the Russian government.

“I did not mention communications I had had with the Russian ambassador over the years because the question did not ask about them,” he wrote.

Earlier this month, the American Civil Liberties Union filed an ethics complaint against the attorney general with the Alabama State Bar’s disciplinary commission. Sessions, whom the Senate confirmed last month following an acrimonious partisan debate, has been a member of the bar since 1973.

Chris Anders, deputy director of the ACLU’s legislative office in Washington, claims that Sessions had violated Alabama’s rules of professional conduct preventing lawyers from engaging in “conduct involving dishonest, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation,” according to the complaint, which also cites The Post’s story.

Larrabee, the Massachusetts attorney, also filed a complaint with the Alabama bar around the same time the ACLU did.

“It seems to me that this is part of a pervasive culture of dishonesty in the White House,” Larrabee said, citing Michael Flynn, Kellyanne Conway and the president as examples.

Flynn resigned from his post as Trump’s national security adviser last month over revelations about his potentially illegal contacts with the Russian ambassador to the United States, and his misleading statements about the matter to senior Trump administration officials, including Vice President Pence, The Post’s Greg Miller and Philip Rucker reported.

Conway, counselor to the president, attracted criticism when she said during a television interview in January that White House press secretary Sean Spicer “gave alternative facts” about the size of Trump’s inauguration crowd.

President Trump himself has been a purveyor of false claims, many of which have been repeatedly debunked.

READ MORE:

Amid deep partisan rancor, Senate confirms Sessions for attorney general

Jeff Sessions’s denials of contact with Russians are falling apart quickly

Read the letter Coretta Scott King wrote opposing Sessions’s 1986 federal nomination